DoD photo by Petty Officer 1st Class Charles 
Abell, U.S. Navy Military Interdiction   Ops troops
from San Diego in Persian Gulf hunt for
sanctioned chlorine & infant formula
I
R A Q
antebellum a r c h i v e
IraqDaily re "water supply"
Turkey, Syria & Iraq water issues
& links
extremely comprehensive links from
Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq

Fed. American Scientists re Iraq
Vatican campaign against Iraqi sanctions

DIA Water Vulnerability Report
Cong.Staff Delegation rpt 3.00
UN FAO report 9.13.00
UK & ICC Tribunal 8.25.00
DEATH STATISTICS IN IRAQ
UN imposed economic sanctions in place since the end of Gulf War in 1991. Sanctions had little effect on policies of Iraqi Govt, chilling toll on civilian population. The Iraqi Ministry of Health estimates that 109,720 persons have died annually between August 1990 and March 1994 as a direct result of the sanctions.
• From The Children are Dying: Reports by UN Food and Agriculture Organization. Since Aug. 1990, 567,000 children in Iraq have died as a consequence of the sanctions.
• THE LANCET, Volume 346 Number 8988. Saturday 12.2.95. After the sanctions, there was two-fold increase in infant mortality and five-fold increase in under-5 mortality.
• The LANCET Volume 346, Number 8988. Saturday 12.2.95 There are 4,500 children under the age of 5 dying each month from hunger and disease. In Central/Southern Iraq, 27.5% of Iraq's three million children (some 900,000) are now at risk of acute malnutrition.
• UNICEF Report Due to the hazards of the water supply, govt statistical office figures show 1,819 cases of typhoid fever in 1989 and 24,436 cases in 1994. Similarly, there were no reported cases of cholera in 1989, but 1,345 cases in 1994.
• 4/99 Washington Physicians for Social Responsibility effect of sanctions on Iraqi citizens, especially children. Intentionally defied sanctions with, visit, medicine, equipt & medical textbooks without required UN approval. or US travel permit.

9/5/00 PDF Human Rights Impact of Economic Sanctions on Iraq bkgd paper by Office of High Commissioner for Human Rights for ExecComm on Humanitarian Affairs U.K.

First use of poison gas bombs anywhere by the British in Iraq.
Steven Muhlberger, assoc. history prof.
Nipissing Univ. (Ontario, Canada)
"Be it thy course to busy giddy minds with foreign quarrels…"
Henry IV 4:4, counsel to his son   Shakespeare
Join delegation to Iraq sanctions challenge IV
1.16.01   Ship Medicine to Challenge Genocide

Bellicose Saddam jangles world nerves
Few believe Saddam still harbors enough military might to seriously trouble Kuwait shielded by US & UK
9.19.00  
AFP English

Dubai   With a finely timed accusation that Kuwait is stealing Iraqi oil, Saddam Hussein has set Western & Gulf nerves jangling once again. It took only a brief statement from Iraq's Oil Minister Amer Rashid last Thursday to ignite fears in Kuwait of a new war over the emirate's oil riches. The same accusation sparked the 1990 invasion of Kuwait, taking the world by surprise.
This time U.S. & Kuwaiti leaders immediately fired off warnings of grave consequences if Iraq's belligerency spills over. But Iraq has defiantly r7epeated the charges daily and warned it will take "adequate measures" to protect its rights and estimated the theft at 300,000 barrels per day.

    [ The U.S. is poisoning your water in violation of the Geneva Convention which kills a million of your kids, U.N. arms inspectors plant covert espionage devices under pretense of disarmament, neighbor Iran harbors wildcat rebels shooting 122mm rounds into your citizens' homes, neighbor Turkey flies twice weekly airstrikes whenever it pleases and neighbor Kuwait steals slant-drilled oil.   Wouldn't you be "bellicose" ? ]
    en famille
Blair is walking into a dogfight on Bush's ranch ¹
Internal rivalry & factionalism driving US policy on Iraq
3.31.02   Dan Plesch Independent UK

auth."Sheriff & Outlaws in the Global Village Menard Press,
sr research fellow Royal United Services Inst. for Def.Studies,
founder, BASIC (British American Security Info. Council)

By this time next Sunday, Tony Blair will have finished discussing the attack on Iraq at President Bush's Texas ranch. Mr Blair & his advisers are not just resigned to having to go along with the US; there is genuine enthusiasm for taking action against a dictator whom the PM believes to be public enemy no. 1. But these enthusiasms are confined to the inner circle at No 10. Chief of Defence Staff Sir Michael Boyce, has reflected the views of senior military establishment by suggesting we should learn to live with weapons of mass destruction, and that if, as he put it, Britain was deliberately going to put its "hand in the mangle" of Afghanistan, we should not simultaneously do so in Iraq. Scepticism about military expeditions to Iraq and recent troop deployment to Afghanistan has spread beyond the usual suspects. A retired wing commander rang me to express his fears about our troops operating under the command of the U.S. army. His peacetime service under U.S. air force generals had been bad enough, he said, and US army generals were of poorer quality.

