including Global gag order aka Mexico City Policy Malthus eugenics new phyllum	P	opulation
		CONTROL
	new UN Pop. Fund Camp of the Saints eugenics NFIMH IVF contraception hysterectomy Bush family WorldWatch Inst. re Malthus dirt gap superior Mexica birthrate chill pill fidelity Nippon jade kingdom biological warfare Repository for Germinal Choice AIDS diplomacy Africa Malthus population & sustainability ZPG.org NARAL Sea of Change timeline native american sterilization stealing abo kids bioweapon racial targeting HUD per C.A.Fitts EugenicsWatch worldometer USC David M. Heer Claire Berlinski Jared Diamond healing technology
#16 Human genome project opens door to ethnically specific bioweapons   Top 25 censored media stories of 2001 Project Censored In-depth evaluation of sustainable development ¹   3.27.01   UN Office of Internal Oversight Services rpt E/AC.51/2001/2 per Gen.Assembly res. 48/218B & 54/244. Reviews sustainable development subpgm and presents findings: support to intergovt processes, monitoring & coordinated approaches to implementation of sustainable development goals, dialogue with major groups, and support to intl cooperation & national pgm. Incl recommendations

  NatSec Study memo 200
  4.24.74   Henry Kissinger ¹ ª ²

Implications of world wide population growth for U.S. security & overseas interests

Dr. Henry Kissinger proposed in his memorandum to the NSC that "depopulation should be the highest priority of US foreign policy towards the 3rd world." He quoted reasons of national security, and because `The US economy will require large and increasing amounts of minerals from abroad, especially from less-developed countries...Wherever a lessening of population can increase the prospects for such stability, population policy becomes relevant to resources, supplies and to the economic interests of U.S." …

World depopulation is top NSC Agenda
Club of Rome & Haig-Kissinger depopulation policy
3.10.81   Lonnie Wolfe EIR

reading The Evolution of Desire   David M. Buss Strategies of human mating The Mating Mind   Geoffrey Miller How sexual choice shaped the evolution of human nature Sperm Wars   Robin Baker   ƒ Science of sex "less than 1 percent of sperm is actually designed to fertilize an egg (the rest are there to block other men's sperm), and that 4 to 10 percent of all children born to married couples are in fact the offspring of other men, usually of higher socioeconomic status, with whom the mother had a short-term relationship" "Men, he says, pursue 4 reproductive strategies: bisexuality, pursuit or avoidance of sperm warfare and a balancing of this pursuit/avoidance, which strategy a male is programmed to adopt will depend largely on his rate of sperm production." Red Queen   Matt Ridley Sex and the evolution of human nature … sex? One of the main biological reasons, contends Ridley, is to combat disease. By constantly combining and recombining genes every generation, people "keep their genes one step ahead of their parasites," thereby strengthening resistance to bacteria and viruses that cause deadly diseases or epidemics. Called the "Red Queen Theory" by biologists after the chess piece in Lewis Carroll's Through the Looking-Glass which runs but stays in the same place, … men are polygamous for the obvious reason that whichever gender has to spend the most time and energy creating and rearing offspring tends to avoid extra mating. Women, though far less interested in multiple partners, will commit adultery if stuck with a mediocre mate. In Ridley's not wholly convincing conclusion, even human intellect is chalked up to sex: virtuosity, individuality, inventiveness and related traits are what make people sexually attractive. On the Genealogy of Morals ¹ and Ecce Homo   Friedrich Nietzsche   sequel to Beyond Good & Evil, Nietzsche's 8th book; 3 essays revealing his opposition to Christian morality … aristocratic radicalism, in which he sets up an opposition between the morality of the masters and what he terms "slave morality". It is this "slave morality" motivated by a spirit of resentment that Nietzsche seeks to overcome by a return to the morality of the masters. Nietzsche is firmly opposed to the Judeo-Christian tradition, which he views as the culmination of slave morality. According to Nietzsche, slaves sought to revolt against their masters by supplanting the morality of the masters with their own which glorifies the weak, meek, and sickly. Instead, Nietzsche advocates a revaluation of all values with a return to the morality of the masters, who are proud, strong, and heroic. The preface notes the slave rebellion in morality, in which a morality of pity came to replace the morality of the masters. Nietzsche references the work of Schopenhauer, his great teacher, who he believes has made possible a new Buddhism for Europeans, nihilism. Jews have come to conquer Rome through the slave revolt in which today in Rome they bow before 3 Jews and a Jewess (Jesus, Peter, Paul, and Mary). Nietzsche claims that the Renaissance represented a return to the classical idea; however with the Reformation motivated largely by resentment and the French Revolution the slave revolt was made complete.

… The targeting agency for the operation is the National Security Council's Ad Hoc Group on Population Policy. Its policy-planning group is in the U.S. State Dept's Office of Population Affairs, established in 1975 by Henry Kissinger.
This group drafted the Carter administration's Global 2000 document, which calls for global population reduction, …
Thomas Ferguson, the Latin American case officer for the State Dept's Office of Population Affairs (OPA). "Either they [govts] do it our way, through nice clean methods or they will get the kind of mess that we have in El Salvador, or in Iran, or in Beirut. Population is a political problem. Once population is out of control it requires authoritarian govt, even fascism, to reduce it.

"The professionals," said Ferguson, "aren't interested in lowering population for humanitarian reasons. That sounds nice. We look at resources and environmental constraints. We look at our strategic needs, and we say that this country must lower its population-or else we will have trouble."
"So steps are taken. El Salvador is an example where our failure to lower population by simple means has created the basis for a national security crisis. The El Salvador govt failed to use our programs to lower their population. Now they get a civil war because of it. … There will be dislocation and food shortages. They still have too many people there."

Civil wars are somewhat drawn-out ways to reduce population, the OPA official added.
"The quickest way to reduce population is through famine, like in Africa or through disease like the Black Death," …
Ferguson's OPA monitors populations in the Third World and maps strategies to reduce them. Its budget for FY 1980 was $190 million; for FY 198l, it will be $220 million.
The Global 2000 report calls for doubling that figure.

