R I S O N  
& links  
    general  
Lori Berenson:
when SLAPP lawsuits fail: counter-activism terrorist charges
Prison Activist Resource Center
True Justice WebRing links list
Expedient guilt - People vs. West hybrid pleas
white collar sentencing

Chicano Mexicano Prison Project
2nd Conf. on Raza Prisoners & Colonialism
Prison Literacy Project video
grass-roots shared identity theme correspondence campaign

Scottsboro Boys Case:   Scottsboro, Jackson Cty
"Bigots w/ badges" : CARCLE cops against hate crimes within their ranks


    local    
racial profiling: Dwight McKinney
  got life w/o parole because cops lied
Orange County Jail : riots, beatings, lawsuits
    state
C.A.T.S. Californians 2 AMEND 3 STRIKES
"Petitions in support of SB 873, SB 79 & AB 1247
to amend the 3 Strikes Law as it was intended to be,
not as it is presently being used now."

Easing the hard time   Seeking a haven from gang life, thousands of California inmates are choosing to live on 'sensitive-needs' yards. The demand is growing.   9.16.05   Sam Quinones L.A. Times

Once upon a time, had they met on a prison yard, inmates Emilio Soto and Gerardo Fuentes might have sliced each other to pieces. Soto was a gang member from Stockton, Fuentes one from Los Angeles. "Any little look that I thought was disrespectful or he thought was disrespectful," Fuentes said, "and it would have been on."
For almost 40 years, Latino gangs from Northern and Southern California have been at war. The feud has cost hundreds of lives inside and outside prison, dictated prison budgets and forced authorities to separate one from the other. Today, though, Soto and Fuentes live in peace, side by side, on the top tier of cellblock C-4 at the state prison in Lancaster. They are part of a revolution in protective custody that is slowly breaking the stranglehold of gang-imposed rules on state prison life.

Until now, protective custody has been for prison's pariahs, sex offenders, informants, homosexuals, who were locked in their cells most of the day. Gang members and other inmates viewed this as an unmanly and arduous way to do time. But in the last few years, California prisons have given inmates another choice by converting entire yards to protective custody.
The result: Thousands of ex-gang members, serving time for murder, robbery and assault, have defected to these so-called sensitive-needs yards (SNYs), seeking a haven from gang life. As on regular prison yards, SNY inmates live two to a cell and have the same exercise and meal routines. The only difference is that they live with other inmates whose lives, like theirs, would be in danger if they were in the general mix.

Demand for SNY space is growing unrelentingly. Since 1998, when the practice of setting aside whole yards for protective custody began, the SNY population has grown from less than 1,000 to more than 13,000, almost 9% of adult male inmates, by far the largest protective-custody population in state history. Inmates requesting sensitive-needs yards must explain why they need protective custody, and their claims are investigated by prison staff. Prison reception centers in Chino, Delano and Wasco report a combined 1,400 new inmates awaiting SNY assignments.
"We were asking people to step forward and renounce the gangs," said Joe McGrath, deputy director of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation. "You can't legitimately ask them to do that if you can't guarantee … a better quality of life."

This year, Mule Creek State Prison in Ione became the first all-SNY institution. Three of the four yards at the prison in Lancaster are for SNY and honor inmates. Pleasant Valley State Prison in Coalinga is half SNY. Corcoran State Prison and Kern Valley State Prison in Delano will convert yards to SNYs by year's end, officials say.
Meanwhile, so many gang members with heavy reputations are opting into the yards that protective custody "is no longer synonymous with being a punk," said David Delgadillo, a former longtime member of the Mexican Mafia on a sensitive-needs yard at Pleasant Valley, serving time for murder and attempted murder. "Now it's becoming common for people to drop out."

Some SNY inmates have had a change of heart. Some have refused to kill a friend on gang orders. Many are simply tired. Rudy Martinez, a Mexican Mafia associate serving time for murder, realized he'd had enough while being bused out of Pelican Bay State Prison in Crescent City a few years ago. He saw people jogging, driving, entering restaurants. At one clogged intersection, a motorist pounded the dashboard, yelling at traffic. "She was so frustrated, but I wanted to trade places with her," Martinez said. He left the mafia for an SNY shortly thereafter, hoping for parole someday.
Others' motives in asking for SNY placements are less pure. They've run up prison drug or gambling debts they can't pay. Some plan to go back to gang life once freed.
Nevertheless, for the first time on California prison yards, large numbers of Northern and Southern California Latinos, blacks and whites, Bloods and Crips, Nazi Lowriders and Aryan Brotherhood members all live together. And all of them coexist with homosexuals, sex offenders, former police officers and informants.

Though they don't keep statistics or cost estimates by yard, prison officials say fights, stabbings and riots are less common on SNYs, making them safer and less expensive to operate.
"You still have [fights], but they're nowhere near what's generated on an active gang yard," said Lt. Ken Lewis, Lancaster state prison spokesman. "Any time you have a minimum amount of violence on a yard, obviously it's a cost savings."
Still, much is unknown about the effects of SNYs. No one has studied recidivism among parolees from the yards, for example, or whether SNY inmates might make better use of classes, jobs and self-help groups than those on gang-dominated yards. For now, no greater resources are devoted to rehabilitation on SNYs than anywhere else.
"It's an innovation whose consequences aren't known and have yet to be studied," said Valerie Jenness, a criminologist at UC Irvine.

This year, though, the state prison system adopted inmate rehabilitation as a goal, and the U.S. Supreme Court ordered racial integration in California prisons. SNYs are among the few places where gang rules and violence don't get in the way.
By 26, Emilio Soto was such a dedicated member of Nuestra Familia, the prison gang of Northern California Latinos, that he had threatened to kill his own brother if he spoke against the organization. But when Soto was in Pelican Bay State Prison, he said, a gang leader spread false rumors that he'd turned informant. Based on that, Soto said, Nuestra Familia members tried to kill him.
Even so, for 5 years, Soto refused protective custody, risking stabbings every day. Finally, he tired of the gang life and entered an SNY at another prison in 1999. He was so ashamed that he didn't speak to his family for 3 years.
In gangs, "you're brainwashed," said Soto, now 37 and serving time for murder. "Even if there's a threat on your life, you're supposed to be this down homeboy. But then you do it all, and they want to kill you anyway. So where's the love?"
There is none, former gang members say, and that's why SNYs are growing. Gangs, they say, roil in conspiracy. Betrayal comes like breakfast, and that knife in your back might be your best friend's.

"They just want to whack you for anything," said Albert Martinez, a former gang member from the Maravilla neighborhood of East L.A. who is now on the Lancaster state prison's C Yard. "It's not like it used to be. There's no old-school values."
Indeed, the rules of prison gangs have changed, said Lt. Bruce Frank, head of gang investigations at the prison. "A lot of the newer guys don't have the level of respect that the older guys used to have," Frank said. Gangs "used to have a more solid structure. Now it's almost a free-for-all."
Part of the reason for the disintegration, former members say, is Pelican Bay State Prison, near the Oregon border, where many gang leaders from throughout the state are isolated in maximum-security lockdowns. Without leadership, gang subordinates feud constantly. Gang leaders, meanwhile, are left to imagine all kinds of duplicity in their underlings, and issue "green lights", death warrants, like Detroit unemployment slips, former gang members and prison officials say.

"There's nothing to do. So anything they suspect on someone, they run with it," Soto said. "If there's nobody else to get, they focus on killing each other."
Nuestra Familia has marked for death more than 1,000 people, many of them fellow Nuestra Familia members, said Devan Hawkes, a prison-gang expert at Pelican Bay.
"When the inmates hear their names are on the list," Hawkes said, "they often will try to get protective custody."
All this has fostered "politics," the name given to the gossip and backbiting that has made prison gang life resemble a high school popularity contest, except, in this case, the participants have shanks. Just surviving politics is exhausting, SNY inmates say.

Wayne Bradley, a longtime member of the Rolling 30s Crips in South Los Angeles, said he was stabbed by youngsters in his own gang for refusing to hide their drugs and shanks. Planning against future attacks, Bradley had a nervous breakdown, he said.
"It's like a chess game with no rules," Bradley said. "Plus you got to watch the dudes the other guy's got standing behind you."
For some inmates, SNYs are purgatories of regret.
"I'm doing time for guys … who want to kill me," said Freddie Gonzalez, a Mexican Mafia dropout from Pomona who is serving a life sentence for killing a Nuestra Familia member on mafia orders. "Some of us older guys get together. We say, 'What did we do all that stuff for?' I don't know."

For others, though, SNYs are a place to bury petty, but lethal, differences. The 40-year war between Northern and Southern California Latino gang members is a case in point. Nuestra Familia, the prison gang of northerners, is allied with black prison gangs. The Mexican Mafia, controlling inmates from Southern California Latino street gangs, is linked with the white Aryan Brotherhood.
Those alliances have turned prison yards into something resembling the Jim Crow South: Latino inmates from Southern California, for example, are forbidden from sharing anything with blacks or Northern California Latinos: phones, water faucets, TVs or basketball courts.
So there would be no mistake, Nuestra Familia members distinguished themselves with tattoos of the number 14, because N is the 14th letter of the alphabet. Mafia members took 13 as their badge, because M is the 13th.

"Before I came to prison, I'd heard about Norteños [Northern California gang members] and 14, but I'd never seen a Norteño," said Fuentes, who has a 13 tattooed on his chin. "When I saw one, it was just pure hatred." He opted into an SNY at 26, after a dispute with his prison-gang leaders. Even years later, when placed in a cell near Soto, a former Nuestra Familia member with a 14 tattooed on his wrist, Fuentes said he felt uneasy.
But "now I see Emilio as Emilio," said Fuentes. "I'm 31 now…. It seems pretty childish now. I did a lot of stupid things for the 13 on my chin."

Looking beyond prison walls, the growth of SNYs is a measure of the chaos on the streets of Southern California, say gang members and state officials. In the mid-1990s, the Mexican Mafia behind bars extended its power to Southern California Latino gangs on the outside. The imprisoned mafiosos ordered gang members to collect "taxes" from drug dealers operating on their home turf, or face death in prison.
But because many mafia leaders are locked away, their control over street taxation has weakened. Greed, lack of control and drug addiction breed feuds, rip-offs and betrayals on the street. Gang members use the drugs they're supposed to sell or rob mafia-protected dealers.
Mafiosos in Pelican Bay, some of them also drug addicts, bring wayward street soldiers into line for offenses real or imagined by issuing "green lights." And such green-lighting is driving new inmates to SNYs at a good clip, inmates and prison officials say.

The SNYs "are so full because the [Mexican Mafia] brothers are making them full," said Armando Ibarra, 32, a former street representative for the mafia, who opted for protective custody after mafiosos accused him, falsely, he says, of stealing $87,000. They "don't care no more about the [guys] that are working for them."
Other inmates check into SNYs after fouling up mafia orders. In March, for example, two men were shot to death at a home in Mentone, a community near San Bernardino, killings that prison-gang investigators believe were mafia-ordered. During the attack, an infant was shot in the foot, an unpardonable act to the Mexican Mafia, said Leo Duarte, a California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation investigator.
"That guy should never have shot that guy holding a baby," Duarte said. The mafioso who controls the area "was overheard on a recording: 'I can't give him a pass. He shot a baby.' Those are the exact words."
When the man suspected of, though not yet charged with, the shooting returned to prison on a parole violation, he asked for protective custody, Duarte said.

C Yard is akin to a gang member retirement home for Emilio Soto and Gerardo Fuentes. Fuentes misses the camaraderie of his former homeboys and the respect their numbers inspired among correctional officers. In SNYs, "the cops will talk to you any which way they want. On the mainline, they wouldn't do that because they'll get hit" by other gang members.
Soto and Fuentes say that inmates on SNYs inform easily on one another, and neither likes living near child molesters and homosexuals. Furthermore, they say, SNYs don't have enough jobs, vocational training or self-help groups. Fewer than half of the 1,100 inmates on C Yard have jobs, according to inmates and prison officials. The rest are idle or locked in their cells much of the time.
"There's no rehabilitation in the state of California," Soto said, "so you have to choose to rehab yourself."

Still, both men expect gangs to push more inmates into sensitive-needs yards. Soto says the Nuestra Familia leader who tried to kill him was himself stabbed by the gang's soldiers a few years later. Soto has heard that he is on an SNY at Pleasant Valley State Prison.
In the meantime, Northerner and Southerner have let down their guard, dropped the fixation on "13" and "14" and found a way to get along on a tier in a California prison.
"You start seeing things, after doing so much time," said Fuentes, serving a life sentence since he was 21 for murder and robbery. "After watching people fight for power and backstab one another, you say, 'This is all BS. [Gang leaders] are up in Pelican Bay. You're their pawn. This is their chessboard.' "


Senate rejects felon vote bid
Measure would've restored rights after sentence completed
2.15.02   Janelle Carter AP

Wash.D.C.   The Senate rejected a measure Thursday that would have given felons the right to vote after they complete their sentences. It was just one of the many amendments senators were considering as part of a $3.4 billion election overhaul bill. The issue of allowing felons the right to vote brought some of the most emotional rhetoric in a day that dealt mostly with ballot machines and voting technology. "They've paid their debt to society. Shouldn't they be able to have the right to vote? That's what this is all about," said Sen. Harry Reid, D-NV, an amendment sponsor. The measure's co-sponsor, Sen. Arlen Specter, R-PA., said, "That person owes nothing more to society and that person, I think, deserves the right to vote." But the 2 were unable to sway their colleagues, many of whom came to the floor to denounce the amendment, before voting it down 63-31.

"I don't think American policy is going to be better informed if we have a bunch of felons in the process," said Sen. Jeff Sessions, R-AL. Sen. Mitch McConnell, R-KY., said that when a person is convicted "that person should lose his right to vote." "Do we want to see convicted terrorists voting in elections? Do we want to see jailhouse blocs banning together to oust sheriffs?" McConnell said.

Felons' voting rights vary by state. 9 states impose a lifetime voting ban on convicted felons. In 32 states, felons can vote after serving their sentence and completing parole. 2 states, Maine & Vermont, have no prohibition and allow prisoners to vote. Massachusetts voters in 2000 voted to place prohibitions on felons' voting rights. 6 other states impose restrictions based on a felon's prior record or parole status. The Reid-Specter proposal would have given felons the right to vote in federal elections. But many lawmakers said that would create a confusing system, particularly for states that hold state and federal elections on the same day. The elections bill, which would spend the money over 5 years, requires that states enact computerized statewide registration lists and accessibility provisions for the disabled. The House has passed its own $2.6 billion bill which sets minimum standards such as the statewide registration system, but the House gives states the leeway to develop their own improvements.