This uncertainty means that Mr Blair has to take this opportunity to find out what military action Mr Bush really intends in his expanding war against terror. Almost as important is the need to get an understanding of how the US decision-making process works. As one US intelligence official told me, only 8 people in Washington are now allowed to read even quite low-level intelligence assessments, which for decades had been circulated to several dozen. Mr Bush's inner team already had a notoriously narrow worldview and are now preventing even their senior advisers from being properly briefed. The broad strategy is very clear. For GOP strategists, the desire to crush President Saddam Hussein is not really about revenge or weapons of mass destruction. It has far more to do with the need to show that it is not possible for any state or individual to fight the U.S. and survive. For today's GOP, "Make My Day" is a motto for the real world.

The plans being considered are intended to provoke internal coup & rebellion by the Kurdish & Shia minorities. The optimum scenario involves massive air attack supporting ground attack from 3 directions. An assault by 30,000 US troops already in Kuwait accompanied by seizure of Iraqi airbases by 82nd Airborne Div. with, in the north, assistance of the Turkish army. Supporters of this view outside govt include Pres. Reagan's former arms control adviser Ken Adelman, who believes that the war would be over in a month. It could take place as early as this summer, be preceded by the production of evidence of Saddam's weapons programs, and base its legitimacy under the UN on the argument that Saddam is in breach of the ceasefire agreement that ended the 1991 Gulf War. In this strategy, American troops would be hailed as liberators in Baghdad, and exiled Iraqi officers would form a new govt.

Concerns over Iraq's use of chemical or biological weapons on Israel, the reaction in the Arab world, and lack of international support would be dismissed as inevitable in any circumstance and so, it is argued, we might as well get it over with. Mr Bush's natural decisiveness is supported by his National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice. She takes as a model the way she helped Mr Bush's father push through German unification in the face of objections from both Margaret Thatcher & François Mitterrand. A slower build-up, leading to an assault by 300,000 troops around the end of the year may be more likely, as it would give a higher chance of military victory, but it runs the risk that Saddam or other international events will delay things still further. In this scenario a cat & mouse game over UN weapons inspections would be allowed to run on until after the US mid-term elections and until a massive force could be assembled.

All the current sabre-rattling is simply designed to intimidate Saddam into compliance. But a game of triple bluff is also possible, in which Saddam is made to believe the current rhetoric is a bluff and then is attacked anyway.
It is unlikely that the decision has been made yet. For from behind closed doors can be heard the muffled sounds of an epic Washington dogfight among Mr Bush & his advisers. Public support for the President as well as the collapse of the Taliban have concealed incompetence & mismanagement of war against terror. Sr defence official in London recently told me he considered the "axis of evil" speech as little more than the justification for spending billions on hi-tech weapons favoured by DefSec Rumsfeld but largely irrelevant to the war on terrorism. Meanwhile, Mr Bush has left the coastguard underfunded. There is also no cash to produce a uniform system for turning Arabic words into English, so someone being observed by different agencies can elude detection simply by having his name written differently in English by the people trying to catch him.

US inter-service rivalries have also got in the way of the effective conduct of the war. At first USAF insisted on using B-2 & B-1 bombers as well as the veteran B-52s, in order to justify their vast cost, but their defects soon proved too obvious and the US fell back on the old and reliable B-52s. In recent weeks the ill-fated attack by U.S. army at Gardez was the product of the desperate attempt by the army to get in on the action, previously dominated by U.S. Marines. Up to Tora Bora, all the glory had gone to the USAF's carrier-based "top guns", special forces and the marines. Fearing that it would lose out in the defence budget, army chiefs pushed for a mission. The result was a laboriously planned attack by troops of the 10th Mountain & 101st Airborne Div. which was comprehensively ambushed by the guerrillas. The ensuing row resulted in the urgent request for British help, one of our major assets being that we are not part of the inter-service rivalries.