The sphere of Kissinger In 1975, OPA was brought under a reorganized State Dept Bureau of Oceans, International Environmental, and Scientific Affairs, a body created by Henry Kissinger. The agency was assigned to carry out the directives of the NSC Ad Hoc Group.
According to an NSC spokesman, Kissinger initiated both groups after discussion with leaders of the Club of Rome during the 1974 population conferences in Bucharest and Rome. …

"For a long time," Ferguson stated, "people here were timid" They listened to arguments from Third World leaders that said that the best contraceptive was economic reform and development.
So we pushed development programs, and we helped create a population time bomb."
"We are letting people breed like flies without allowing for natural causes to keep population down. We raised the birth survival rates, extended life-spans by lowering death rates, and did nothing about lowering birth rates. …

Accordingly, the Bureau of Oceans, International Environmental, and Scientific Affairs has consistently blocked industrialization policies in the Third World … According to an NSC spokesman, the U.S. now shares the view of former World Bank President Robert McNamara that the "population crisis" is a greater threat to U.S. national security interests than "nuclear annihilation."
"Every hot spot in the world corresponds to a population crisis point," said Ferguson who would rename Brzezinski's arc of crisis doctrine the "arc of population crisis."

This is corroborated by statements in the NSC Ad Hoc Group's April 1980 report. There is "an increased potential for social unrest, economic and political instability, mass migration and possible international conflicts over control of land and resources," says the NSC report.
It then cites "demographic pressures" as key to understanding "examples of recent warfare in India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, El Salvador. Honduras, and Ethiopia, and the growing potential forinstability in such places as Turkey, the Philippines, Central America, Iran, and Pakistan."

Through extraordinary efforts, the Ad Hoc Group and OPA estimate that they may be able to keep a billion people from being born through contraceptive programs. …

[ reminder: Many anti-pop.control campaigns are explicitly, albeit unpublicized, funded by Catholic Church on doctrinal basis that elevates infallible institution above the planet & the species in determining ethics.
  Influence of conflicts of interest upon premises must be constantly examined to assess advocates of either side of this issue. ]

The Billionth Baby Club
8.19.99   Sadanand Dhume FEER

At current rates, India will overtake China as the country with the biggest population some time in the next few decades. But catching up in other areas may take longer. On average, Chinese are better educated than Indians, live longer and are less likely to endure dire poverty. Indians acknowledge this, but are quick to point out that human-development statistics aside, they have reason for pride.
"India is a democratic, open society, and we have maintained our diversity," says B.G. Verghese at the Centre for Policy Research, a New Delhi-based think-tank. "We are ahead of China in areas such as federalism, stockmarkets, banking, a legal system and the use of English."
As India's 600 million voters head to the polls in general elections next month, they may find solace in the fact that while two of the world's countries are now home to more than a billion people, only one elects its leaders.