The last man Joe Barboza killed, the last one anyone knows about anyway, was Clay Wilson, a skinny crook who drove a bulldozer when he wasn't stealing things from people. It was Wilson's misfortune to live in Santa Rosa, CA, in the wine country above San Francisco. That's where the U.S. Justice Dept decided to settle Barboza after giving him a new identity as the federal govt's first-ever protected witness. Barboza was an enthusiastic killer. He made his name in the 1960s as an enforcer in a war between Boston's Irish gangs. He once chewed on a bit of bone he blasted from the skull of one of his victims. He had a thing for chewing. A friend suspects that grew from the odd set of incisors that gave Barboza a pair of fangs. Barboza once chewed off a man's cheek during a fight. He was unpredictable, so much so that by early middle age he was scaring even the Mafia. The FBI used that bit of intelligence, that the mob might feel more comfortable if Barboza were history, to leverage him into becoming a cooperating witness. He became the prosecution star in three sensational mob trials in Boston. As he helped put 9 supposed gangsters in jail, the govt decided Barboza was so important to its crusade against organized crime that it created the witness protection program. It was supposed to guarantee his safety and, more important, encourage other criminals to cooperate. That was in 1969.

More than 30 years later, investigators working for Congress and the Justice Dept are re-examining Barboza's career, part of a long & adversarial look at possible abuses committed by FBI agents & prosecutors who worked with organized crime informants in Boston. Congress will be asking new questions at hearings this week about who the witness protection program was designed to protect. Was it Barboza or his handlers in the govt? At least part of the answer lies in Clay Wilson's murder and in the bizarre trial that followed. "It was the worst travesty of justice I ever saw," said Ed Cameron, who worked on the Wilson homicide as an inspector for the Sonoma County district attorney's office. "There must have been others, but I don't think the FBI ever covered up anything to this extent before. "It was the damnedest thing I've ever been involved in. How in the hell do you get yourself in a position where the district attorney's office is working with the Mafia and the public defender's office is working with the FBI in a capital case?"

Innocent Men Jailed
Barboza was a bull-necked Portuguese boxer from New Bedford, MA, who grew up in reform school. He wasn't much of a fighter, but showed an affinity for violence. He is said to have beaten a man to death with a banister. By all accounts, he killed at least 20 men before being gunned down in 1976 at the age of 43. Everyone who touched Barboza came away tarred. The cases in which he was involved as an FBI witness are emblematic of the abuses Congress is investigating. They also illustrate the difficulty of dealing with manipulative informants. To begin with, when Barboza testified against the mob, he was lying through his pointy teeth. His perjury imprisoned at least 7 innocent men. 2 of them died of old age in prison. 2 more were released with little more than apologies after serving about 30 years; Barboza tossed one of those 2 into a murder plot because the man had refused to repay an extortionate $400 loan.

By the 1970s, when it began to look likely, from his own admissions, informant tips and from long suppressed police reports, that Barboza had jailed innocent men, the criminal justice apparatus in eastern Massachusetts refused to notice. That failure to act in the face of mounting evidence has contributed to the belief among many experts today that Barboza was part of a cynical plan to imprison suspected gangsters the govt could not convict legitimately. The question driving the investigators looking back into abuses in the informant program is not whether anyone in law enforcement knew Barboza was lying. Rather, efforts are under way to learn how many knew and how such an assault on the integrity of the criminal justice system could have occurred.
Musty FBI memorandums that a variety of investigators have recently pried from an antagonistic Justice Dept show that, in at least one of Barboza's cases, agents in Boston knew he was falsely implicating innocent men even before he testified. A Boston agent involved in that case dictated a memo listing the real killers and had it sent to the office of then-FBI dir. J. Edgar Hoover in Washington. Nothing was done to help the innocent men. The memos suggest that by the 1960s, Hoover had responded to criticism from Congress by forcefully instructing his troops to attack the Mafia, then a significant, but largely ignored, national problem. Several law enforcement experts believe that Hoover's instruction was taken as authorization to play fast & loose with the law in cases involving suspected Mafiosi in Boston & elsewhere.

For example, memorandums just obtained by congressional investigators show that the FBI installed an illegal microphone during the early 1960s in the Boston office used by New England mob captain Gennaro J. Angiulo. Similarly, conversations from an illegal microphone in mob boss Raymond L.S. Patriarca's office found their way into FBI records. Barboza was recruited as a witness during that period by FBI agents Dennis Condon and H. Paul Rico. Rico, it turns out, was later rebuked by the Rhode Island Supreme Court for instructing another informant to lie during a mob trial there in 1970. The wrongly convicted defendant in Rhode Island was freed after serving 18 years in prison. Rico & Condon worked on cases involving Barboza with former Asst U.S. Atty Edward F. Harrington, now a senior U.S. District judge in Boston. When Barboza wrote his book, "Barboza," billed as the "nakedly brutal" story of his life in crime, he dedicated it "To Edward F. Harrington, With Respect."
Condon, Rico and Harrington along with state officials from California have been summoned by the House Committee on Govt Reform to testify Wed & Thu about Barboza and the Wilson murder. Prodded by the committee in May during an earlier session about one of the men Barboza framed, Rico conceded that he recently had been persuaded the man was innocent. Then he snapped: "What do you want, tears?" Eventually, the committee hopes to review the FBI's relationship with 2 other notorious informants who may have been allowed to get away with murdering officials in the U.S. jai alai industry. Connecticut's former Chief State's Atty Austin J. McGuigan has been asked to testify Feb. 27 about problems he experienced while investigating the murder of the man who owned the Hartford jai alai fronton. But this week, the center of the committee's attention will be Barboza, whose own lawyer called him "one of the worst men on the face of the earth."

James Wilson, the committee's chief counsel, said: "Our concern is whether or not the federal govt hindered or discouraged a murder prosecution in California." After the review of thousands of FBI memorandums, committee staff members believe they can make a case that Barboza's handlers in the Justice Dept went to unusual lengths to help him fight the California murder charge. The reason: Barboza was threatening to recant his perjured testimony in the Boston mob cases. The federal govt tried to close the book on Barboza's East Coast mayhem in 1969 when the federal marshals service deposited him in California with his wife and 2 young children. A condition of Barboza's release was that he never again set foot in Massachusetts. He had a new name, Joseph Bentley. In his book, Barboza wrote: "I was enrolled in a cooking school where I learned French style cooking. Mostly how to cook with wines. I graduated as a sauce, vegetable and roast cook, and I shipped out on the SS President Wilson bound for the Orient."
A forger who became a Barboza confidant while the two were briefly locked up together in a Massachusetts prison discussed the same events in a book of his own. William Geraway said Barboza's sea voyage had little to do with French cuisine. He said Barboza told him he contracted a venereal disease from a woman named Ferlina in the Philippines, robbed a sailor in Hong Kong after mutilating him with a fishing knife and tried to kill another sailor on the return voyage.

Under A Stump
One trip over the sea, it seems, was enough for the man the Boston newspapers called "The Animal." By 1970, Barboza was in Santa Rosa, where he met gangly Clay Wilson. Wilson's mistake was confiding to Barboza about $250,000 in stocks, bonds, antiques and jewelry he had just stolen from a home in Petaluma. One early summer day, as Barboza, Wilson, Wilson's wife and another woman walked in the woods near Santa Rosa, Barboza fired 2 shots into Wilson's head. He dug a hole for the body and covered it with a stump that later would require 3 policemen to move. The two women, who had listened to Barboza brag about owning the FBI and jailing innocent men, kept their mouths shut.
Not long after dispatching Wilson, Barboza sneaked back to New England, where the local mob's most fearsome killers were under orders to make him an object lesson on the perils of working with the FBI. Astonishingly, there is evidence that Barboza traveled East in hopes of exploring with the Mafia the possibility of recanting his crucial testimony in the mob trials. The mob would have listened; one of the men Barboza framed was Patriarca, the New England mob boss. Different explanations have been offered for Barboza's change of heart. The one that people dismiss the quickest is the one he gave in the self-serving autobiography he wrote with an author approved by the FBI. Barboza claimed he only wanted to buy protection for his wife & kids during a visit they planned to the East Coast. The FBI said at the time that Barboza's offer to recant was a fraud. The brash Barboza, bureau sources told reporters, was looking for fast money in a scam perhaps only he would have the temerity to pull: shaking down the Mafia.

2 Barboza acquaintances, his lawyer, F. Lee Bailey and fellow inmate Geraway, had a different explanation. They said Barboza, uncharacteristic as it might seem, had a sincere interest in freeing the innocent men he was responsible for imprisoning. Even while testifying, they said, Barboza never believed the defendants could be convicted on the strength of his word alone. They said Barboza believed his testimony would win him favor with the govt without hurting anyone else. Whatever Barboza's motivation, it quickly became irrelevant. Once Barboza was implicated in Wilson's death, several law enforcement experts familiar with the case say he could use a threat to recant to get govt help in his California murder case. Barboza was linked to the Wilson killing while on one of his secret visits back East. He leveled a pistol at a carload of New Bedford motorists after a traffic dispute. The motorists reported the threat to police, who found Barboza in possession of a small arsenal and a big bag of marijuana.
Having broken his promise to stay out of Massachusetts, Barboza was shipped off to Walpole state prison. He was put in a cell next to Geraway, who had a memory so powerful he would entertain "The Animal" by reciting Oscar Wilde's epic-length "Ballad of Reading Gaol." Geraway said it was not long before Barboza had described Wilson's death down to the least detail. Geraway remembered everything, from the color of Wilson's pants to a description of the stump atop his grave. If anything, Barboza's effort to recant his testimony intensified when he consulted with Bailey following his arrest in New Bedford. "I spoke with Mr. Barboza and learned that he now wanted to say what we in Boston had always known," Bailey said. Bailey said that Barboza told him he had framed most of the defendants in the Boston trials and that he did so in consultation with FBI Agents Condon and Rico. Barboza swore out an affidavit and hoped to boost his questionable credibility by taking a lie detector test, Bailey said.

Barboza's threat set in motion some hurried law enforcement meetings and urgent FBI memo traffic between Boston and Hoover's office in Washington. But by the end of August 1970, a memo shows that Hoover was told that Barboza had secretly signaled he wouldn't recant. But Barboza added ominously that he had "numerous hand written notations" from an assistant district attorney. Bailey said that on the eve of the polygraph examination, Harrington visited Barboza in jail "and somehow, the polygraph test went away." "We learned later, of course, that the FBI said, 'Fire Bailey and don't take the polygraph test or else you're here [in prison] forever,'" Bailey said. "And I'm quite satisfied that happened, since I was terminated." An FBI memo to Hoover marked urgent reported that Barboza told Harrington that his threatened recantation "was just an act" and "he was really still on the side of the govt. He just wanted the [Mafia] to think he was with them."
Geraway, meanwhile, had the admissions he said Barboza made about the Clay Wilson murder and he had no intention of keeping it quiet. After trying and failing to interest Massachusetts officials in the Wilson murder, he mailed the information to authorities in Santa Rosa. Men with shovels followed Geraway's memorized instructions and found Wilson's body right where it was supposed to be, beneath the stump. That set in motion a topsy-turvy trial that lawyers and investigators still talk about in Sonoma County.

Help From High Places
"I think early on in the thing we realized it was just backwards," Cameron said. Marteen Miller, Barboza's court- appointed public defender in the Wilson case, said: "It was bizarre, to say the least." Barboza was extradited from Walpole to California to stand trial in state court, where he pleaded not guilty to the charge of murdering Wilson. He faced a death sentence if convicted, but by all accounts in Santa Rosa he didn't care. "Here he was, with all kinds of evidence against him in a death penalty case, and he acted like he was in small claims court," Miller said. "He wasn't concerned at all. I've been in that business for 34 years and I've never seen anything close to it. It was uncanny." The Sonoma County district attorney's office, assigned to prosecute the case, became just as confused. Barboza was locked securely in the local jail when the jailer called one day to report that Barboza had a visitor. It was Harrington, then head of the Justice Dept's organized crime strike force in Boston. "[Harrington] doesn't come to our office, the district attorney's office," Cameron said. "He goes to the jail and interviews Barboza. Then he came up to our office and we were, to say the least, not very happy with it."

Barboza's lawyer flew to Boston to look for anything that would help him put together a defense. He didn't unearth any blockbuster evidence, but got something almost as good: Harrington, Rico and Condon, all highly regarded federal lawmen, would testify for the defense. That was a big offer in the 1970s, when the appearance of FBI agents at a trial could move jurors one way or the other. "It was unusual to have the FBI in your corner during a death penalty trial," Miller said. The situation was even more perplexing for Cameron, who was looking for help from law enforcement in Boston. "I must have made 10 requests by the telephone: `Can you tell us something about Barboza? Can you tell us anything?' And we always got pretty much shut out of the thing," Cameron said. Frustrated, he flew East, too. To this day, Cameron believes he was followed; his hotel room was entered and his briefcase was rifled. "I got the feeling in my gut that something was wrong back there," Cameron said. "So I went back to the hotel. I took everything out of my briefcase and I locked it up in the hotel safe. And I put a hair around my briefcase to see if somebody would break into it. And sure as hell, somebody opened it. "Now, I don't know if that was Mafia or it was the FBI. From that point on I decided I had to watch everything I did to make sure things were OK."

Back in Santa Rosa, Cameron said the district attorney began getting odd phone calls from people offering to help send Barboza to death row. Prosecutors concluded that the callers were mobsters in New England trying to get even with Barboza. "The public defender's office was getting help from the FBI and we weren't getting any, as far as background information," Cameron said. "We ended up getting witnesses from some suspect sources, to say the least. I'll just say it: The witnesses were fed to us by the Mafia." Despite the lack of federal cooperation from Boston, the district attorney's office in California continued to think it had put together enough evidence on its own to execute Barboza for Wilson's murder. Then, to the district attorney's surprise, Harrington, Condon and Rico appeared as what amounted to character witnesses for Barboza, who was claiming self-defense.
"We were all amazed because it took our capital case and just turned it into shit in a hurry," Cameron said. "Because if you look back at the 1970s, everyone looked up to the FBI. They show up and all of a sudden, they're saying, 'This guy has always been truthful. He's a bad guy, but he's put away some bad people.' And we're going, 'what the hell do we do now?'" Barboza's lawyer interrupted the trial and offered to have Barboza plead guilty if the charge was reduced to second-degree murder. "We thought, 'Well we're screwed now. We better take what we've got,'" Cameron said. "Truthfully, the only reason we took [the plea) was because the FBI testified in his behalf." As Barboza's ghostwriter put it: "Federal officials who had sought to protect Barboza from himself went out to Santa Rosa and testified about his service to the nation." Barboza was sentenced to 5 years to life and, according to Bailey, "was hustled off to Montana to some country club to serve his time."