Communication has virtually broken down between U.S. top commanders. Gen. Franks refuses to talk to or visit the Pentagon even to give press briefings. In a deliberate power play, Donald Rumsfeld walked out of a top White House meeting called by Ms Rice on options for attacking Iraq after just 5 minutes, saying he was too busy to stay.
Arab uprising down on the ranch Such is his influence that colleagues fear that he may simply stop by the White House one evening and get Mr Bush to sign the attack order on Iraq. His decisiveness might be reassuring. But both he & Joint Chiefs of Staff chair Richard Myers seem dangerously ignorant of critical details. At the press conference following the killing of 8t U.S. soldiers in Afghanistan, neither was able to talk about the poor performance of helicopters at high altitude where their rotor blades struggle to get a grip on the thin air. Behind a cloak of public silence there is much ego- driven headbutting and a very narrow sense of what is important.

Such is the closed circle of US policy-making that whatever Tony Blair learns at the Crawford Ranch will be more valuable than anything that MI6 could produce. I recall the honest query of one of Mr Rumsfeld's aides: "Why are we getting all this support from Blair? Thatcher we could understand, but we know he's not one of us." Why indeed? Mr Blair needs to return from the depths of Texas with an answer to convince his own party, his military top brass and the British people. If he does not, much more than just his premiership will be at stake.

Prince Charles against war On Iraq
2.9.03   Phillip SF Indymedia

A serious rift has opened up between Prince Charles & the govt because he is seen to be against a war on Iraq and against Bush. Whitehall also believes the prince is sympathetic to the view of his Arab friends that war on Saddam Hussein is a bid by the US to grab a stake in the Middle East's oil. Despite being colonel-in-chief to 17 regiments, Charles has shown little public support for the soldiers, airmen and sailors about to risk their lives in a Gulf conflict. There are also worries that he makes no secret of his anti-American views in conversations with members of Arab royal families and their leading officials.

A Whitehall source said: "Downing Street tries not to involve the prince in anything because they have concerns over how he will react. He has this lunatic view he is the voice of the people." A diplomatic insider said: "It would be very unhelpful if the prince were to indicate anything other than unswerving support for the govt."
The prince's stance was illustrated last week when, in his role as colonel-in-chief of the Paras, he said a stiff, formal farewell to his men as they prepared to leave for the Gulf. His visit to the Parachute Regiment barracks in Colchester does not merit a single line on his official website. It was not announced by his own office. Yet his opening of an Islamic education ctr in Leicester 2 weeks ago is reported on the website with 19 paragraphs, 2 pictures and a full transcript of his speech.

Charles is rightly feted for his pioneering work creating understanding & tolerance between Islam & other faiths. He also holds many honorary military positions incl chief to the Welsh Guards, the Paras and the Gurkhas. He is Vice-Admiral in the Royal Navy, Air Marshal in the RAF and Lt General in the Army.
Critics say the prince likes to cut a dash in the Paras' coveted red beret with a chestful of medals on his tunic. But they ask how the men of the Parachute Regiment would feel if they knew their colonel's true feelings on the war. The prince's views have led to a worrying split with the American leadership. 2 months ago, Charles had to abandon an official visit to the U.S. because the White House made it clear he wasn't wanted.

The snub, directly from President Bush, came after security sources advised that Charles's presence in America would be "very unhelpful". Washington diplomats were concerned the prince would show his disapproval during meetings with President Bush. Charles, who reads the Koran every day & often adopts Islamic dress at home, spends long hours discussing MidEast problems with Saudi royal family members.

One of his closest friends is former Saudi ambassador Ghazi Algosaibi who wrote a poem in praise of the first woman suicide bomber. Algosaibi said that the "doors of heaven are opened for her".
He once described the Israelis as worse than Nazis and he was a regular guest at Highgrove, Prince Charles's country home, before he was recalled by his govt last year.

Charles is also close to King Abdullah of Jordan. His glamorous wife Queen Rania is a close friend of the prince's partner, Camilla Parker Bowles and is a regular guest at St James's Palace. In private the prince talks about "American imperialism" collapsing the whole of the MidEast. "Of course Saddam is an evil man, but American imperialism will not solve the problem," he said in one discussion.
He sympathises with his Saudi royal friends when they talk about their fears of America's true intentions in Iraq. One close friend said: "They believe the US intends to collapse the whole Gulf economy and take control of oil. "Once that happens the tensions in Israel & Palestine will explode."

Charles's meeting 3 days ago with French President Jacques Chirac was fraught with diplomatic concerns. Before the meeting the Foreign Office asked the Prince of Wales's staff if he would promise not to discuss Iraq. They said yes, but Charles would feel free to give an opinion if Chirac raised Iraq first. Downing Street is understood to have washed its hands of winning Charles's support.
"At such a sensitive time his views are wrong, wrong, wrong," said a Whitehall source. "Unfortunately he is making them a little too widely known "


Saddam exchanged taunts with witnesses
12.31.06   Steven R. Hurst AP

Baghdad, Iraq   Iraqis awoke Saturday to television images of a noose being slipped over Saddam Hussein's neck and his white-shrouded body, the pre-dawn work of black-hooded hangmen. They went to bed as new video emerged showing Saddam exchanging taunts with onlookers before the gallows floor dropped away and the former dictator swung from the rope.