Genocide UN adopted the Convention on the Prevention & Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, more commonly known as the 1948 Genocide Convention or "The Genocide Treaty." … Ironically, the first proceeding brought expressly under the banner of genocide is the Arusha trial, the case arising from the mass slaughter in Rwanda that began in 1994. But the Rwanda situation, as utterly catastrophic is it has been, was nonetheless a civil war. And it is not one that differs, except possibly in scale, from a number of other post-colonial conflicts in the southern hemisphere. As Barry Crawford has noted (Submission to the UN Tribunal on Rwanda, London, 1995), "Genocide means more than mass murder. [It] is distinguished from all other forms of killing by the motivation behind it." The critical point is made that western intervention, both military & economic, set the stage for what may be the most memorable mass orgy of human violence in recent times. Rwanda, already impoverished by a World Bank-imposed structural adjustment scheme, had become completely polarized. … The intent of the Genocide Convention, then, was clearly to separate those in positions of power who engage in planned, carefully-executed & premeditated actions to destroy a group of people from those who act in a random or spontaneous manner, no matter how terrible the outcome of a conflict or how intense the ethnic hatreds that may flare during such a confrontation. Crawford suggests this requirement when he argues: "The idea that the beleaguered Hutu-led govt could plan & execute the deliberate annihilation of an entire people, at a time when it could not even organize to sell the coffee beans on which its economy depended, borders on the incredible." In other words, the organization & competence required for an act of genocide simply did not exist in Rwanda. … The invocation of the genocide treaty against Rwanda's old-guard military does nothing to prevent similar situations from occurring elsewhere on the continent. It merely criminalizes the unfortunate participants in a vicious upheaval, the battle-lines for which were drawn early by foreign institutions. Even more to the point, the genocide charge conveniently exonerates the west for its provocative activities in the region. In fact, it could be argued that no one could have foreseen the scale & intensity of the fighting or the enormous loss of life it caused with the possible exception of U.S. & British intelligence. And it is obvious that western nations, acting as bilateral donors of aid & arms or through the UN, played a critical role in the events that led up to the war. World Bank policy is controlled by the U.S. through a special oversight unit at the Department of the Treasury. The western nations that aided & abetted the RPF did so in a spirit of mutual collaboration. Everything from the collapse of Rwanda's economy to the Arusha conference demands that the Rwandan govt accommodate the unpopular Tutsi opposition forces was orchestrated by westerners. Thus, one can conclude that if anyone exercised a "monopoly on the means of force" in Rwanda, it was the U.S. & its allies. And they, more than anyone, could be called perpetrators of genocide. … Hermann Rauschning, who defected from the Nazi party in the 1930s, warned of the plans of German leaders in a 1940 book called The Voice of Destruction. In that text, he recalled a 1934 conversation in which Hitler said about the peoples of eastern Europe: "We are obliged to depopulate … We shall have to develop a technique of depopulation … I don't necessarily mean destroy; I shall simply take systematic measures to dam their great natural fertility … There are many ways, systematical & comparatively painless, or any rate bloodless, of causing undesirable races to die out … By doing this gradually & without bloodshed, we demonstrate our humanity." (Rauschning, 1940, at pages 34-38). … Population Control in the Early Years The introduction of population control as a global undertaking began quietly in 1945 with the introduction of population change as an official subject for data gathering & analysis, research, & policy study at the newly-founded UN. The move to include demographic issues was promoted by the U.S. & Great Britain, and it passed over the objections of the Soviet bloc. This occurred at a time when western anxiety about low birth rates was at an all-time high. In fact, 2 years before the creation of the UN, Britain's King George the Sixth had established a special panel to look into the matter of falling fertility at home. That panel, which released its final report in June of 1949, concluded that the downward trend in Britain's birth rate was something unique to the wealthy nations, and that it constituted a tremendous danger to western interests. Among other things, the royal panel noted the extraordinarily high rate of population growth experienced by the European nations in the previous two centuries, and said: "The increase in population provided both a motive for, and a means to, the development of the modern techniques of production, trade & communications on which present day European standards of living are based, for it provided both an expanding market & an expanding labour supply." Furthermore, it advised that "the growth of European population, and the expansion of the economic system of which it was partly the cause & partly the essential condition, were largely responsible for the extension of European control over inhabited tropical & semi-tropical countries & their development as suppliers of food & raw material" (Royal Commission on Population, His Majesty's Stationery Office, 1949, at page 7). Noting that population growth continued to take place beyond the borders of the industrial world, the commissioners concluded: "The establishment or continuance among western peoples of sizes of family below replacement level would accentuate a change in relative numbers which threatens in a few generations to be as radical as that between France & Germany in the 19th century, and might be as decisive in its effects on the prestige & influence of the west. The question it should be observed is not merely one of military strength & security; that question becomes merged in more fundamental issues of the maintenance & extension of western values, ideas & culture" (Royal Commission on Population, 1949, at pages 135-136). In the U.S., too, similar worries were being expressed. Frank Notestein, head of an elite demographic research center at Princeton University, warned in 1944 that the development of industry in nations with high fertility rates would only guarantee that western peoples would "become progressively smaller minorities & possess a progressively smaller proportion of the world's wealth & power." Notestein, who soon afterward was chosen the first head of the UN Population Division, admonished: "The determination of national policy toward the underdeveloped regions must be made in light of that fact" (Notestein, in Demographic Studies of Selected Areas of Rapid Growth, Proceedings, 22nd Annual Conference, Milbank Memorial Fund, New York, 1944). Western promotion of population control in developing regions began officially with the founding of the UN. Assistance was funneled to "private" family planning groups through large American foundations & non-govermental organizations and even such "secret" bureaus of govt as the Central Intelligence Agency (see, i.e., Gerard Colby with Charlotte Dennett, Thy Will Be Done, The Conquest of the Amazon: Nelson Rockefeller & Evangelism in the Age of Oil, Harper Collins, 1995). After at least two military panels in the U.S. formally & publicly recommended that population control be made part of U.S. aid to developing nations, Congress in 1965 voted to include family planning in the overseas development budget. The amount of money set aside for this purpose, openly described by American legislators as "the population budget", has consistently increased from year to year. By the late 1970s, hundreds of millions of dollars in Congressionally-earmarked population funds were going every year to a variety of projects to train so- called "third world" medical personnel to operate family planning clinics, to establish & equip birth control centers, and to advocate host country policies favorable to population control activities. By the mid 1980s, money allocated for other programs (including Economic Support Funds, the Commodity Import Program, the Sahel Development Fund and African Development Fund) was being diverted to family planning campaigns in Africa, Asia, Latin America & the Middle East. And between 1980 & 1995, the World Bank increased population sector spending from about $100 million a year to over $2.5 billion (a 25-fold increase). All of this suggests that western leaders, particularly those in the U.S., considered birth curbs in developing countries to be a matter of extremely high priority. And there is much on the record to support that assumption. In 1988, the Department of Defense commissioned a series of studies on demographic trends & their impact on U.S. national security. A summary of the reports, written by an instructor at the National Defense University in Washington and published by the Center for Strategic & International Studies in its Washington Quarterly (Spring 1989) concluded: "As difficult & uncertain as the task may be, policymakers & strategic planners in this country have little choice in the coming decades but to pay serious attention to population trends, their causes, and their effects. Already the U.S. has embarked on an era of constrained resources. It thus becomes more important than ever to do those things that will provide more bang for every buck spent on national security. To claim that decreased defense spending must lead to strategic debilitation is fatuous. Rather, policymakers must anticipate events & conditions before they occur. They must employ all the instruments of statecraft at their disposal (development assistance & population planning every bit as much as new weapon systems). Furthermore, instead of relying on the canard that the threat dictates one's posture, they must attempt to influence the form that threat assumes." And a 1991 report commissioned by the U.S. Army Conference on Long Range Planning, published in the Summer 1991 edition of the journal Foreign Affairs, came to an even more remarkable conclusion. Noting the relatively rapid increase of populations in other regions and the pending decline of the west in terms of absolute & relative numbers, the document stated: "By these projections a very different world would seem to be emerging. Such trends speak to pressures for a systematically diminished role & status for today's industrial democracies. Even with relatively unfavorable assumptions about Third World economic growth, the share of global economic output of today's industrial democracies could decline. With a generalized & progressive industrialization of current low-income areas, the Western diminution would be all the more rapid. Thus, one can easily envision a world more unreceptive, and ultimately more threatening, to the interests of the U.S. & its allies. The population & economic-growth trends described could create an international environment even more menacing to the security prospects of the Western alliance than was the Cold War for the past generation". … Literature prepared by USAID contractors, UN agencies, the World Bank, and a host of private & semi- private family planning associations is redundant to the point of absurdity when it comes to the "problems" encountered in administrating population campaigns. And virtually all of the tens or even hundreds of thousands of reports & memos evaluating the "problem" over the last few years deal with the unpopularity of the services & near-universal resistance to population planning. Of course, voluntarism is what these institutions, too, would prefer to see. It would make their work far easier. But where voluntarism does not work, persuasion is tried. And where persuasion fails, bribery, intimidation, and even outright force is sure to follow. Lest there be any doubt that coercion is an officially-sanctioned part of U.S. population "assistance," the enforcement of strong population policies by "police & military" in developing nations is explicitly endorsed in a 1976 briefing produced by a high-level task force on population within the U.S. National Security Council. Population policies, says that document, are most likely to be effective if three essential conditions are met: there must be "strong direction from the top" (meaning govt officials), "community or 'peer' pressures from below," and "adequate" services that "get to the people." It concludes: "population programs have been particularly successful where leaders have made their positions clear, unequivocal, and public, while maintaining discipline down the line from national to village levels, marshaling govtal workers (including police & military), doctors, and motivators to see that population policies are well administered & executed. Such direction is the sine-qua-non of an effective program" (Attachment to Memorandum for the Chairman, Under Secretaries Committee, National Security Council, January 3, 1977, study by NSC task force May 1976). … This is not a new observation nor is there anything the least bit unique about the assumption that below- replacement fertility in the west, combined with high birthrates in the south, will ultimately dislodge the current world powers from their coveted place of preeminence. "[W]e must never lose sight of the fact that the world population imbalance is heavily against us and is becoming ever more so," says a fairly typical National Security Council memorandum written back in January of 1959 (NSC 902/1; 1 January 1959). In 1994, former Deputy Director for Intelligence at the CIA Ray Cline wrote an entire book on the topic which was called The Power of Nations in the 1990s: A Strategic Assessment ((University Press of America, 1994). … But population, according to Cline, is the single most important factor. "People exploit the raw economic resources of the territory the live in a develop the political & social traditions that shape national cultures," he wrote. "A large territory, if accompanied by a large population, almost automatically confers the status of power on a nation and will be so interpreted by strategists & makers of foreign policy" (Cline, 1994). And the nations destined to attain such status in the future are, of course, those now described almost contemptuously as "the third world." … similar reports & essays, literally thousands & thousands of them, produced over the past half-century by govt agencies, powerful "think tanks," and well-connected scholars. In fact, one is virtually assured of finding some reference to the "national security" dimension of world demographics in any U.S. govt study of foreign relations or military power that applies to a region (as opposed to a single country) and takes a long-term view. Control is being exercised in ever more complex & varied ways. It has become evident since the beginning of the 1980s that the purposeful impoverishment of the developing world has become the essence of the global agenda. Mandatory structural adjustment schemes imposed by western-controlled lenders, the devaluation of currency, inequitable trade practices, and self-serving "aid" projects have all visibly contributed to the breakdown of the world's most vulnerable economies. With the cold war now over, the old constraints against western intervention have evaporated, and the U.S. & allied nations see themselves as free to intervene politically & militarily in ways that adversely affect local stability. They increasingly pursue policies that lead to situations in which there is a power vacuum, as was the case in Rwanda, knowing the horrendous outcome that is possible in the event some domestic crisis ignites an orgy of spontaneous violence. And the resulting human catastrophe is inevitably exploited as "proof" that the local populace is unfit for self-governance and in need of administrative control (meaning both political &/or military supervision, as well as reproductive control) or even punishment. To invoke the Genocide Convention as a way to validate this image is a perversion of the intent & meaning of the treaty. It also diverts attention from the genocidal nature of western population programs and military/economic intervention in the less-developed world. Indeed, the combined effect of this exploitation & aggression demonstrates that reproductive interference is at the core of a much larger strategy to impede development and to prevent the rise of other regions & blocs as competitors for power.   [ No royal jelly for you, little grub. ] Report on European Trip   10.12.39 Mr. W.S. Farish 30 Rockefeller Plaza Dear Mr. Farish: … I stayed in France until Sept. 17th. … In England I met by appointment the Royal Dutch (Shell Oil Co.) gentlemen from Holland, and … a general agreement was reached on the necessary changes in our relations with the I.G. Farben, in view of the state of war … The Royal Dutch Shell group is essentially British … I also had several meetings with … the British Air Ministry. … I required help to obtain the necessary permission to go to Holland … After discussions with the American Amb. Joseph Kennedy … the situation was cleared completely … The gentlemen in the Air Ministry … very kindly offered to assist me later in reentering England. … Pursuant to these arrangements, I was able to keep my appointments in Holland having flown there on a British Royal Air Force bomber, where I had 3 days of discussion with the I.G. representatives. They delivered to me assignments of some 2,000 foreign patents and we did our best to work out complete plans for a modus vivendi which could operate through the term of the war, whether or not the U.S. came in. … Very truly yours, Frank A. Howard Breeding ground for bad ideas re Better for all the World   2.26.06   SD UT … NYC based organization called the Pioneer fund … lengthy gilded pedigree. Begun in 1937 "to advance the scientific study of heredity and human differences", Pioneer Fund directors were openly sympathetic to Nazi race laws. … Founders incl New England textile fortune heir Wycliffe Preston Draper; Harry Laughlin, Congressional advisor & director of Eugenics Records Office at the Cold Spring Harbor biological research lab then funded by Carnegie Institute, future Supreme Court Justice John Harlan; NY scion of wealth Frederick Osborn. Today, its directors incl John B. Trevor Jr.. The fund's tax-exempt charitable purpose is to give grants. The Oakton VA based New Century Foundation is among its grantees. This foundation publishes a newsletter called American Renaissance ; … In 2000, Trevor wrote a letter to American Renaissance praising an article on a writer named Lothrop Stoddard. … Stoddard was author of books w/ titles like The Rising Tide of Color … published in 1920. …