After 5 years, at Barboza's first parole hearing, federal officials again showed up to speak in his behalf. He was released; then in 1976 in San Francisco, he was gunned down by a gangster from Boston. Miller said he figured during the trial that the federal officers appeared in Barboza's behalf because they were afraid he would recant the testimony he had given at the Boston trials. But he said he wondered at the time why they didn't let him and then simply "laugh him out of court." "Evidently," Miller said recently, "now it appears their motive was a little farther reaching than that." Cameron still gets angry just talking about Barboza. "This fellow Barboza murdered one of our street punk criminals who was not a heavyweight by any stretch of the imagination," he said. "But he didn't deserve to get killed. And he got killed as a direct result of letting this animal back out on the street. And it turns out his testimony was false to start with. It's damn well unbelievable right up until today."
2 Guantanamo prisoners force fed
4.1.02   Reuters

Miami   2 prisoners who refused food for 30 days to protest their detention at the U.S. naval base in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, were force fed through stomach tubes Sunday, the military said. The two are among 300 suspected Al Qaeda & Taliban prisoners captured in Afghanistan and held at the U.S. military base in eastern Cuba. Military doctors inserted tubes through the men's noses and down into their stomachs, feeding them a "milkshake-like" nutritional substance used for comatose patients & other involuntary feeding, military spokesmen said. "The detainees said they were refusing to eat because they wanted to go home, and not eating provided a means for them to protest their detention," the military said in a statement. The two were moved last week from the prison to a mobile hospital, where they accepted intravenous fluids to prevent dehydration but still refused food. Doctors & the camp's Muslim chaplain had tried unsuccessfully to persuade them to eat. After the two prisoners refused meals for 30 days, medical personnel resorted to force feeding because of concerns about weight loss and overall health. "It went very smoothly & without incident," said Capt. Al Shimkus, surgeon in charge of the mobile hospital. He said the treatment was expected to continue for at least 7 days, after which "natural hunger pangs usually return, which helps encourage an individual to eat on his own."

In Feb., nearly 200 of Guantanamo prisoners refused at least some meals in a "rolling" hunger strike that began when a guard removed a turban from a praying prisoner. Most of the other prisoners were eating well. Prison task force spokesman Maj. James Bell said they had gained an average of 10 lbs. each since arriving.

From extreme isolation, waves of felons are freed
Young inmate reflects dangers of returning to society without receiving rehabilitation
12.12.02   Kevin Johnson
USA Today

Huntsville, TX     His last evening in solitary confinement, Angel Coronado forced himself to go to sleep before dusk. After nearly 2 years of maddening isolation in a tiny, windowless state prison cell, he hoped that would make the hours leading to his release pass quickly.
The next morning, after a pancake breakfast, as always, shoved into his cell at 3:30 a.m., Coronado, 20, received a set of prison-made clothes, a one-way bus ticket back home to south Texas and a check for $100. Then Coronado, who would pace for hours in his 6 by 10 ft cell to fight off frustration & loneliness, was free, and overwhelmed.
''It's hard to say how good this feels,'' he said, his teeth chattering in the cold wind last month after he walked out of prison and took in a sight from the past: the sky. ''There are no cages to keep me.''

But even before Coronado had packed his few belongings in an old onion sack, Texas prison officials seemed to be planning for his return. They told police in Donna, TX, Coronado's hometown near the Mexican border, that the gang member who was sent to prison here on an assault conviction was headed their way.
The call was similar to thousands of warnings to local police this year about felons like Coronado, who after spending years in extreme isolation are returning to America's streets with little or no rehabilitation, and what analysts suspect are slim hopes of avoiding a return to crime.

Of the record 630,000 felons projected to be released this year from state prisons, the thousands who were kept in solitary confinement for much or all of their sentences could pose the most danger, authorities say. Many are killers, rapists, drug dealers and others who have been in ''super maximum'' security prisons, showpieces of the prison building boom of the 1990s. The scores of new ''super max'' prisons across the USA symbolized a crackdown on crime in which states made sentences tougher and seemed to abandon any pretense of trying to rehabilitate inmates.

As was the case with Coronado at the Coffield prison in Tennessee Colony TX, inmates at super max prisons typically are kept in small cells for 23 hours a day. They have no one to talk with, little or no TV, no windows, restricted visitation with family members and little help in dealing with what analysts call the physical & psychological atrophy that can result from such conditions.
Now, in record numbers, those convicts & other felons are getting out. It's an ongoing exodus that some law enforcement officials believe is at least partly to blame for last year's 2.1% increase in major crimes nationwide, the first such rise in more than a decade.

It's unclear how many inmates are being released directly from isolation cells into communities; states do not keep uniform statistics on such inmates. But Texas, which has more than 9,000 inmates in isolation, the most in the nation, says it released 1,321 in 2001. During the past 21 months, Florida has set free nearly 1,000 inmates who were in isolation.
Prison officials say some released from super max prisons this year had been in isolation for a decade. Others, like Coronado, are gang members who wound up in isolation for shorter periods after breaking prison rules or getting into fights with other inmates.

States are just beginning to examine the threat that such convicts pose after their release. But law enforcement & prison officials agree that the percentage of formerly isolated inmates who are likely to be arrested within 3 years of their release easily surpasses the 62% recidivism rate for all felons that has been reported by the Justice Dept.
''This class of prisoner represents the highest possible risk,'' says former TX Dist. Court judge Fernando Mancias, who sent Coronado to the general prison population 3 years ago, before Coronado's discipline problems landed the inmate in isolation. ''We've been destroying these people, denying them access to rehabilitation and releasing them to communities resentful & angry.'' Mancias, now a lawyer in Mission TX, says he hopes that Coronado will turn his life around. But Mancias, who opposes the broad use of solitary confinement, says that most inmates like Coronado are ''doomed to failure.''

Construction of super max prisons has fueled a jump in the number of inmates held in isolation nationwide. A recent survey of 34 states & the District of Columbia by the Criminal Justice Institute, a national research firm in Connecticut, found the percentage of isolated prisoners in those jurisdictions rose from an average of 4.5% in 1994 to 6.5% last year.
Prison officials say the increasing use of isolation cells has made their facilities safer & more manageable, and broken the hold that gangs had on some prisons. But mental health specialists say the lack of attention to how isolation can affect inmates long after their release has put the public at increased risk.

Justice Dept has moved to reduce that risk. This year, it allocated more than $150 million to states to help violent offenders before release with basic social skills, education and job training. But in some states, inmates in isolation are denied access to rehabilitation programs for security reasons.
''The prison system has forgotten that one of its missions is to increase the safety of the public when these people are released,'' says Harvard Univ. psychiatrist Stuart Grassian who studied long-term effects of solitary confinement. ''When everybody was talking about getting tough on crime, all we really did was get tough on ourselves. Our system has succeeded in making prisoners as agitated & violent as humanly possible,'' Grassian says. ''What people forget is that 95% of these (inmates) get out at some point. These people have no clue about how to get along in a real-life setting. The only thing you can do is pray they don't pick you as their next victim.''

Except for the exaggerated swagger of a prison gangster, there is nothing scary looking about Angel Coronado. Of the 25 just-released inmates boarding the southbound Greyhound out of Huntsville, Coronado, short, wiry and unassuming, looks the least like a hardened criminal. But he has been in trouble nearly half his life.
He says he began snorting cocaine when he was 12. A juvenile rap sheet followed, highlighted by incidents of criminal mischief, 2 burglaries and an escape from a youth home in south Texas. He fell in with a gang as a teenager, and, barely a month out of treatment for cocaine abuse in June 1999, he was the triggerman in a shooting in Donna, a town of nearly 15,000 on the southern tip of Texas.

Coronado was sentenced to 6 years' probation, avoiding prison largely because no one was hit by the shotgun blasts he fired while in a cocaine-induced haze. ''I don't remember their names,'' he says, recounting the incident & his intended targets. ''I wanted to hurt them, yeah. Kill them? I don't think so.''
Less than 4 months later, his probation was revoked when he ran over a friend while driving drunk. The friend survived, but Coronado was sent into the state prison system. Like his older brother, Daniel ''Danny Boy'' Coronado, 21, a convicted burglar who now is in solitary confinement for assaulting a prison guard, Angel Coronado spent time in several prisons before being moved into isolation.

In 2000, about a year into his 3 year sentence, Coronado was first put into isolation, Texas calls it ''administrative segregation'', when guards found 2 shanks he had fashioned from coils in a hot plate. Coronado briefly was returned to the general prison population, only to be sent back to ''AdSeg'' for good when he joined a gang brawl in a prison chapel.
For much of the past 2 years, he spent 23 hours a day in a cell at Coffield that was furnished only with a single bunk, a steel toilet and a narrow ribbon of concrete floor where he paced, 5 steps one way, 5 steps back, to blow off steam.
''It can really drive you crazy,'' Coronado says now, staring blankly out of the bus window. The lack of human contact, even with other inmates, was the most difficult part of his confinement, Coronado says.

Before he was taken from his cell at Coffield, driven 75 miles south to the main state prison unit at Huntsville and then released, his only visitor in nearly a year was a USA TODAY reporter who sought his cooperation for this article. His mother's poor health, his relatives' busy work schedules and lack of money kept many potential visitors away, Coronado says.
In an interview a week before he was released, a nervous Coronado shook as he spoke. His eyes darted from point to point. Asked whether he had requested medical treatment to deal with the effects of isolation, Coronado said he had met with a psychiatrist for a couple of months ''just to have somebody to talk to. It was getting to me,'' he says.

When he wasn't pacing the cell, he occupied himself by following a routine of sleeping, reading (mostly true crime stories) and writing letters. His daily ritual was interrupted only by the rigid schedule of meal deliveries:
  Breakfast: 3:30 a.m., lunch: 9 a.m., dinner: 3:30 p.m.
Exercise time, about 30 minutes to an hour each day alone in a separate caged area, generally depended on which side of the prison unit the guards serviced first. Showers were optional. When Coronado did go to wash, he was put in shackles and was under close watch until he was returned to his cell.

''There ain't nothin' to see but walls,'' he says. ''It's like I could feel the anger building inside of me. The only way I could get myself away from my cell was to write letters to my family. I tried to get the letters to carry me out of there.''
Leaving prison, he settles into one of the bus' window seats on an overcast Friday. Coronado says the tall, brick prison walls passing by him are like scenes from his daydreams back in maximum security. As the bus turns on to Interstate 45 south toward Houston, many of the inmates aboard shriek in delight. There are high-fives and a few middle fingers pointed back toward the prison. A smiling Coronado never looks back.
''Thanks for going Greyhound,'' the stocky bus driver calls out.

In nearly every case in which American Civil Liberties Union atty David Fahti has challenged the conditions of solitary confinement in super max prisons, the lawsuits describe how long-term isolation promotes physical deterioration & mental illness in the inmates. In Wisconsin, Connecticut, New Mexico, Ohio, California and Florida, Fahti & the ACLU have gone to court to protest what the attorney describes as a ''life-shattering'' policy of punishment that stops just short of the death penalty.
Under the terms of one settlement with the ACLU, CT officials last year withdrew inmates the state had sent to a super max unit in VA, which had extra prison space. The ACLU alleged that the inmates were unfairly confined in extreme isolation. A MA campaign has been launched by the American Friends Service Committee to abolish the practice of disciplinary segregation. Legislators also are sponsoring proposals that would force the state to track inmates released from solitary confinement as a way to more accurately measure recidivism.

''This should be a huge concern in this country, not just because of what is happening inside prisons, which is catastrophic,'' Fahti says. ''Very little is being done to help these people transition back home. And most of them are getting out.''
Harvard psychiatrist Grassian who has testified in cases brought against prison systems, says some of the hundreds of inmates he has interviewed have called him after their release ''in desperate straits.'' ''In some cases, their ability to think & to reason is totally gone,'' Grassian says.

Texas prison spokesman Larry Fitzgerald makes no apologies for the state's use of disciplinary segregation. He says that in the mid-1980s, when violent prison gangs virtually ruled some facilities, prison officials began to use isolation cells to restore order and break up criminal groups.
Fitzgerald credits the strategy with reducing Texas' prison homicides from 20 to 30 a year in the 1980s to single digits now. Since Sept. 2001, there have been 4 slayings in Texas' prison system, which has nearly 150,000 inmates, he says. ''Given our clientele,'' Fitzgerald says, ''you could go to any city of equal size and probably not find those kind of numbers. Clearly, this plan works.''

Since 1995, the number of beds assigned to segregation units in Texas' prison system has jumped from 7,066 to more than 9,000 this year. Although a few other states have a higher percentage of their inmates in isolation, Texas' prison system, nation's second-largest behind California's, has far more inmates in such units than any other state, according to the Criminal Justice Institute survey.
Though prison officials laud inmate isolation plans, there is growing concern among some Texas officials about how isolated inmates adjust to freedom. Within 6 months, TX Dept of Criminal Justice plans to start providing education & ''re-entry'' programs to inmates who are in isolation, lifting a prohibition that has been in place for years.
''There is a significant need for release preparation services to be developed & offered to this particular population,'' the department said in a recent report, adding that isolated inmates ''pose a serious risk to the community.''

7 hours into Coronado's 340 mile trip home, he is still enthralled by the passing scenery. He is dazzled by the lights in the small towns of Refugio, Robstown and Kingsville. During a stop in Refugio, Coronado savors a burger from Dairy Queen. When his eyes aren't glued to the window, he picks through the onion sack for letters he received in prison. One of the last ones came Nov. 2 from his brother, who was being held in a segregation unit less than a mile from Coronado's cell.