2.17.01 early morning   decrepit Cambodian-registered ship "East Sea", loaded with 1000 Iraqi Kurds packed shoulder to shoulder, was intentionally beached in sandbank 20 yards off Boulouris Beach near resort of Nice. from Camp of the Saints by Jean Raspail: " 'There's no 3rd world. No, not anymore. That's only a phrase you coined to keep us in our place. There's one world, only one, and its going to be flooded with life, submerged. This country of mine is a roaring river. A river of sperm. Now, all of a sudden, it's shifting course, my friend, & heading west.' … At the first signs of flight, my duty demanded that I order the army to take up positions along the coast. The result is that now, should we only choose to do so, we are perfectly able to repulse the invasion & destroy the invader. Assuming, that is, that we are willing to murder, with or without regret, a million helpless wretches. Past wars have abounded in just such crimes, but conscience back then hadn't yet learned to waver. Survival was all, and it condoned the carnage. Besides, those were wars of rich against rich. Today, it's the poor who are on the attack, with their ultimate weapon."   ¹ Malthus bicentenary human pop. competition pursuit of power pop. fallacies pop. vs liberty   We still haven't proved Malthus wrong   Ê   10.9.98   Donella H. Meadows AlterNet ¹ ² ³   2050 … Both Marxists & capitalists energetically bash that idea. Marxists don't believe people can ever be in excess if the economy is just organized to use them properly. Capitalists mock Malthus for not foreseeing the progress that now allows us to feed six times as many people as there were in 1798. … A new publication by the Worldwatch Institute is full of facts that show Malthus to be not dead, not wrong, maybe not right either. The patterns by which the human race reproduces itself are changing. Over another few decades, we will probably put old Malthus to rest at last. It's up to us to decide whether he'll rest triumphant or discredited. The most striking global change is that population growth is slowing. The growth rate peaked in 1964 at 2.2 percent. In 1998 it is 1.4 percent. That's an amazing drop. The average number of children born to a woman in India has gone down from 5.3 to 3.6. In China the average woman bears just 1.8 children, fewer than the average in U.S.. In 32 countries, including Japan ¹, France, U.K. and Spain, population growth is at or near zero. … These slow or no-growth countries contain 2 billion people, about one-third of the world population. They are either rich industrial countries or past or present communist countries. What they have in common is not wealth, but education. But the other two-thirds of humanity is chillingly close to proving Malthus right. These are the countries we like to call "developing," where virtually all population growth is now happening. Birth rates in most of these places are dropping too, but slowly. They are growing by 80 million people a year, the equivalent of a whole new Mexico every 14 months. The UN expects them to add another 3.3 billion people over the next 50 years. The Worldwatch booklet makes that forecast look impossible. It points out that the world fish catch per person has been stagnant since 1968, and that many great fisheries are now in active decline. Global grain production per person has been dropping for 14 years -- the world's farmers are constantly more productive, but they're not keeping up with population growth. Irrigated agriculture is particularly threatened as aquifers are overpumped and water tables fall. If the rising population and declining groundwater trends continue, Worldwatch calculates, by 2050 there will be only one-fourth as much fresh water per person as there was in 1950. … [ lebensraum of domestic politics ] Value voters   excerpted   Henry George "land value tax" The best indicator of whether a state will swing Red or Blue? The cost of buying a home and raising a family. 2.11.08   Steve Sailer American Conservative   … First-time readers of Pride and Prejudice frequently remark that Austen’s romance novels are, by American standards, not terribly romantic. She possessed a hard-headed understanding of how in traditional English society, wedlock was a luxury that some would never be able to afford, an assumption that often shocks us in our more sentimental 21st century. Economic historian Gregory Clark’s recent book, A Farewell to Alms, quantified the Malthusian reality under the social structure acerbically depicted in Austen’s books. The English in the 1200-1800 era imposed upon themselves the sexual self-restraint that pioneering economist Thomas Malthus famously (but belatedly) suggested they follow in 1798. By practicing population control, the English largely avoided the cycles of rapid growth followed by cataclysmic famines that plagued China, where women married universally and young. The English postponed marriage and children until a man and woman could afford the accouterments suitable for a respectable married couple of their class. In the six centuries up through Austen’s lifetime, Clark found, English women didn’t marry on average until age 24 to 26, with poor women often having to wait until their 30s to wed. 10 to 20 percent never married. Judging from the high fertility of married couples, contraceptive practices appear to have been almost unknown in England in this time, but merely three or four percent of all births were illegitimate, demonstrating that rigid premarital self-discipline was the norm. A half-century before Malthus’s gloomy and Austen’s witty reflections on life and love in crowded England, Ben Franklin pointed out that in his lightly populated America, the human condition was more relaxed and happy. In his insightful 1751 essay, “Observations concerning The Increase of Mankind,” Franklin spelled out, with an 18th-century surfeit of capitalization, the first, nonpartisan half of the theory of affordable family formation: “For People increase in Proportion to the Number of Marriages, and that is greater in Proportion to the Ease and Convenience of supporting a Family. When Families can be easily supported, more Persons marry, and earlier in Life.” He outlined the virtuous cycle connecting the colonies’ limited population, low land prices, high wages, early marriage, and abundant children: “Europe is generally full settled with Husbandmen, Manufacturers, &c. and therefore cannot now much increase in People. … Land being thus plenty in America, and so cheap as that a labouring Man, that understands Husbandry, can in a short Time save Money enough to purchase a Piece of new Land sufficient for a Plantation, whereon he may subsist a Family; such are not afraid to marry…” Franklin concluded, “Hence Marriages in America are more general, and more generally early, than in Europe.” The Industrial Revolution broke the tyranny of the Malthusian Trap over food, but the supply of and demand for land never ceased to influence decisions to marry and have children. As America’s coastal regions filled up, affordability of family formation began to differ sharply from state to state, disparities partially masked over the last few years by subprime mortgages and other financial gambits. CNN reported in 2006: “More than 90 percent of homes in [Indianapolis] were affordable to families earning the median income for the area of about $65,100. In Los Angeles, the least affordable big metro area, only 1.9 percent of the homes sold were within the reach of families earning a median income for the city of $56,200.” When I lived in the Midwest, from age 24 to 34, I attended numerous weddings, but as my social circle matured, the invitations naturally dried up. Yet when I moved back to my native, but now much more expensive, Los Angeles in 2000, I suddenly started being invited to weddings again. Like male characters in a Jane Austen novel, four of my seven closest friends from my high-school class of 1976 got married and bought houses for the first time in their early forties. Similarly, the cost of childrearing varies more across the country than ever before. A study of census data by the New York Times found that “Manhattan’s 35,000 or so white non-Hispanic toddlers are being raised by parents whose median income was $284,208 a year in 2005". Second was San Francisco, where the 50th percentile of income for white parents of small children fell at $150,763. That explains a lot about why the city by the bay is last in the country in percentage of residents under 18, below even retirement havens such as Palm Beach. GOP “family values” resound more in states where people can more afford to have families. In parts of the country where “Families can be easily supported, more Persons marry, and earlier in Life.” Where it is economical to buy a house with a yard in a neighborhood with a decent public school, you will generally find more conservatives. It’s a stereotype that marriage, mortgage, and kids make people more conservative, but, like most stereotypes, it’s reasonably true. You’ll find fewer Republicans in places where family formation is expensive. Where fewer people can form families, Republican candidates making speeches about family values just sound irrelevant or irritating.   … the Dirt Gap: Republican regions simply have more acres of land per person. Even excluding Alaska, counties that voted for Bush are only one-fourth as densely populated on average as Kerry’s counties. Bush carried the 20 states that have the cheapest housing costs, while Kerry won the nine states that are most expensive. The states with the lowest-cost housing are Mississippi where Bush won an extraordinary 85 percent of the white vote, Bill Clinton home state Arkansas now solidly Republican, and GOP anchor state of Texas. In recent years, the most expensive state for housing has been California. Although GOP presidential candidates carried California nine out of ten times from 1952 to 1988, they have not come close in the four elections since.   … 2005 New York Times article focusing on Portland made clear: “Vibrant Cities Find One Thing Missing: Children.” The Mortgage Gap leads, in turn, to a third factor: the Marriage Gap. Sophisticated voting analysts have long noted that the celebrated “gender gap” is dwarfed by the obscure “marriage gap.” Democratic pollster Stanley Greenberg’s multiple regression analysis of the 2004 exit polls revealed: The marriage gap is one of the most important cleavages in electoral politics. This is true even when controlling for other demographic and behavioral factors such as gender, age, race, gun ownership, union household membership, party identification, education, income, and church attendance. … In contrast, once other demographic and behavioral factors were controlled for, a voter’s gender had no significant effect on their likelihood to vote for the Democrat. "Being married” drives voters toward the GOP.   … The white vote is the decisive swing vote. The media drones on about supposedly decisive minority “swing voters” such as the small Hispanic bloc, only 6.0 percent of all voters in 2004, according to the census. The white bloc was dominant, casting 79 percent of the vote. Whites are highly diverse politically. Each state’s overall voting behavior is driven primarily by the divergences in marriage and baby-making among whites. Whites appear more sensitive to cost-of-living calculations about marriage and babies   … demographer Hans Johnson of the Public Policy Institute of California finds that American-born white women in costly California are having babies at a rate of only 1.6 per lifetime, while immigrant Latinas are having 3.7. Little media attention has been paid to the relentless surge in illegitimacy. From 2005 to 2006, the number of babies born to married white women declined 0.4 percent, while the number born to unmarried Hispanic women rose an astonishing 9.6 percent. Across all races, the illegitimacy rate in 2006 was 39 percent, up from 28 percent in 1990. For blacks, it was 71 percent, for Hispanics 50 percent, and for whites 27 percent. Women in higher social classes are more likely to avoid the troubles of giving birth out of wedlock. They often postpone marriage and children until they can afford the down payment on a house in a neighborhood with good public schools.   … the late housing bubble, over which Republicans George W. Bush and Alan Greenspan complacently presided, reduced the affordability of family formation, which should help the Democrats in the long run. This theory suggests that, in order to encourage marriage and children among voters, Republicans should pursue policies that raise wages, lower demand for houses, and keep the public schools from eroding further. The most obvious way to move the country toward a more Republican future is to restrict immigration. This revamped GOP could then position itself as the party of more weddings and more babies, while describing the Democrats, with some accuracy, as the party of dying alone. eugenics   U.S. eugenics program ¹   Carl Bajema ß ç ïndigo çhildren   breeding out color   ISAR   Howard Garber,   Orange Cty CA eugenicist &   46th Cong. Dist. candidate ¹ ² ³   dysgenics: withholding   nutrition to stunt development   natal attention to stunt social skills   education to stunt maturation for sake of establishing physical & mental caste inferiority Ex.   worker ants & bees   A.Huxley's Brave New World social hierarchy   perjorative   "alcohol in the test tube womb" "The [govt] must put the most modern medical means in the service of this knowledge. … Those who are physically and mentally unhealthy and unworthy must not perpetuate their suffering in the body of their children. … The prevention of the faculty and opportunity to procreate on the part of the physically degenerate and mentally sick, over a period of only 600 years, would … free humanity from an immeasurable misfortune." attrib. A.Hitler Alfred Rosenberg "Per capita income gap between developed & developing countries is increasing, in large part the result of higher birth rates in the poorer countries. … Famine in India, unwanted babies in U.S., poverty that seemed to form an unbreakable chain for millions of people; how should we tackle these problems? … It is quite clear that one of the major challenges of the 1970s … will be to curb the world's fertility." attrib. Geo.Bush pere Madison Grant

Race hygiene: 3 Bush family alliances ¹ ª º cit.   Geo. Bush the unauthorized biography Webster G. Tarpley & Anton Chaikin … alliance of Bush family with 3 other families: Farish, Draper and Gray. Private associations among these families led to the President's relationship to his closest, most confidential advisers. These alliances were forged in earlier Hitler project and its immediate aftermath … (& incl) obsession with supposed overpopulation … Bush & Farish When Geo.Bush elected V.President 1980, Texan Wm "Will" Stamps Farish III took over management of all of Geo.Bush's personal wealth in "blind trust". Known as one of the richest men in Texas, Will Farish keeps his business affairs under intense secrecy. Only the source of his immense wealth is known, not its employment. Will Farish long been Bush's closest friend & confidante. He is also unique private host to Britain's Queen Elizabeth II: Farish owns & boards the studs which mate with the Queen's mares. That is her public rationale when she comes to America and stays in Farish's house. … the Bush family money. Farish's own family fortune was made in the same Hitler project, in partnership with Geo.Bush's father. On 3.25.42 U.S. Asst Atty Gen. Thurman Arnold announced Wm Stamps Farish, grandfather of the President's money manager, pled "no contest" to charges of criminal conspiracy with the Nazis. Farish was principal manager of a worldwide cartel between Standard Oil Co. of New Jersey & I.G. Farben concern. The merged enterprise opened the Auschwitz slave labor camp 6.14.40 to produce artificial rubber & gasoline from coal. The Hitler govt supplied political opponents & Jews as slaves worked to near death and then murdered. Arnold disclosed that Standard Oil of NJ, later known as Exxon, of which Farish was president & chief executive, had agreed to stop hiding from the U.S. patents for artificial rubber which the company had provided to the Nazis. Senate investigating committee under Sen., later U.S. President, Harry Truman D-MO called Arnold to testify at hearings on U.S. corporations' collaboration with the Nazis. Senators expressed outrage at the cynical way Farish was continuing an alliance with the Hitler regime that had begun back in 1933, when Farish became chief of Jersey Standard. … The Justice Dept laid before the committee a letter, written to Standard president Farish by his vice president, shortly after the beginning of World War II (Sept. 1, 1939) in Europe. The letter concerned a renewal of their earlier agreements with the Nazis: Cold realities behind WWII, which help explain Bush-Farish family alliance and their peculiar closeness to the Queen of England: Shell Oil is principally owned by the British royal family. Shell's chairman Sir Henri Deterding helped sponsor Hitler's rise to power, by arrangement with the royal family's Bank of England Governor Montagu Norman. Their ally Standard Oil would take part in the Hitler project right up to the end. When grandfather Farish signed the Justice Dept's consent decree March 1942, the govt had already started picking its way through tangled web of world-monopoly oil & chemical agreements between Standard Oil & the Nazis.