    Angel,
    I hope you play it cool out there and look out for Timmy (at 16, the youngest of the Coronado brothers). He's still young, even though he says he knows what he's doing. Look out for Mom, Angel. Help her find a good place to live. I'll be back here waiting for my day to come.
    Love, Danny Boy
In a sense, the letter is a reminder of what Angel Coronado faces back in Donna: relatives who have gotten on with their lives, the temptations of street life, a difficult hunt for a job, and a decision on whether to try to finish his last 2 years of high school.
He has no special skills and only vague plans. ''Eventually, I'd like to get a job in construction,'' he says. His grandfather, Natividad Nino, a longtime local carpenter, says he'll try to teach the trade to his grandson. But skilled craftsmen are struggling along the U.S. border, Nino says, where cheap Mexican labor rules the market.

What seems to worry Coronado the most is how he'll handle his first encounter with the homeboys he left behind. ''I might go cruising with them,'' he says. ''But I have to know when it's time to go home. I can't go back'' to prison. Former judge Mancias says Coronado is ''coming back to one of the poorest counties in the nation. It's a bad, bad place for somebody like Angel. His experience in prison will make things more difficult. I'd say the chances are less than 25% he'll be able to stay out'' of prison.

It is nearly 1 a.m. Saturday, about 13 hours after his release, when Coronado finally arrives at his mother's crowded apartment in Donna, setting off an explosion of emotion. Two sisters, several nieces, brother Timmy and Coronado's mother, Trinidad, swarm him in a family embrace in the dirt front yard.
''This is a day I've been waiting for,'' Trinidad Coronado says when the family scrum moves inside. ''I've got one more son (Danny) to go and that will complete my life.'' 10 days later, Coronado landed a job as landscaper's helper, making $5.20 an hour. He pulls weeds & plants shrubs and says he hasn't hung out with his old gang. He says he's happy. ''I like being outside.''


Las Vegas   Environmentalists dressed in prison uniforms circled a collection of dusty computers outside the Consumer Electronics Show Thursday to protest Dell Computer's use of inmates to recycle computers. "I lost my job. I robbed a store. Went to jail. I got my job back," chanted 5 mock prisoners wearing "Dell Recycling Team" signs and linked by chains.
While Dell co. executives gathered at the huge electronics convention, the "high-tech chain gang," members of the Silicon Valley Toxics Coalition, attracted a small crowd outside. The coalition says Dell's computer recycling program is a sham, and Dell is putting prison workers in danger because they are not protected by federal Occupational Health and Safety Administration standards.

"Dell is an environmental laggard," said protester Fred Kirsch, 26. The coalition also complains that instead of using cheap prison labor, Round Rock TX based Dell could provide others with jobs. The nation's top-selling computer manufacturer deals with U.S. govt. contractor, UNICOR, which employs prison inmates to recycle outdated computers.
Dell spokesman Bryant Hilton acknowledged prison labor saves the co. money, but said inmates meet all OSHA standards. Dell's program lets owners of obsolete Dell equipt pay shipping costs to return their computers but they do not have to pay any additional costs associated with recycling in the DellExchange program.
Coalition exec. dir. Ted Smith said Dell doesn't do much to promote the program.

Hilton said the protest was partially the result of miscommunication, and said his co. & the coalition have the same goal. "I think our challenge now is educating our customers about what their options are," he said. "I think there's a lack of awareness of what to do with an old computer."
Victor Ramirez, 30, who uses a Dell computer at his job as a graphic designer for the Chicago Transit Authority, laughed as he watched the protest. "They'll throw everything in a landfill," Ramirez said of Dell. "They don't care. They're all about the money."

Also Thursday, a new report by the coalition said U.S. technology companies lag foreign rivals in reducing hazardous materials in electronic devices, exposing gadget-hungry Americans to toxins whenever they use computers. The Computer TakeBack Campaign assigned poor or failing grades to Hewlett-Packard, Micron Technology, Gateway and Dell in its third annual report card.

  Empire abroad, prisons at home: dark connections
    3.24.02   Paul Street ZNet

It is commonplace for left writers & activists to note stark contradictions between declared objectives of U.S. foreign policy and the harsh imperial realities of that policy. It is difficult, we note, with good reason, for thinking persons to take seriously the US govt's statements for freedom, justice, democracy & security as well as against terrorism, authoritarianism, violence, & insecurity when Uncle Sam's policy makers:

  •   Fuel the global arms race and engage in reckless saber-rattling military actions & pronouncements that mock international law and threaten to produce new global war

  •   Undercut nuclear arms control agreements to advance a dangerously destabilizing Star Wars scheme as part of the agenda for the US-dominated militarization of space.

  •   Transfer nearly unimaginable & unprecedented sums of wealth, hundreds of billions of dollars, to world's history's most fearsome military establishment and an evil axis of "defense" corporations on a planet where at least two billion people live in desperate poverty, on less than two dollars a day.

  •   dvance a toxic agenda of corporate & finance capitalist globalization that polarizes wealth inequality and thereby increases political, military, and ecological instability in a planet that is already harshly unequal, fragile, and violence-torn

  •   Inflict violence & terror, both directly & indirectly, on masses of people the world over, even in some of the most desperate lands on earth, like Afghanistan

  •   Support (fund, equip, train, etc.) authoritarian regimes that terrorize & repress significant portions of their subject and/or adjacent/colonized populations, as in (to name just a few examples among many) Columbia, Turkey, Pakistan, Russia, Uzbekastan, Israel, and Indonesia.

  •   Restrict the flow of information about the consequences of US overseas policies and plan the creation of an openly Orwellian disinformation agency to shape foreign perceptions of the US and US policy through lies & propaganda

  •   Maintain many hundreds of military bases & installations in more than 50 "sovereign" nations across the world, each serving as a powerful symbol of America's status as the world's unrivalled imperial master and many providing the source for considerable resentment of that status.

  •   Strategize to overturn the official repudiation of the use of nuclear weapons in a first strike capacity.
It is important, however, to also keep our eyes on the US domestic scene, where the chasm between declared goals and harsh social realities is also great. That scene, after all, is where the true social & political taproot of dangerous imperial projects and the authoritarian values, paradigms, policies, and practices that inform such projects are always found.

Consider, for example, the startling expansion of a racist mass incarceration state before and then through the period that has witnessed U.S. emergence as the world's unchallenged superpower. In a contradiction that Orwell could certainly appreciate, the nation that proudly proclaims itself homeland & headquarters of world freedom now imprisons 730,000 people per year. Between 1972 & 2000, the number of people behind bars in the U.S. rose from 330,000 to nearly 2 million.

In the latter year, the number of adults under "correctional supervision", behind bars, on parole or on probation, reached a new historical high point of 6.47 million, equaling one in every 32 adults. U.S. rate of incarceration is 699 per 100,000. The next highest rate in the world is Russia at 644; the American rate is 6x higher than those of Britain, Canada, or France. "No other Western democratic country has ever imprisoned this proportion of its population," says Univ. of Chicago Law School prof. emeritus Norval Morris. He calls the number of people held behind bars in U.S. "appalling."

The numbers deserve serious reflection in a time when official US propaganda for the masses, constructed by elite policymakers and political intellectuals who show that they know much better when talking to each other, claims 9.11.01 attackers were motivated by fear & hatred of American unparalleled "freedom." The majority of those entering the inherently violent space of America's prison nation, where as many as 7% of inmates are raped, do so for nonviolent crimes.
Between 1980 & 1997, the Justice Policy Institute reports, "the number of violent offenders committed to state prison nearly doubled (up 82%)," but "the number of nonviolent offenders tripled (up 207%)." People who committed nonviolent crimes account for more than three fourths of nation's massive increase in prisoners between 1978 & 1996.

U.S. correctional statistics & expenditures become even more "appalling" when broken down by race. Non- Hispanic whites accounted for 42% of state prison inmates in 1979 but less than a third by end of the 20th century. Nearly 10% of black non-Hispanic men 25 to 29 years old were in prison in 2000 compared to 1.1% of whites in the same age group. Bureau of Justice Statistics estimates that a young black man age 16 in 1996 faces 29% of serving time in prison during his life.
Thanks to felony disenfranchisement laws in the US and to racial disparities in the criminal justice system, a remarkable one and a half million African-Americans, or 13% of black men do not possess the right to vote. That rate is 7x the national average and it may well have made the difference for Bush in his 2000 "election." In my home state Illinois, there are nearly 20,000 more black males in the Illinois state prison system than in the state's public universities.

To house its' dramatically rising number of predominantly black prisoners, Illinois has built 20 adult prisons since 1980, all located downstate, where incarceration provides employment, census count, and tax dollars for thousands in predominantly white prison towns that welcome mass incarceration as the solution to local unemployment produced by the closing of factories, mines, mills, and farms.
Some liberals & leftists hoped that the end of the Cold War would bring a long "peace dividend." With the defeat of Uncle Sam's "evil empire, " we prayed, surplus social capital previously spent on weapons, troops, and military bureaucracy would now be freed up for progressive social and environmental investment. These hopes seem naïve when viewed in the horrifying clarity of hindsight. Military budgets are now back to Cold War levels & beyond. Social & esp. welfare expenditures on the poor have fallen consistently through a decade dedicated to neo-liberal principles: state intervention for the wealthy and "free" market discipline for the poor.

Masters of American domestic policy chose a new social program for America's most disadvantaged citizens: lockdown, not a hand up. Fittingly enough, the number of American prisoners (predominantly male) is now roughly equal to the number of American welfare households (headed predominantly by females). If anything, some communities report a post-Cold War prison dividend, as mass incarceration provided jobs to communities where base-closings and related changes in military strategy resulting from the Soviet collapse led to employment declines.
Mass incarceration's elite apologists offer curious explanations for America's great racist lockdown. They claim that mass incarceration arose as a rational response to rising crime during the 1970s & 1980s. Crime is falling since the early 1990s, they say, because "prison works": it locks up & deters criminals. The prison population is disproportionately black, they claim, simply because, as celebrated black conservative linguist John McWhorter puts it, blacks' "proportion of the prison population neatly reflects the rate at which they commit crimes."

While it provides comfort to the privileged, the official explanation does not explain why crime rates increased in the 1970s and the late 1980s when the incarceration rate grew at the same rate as in the 1990s. It does not tell us why mass incarceration continued apace through the 1990s even as crime fell. It ignores the likelihood that other factors, including the record-length economic expansion of the 1990s, provide better explanations than incarceration for declining crime. It sits awkwardly next to international data showing that US citizens are just as likely to be victimized by crime as citizens in European countries who jail & imprison relatively tiny percentages of their population.

Real forces behind "appalling" prison growth in the "land of the free" include the shift from indeterminate to determinant sentencing that began in the 1970s, when lawmakers began restricting the discretion of judges & parole boards to decide how long prisoners stay behind bars. Under the earlier system traditional in American criminal justice practice, judges set minimum & maximum sentences and parole boards had considerable leeway to determine when prisoners were released on the basis of "good behavior" and related evidence of rehabilitation.
As the ruling paradigm of American penology shifted from rehabilitation to purely punitive incapacitation during the 1970s and 1980s, sentences grew, a development reinforced by the passage of "truth-in-sentencing" laws in the 1990s. States created new criminal offences & stiffer sentence for crimes already on the books. They also dramatically increased the number of police officers on the streets, something that led to more arrests and to more crimes being reported. They also began returning high number of parolees to prison on technical parole violations.

It's all strongly linked to Ronald Reagan's War on Drugs, "which is in fact," writes Mark Crispin Miller, "a race war waged by legal means." The stiffer sentences & policy-driven arrests and prosecutions have been strongly concentrated in the drug area. The number of drug offenders in American prisons & jails increased more eleven times (1040%) between 1980 & 1997.
While nearly three fourths of illicit drug users are of European-American ancestry and 15% are black, blacks make up 37% of those arrested on drug charges. They are more than 4 of every 10 drug offenders in federal prison and almost 60% of those in state prison. At its moment of launch, policymakers, including Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan, knew very well that the war on drugs, whose resulting arrests and incarceration are much more policy-driven than those for violent crime, would lead to a dramatic increase in black and Hispanic incarceration rates.

America's racist mass incarceration binge is policy-driven. I'll never forget the day I naively sought to "speak truth to power" (an inherently futile endeavor) on this policy and its consequences in my state. As a member of a Chicago-based council of advisers seeking to reduce criminal recidivism and help ex-prisoners' reintegrate into society, I was invited to make our constituents' case to Matt Bettenhausen, Illinois' "Deputy Governor for Criminal Justice & Public Safety."
Nine of us presented our findings & proposals in a pleasant Chicago conference room on a cold December morning. Bettenhausen, who hails from a local family of accomplished racecar drivers, arrived in time only for the last talk. He apologized for his lateness, explaining that he had been unavoidably meeting with the state's Atty General on the war against terrorism. His eyes beamed with pride as he told us that he has become much busier since his appointment as the state's "first-ever Homeland Security Coordinator". He regaled us with the latest reports on the progress of the US military campaign in Afghanistan. "Wow," a participant muttered, "he watches CNN."

After establishing our issue's relative insignificance, he told us that Illinois gov. George Ryan would not be reversing his recent decision to eliminate higher education & vocational training for prisoners from the state's budget. The cuts, he noted, were compelled by the "post-9.11.01 economic downturn", questionable & rather imperial dating of an overdue downturn in the business cycle. Tires squealing, he raced off to another meeting related to the war on terror. This was a pit stop the Homeland Security Coordinator didn't need!

I was reminded of James Madison's comment that "the fetters imposed on liberty at home have ever been forged out of the weapons provided for defense against real, pretended, or imaginary dangers from abroad." This, alas, is only one of many powerful if sometimes subtle lines of continuity, connection, and consistency between American global imperialism and American domestic mass incarceration. Among many dark connections, consider the following:

  •   Like the imperial foreign policy that preceded then expanded after 9.11.01, mass incarceration is anti- democratic. This is most obviously true in terms of its consequences for its immediate victims (prisoners) but is true even in terms of the remarkably slight role that the majority of Americans play in shaping policy. Recent polling data suggests that most Americans reject the imprisonment of nonviolent offenders and support rehabilitation & alternative sentencing and diversion measures over costly & counter-productive strategy of mass incarceration.

  •   Like victims of America's incarceration regime, targets & victims of U.S. foreign policy are disproportionately "people of color" (ie non-whites). It is certainly more than mere coincidence that a nation which targets minority "crime in the streets" but takes a relatively mild approach to predominantly white middle- and upper-class "crime in the suites" also denounces Middle Eastern "terrorism" when it is carried out by swarthy Arabs but turns a relatively blind eye to the far more deadly "police actions" of the region's one state peopled and ruled by persons of European ancestry. One could give many more examples from US foreign policy.