Many patents & other Nazi-owned aspects of the partnership had been seized by the U.S. Alien Property Custodian.

Uncle Sam would not seize Prescott Bush's Union Banking Corporation for another 7 months. Bush-Farish axis began in 1929 the year Harriman bank bought Dresser Industries, supplier of oil-pipeline couplers to Standard & other companies. Prescott Bush became director & financial czar of Dresser, installing Yale classmate Neil Mahlon as chairman. Geo. Bush would later name one of his sons after the Dresser executive.

Wm S. Farish was main organizer of Humble Oil Co. of Texas, which Farish merged into Standard Oil of NJ. Farish built up Humble-Standard empire of pipelines & refineries in Texas. The stock market crashed just after the Bush family got into the oil business. World financial crisis led to merger of Walker-Harriman bank with Brown Brothers in 1931. Former Brown partner Montagu Norman & his protégé Hjalmar Schacht paid frantic visits to NY that year and the next, preparing the new Hitler regime for Germany.

Most important American political event in those preparations for Hitler was infamous "3rd Intl Congress on Eugenics" at American Museum of Natural History 8.21-23.32 in NY, supervised by Intl Fed. of Eugenics Societies. This meeting took up stubborn persistence of African-Americans and other allegedly "inferior" & "socially inadequate" groups in reproducing, expanding their numbers, and amalgamating with others. It was recommended that these "dangers" to the "better" ethnic groups and to the "well-born", could be dealt with by sterilization or "cutting off the bad stock" of the "unfit".
Italy's fascist govt sent an official representative. Averell Harriman's sister Mary, "Entertainment" dir. for the Congress, lived in Virginia fox-hunting country; her state supplied the speaker on "racial purity", W.A. Plecker, VA commissioner of vital statistics. Plecker reportedly held the delegates spellbound with his account of the struggle to stop race-mixing & inter-racial sex in Virginia. Congress proceedings were dedicated to Averell Harriman's mother; she paid for founding the race-science movement in America in 1910, building Eugenics Record Office as branch of the Galton National Laboratory in London. She & other Harrimans were usually escorted to the horse races by George Herbert Walker; they shared with the Bushes & the Farishes a fascination with "breeding thoroughbreds" among horses & humans.