  •   Like the worst aspects of that policy, domestic mass incarceration is part of a vicious policy circle that feeds upon itself in the fashion of a classic self-fulfilling prophecy. America's commitment to imperial militarism & corporate-financial globalization produces instability, poverty, and violence around the world, providing endless pretexts for illusory "corrections" provided by more US empire. Domestic mass incarceration furthers the impoverishment, demoralization, and destabilization of America's most disadvantaged communities and families, creating conditions and expanding recruits to inner-city crime, which provides the pretext for yet more non- corrective corrections expansion.

  •   Like the imperial project, the domestic lock up is remarkably expensive & regressive and carries huge social-democratic opportunity costs paid for by American taxpayers. Both policies divert billions of dollars from social programs that might tackle endemic poverty & inequality and thereby eliminate the need for punitive, vengeful, and authoritarian policies.
Rewards go esp. to a relatively small minority of private corporate contractors: military & prison industrial complexes, which are not devoid of interlocking relationships of financial, social, intellectual, and technological capital.

  •   Both policies recruit significant rank & file constituencies thanks to their role in producing relatively de-concentrated local economic development and employment opportunities for lower to lower-middle-class persons. Those constituencies' often difficult economic situation in an age of deindustrialization and top-down class warfare encourages them to enter high-stress positions (prison guard, infantryman) in potentially dangerous and atavistic settings that most people of greater advantage (leaving aside tourists like upper-class Vietnam War veteran Oliver Stone) naturally avoid.

  •   Because they are both rooted in & reflective of the desperate, egoistic, and inherently short-term, parasitic, socially dependent (dispossessed), and profit-centered calculations of the capitalist system, the prison- & military-industrial complexes both take on toxic lives of their own. They quickly lose touch with their own purported noble objectives (peace, stability, and the rest) and develop a vested interest in the perpetuation of the very conditions they are officially supposed to eliminate.

  •   Both policies and the mass public confusion (thankfully beginning to fade somewhat on prison and the war on drugs) that encourages or at least permits them are dangerously fed by a powerful & inflammatory barrage of biased media coverage. This deeply reactionary coverage provides a steady flow of de-contextualized images & sound bites to the public about the savage inhumanity of disproportionately dark-skinned murderers, rapists, rioters, terrorists, drug dealers, gang-bangers, and other assorted dangerous outlaws at home & abroad.

  •   Both policies are fed & rationalized by the War on Drugs. Both at home & abroad, this war's chief designers have a very special preference for targeting the weak, the "colored" and the poor (inner city black crack and marijuana users and marginal indigenous Colombian coca farmers, for example), leaving alone rich, white, and powerful. The latter include heads of leading offshore financial corporations that profit from drug profits and the chiefs of American tobacco corporations, whose product kills far more people than the Reagan & post-Reagan era devil drug cocaine. Without the War, of course, manufacture & trade of the illegal substances whose harmful consequences US policymakers obsessively claim to abhor would be far less profitable.

  •   Both policies are strongly related to the U.S. policy of corporate globalization. While that policy provides pretext, necessity, and rationalization for the imperial project (as noted above), it also provides essential context for American deindustrialization. Resulting loss of good jobs for people without higher educational degrees is a fundamental cause of the deepening crisis of inner city life, creating fertile soil for the rise of "criminal" behavior and an urban drug trade that provides pretexts for racially disparate mass incarceration.

    It creates hunger for almost any kind of job growth, even that provided by mass incarceration, in predominantly white "downstate" (Illinois) or alternately "upstate" (as in New York or Michigan) prison communities. Those communities have turned, toxically, to the criminalized urban "underclass" as the raw material that provides the ticket to their little piece of the American dream or nightmare. There are many more connections that could be made re factors that feed & further both resurgent U.S. imperialism & the domestic prison craze. These are enough, however, to suggest how darkly perfect and appropriate it is that the official figurehead of that imperial expansion, GWBush, had only recently, prior to his incarceration-assisted appointment to the U.S. Presidency, come, as Governor of Texas, to oversee, in Molly Ivins' words, "the largest prison system on the planet earth." As Madison knew, there is an intimate, dialectically inseparable connection between prisons & repression at home & empire abroad. Concerned Americans owe it to themselves and their brothers & sisters around the world to make and act upon the dark connection.

    Wanted: your state's inmates   In a strapped rural town, 475 Hawaiian felons coming to its private prison is hailed as good news   6.5.04   Ellen Barry & R.Sloan L.A. Times

    Tutwiler MS   Once the heart of a thriving cotton economy, Tutwiler, population 1,364, had become an economic dead zone. The main street is a stretch of boarded-up windows and collapsed roofs, where signs warn against loitering and men loiter anyway. At the edge of town, fields of cotton & soybeans extend flat to the horizon. In Tutwiler's litany of disappointment, few sights were more discouraging than the brand-new prison, empty since 1,424 Alabama inmates left in March 2004. A group of Wisconsin prisoners left early too, after they complained about being housed too far from their families. Finally, last month, came a piece of good news, in the form of 475 felons from Hawaii.
    Like so many rural communities across America, Tutwiler has become dependent on the prison business. 4 years ago, when Corrections Corp. of America was looking to build a $35-million private prison, it could hardly have found a more accommodating community. Roman Catholic nun Sister Maureen Delaney, who directs Tutwiler's Community Education Ctr, tried to spur debate about possible downsides, like the dangers a prison could bring. But few in town wanted to discuss it.

    The same was true in mid-May, as residents awaited the arrival of the most dangerous group of criminals to be housed here. "An issue is not an issue unless people are willing to rise up and get upset about it," Delaney said. "When push comes to shove, people want the jobs."
    Shortly after taking office last winter, GOP Gov. Haley Barbour changed Mississippi's law to allow the facility to accept maximum-security prisoners from other states. Tallahatchie County, where the Tutwiler correctional facility is located, is now among the nation's most flexible prison locations, warden Jack Cooke said.
    Among the Hawaiian prisoners scheduled to be housed here are some who were involved in a series of riots in an Arizona prison between 1998 & 2001. "I think it's common knowledge with these prisoners that wherever they go, there seems to be an uprising," said Baptist minister Rev. William Wall, whose wife works as a nurse at the facility.

    A second group of prisoners from Colorado, rejected by Texas officials because of their violent histories, began arriving a few days after the first Hawaiians. Gradually, the Tallahatchie County Correctional Facility lurched back to life. Job-seekers lined up outside its bright white walls, with double rows of chain-link fence topped by triple coils of razor wire.
    When all 1,400 cells are full, as the locals hope they will be, there will be more prisoners here than citizens. When the contract with Hawaii was finalized, people rejoiced. "The whole courtroom just went crazy," said Sykes Sturdivant, who serves on the Tallahatchie County Prison Authority. "All these employees were happy as a lark."
    When the first busloads of Hawaiian prisoners arrived from Arizona, word spread quickly about the new inmates, a fastidiously neat group of men who remove their shoes before entering their cells. A team of consultants & prison staff delivered "cultural orientation" to local hires, many of whom were uncertain whether the Hawaiian prisoners would speak English.

    The imported inmates must be treated the same way they would be in Hawaii. So they are served a rice-based diet and can have televisions in their rooms. Clothing & grooming rules are relaxed at the private facility, as they would be in a Hawaiian prison, with some prisoners allowed to wear a traditional Polynesian skirt, called a lava- lava, while inside their cells, authorities said.
    If people outside the facility showed little interest in the threat posed by the new prisoners, authorities inside were keenly focused on it. With its own facilities desperately crowded and the cost of housing inmates prohibitively expensive, Hawaii began exporting its prisoners in 1995, against the protests of convicts' families and other advocates. (State officials said it cost them $102 a day to house the inmates in Hawaii, $52 a day in Arizona and $43 in Mississippi.) Suddenly mixed with inmates from other states, the felons sought to strengthen their position inside mainland prisons by forming a gang called the United Samoan Organization, or USO, Tallahatchie assistant warden Dick Smelser said.

    Prison consultant Ben Griego, who helped train the Tutwiler staff, said cultural differences had worked in the inmates' favor in the past. Hawaiian inmates were so neat and seemingly well-behaved, he said, that prison officers at times lowered their guard. In a private prison in Florence AZ, a group of prisoners was found to be distributing alcohol & drugs and operating a prostitution ring using female Immigration & Naturalization Service detainees. A Hawaiian state inspection team that visited the site in 2001 reported: "The USO family runs this facility."
    "The Hawaiians are very smooth in the way they operate," Griego said. "They take a very polite approach," making recommendations on how better to run the facility, "and before you know it, it was your idea."

    Prison officials are training Tutwiler's workers to identify gangs at their earliest stages, for example, teaching them to identify gang-related tattoos and report new tattoos that might suggest members are actively recruiting. Outside the gates, Tutwiler's residents watched alertly for signs of the new arrivals. Agnes Martindale, 88, who lives half a mile from the prison, listened carefully one recent morning to a clamor from inside the fences. "I thought maybe somebody had escaped," she said. "They said it was just exercise."
    Others were encouraged by the group's arrival. Janie Downs, 84, said she'd watched the grocery store, the doctor's clinic, the sidewalk cafes drain out of Tutwiler. As soon as she can sell her family's store, she's leaving too. "The people around here don't want to work," she said. "They stay up all night & sell dope and sleep all day." As for the prisoners, she said, "We're real proud to have them. We need them … I think we're going to be well- pleased with them."

    At a community meeting last month to address questions about the imported inmates, local authorities focused on the prison's financial benefits. Corrections Corp. of America pays the county $300,000 in property taxes a year, which has allowed the school district to build 2 new buildings, said county district supervisor Jerome Little.
    "The state of Mississippi is not giving you buildings," Little said.

    Berkeley CA & A Halliburton subsidiary has just received a $385 million contract from the Dept of Homeland Security to provide "temporary detention and processing capabilities." Announced 1.24.06 by engineering & construction firm KBR   [ Kellog, Brown & Root aka Halliburton ],   the contract calls for preparing for "an emergency influx of immigrants, or to support the rapid development of new programs" in the event of other emergencies, such as "a natural disaster." The release offered no details about where Halliburton was to build these facilities, or when.

    To date, some newspapers have worried that open-ended provisions in the contract could lead to cost overruns, such as have occurred with KBR in Iraq. A Homeland Security spokesperson has responded that this is a "contingency contract" and that conceivably no centers might be built. But almost no paper so far has discussed the possibility that detention centers could be used to detain American citizens if the Bush administration were to declare martial law.

    For those who follow covert govt operations abroad and at home, the contract evoked ominous memories of Oliver North's controversial Rex-84 "readiness exercise" in 1984. This called for the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) to round up and detain 400,000 imaginary "refugees," in the context of "uncontrolled population movements" over the Mexican border into U.S. North's activities raised civil liberties concerns in both Congress and the Justice Dept. The concerns persist.
    "Almost certainly this is preparation for a roundup after the next 9.11.01 for Mid-Easterners, Muslims and possibly dissenters," says former military analyst Daniel Ellsberg, who in 1971 released the Pentagon Papers, the U.S. military's account of its activities in Vietnam. "They've already done this on a smaller scale, with the 'special registration' detentions of immigrant men from Muslim countries, and with Guantanamo."

    Plans for detention facilities or camps have a long history, going back to fears in the 1970s of a national uprising by black militants. As Alonzo Chardy reported in the 7.5.87 Miami Herald, an executive order for continuity of government (COG) had been drafted in 1982 by FEMA head Louis Giuffrida. The order called for "suspension of the Constitution" and "declaration of martial law." The martial law portions of the plan were outlined in a memo by Giuffrida's deputy, John Brinkerhoff.
    In 1985, President Reagan signed National Security Decision Directive 188, one of a series of directives that authorized continued planning for COG by a private parallel govt.

    Two books, James Mann's "Rise of the Vulcans" and James Bamford's "A Pretext for War", have revealed that in the 1980s this parallel structure, operating outside normal govt channels, included the then-head of G. D. Searle and Co. Donald Rumsfeld, and then WY cngressman Dick Cheney.
    After 9.11.01, new martial law plans began to surface similar to those of FEMA in the 1980s. In January 2002 the Pentagon submitted a proposal for deploying troops on American streets. One month later John Brinkerhoff, the author of the 1982 FEMA memo, published an article arguing for the legality of using U.S. troops for purposes of domestic security.

    In April 2002, Defense Dept. officials implemented a plan for domestic U.S. military operations by creating a new U.S. Northern Command (CINC-NORTHCOM) for the continental U.S. DefSec Rumsfeld called this "the most sweeping set of changes since the unified command system was set up in 1946."
    The NORTHCOM commander, DefSec Rumsfeld announced, is responsible for "homeland defense and also serves as head of the North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD). … He will command U.S. forces that operate within the U.S. in support of civil authorities. The command will provide civil support not only in response to attacks, but for natural disasters."

    John Brinkerhoff later commented on PBS that, "The U.S. itself is now for the first time since the War of 1812 a theater of war. That means that we should apply, in my view, the same kind of command structure in the U.S. that we apply in other theaters of war."
    In response to Hurricane Katrina in Sept. 2005, according to the Washington Post, White House senior adviser Karl Rove told the governor of Louisiana, Kathleen Babineaux Blanco, that she should explore legal options to impose martial law "or as close as we can get." The White House tried vigorously, but ultimately failed, to compel Gov. Blanco to yield control of the state National Guard.

    Also in September, NORTHCOM conducted its highly classified Granite Shadow exercise in Washington. As William Arkin reported in the Washington Post, "Granite Shadow is yet another new Top Secret and compartmented operation related to the military's extra-legal powers regarding weapons of mass destruction. It allows for emergency military operations in the U.S. without civilian supervision or control."
    It is clear that the Bush administration is thinking seriously about martial law.