Averell Harriman personally arranged with the Walker/Bush Hamburg-Amerika Line to transport Nazi ideologues from Germany to NY for this meeting. The most famous among those transported was Dr. Ernst Ruaudin, psychiatrist at Kaiser Wilhelm Inst. for Genealogy & Demography in Berlin, where Rockefeller family paid for Dr. Ruaudin to occupy an entire floor with his eugenics "research". Dr. Ruaudin addressed the Intl Federation's 1928 Munich meeting, speaking on "Mental Aberration & Race Hygiene", while others (Germans & Americans) spoke on race-mixing & sterilization of the unfit. Ruaudin had also led the German delegation to the 1930 Mental Hygiene Congress in Wash.DC.
At Harrimans' 1932 NY Eugenics Congress, Ruaudin was unanimously elected president of Intl Fed, of Eugenics Societies. This was recognition of Ruaudin as founder of German Society for Race Hygiene, with co-founder, Eugenics Federation vp Alfred Ploautz. … Components of movement incl groups with overlapping leadership, dedicated to:

•   sterilization of mental patients ("mental hygiene societies");
•   execution of the insane, criminals and the terminally ill ("euthanasia societies");
•   eugenical race-purification by prevention of births to parents from "inferior" blood stocks ("birth control societies")

In 1933, as what Hitler called his "New Order" appeared, John D. Rockefeller, Jr. appointed Wm S. Farish chairman of Standard Oil of NJ (in 1937 he was made president & chief executive). Farish moved his offices to Rockefeller Ctr, NY where he spent a good deal of time with I.G. Farben chairman Hermann Schmitz; his company paid a publicity man, Ivy Lee, to write pro-I.G. Farben & pro-Nazi propaganda and get it into the U.S. press. Now that he was outside of Texas, Farish found himself in the shipping business, like the Bush family.[ Samuel Russell legacy of means to control of intl trade ]
He hired Nazi German crews for Standard Oil tankers. And he hired Walker/Bush/Harriman Hamburg-Amerika Line chairman Emil Helfferich as chairman also of Standard Oil subsidiary in Germany. Hamburg-Amerika board member Karl Lindemann also became a top Farish-Standard executive in Germany. This interlock between their Nazi German operations put Farish together with Prescott Bush in a small, select group of men operating from abroad through Hitler's "revolution", calculating that they would never be punished.

In 1939, Farish's daughter Martha married Averell Harriman's nephew, Edward Harriman Gerry; Farish in-laws became Prescott Bush's partners at 59 Broadway. Both Emil Helfferich & Karl Lindemann were authorized to write checks to Nazi S.S. chief Heinrich Himmler on a special Standard Oil account. This account was managed by German-British-American banker, Kurt von Schroeder. Per U.S. intelligence documents reviewed by author Anthony Sutton, Emil Helfferich continued his payments to the S.S. into 1944, when the S.S. was supervising mass murder at Standard-I.G. Farben Auschwitz & other death camps. Helfferich told Allied interrogators after the war that these were not his personal contributions; they were corporate Standard Oil funds.

After pleading "no contest" to charges of criminal conspiracy with the Nazis, Wm Stamps Farish was fined $5,000. Similar fines were levied against Standard Oil: $5,000 each for the parent company and for several subsidiaries. Farish acquired millions of dollars in conjunction with Hitler's New Order, as a large stockholder, chairman & president of Standard Oil. The U.S. govt sought use of patents his company had given to the Nazis, the Auschwitz patents, but withheld from U.S. military & industry. … Farish went before Senate committee investigating the national defense program. Committee chair Sen. Harry Truman, told newsmen before Farish testified: "I think this approaches treason". Farish began breaking apart at these hearings. He shouted his "indignation" at the Senators, and claimed he was not "disloyal". After March-April hearings ended, more from Justice Dept & U.S. Congress on Farish & Standard Oil:

•   Farish deceived U.S. Navy to prevent Navy from acquiring certain patents, while supplying them to Nazi war machine;
•   meanwhile, he was supplying gasoline & tetraethyl lead to Germany's submarines & air force.

Farish family was devastated by the exposure. Son Wm Stamps Farish, Jr., Army Air Force Lt., was humiliated by public knowledge his father was fueling the enemy's aircraft; he died in a training accident in Texas 6 months later. With this double death, the fortune comprising much of Standard Oil's profits from Texas & Nazi Germany was now settled upon 4 year old grandson Wm " Will " Stamps Farish III. Will Farish grew up a recluse, most secretive multi-millionaire in Texas, with investments of "that money" in a multitude of foreign countries, and a host of exotic contacts overlapping the intelligence & financial worlds, particularly in Britain.

Bush-Farish axis started Geo.Bush's career. After 1948 Yale and Skull & Bones graduation, he flew to Texas on a corporate airplane and was employed by his father's Dresser Industries.

In a couple of years he got help from his uncle Geo.Walker Jr. & Farish's British banker friends to set him up in the oil property speculation business. Soon thereafter, Geo.Bush founded the Zapata Oil Co., which put oil drilling rigs into locations of great strategic interest to the Anglo-American intelligence community. Will Farish at 25 years old was a personal aide to Zapata chair Geo.Bush in Bush's unsuccessful 1964 campaign for Senate. Will Farish used "that Auschwitz money" to back Geo.Bush financially, investing in Zapata. When Bush was elected to Congress in 1966, Farish joined the Zapata board. When Geo.Bush became U.S. VP in 1980, Farish & Bush family fortunes were again completely, secretly commingled.