    Many critics have alleged that FEMA's spectacular failure to respond to Katrina followed from a deliberate White House policy: of paring back FEMA, and instead strengthening the military for responses to disasters.
    A multimillion program for detention facilities will greatly increase NORTHCOM's ability to respond to any domestic disorders.
      elsewhere
    Convicts are condemned to a 'paradise' in Mexico
    Inmates, families housed together in unusual experiment
    2.3.02   Mary Jordan & Laurie Freeman
    Wash.Post pA22

    Isla Maria Madre, Mexico   Lorena Avila Suarez was 8 years old when she arrived by boat on this tiny Pacific island, coming ashore to be with her father, a convicted murderer. She grew up among the other inmates & their children in one of the world's most unusual prisons, an island with a church, a bakery and a dance hall where convicts are allowed to serve sentences alongside their family members. Then she fell in love with a convicted cocaine trafficker. So when her father was released a few years ago, and her mother & 3 sisters left with him, Avila Suarez stayed behind with her new husband. She still lives here in the prison where she has spent most of her life.
    "Sometimes I would rather be on the outside. It is always the same here," said Avila Suarez, 25, nuzzling up to her husband, Jesus Lopez, 33, who has 18 years left to serve. "But when I leave, I would like it to be with him." Isla Maria is a Mexican govt prison experiment in the Pacific Ocean 95 mi. south of Mazatlan. Started at the turn of the century as a Mexican version of Alcatraz, where the worst of the worst were condemned to a life of hard labor, it has been transformed into a relative paradise for inmates who have shown a willingness to reform.

    Rehabilitation is a bedrock principle of the Mexican judicial system, so much so that neither the death penalty nor life imprisonment is allowed under law. Proponents say Isla Maria is a logical extension of that idea: If prisoners are going to have to return to life in a normal community one day, why not keep them in a prison that simulates a normal community? There are no cells or bars here. The inmates are called "colonists." They wear no uniforms and live in ordinary housing on streets that look like those in any Mexican town. While navy officers on the perimeter of the 54 sq. mi. island carry machine guns, the prison guards carry no guns. About 600 children of inmates live in little houses with their parents and attend public schools on pretty, palm-lined streets.
    "This prison used to be almost hell. The inmates were treated savagely & humiliated," said the warden, Raul Soto Calderon. Now, he said, "If you didn't know this was a prison, you wouldn't realize it. There is nothing like this in the world." For one thing, it would be expensive to duplicate. With an annual budget of $4 million for 1,600 inmates, the govt pays about 3 times as much to handle each prisoner here as it does for those at any other prison. Transportation costs for supplies & people are high. The warden, for instance, recently had to rent a small plane to airlift a prisoner with a severe kidney problem.

    Public Security Minister Alejandro Gertz Manero, whose dept runs the prison, questions the wisdom of a cash- strapped govt running what he calls a "paradise." He would like all Mexican prisons to focus on making criminals pay restitution for their crimes. Some also question the wisdom of allowing children to grow up in prison. In several other Mexican prisons, children also live alongside their parents, usually their mothers. Although this practice is lauded for keeping families intact, it is also criticized because it means children are raised in a community of criminals, where everything from freedom to food is limited.
    "For some children it can be a little damaging," said Oliva Suarez Ilago, Avila Suarez's mother, who now lives on a peach farm in central Mexico. "They see things they shouldn't. They become aggressive & badly spoken." Avila Suarez, who does not have children, says other parents worry about having to wait for medicine that arrives on a weekly ship. "Some children are exposed to good people on the island who say to them, 'See where I am. Learn from me,' " she said. But other children live among "people who don't want to change."

    Yet for some children, living here is far safer than it is in the rough neighborhoods they left behind, and the govt white-washed housing is often better, too. "I like it here because I am here with my dad," Maribel Cisneros, 13, said recently as she sat at her desk in a history class. "My dad is here because of drugs." The inmates clearly like it here. "When I got here I cried. What beauty!" said Guadalupe Rodriquez Quiroz, a convicted heroin-seller who spent 4 years in a crowded, violent Tijuana prison before arriving here. There, she said, guards made inmates pay for everything, incl use of the bathroom.
    A key element of the Isla Maria experiment is to take power away from guards, who have often turned Mexican prisons into sewers of bribery & illegal punishments. Here there are only 36 guards. Most of the inmates are at Isla Maria on drug convictions; the typical sentence here is 10 years for marijuana trafficking. But there are a few who committed robbery, assault or even murder. And the sight of Luis Oscar Mendez Juarez, who killed a man during a robbery in Mexico City, swinging on a hammock by the ocean can be a bit jarring.

    The new warden said he is still weeding out the prison population. He said some of the inmates who have been sent here do not meet the island's current standards. He is in the midst of a major expansion, nearly doubling the inmate population this year to 3,000. He is also planning to order off the island any children over the age of 12. All inmates have the option of bringing their families, but many spouses & children do not want to forfeit their jobs and routines on the mainland. For some, it is prohibitively expensive to get to Mazatlan, where a navy ship shuttles families to the island. Isla Maria has also been unable to completely shed its reputation for harsh treatment, so it has not been much in demand among the main prison population in Mexico. But word is getting out.

    Avila Suarez & her husband share a one-bedroom home with a concrete floor and sparse furnishings: a double bed, a tiny television and a radio. They eat red snapper & other fresh fish caught by inmates. Their 2 lime-green parrots, Lino and Gustavo, fly freely about the house. "They have never been caged," Lopez said. Before being moved here, Lopez spent several years in a Guadalajara jail, where, he said, "you are obliged to be aggressive to stay alive." "I would be a different person if I had to stay in Guadalajara," Lopez said. There he learned that "you rob or are robbed, you defend yourself or you are beaten. Here, it is so safe you can leave your bike outside for 3 days and nobody would take it."
    Now the chatty Lopez is host of the island radio show, "Window by the Sea." He said people here "are afraid to make mistakes because they will be forced to leave the island." Warden Soto Calderon said that in the 9 months that he has been here, he has transferred 93 trouble-making inmates to mainland prisons. A few people have been punished for trying to ferment corn or rice to make moonshine or for smoking marijuana. Punishment is banishment to a camp on the far side of the island where there is no music, television or family life. In the old days, it used to be splitting rocks in the hot sun.

    Suarez Ilago, Avila Suarez's mother, said there were many good things about Isla Maria. Her husband, who killed a man in a street brawl, had no formal schooling when he arrived, but spent his years on the island finishing primary school and learning to work a farm. She said he now works hard on their little peach farm, no longer drinks and has had no more troubles with the law. Despite the rehabilitative effect Isla Maria had on her husband, Suarez Ilago said, "I never forgot for a moment that I was in jail." During the decade she spent on the island with her 4 daughters, she would look out at the endless ocean and see it as invisible bars.
    "I feel bad that I brought her to the island and then left her there," she said about her one daughter still in the penal colony. "It was like leaving half of my heart there." But Avila Suarez said she does not feel like someone left behind. She has a job as a telephone operator, takes occasional vacations and lives what she considers a normal life. She said she misses the little comforts that the mainland provides, like variety of food, the sight of a mountain or a highway, the latest magazines. But more important to her are the good times, and the lifetime of memories here. Nearly everyone on the island came to her wedding ceremony 7 years ago. She was just 18, stepping lightly into marriage & adulthood in a prison dining hall with an inmate band playing salsa.

      In Mexico hinterland, life beyond the law
      Man buried alive on elders' order
    3.15.02   Kevin Sullivan & L.Freeman Wash.Post pA1

    Dos Rios, Mexico   Teofilo Gonzalez Cano stabbed his cousin to death with 2 quick jabs to the heart. They had been the best of friends, growing up together in the same mud-brick house in this tiny village in southern Mexico. But one night they drank themselves nearly blind on homemade grain alcohol. An argument about nothing got out of hand, and soon Vicente Gonzalez Santiago lay dead in the dirt. Teofilo ran. They found him at dawn, sitting in a forest clutching his empty bottle. The local farmer who served as village constable, another cousin of Teofilo's, bound his hands behind his back and brought him in.
    The whole village was waiting, more than 300 people. They forced Teofilo to lie facedown next to Vicente's corpse. They shouted at him, called him a murderer. His mother sat in the dirt next to her son, pleading for mercy. The nearest police were more than 2 hours' drive away and there was no telephone in Dos Rios, hidden in rugged mountains 180 miles southwest of Mexico City. Justice in this backwater belongs to a half-dozen town elders, who stood over the 2 cousins in their early thirties, one dead and one accused, and debated the punishment that day in 1999. Finally they agreed. "They said the two of them should be buried together," said Catarina Cano Santiago, Teofilo's mother.

    According to Cano, other Dos Rios residents & human rights investigators, the elders enlisted villagers to carry out the sentence. Some of the men hacked a grave in the rocky soil of the village cemetery. Someone banged together a flimsy wooden coffin, and the villagers put Vicente's body in it. They hoisted the box and began a procession down a narrow cow path to the graveyard. Others dragged Teofilo by the arms. Women & children followed, marching under a hot sun past fields of dead corn. They placed Vicente's coffin in the hole, then threw Teofilo in on top, with his arms & legs tied together. He screamed & begged for his life, calling out to his mother, "Please don't let them do this to me!" She tried to help him, but her neighbors & friends held her back. The law had spoken, and no one would stand in its way.
    20y men started throwing dirt into the hole with shovels & sticks. Teofilo, screaming, tried to climb out. His 14- year-old son, Felipe, ran to him and tried to hug him & pull him up. Someone tossed a lasso around Teofilo's neck and jerked him back into the grave, ripping him from his boy's embrace. They pulled the crying youth away from his father as the dirt piled higher on top of him, until he disappeared into the ground. "When they finished," said his mother, "you could still hear him screaming under the ground."

    Dos Rios is a dusty wisp of a village clinging to a mountainside in Guerrero state. It takes 12 hours to drive there from the capital, down a road that turns from pavement to dirt to a harrowing path that drops thousands of feet on either side. Fewer than 400 people live in Dos Rios, in a cluster of soft-brick huts baked by a close, heavy sun. There is no electricity, not a light bulb in town. The only vehicle is an old Ford pickup truck. A priest comes once a year to say Mass in the crumbling Roman Catholic church. It has been months since a police patrol passed through. As Mexico seeks to modernize, setting up a formal justice system in places like this is one of its most difficult challenges. Mexico has more than 148,000 communities with fewer than 100 residents, many of them isolated in the vast stretches of mountains & deserts that cover much of this country. By comparison, the U.S., which has 5 times more land area, has fewer than 2,000 towns with populations under 100.

    More than 25 million Mexicans, a quarter of the population, live in communities of 2,500 people or fewer. Govt officials say it is simply too expensive to run roads & electric lines to many of them, let alone provide police, prosecutors and judges. As a result, millions of Mexicans live in places that remain largely beyond the law. "The rule of law is absent in these towns. The level of impunity is extremely high," said Adolfo Aguilar Zinser, Mexico's new UN ambassador, who served until recently as national security adviser. He said the administration of President Vicente Fox is working to equip rural police with satellite communication systems and create more uniform police coverage around the country. But he said many state & local govt officials have resisted that idea because they still operate under the practices that dominated during 7 decades of rule by the Institutional Revolutionary Party. For years, he said, the PRI encouraged powerful local bosses to handle justice in their own way.

    Abel Barrera, a human rights activist based in Tlapa, near Dos Rios, called justice in Mexico "unbalanced." "Things have changed in the cities, but in parts of the country like this, here in the countryside, violence is still the accepted mechanism of justice," said Barrera, who investigated the Teofilo Gonzalez Cano case. "It's still the law of the jungle." There is no formal accounting of how many people are killed in Mexico's rough rural justice every year. But human rights groups estimate that hundreds have been killed and hundreds more beaten over the years in punishments meted out beyond official scrutiny. Barrera said at least 10 people a year are killed in the region around Dos Rios in a form of local justice. "People here have not yet taken notice that Mexico is changing," Barrera said.

    Equal protection under the law does not exist. Sentences are given out on the judgment of a few men, who often have little education & no legal training. Their decisions are effectively beyond the oversight of federal, state and municipal govts. In some cases, their punishment is far more harsh than the formal legal system requires. For example, Mexico has no death penalty or life sentences, but the Dos Rios villagers buried Teofilo alive. In other cases, local elders are far more lenient than judges. Town elders in Dos Rios said they would punish a rapist with "a few hours" in the town's small jail cell, plus a restitution payment of perhaps $100 to the victim's family. They recalled one case in which the rapist was forced to pay for a party that the victim's family was planning.

    Dos Rios is a Mixtec Indian community, governed by traditional practices. Mexico has long debated how far to go in allowing its 10 million Indians to run their own judicial systems. Critics argue that all Mexicans should be governed by the same legal system. But Dos Rios remains one of many places, Indian & non-Indian, set apart from mainstream justice in Mexico. With each passing decade, roads and other public services creep closer to these self-ruled villages. 10 years ago, the road into Dos Rios was little more than a donkey path used largely by farmers hauling their opium poppies to market. Today, trucks hauling beer & Pepsi lumber down the roads, supplying villages with the syrupy smack of globalization.
    But the rule of law cannot be loaded onto a delivery truck, and the protection of police & courts still barely exists. "We can't get everywhere," said Isidro Basurto Mendoz, the official in charge of police in Metlatonoc, the municipal seat, which is 3 hours from Dos Rios by car and 10 on foot. "The distances are too great, and we have no communications. The problem is that when we can't get there, people take justice into their own hands." Basurto said he has 18 police officers and one pickup truck to cover 30,000 people in 156 small communities spread over an area about the size of Montgomery County. Most are reachable only by four-wheel-drive vehicles. In the rainy season they are cut off by impassable roads.

    As Basurto spoke, word filtered in that 2 men had been killed the night before in a village a couple of hours' drive into the mountains. A dozen of Basurto's officers grabbed their shotguns and hopped into the back of the police pickup. Despite the display of firepower, Basurto said he and his men would almost certainly not solve the crime. "I'm going to get the information, give the bodies to the families for burial, then I'll come back to do the paperwork," he said. Basurto said it was unlikely that any suspect would ever be convicted. He said his officers are not trained to gather or handle evidence. Witnesses would need to drive for hours or walk for days to give testimony before a judge. He said people have no money to make such a trip, and would fear retaliation.
    2 suspects were recently arrested & charged with murder in a nearby village. Basurto turned them over to regional prosecutors, but they were free within 3 months. He suspects they paid a bribe to get the charges dropped. Now, he said, they are back in their village, threatening to kill those who identified them. Basurto said that case is unusual because the suspects were charged and turned over to prosecutors. "Usually by the time we find out about a case, it's already been resolved," he said. "Or we don't find out about it at all."

    Teofilo & Vicente grew up the way all children do here: poorly nourished, without shoes and with little knowledge of the outside world. They played among the chickens & mango trees, and they were lucky to survive. Elders here say that until a state govt doctor began making regular visits a few years ago, many children died for lack of medicine & basic care.
    The 2 boys were reared in one of the village's small red-brown cubes of mud. Together, working the fields of corn & beans, they grew into men. There are no known photos of either cousin in this village, where cameras are rare. Their families describe them as typical in every way, 2 sturdy farmhands.
    They both married and had the same kind of families: 3 sons & a daughter. Then things went sour for Teofilo. His wife died in childbirth. He remarried, but his second wife died of a fever about 5 years ago. He was raising his children alone. Vicente was building his own house, next to a shady grove of banana trees where he was raised. His uncle lived there, too. It was in his house that Vicente & Teofilo started drinking one afternoon in March 1999. They drank all night. Some here say that Vicente began making jokes about Teofilo's 2 dead wives. All that is known for sure is that sometime after midnight, Teofilo pulled out a small knife and stabbed Vicente twice in the chest.

    By 8 a.m. Teofilo had been brought in and the 2 men lay side by side on the dirt floor of Vicente's house, with the 6 elders standing over them, discussing their fate. Vicente's brother, who declined to give his name in an effort to avoid drawing more attention to the case, said the elders made the decision to bury Teofilo alive. The town elders also wish to avoid attention. Asked about the case one recent morning, Juan Gonzalez Ruiz, the comisario , or head of the local govt, switched out of Spanish and consulted with the 5 other elders, all men in their forties & fifties sitting outside the village hall. They debated for 20 minutes in their Indian language. According to a local schoolteacher who speaks both languages, Gonzalez wanted to tell the truth but the elders instructed him to lie. They said they did not want any more trouble.
    Following their orders, Gonzalez told a reporter that Vicente had died in an accident and that Teofilo had run away. The elders nodded in agreement. The comisario is elected by village residents, and the elders are former comisarios. They said their main goal was to find negotiated solutions to crimes & disputes. They have 10 unpaid "community police" officers, whose duties include helping to keep the peace at festivals and tracking down stolen animals. Justice varies greatly by community. In some villages, stealing an animal has led to hanging. But here, Gonzalez said, the penalty for stealing a cow is a few hours in jail. He said he or the elders go to the cell and ask the thief why he stole. They try to impress on him that stealing is bad.

      In Mexico, justice at a price
      Inmate couldn't buy what he needed, his name
      3.25.02   Mary Jordan Wash.Post pA1
    Tijuana, Mexico The cop looked Jimmy Salguero in the eyes and asked the question that would change his life. "What's your name?" he said.
    "Jimmy Salguero," said Jimmy Salguero. The officer clicked a few keys on his computer keyboard.
    "No, you're Jaime Garcia," he said.
    "No I'm not," he insisted.
    But it was no use. It was a Friday night, and the police would look good ending the week with a prize arrest. So a Guatemalan painter named Jimmy Salguero became Tijuana robber Jaime Garcia. Telling the story later, Salguero, 32, said that he had been just another face in Tijuana, living in a Salvation Army shelter and trying to scheme his way across the border into the U.S. To pick up some cash, he had taken a job painting apartments. As he left work that evening in May 2000, the police stopped him & 4 Mexican painters and asked for their identification. The others produced ID cards. Salguero had none.
    The officers whispered among themselves, then hauled him to the station, gave him a new name and sent him to La Mesa, one of the most notorious prisons in Latin America. When Salguero protested, the cops punched him. They told him to shut up. Behind bars, month after month, everyone called him Jaime.

    The presumption of innocence and the right to see an attorney have long been written into Mexican law. But in practice those protections are often available only to those who can afford them. President Vicente Fox, who took office nearly 16 months ago promising to spread democratic protections to all, has sought to end govt abuse of individuals, and in particular to end a tradition of arbitrary, sloppy and corrupt police practices. But injustice has deep roots in Mexico's justice system. There are still 2 legal systems in the country: one for those with money & connections, and one for the poor.
    Salguero said he saw that up close on the ride to the police station, when one of the officers offered him the opportunity to buy his way out of trouble. "I hear it costs about $1,500 to $2,000 to cross the border," the officer said slyly, Salguero recalled, referring to the going rate for a smuggler to guide immigrants into the U.S. Salguero said he understood the deal being offered: Turn over your travel money and you can go home. But he had no cash. "I just asked, 'How long will I be in this place?' " Salguero said. When the police officers realized they were squeezing an empty wallet, they turned cold. "They told me, 'It will be one to three months before the judge sees you.' "

    As an undocumented migrant, Salguero was particularly vulnerable to police abuse. But he figured one person could surely help him: his older sister Ericka, a successful office clerk who lives in Rockville, MD. He placed a collect phone call from the station. To his relief, she answered. He was certain that his sister, an 18-year resident of the U.S. with legal status there, could convince the Tijuana police that he was Guatemalan. Salguero handed the phone to the officer on duty. "Please talk to my sister," he said. The officer grabbed the phone and hung up.
    "The line just cut off," his sister recalled. "They just didn't care who he was." Still, she figured the police would correct their mistake: "You take someone's fingerprints and you find out who he is, or who he is not. How hard is that?" But everything got harder.
    At first, Salguero didn't have a bed in prison. He needed cash for that. In La Mesa, as in many Mexican prisons, inmates pay for their accommodations. How well you sleep, eat and live depends on how much money you have. The divide between rich & poor so prevalent in Latin America is exaggerated inside that giant cage. The night Salguero arrived in the spring of 2000, he was broke. In La Mesa, penniless can mean homeless. Night after night, he joined other poor inmates searching for a patch of hard ground on the basketball court. "There was no mattress, but somehow I got a blanket," Salguero said. He soon learned that the thin blanket was one of the rare comforts provided free of charge. Even visiting rights & toilet paper would cost him.

    From his concrete bed, Salguero could see the prison's version of luxury. The central section of the prison was filled with more than 400 small wooden houses, many with windows, balconies and stereos. The richer inmates live there. The warden, Carlos Lugo Felix, said it was his understanding that the top price for one of the little houses was $1,500. But inmates & human rights advocates, incl Brazilian law professor Cesar Barros Leal who visited La Mesa in December, said the black market price is as high as $30,000 for the finest homes. Middle-class prisoners sleep in relatively uncrowded cells, sharing one with perhaps 6 others. And the poorest sleep on the ground, Barros said.
    Prison officials, trying to squeeze 5,500 inmates into a space built with a tiny budget for 2,800, allowed prisoners to build their own tiny houses years ago. Officials also allowed inmates to open kiosks, where they sell shrimp cocktails, hamburgers, tacos and burritos, and even rent videos. Inmates without cash do without. Family is a kind of wealth here, too. By long-established custom in Mexico, prisons do not provide all of an inmate's food & supplies. An inmate's family is expected to make frequent visits and provide milk, meat, shampoo, jeans, shirts and medicine or the money to buy them.

    5 days a week, Salguero watched a parade of more than 2,000 visitors enter La Mesa, lugging bags of supplies. Some men around him ate as well as they would at home, with enchiladas one day and fried chicken the next. But Salguero, with no family in Mexico, survived mainly on the gruel that was wheeled around the prison in vats. All around him, families spent nights together: More than 500 wives & several hundred children spend at least a few nights a week inside the prison. But nobody visited Salguero, and no one threw anything over the wall for him at night in what is known as the "rain of objects."
    With the guards paid off to look the other way, family members & friends tossed packages over the prison wall, often at times & places arranged on smuggled cell phones. Even cocaine & heroin stuffed inside soccer balls were thrown over the wall. Salguero's thoughts were consumed by earning money. He needed to eat and to bribe guards. So he worked for other inmates who ran shoeshine & laundry businesses. And he carved wooden ships & picture frames and sold them to `inmates & visitors. "You pay for everything, even for water," he said. "To not have money in prison is like being out on the street without anything, with nothing to wear, no way to bathe yourself."

    Inmates have even divided the territory inside the prison and set up what amounts to a system of tollbooths. When Salguero wanted to use a pay phone, he paid a gatekeeper about 5¢ cents in pesos. When he wanted to go into the visitors' area to try to talk to someone else's attorney, he forked over 20¢. What really drained his finances was the roll-call bribe. Every night, when the prisoners lined up to be counted, Salguero had to slip a guard 50¢ to be marked present on the attendance sheet. The days inmates spend in prison are recorded only when they are marked present; missing roll call means spending more time in prison. Guards have turned that into a big moneymaker. With more than 5,000 inmates in La Mesa, the total take from the shakedown could reach $2,500 or more a day.
    Salguero paid his 50¢ nearly every night. Each time he did, Jaime Garcia got credit for another day in prison. Garcia, a convicted robber, was being sought for violating parole when Salguero was arrested. Now Salguero was serving out the remainder of Garcia's 5 year term. The injustice tore at him. "I kept saying 'I want to see a judge or a lawyer,' " he said. "But nobody paid any attention to me. Other guys in jail said to me, 'Welcome to Mexico. That's how justice is.' "

    Salguero was not the only inmate serving time unjustly in Mexico. Human rights advocates and Mexican law enforcement officials said there have been many cases in which the wrong person has served time. Record- keeping has been so sloppy in prisons that officials have not even known the actual identities of inmates, or how many there are. Most prisons lack computerized databases of criminals' fingerprints or mug shots. Some inmates who cannot afford a lawyer have been kept in prison beyond their sentences. And fugitives wanted for serious crimes have been discovered in prison serving time for petty offenses under assumed names.
    A spokesman for the state police in Tijuana said he was unaware of Salguero's case and could not comment on it. Lugo, the warden, said that since he took over 4 months ago, he has established new procedures for registering and tracking inmates. Salguero, a quiet, serious man, became withdrawn as time passed. On good days he dreamed of getting out to go back to school to learn automobile engineering. He wanted to build cars in the U.S. He had only finished primary school in Puerto Barrios, his home town in Guatemala, 2,600 miles southeast of here.

    He joined a Bible study group. His new friends got him off the ground and into a bunk. They paid for his new quarters and later, when he had money, they charged him a small fee each week. But they offered no hope. "Even my brothers in the Christian group told me, 'You will be here for a long time.' I asked their visitors to help me but they didn't. Maybe they were scared or maybe they thought I was lying. Even a pastor told me I was paying for some debt I probably owed."
    Christmas 2000 came and went. "In my solitude, I would read the Bible," he said. "It was the only thing that consoled me. I felt invisible."

    In Rockville, Ericka Salguero was frantic. With 3 small children, a new mortgage and a demanding job, she couldn't afford the 2,800-mile trip to Tijuana. Her pleas for help from the Guatemalan embassies in the U.S. & Mexico went nowhere. She arranged for a relative in Los Angeles to take the 3 hour bus trip across the border to give Salguero money & new clothes. She was worried because when she had last spoken to her brother he had said: "Send money so I won't get beaten."
    Ericka's mother-in-law arrived at La Mesa and waited nervously in the long visitors' line. The sight of police in bulletproof vests on the roof made her jittery; the smell of sewage and the picture of too many people behind chain- link fences made her sad.

    When she finally arrived at the visitors' window, she asked to see Salguero, using the name Jaime Garcia. She didn't know it, but she had just fallen into another moneymaking racket. The inmates who control the visitors' area charge a fee to find the inmate being summoned. And often, they charge the inmates for the "privilege" of seeing their visitors. She didn't know that she was supposed to pay. Salguero never appeared. The inmates persuaded her to leave the package of clothes & money with them; they said they would deliver it. But Salguero said he never received the package or a message that a visitor had come.
    "I wanted to scream. I wanted to say, 'I am not this person,' " he said. But complaints earned him a beating or, from the gentler guards, these words: "Then prove it." Salguero couldn't. So he carved boats. When he had the extra pesos, he paid to get into the visitors' area to beg a few words with other inmates' visitors and attorneys. No one took him seriously.

    Finally, one visitor gave him what turned out to be a golden brushoff. If you think you have a real gripe, call the human rights office in Tijuana, he said. The man passed him the phone number. Salguero was excited about the new lead, but he needed $3 for a phone card to pursue it. He worked and saved, ate less, and finally bought a shiny new phone card. It had been more than a year since his arrest. He slipped the card into a phone, dialed the number, and Luis Hernandez picked up.
    Hernandez, a 22-year-old lawyer, had been working in the human rights office for 4 months. He was fielding five or six calls a day from prisoners in La Mesa, all with horror stories. On 5.25.01, he visited Salguero. After they talked, Hernandez went to the court to see the file of Jaime Garcia. "I was stunned," he said.

    The man in the photo in Garcia's file was obviously not Salguero. He was older, taller and fatter. He had dark skin & curly hair, not the fair skin and straight hair of the man Hernandez had just visited. And he had drug needle marks running up and down his arms; Salguero did not. Hernandez wrote to the judge in Garcia's case. On June 5, as Jimmy Salguero neared the end of his 13th month in prison, he was summoned to the office of the deputy prison director. "Are you Jaime Garcia?" the man asked.
    "That is what they call me here. My real name is Jimmy Salguero. I am not Mexican." The official, who, along with other top management has since left the prison, was quiet. He told him to wait. An hour later he returned and said only this: "I have good news. You are free to leave." In minutes Salguero was on the street. He raced to find Hernandez.
    "Jimmy walked in and was in disbelief. His face was blank. No one told him why they released him," said the lawyer, reached in Spain, where he is now studying for a doctorate in human rights. He said he believed Salguero should sue the Tijuana police. Ericka Salguero said he should receive an apology, at least. "They stole a year of his life, and it is not good enough to say, 'Bye, bye,' as if nothing happened," she said. But Salguero's thoughts are already in Canada. They make cars there, too, and since 9.11.01Sept. 11, it's easier to go there than to the U.S.. He spends his days painting cars in Tijuana, saving his money.

    Tijuana, Mexico   Under cover of predawn darkness, 2,000 prisoners were handcuffed and moved out of La Mesa penitentiary surrounded by heavily armed police & soldiers today as the Mexican govt sought to regain control over one of North America's most notorious prisons. With helicopters flying overhead as an extra precaution, the most dangerous convicted murderers, drug traffickers and other convicts from La Mesa were herded onto buses & trucks and driven to a new prison in El Hongo, a small town 50 miles east of Tijuana just south of the border with California.
    For decades, wives & children of convicts have been permitted to live inside La Mesa, home to many of Mexico's drug traffickers. But today that practice ended, too, as hundreds of women & children were escorted out of the prison carrying their belongings. Bulldozers this afternoon began to raze the center of the prison, called El Pueblito or Little Town because it resembled a neighborhood. There, wealthier inmates built more than 400 homes, some equipped with computers, phones, DVD players and tequila bars. The plan is to turn La Mesa into a conventional state prison, with cellblocks, no frills and no families, for the more than 4,000 inmates who will remain.