"The Bush family fortune came from the Third Reich." John Loftus, US Justice Dept. Nazi War Crimes investigator & pres., Florida Holocaust Museum per 11.11.00 Sarasota Herald-Tribune Only Florida could produce adoption law encouraging abortion   10.22.02   J.Collins Times … America's Scarlet Letter law, the ultimate double standard law, created by Walter Campbell, a Democratic state senator, and passed in Florida last year. … requires women of all ages (incl minors) who do not know the identity of their child's father to publish in newspapers sexual details about themselves and their possible sexual partners before they are allowed to put the child up for adoption. Background searches are the first step, but when these fail, the law states that the mother must place legal notices in newspapers in cities where the baby may have been conceived. She must include her name & description, name & description of the possible father, and dates & places where conception might have taken place. The notifications must be published wherever conception may have occurred, even if it is outside the state of Florida. … completely beyond the realms of logic. The result of this law is that many women who would normally give birth to their babies then give them up for adoption might decide to have an abortion instead. Why should they go through embarrassment & humiliation of having to list their description & their sex partners in the newspapers? Ironically, it is the anti-abortion lobby which came up with this law in the first place. … law that benefits no one, esp. the unborn child.

D.C. Policy-makers: marriage is back 2.28.02   AP WASHINGTON   Marriage, butt of untold numbers of jokes over the centuries, is back. After years of what one researcher calls an "enforced spell of silence," marriage is the new mantra among Washington policy-makers who want to nudge unwed parents toward the altar to improve their lives and those of their children. "We will work to strengthen marriage," President Bush proclaimed this week in announcing welfare reform proposals that include spending up to $200 million a year on pro-marriage programs. It's music to the ears of conservatives, who've waited decades to hear this tune. Conservative Heritage Foundation sr research fellow Robert Rector says talking about the impact of marriage on social problems became "politically incorrect" in the years after Daniel Patrick Moynihan, a future senator, prompted charges of racism with his 1965 report on the breakdown of the black family. Dan Quayle got slapped around during the 1992 presidential campaign for criticizing TV's Murphy Brown for delivering a baby sans hubby. But it was President Clinton, whose marriage was a bounteous subject for armchair analysis, who really elevated the issue during the last round of welfare changes 5 years ago. The subject largely drifted off the radar screen again after that. "It's back, now," says Rector, "and it's a more honest discussion this time around." One reason the welfare conversation is coming back to marriage is that some 80% of child poverty occurs among youth from broken families or unwed parents. Nearly a third of all American children are being born out of wedlock, and children raised by never-married mothers are 7 times more likely to live in poverty than those raised by married, biological parents. Bush says kids in two-parent families are also less likely to drop out of school, become addicted to drugs, have a child out of wedlock, suffer abuse or end up in prison. Conservatives would love to see all those unwed mothers marching down the aisle for moral reasons, too. But some worry the "pro-marriage" camp may get carried away about the benefits of matrimony. A 3-city study released earlier this month by researchers at Johns Hopkins University found a slight increase in poor children growing up in two-parent households. "I think marriage is overrated as a cure for the problems of children in low-income families," said Andrew Chernin, a sociology professor at Johns Hopkins University and an author of the study. "No one is anti-marriage, but I don't the benefits of marriage policy are as high as some others do." Bush insists he's a realist. "I understand there are some families that simply aren't meant to be," he said Wednesday. "On the other hand, we ought to aim for a goal, a goal that recognizes the power and importance of two-parent families in America. "Libertarians reject the whole idea of govt trying to steer people to the altar. "It's a bit silly," said Kimble Ainslie, a policy analyst at the Cato Institute. Of course, there are other ways to entice a reluctant parent down the aisle. The Heritage Foundation's Rector, for example, suggests using celebrities to "affirm the linkage between marriage and personal happiness." No less an authority than Donald Trump, two marriages down and perhaps a third to come, is happy to oblige. "Marriage is a great institution if you get it right," he said Tuesday on MSNBC's "Region in Conflict," of all shows. "When you get it right, there's nothing better; when you don't get it right, it is a mistake."   faith based patronage Enron & Jeb stifling loudmouth wives AVOT

Axis of Evil Manhattan Institute slogan in service to NWO 3.1.02   Robt Lederman   The man who coined GW's now infamous slogan, "Axis of Evil" was a sr fellow at the Manhattan Institute (MI) before joining the Bush admin. He's just been dropped from the Bush payroll according to Wash.Times. MI also coined the slogan, "Compassionate Conservatism" for GW, who publicly claims the Rockefeller-funded organizations' influence on his thinking is, "second only to the Holy Bible". What is the Manhattan Institute? MI is a right wing think tank founded in 1978 by Wm Casey, Bush/Reagan's CIA dir.   [ & Nixon SEC Dir. ] Following WWII Casey helped bring thousands of former Nazis involved in eugenics & the Holocaust to the U.S. As CIA director he later funded bin Laden and Co. with billions in arms, terrorist training & cash and was also a key player in arming the Contras. MI is funded by JP Morgan/Chase bank (owned by David Rockefeller) and by pharmaceutical companies (Pfizer and Lilly) directly connected to Rockefeller, Bush Sr and many of the current Bush administration officials. Bush Sr was Eli Lilly director in the late 70's. Bush Budget dir. Mitch Daniels was also a Lilly sr executive. Donald Rumsfeld formerly headed Searle Pharmaceuticals. All of these companies depend in large part for their products on research originally done by the IG Farben chemical cartel in Nazi Germany. Rockefeller's Chase bank was among Hitler's biggest U.S. supporters before and during WWII. The Rockefeller families' Standard Oil of NJ was half owner of IG Farben, the industrial base of the entire Third Reich. GWBush's grandfather, Prescott Bush and Prescott's father-in-law George Herbert Walker (who GW is named after) were Wall St bankers whose fortune was made operating & financing shipping companies, banks & steel foundries for the Nazi regime.

MI's most famous alumni after Rudy Giuliani is Charles Murray, auth. "The Bell Curve", modern classic of eugenics. The Bell Curve popularized idea that Blacks are genetically inferior in intelligence to Whites as a justification for eliminating welfare, increasing so-called quality of life arrests, limiting parole, taking children from Black families etc. Murray was paid consultant on Wisconsin Gov. Tommy Thompson's welfare program and is a spokesman for the Federalist Society, which has direct ties to a number of current U.S. Supreme Court judges.
Thompson's #2 man on welfare reform was Jason Turner, who Rudy Giuliani later hired to head up NYC's welfare reform. Turner actually quoted the motto from the gates of Auschwitz to explain Giuliani's workfare policy and later forced to apologize. ¹

Rudy Giuliani also claims to get all of his ideas directly from MI. Many of his policy ideas are directly based on Murray's books. MI has spearheaded a decades long effort to make the goals of eugenics respectable again. The Bush family, the Harriman family (the Wall St business partners of Bush in financing Hitler) and the Rockefeller family are the elite of the American eugenics movement.

verif. David Frum assoc. w/ MI "Where Did the Sixties Come From? By David Frum Sr Fellow Manhattan Institute."
search MI website on David Frum; hundreds of documents' pages relate to him.