    Mexican officials said La Mesa has been controlled over the years as much by inmates as state authorities. Previous plans to remove families and transfer prisoners were never executed because of fears of rioting and, many believe, because prisoners paid kickbacks to quash any proposed changes. But in a surprise operation that involved the army, federal police and state riot police, who surrounded the prison for fear of rioting, about one-third of the inmates were removed beginning at about 1 a.m. Afterward, state social workers took away about 40 children who have no known guardian except for the inmate they were living with. Some of the children carried toys and had tears in their eyes. "There was no reason for families to be in there. They were there because no one said they couldn't," said a spokesman for the state, Gustavo Magallanes. He said 43 prisoners who were considered the leaders of a drug distribution network that operated inside and outside the prison were taken to maximum security prisons.

    President Vicente Fox said in an interview that today's move was a victory against impunity. He said the army, working with newly trained federal police officers in Tijuana, has recently scored "extraordinary results against organized crime & drug traffickers, and now we are correcting the prison. It will be a complete cleansing." The Mexican prison system, which houses 165,000 inmates, has long been poorly funded and corrupted by cash from prisoners &and drug cartels. Since Fox took office at the end of 2000, human rights workers have been granted greater access to the prisons. They have reported that a two-tier system exists, one for those with money and one for those without.
    The National Human Rights Commission declared 2 years ago that La Mesa was Mexico's worst prison because of overcrowding and privileges for those with money. Inmates & guards have outlined an extensive kickback system in the prison for the right to see a visitor or not to be beaten. While wealthier prisoners could rent the houses in the center of the prison, poor ones did not even get a bed. Some slept on the pavement of the basketball court.

    Alejandro Gertz Manero, the national public security chief, who was involved in today's operation, said in a recent interview that it has only been since January 2001 that authorities had taken back full control of federally run maximum security prisons. That, he said, was when one of the biggest drug traffickers in Mexico, Joaquin "El Chapo" Guzman, bribed his way out of a federal prison in a laundry bin. He is still at large. "Ten days after El Chapo escaped, we took control of those federal prisons. We weren't in charge of them before. … The drug traffickers were the owners," Gertz Manero said. He said the federal govt is setting its sights on helping clean up some of the state prisons. Some, he said, "are not in the hands of anyone."

    La Mesa is a concrete structure that takes up 2 huge city blocks. Today a wall of military & police trucks sealed off the prison and riot police walked the walls. "It's the end of an era. It's a good change," said Jesus Blancornelas, a Tijuana journalist who has written a bestseller on the drug trade in this city, just across the border from San Diego. He said a saying he heard in the U.S., "Even if a jail is made of gold, it is still a jail," has never applied at La Mesa. Here, he said, life inside could be as good as outside and money bought just about anything. More than 6,000 prisoners have been living in La Mesa, in a space built for fewer than 2,000. According to human rights officials' estimates, more than half the prison population is using drugs, including heroin.
    None of the prison guards at La Mesa will be allowed to work in El Hongo, a state-of-the-art facility where guards have been training for months and are better paid. Unlike the practice in La Mesa, family members will not be permitted to bring in cash or food. A new banking system has been set up in which families can deposit money in inmates' accounts and each prisoner can spend a maximum of $5 a day. To further try to separate inmates' cash from guards, prisoners are to be issued electronic debit cards.

    Veronica Vargas, 19, was one of the wives thrown out of La Mesa. As she boarded a bus with bags of clothes & other belongings, she said she had lived inside for 7 months. She said she wanted to be with her husband who, she said, was serving a 30-year sentence for migrant smuggling. She said she & her husband paid $800 rent but she did not know where the money went. "We had our little house, with a television & refrigerator and everything that we needed," she said. "But it still felt like a prison."


    Education is sorely lacking. 67 children study in the village school, which goes to the sixth grade. Only a few children finish all 6 years. If they wanted to continue their schooling, they would have to drive three hours to Metlatonoc. No one can remember anyone ever doing that. The people are accustomed to accepting the punishments meted out by the elders. But Teofilo's case shocked many residents. Guadalupe Martinez Castillo, who said she is about 40, said she still cannot believe what her town did. "It frightens me because I think the same could happen to me, my children, my family," she said. "Everyone lives in fear because they didn't do that to an animal, they killed a person."
    Cano, Teofilo's mother, said she lives with fear & regret. From her home, she can just about see the village's hilltop cemetery, where the 2 cousins are buried in a grave marked by a single anonymous slab of wood jammed into the rocky ground. Sitting in the red dirt at her house, Cano said she wished she had filed some kind of complaint about her son's death. But she is afraid to challenge the men who run Dos Rios. "I don't have the courage to confront them," she said. "If I were a man, it might be different. But people here don't know who to go to for justice."

    Francisco Estrada Rojas, who teaches at the elementary school, said the elders ordered Teofilo to be buried alive to "teach a big lesson." He said there had been several murders in Dos Rios in the years leading up to Teofilo's execution. He said that, in the absence of police, disputes over land, family matters, a few cattle or other minor issues often ended in bloodshed. He said few of those killers were caught, and when they were, they almost always seemed to be able to bribe police or prosecutors to let them off. "That's why people take justice into their own hands," Estrada said. "This happened because the community had been beaten down by so many crimes without punishment."
    Estrada said that when the police arrived a day after the murders, they wanted to dig up the men to see for themselves what had happened, and to put the 2 men in separate graves. But local officials told the police that no one in town would help them. Estrada said they told the police: "You'll have to pay for the food & drink of the laborers, and no one wants to do that kind of work." Several people in the community said the police stayed only a few minutes longer. There is a widespread belief here that the officers were paid a bribe to forget about the whole thing. "They didn't arrest anybody," Estrada said. "Because they would have had to arrest the whole community."

    Mexico City   Giovanni Hurtado Aviles was hurrying to his engineering class when he realized he didn't have the 2 pesos, about 20#162;, for the subway. When he tried to use somebody's else's pass to get on, he was caught and hauled to jail. "I made a mistake. I am really sorry. I won't do it again," Hurtado, 20, said he told the guard who nabbed him that January morning. But the Mexican justice system, which often fails to punish serious criminals, zealously prosecutes the most minor of offenders. So the college student with no criminal record was denied bail and forced to mop floors for 12 hours a day for 2 months while he awaited trial.
    "Our justice system is not just," said the Rev. Jose Luis Tellez, a Roman Catholic priest & lawyer who tries to get such prisoners freed. "The real criminals are at home in their houses while these people are in jail." Mexico's courts & jails are clogged with people like Hurtado, people who stole a bicycle, bread, shampoo, subway fare. More than half of the 22,000 prisoners in Mexico City's jails are there for offenses so slight that human rights advocates, and increasingly, city officials, say they never should have been jailed in the first place.

    According to recent testimony to the Mexican Congress by top law enforcement officials, well over 90#37; of serious crime goes unpunished. In a nation with one of the world's highest kidnapping rates, much drug-related bloodshed and a chilling level of violence on the streets of the capital, the prisons are choked with people who stole to eat. Tellez said a man who stole a Gansito, similar to a Twinkie, was released in November after spending 3 years in jail. He said another man who stole bread worth about $4 was sentenced to 6 years.
    Public opinion polls show that Mexicans are fed up with their justice system. One of the key complaints is that it thunders down so hard on petty criminals. At every turn, the system is consumed with the smallest crimes: Poorly trained police focus on the easiest crimes to solve; corrupt officers, often paid to look the other way when there is more serious crime, have no such incentive to let small-time offenders go. Legislators under political pressure to combat rising crime rates have set tough minimum sentences for the smallest of robberies.

    The result is that in many cases, as with Hurtado, the subway cheater, judges are forced by the law to hand down sentences they believe are unfair. Judges in Mexico have almost no discretionary authority. The Mexican legal system, based in 19th century Napoleonic Code, deliberately limits the role of judges. The theory is that legislators should craft penalties and judges should simply impose them. The judge in Hurtado's case wanted to be lenient but said the law would not let him. He convicted Hurtado of "using a false document", showing a subway worker's pass that Hurtado said he had found on the floor. That is the equivalent of a felony, a crime considered too grave to warrant bail, punishable by a minimum of 4 years in prison. Behind bars, Hurtado vomited from nervousness. He fell far behind on his class work and lost wages from an after-school job.
    "What my son did wasn't a crime; it was a mistake," said his mother, Laura Aviles Rodriguez. "Who would call this justice?"

    Behind the high brick walls of a Mexico City development called Poinsettia, amid gardens of purple bougainvillea and expensive SUVs parked in a row on the cobblestones, Oscar Espinosa Villareal lives the life of an accused embezzler with means. Espinosa, Mexico City's mayor from 1994 to 1997, is accused of illegally diverting $45 million that was never accounted for during his term. When a judge issued a warrant for his arrest in Aug. 2000, he did what many wealthy Mexicans do in the same situation: He bought a plane ticket and fled the country. His top aide is still a fugitive.
    Espinosa flew to Canada then Nicaragua, where he was caught. He maintains he has done nothing illegal and that he is the victim of a revenge campaign by his political enemies. He fought extradition on grounds that the case against him amounted to political persecution, but the Nicaraguans sent him home. Espinosa is part of the well- connected old guard of the Institutional Revolutionary Party, or PRI, which ran Mexico from 1929 to 2000. He served as campaign finance manager for his old friend, Ernesto Zedillo, who became president and rewarded Espinosa with the mayor's job, a presidentially appointed position until 1997. When Espinosa's term expired, Zedillo appointed him to serve as national tourism minister from 1997 to 2000.

    When Espinosa arrived back in Mexico on a federal police jet from Nicaragua, his wealth & connections kicked in. He hired one of Mexico's leading lawyers, who persuaded a federal judge to issue an order forbidding his arrest & detention, allowing him to remain free pending trial. Espinosa was ordered to post bail of about $400,000. He paid about $12,000 in cash, put up his house to cover the balance, and then went home.
    Based on Mexico's long history of elites beating criminal charges, few here believe Espinosa will ever be convicted. It is a story Mexicans know well: Accused of stealing $45 million, Espinosa sleeps in his own bed at night, while Hurtado, who sneaked a 20¢ subway ride, was forced to sleep on a jailhouse cot for months awaiting trial. Francisco Garduno, former head of prisons for Mexico City, has given speeches to inmates citing Espinosa as an example of how those accused of major crimes get better treatment than minor offenders, who are invariably poor. "The road to justice opens up wide for them," Garduno said. "But for the poor it is very narrow."

    Far from Espinosa's hillside retreat, in a rough neighborhood in the southeast side of the city, Tellez, the Catholic priest, runs a church program to get minor offenders out of jail. Frustrated with the govt's approach to petty criminals, the church has quietly begun its own effort to help. The church pays fines & bail for thousands of nonviolent petty criminals, most of them first offenders. People convicted of a crime are often allowed to choose jail time or a fine. Tellez said he has handled cases of many who could have avoided jail or served less time by paying a fine of as little as $25. "It absolutely is unfair that money determines freedom," Tellez said.
    Church lawyers last year reviewed the files of 11,000 prisoners in Mexico City jails, half the city's inmates. They concluded that at least 4,000 were minor offenders stuck behind bars because they could not afford to pay fines or bail. In all, the church has arranged for the release of 4,100 people. A private foundation, supported by Telefonos de Mexico, or Telmex, the country's largest telephone co., has paid for the release of 20,000 minor offenders in the last five years. The foundation spokesman, Mario Cobo Trujillo, said cases have included a man, charged with injuring another man in a fight, who spent 8 months in jail awaiting trial until the foundation paid his $25 bail. Cobo said another man spent more than 18 months awaiting trial for want of $100 for bail.

    Mexico's culture of official secrecy has kept the extent of the problem hidden. Until recently all prison records in Mexico were considered confidential, and they are still difficult to obtain. That has made it hard to document how the system has been primarily focused on the least significant crimes. But now that church lawyers & human rights workers are being given access, members of the public are getting their first glimpses at the make-up of the prison population. What they are finding has sparked a drive to substitute restitution & community service for prison time for minor offenders.
    Hurtado's case was handled by Judge Eduardo Mata, a chain-smoking former prosecutor. "Ever since I got this case, I thought it was a shame," Mata said in an interview in his glass-walled courthouse office. "He just did something stupid. But there was nothing I could do." Mata, who has been a judge for 9 years, said the case was a frustrating reminder of the strict limits on his authority and how minor offenders end up behind bars. "I think we need reforms that give judges more freedom," he said. "We don't have the flexibility we need."

    A Mexican judge's main task is to read files and issue a sentence that falls between the minimum & maximum penalty established in the criminal codes. In Mexico there are no jury trials. And in many cases, the judge never even sees the defendant, issuing his decision based on the written record. Limiting the judge's authority is meant to limit bribery and other corruption on the bench. "Our hands are tied by the law," Mata said. "We can't do anything if we think the minimum sentence is unfair."
    Mata recalled a case in which a young man stole a bag of bread from a woman in a Mexico City market. Police grabbed him immediately, and they and the thief discovered that the woman had also stuffed 40,000 pesos, about $4,500, into the bag after a trip to the bank. Mata said he wanted to sentence the man based on his intention, which he said was to steal a loaf of bread. But because the man had committed a major robbery, even unwittingly, Mata said, the law required him to sentence him to several years in prison. In Hurtado's case, Mata said the best he could do was issue the minimum sentence for his crime: 4 years in prison and a fine of about $950. Mata said he then used the only wiggle room the law allowed him, letting Hurtado substitute an additional fine of about $560 for his prison time. "He didn't damage society in any way," Mata said. "I didn't like the sentence I had to give him. Our laws aren't that fair."

    Gaunt & defeated, Hurtado walked out of jail on March 13 after 63 days behind bars. A former employer lent him more than $1,500 to pay his fines, allowing him to avoid a prison sentence that would have kept him locked up until 2006. That makes him luckier than most. But it will take every peso of his earnings and his mother's for more than a year to pay back his debt. Former prison chief Garduno, who now runs the city's transportation dept, is outraged at how the system treated Hurtado and how it punishes the wrong people. So he gave him a city job to help him pay off his debts. "I am trying to repair the damage done to our society," Garduno said. "I am trying to rectify something that has happened to thousands of people in Mexico."



    PicoSearch
    §ite map
    courtesy of FreeFind
    presented by §
    OCIAL
    JUSTICE  
    Home Search Site Portal E-mail