In Baghdad's Shiite neighborhood of Sadr City, victims of his three decades of autocratic rule took to the streets to celebrate, dancing, beating drums and hanging Saddam in effigy. Celebratory gunfire erupted across other Shiite neighborhoods in Baghdad and other predominantly Shiite regions of the country.
There was no sign of a feared Sunni uprising in retaliation for the execution, and the bloodshed from civil warfare was not far off the daily average, 92 from bombings and death squads.

Outside the Sunni insurgent stronghold of Ramadi, west of the capital, loyalists marched with Saddam pictures and waved Iraqi flags. Defying curfews, hundreds took to the streets vowing revenge in Samarra, north of Baghdad, and gunmen paraded and fired into the air in support of Saddam in Tikrit, his hometown.
Still, authorities imposed curfews sparingly in contrast to the several-day lockdown put in place after Saddam was sentenced to death 11.5.06

By several accounts, Saddam was calm but scornful of his captors, engaging in a give-and-take with the crowd gathered to watch him die and insisting he was Iraq's savior, not its tyrant and scourge.
"He said we are going to heaven and our enemies will rot in hell and he also called for forgiveness and love among Iraqis but also stressed that the Iraqis should fight the Americans and the Persians," Munir Haddad, an appeals court judge who witnessed the hanging, told the British Broadcasting Corp.
Another witness, national security adviser Mowaffak al-Rubaie, told The New York Times that one of the guards shouted at Saddam: "You have destroyed us. You have killed us. You have made us live in destitution."
"I have saved you from destitution and misery and destroyed your enemies, the Persian and Americans," Saddam responded, al-Rubaie told the Times.
"God damn you," the guard said.
"God damn you," responded Saddam.

New video, first broadcast by Al-Jazeera satellite television early Sunday, had sound of someone in the group praising the founder of the Shiite Dawa Party, who was executed in 1980 along with his sister by Saddam. Saddam appeared to smile at those taunting him from below the gallows. He said they were not showing manhood.
Then Saddam began reciting the "Shahada," a Muslim prayer that says there is no god but God and Muhammad is his messenger, according to an unabridged copy of the same tape, apparently shot with a camera phone and posted on a Web site.
Saddam made it to midway through his second recitation of the verse. His last word was Muhammad.
The floor dropped out of the gallows.

"The tyrant has fallen," someone in the group of onlookers shouted. The video showed a close-up of Saddam's face as he swung from the rope. Then came another voice: "Let him swing for three minutes."
The responses within Iraq to Saddam's death echoed the larger reaction across the Middle East, with his enemies rejoicing and his defenders proclaiming him a martyr. While Iranians and Kuwaitis welcomed the death of the leader who led wars against each of their countries, Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said the execution prevented exposure of the secrets and crimes the former dictator committed during his brutal rule.

Some Arab govts denounced the timing the 69-year-old former president's hanging just before the start of the most important holiday of the Islamic calendar, Eid al-Adha. Libya announced a three-day official mourning period and canceled all celebrations for Eid.
Within Iraq and across the world, the airwaves were alive with pictures of Saddam in death, a bruise on his cheek, his neck elongated and twisted impossibly to the right, grisly proof that the man who had tormented and killed so many during a bloody quarter-century rule was truly dead.

But some Iraqis, like 34-year-old Haider Hamed, a candy store owner in east Baghdad, wondered what would really change with the execution of Saddam, who was just four months shy of his 70th birthday.
"He's gone, but our problems continue," said the Shiite Muslim, whose uncle was killed in one of Saddam's many brutal purges. "We brought problems on ourselves after Saddam because we began fighting Shiite on Sunni and Sunni on Shiite."
At least 80 Iraqis died in bombings and other attacks Saturday, and police said 12 more tortured bodies were found dumped in Baghdad. The U.S. military announced six more service-members, 3 soldiers & 3 Marines, were killed.

The execution took place on the penultimate day of the year's deadliest month for U.S. troops, with the toll reaching 109. At least 2,998 members of the U.S. military have died in Iraq since the war began in March 2003, according to an AP count.
Arab satellite television channels said Saddam's body had been be returned to Tikrit for Sunday burial next to his sons Odai and Qusai in the main cemetery in the nearby town of Ouja, where Saddam was born. The sons and a grandson were killed in a gunbattle with the Americans in Mosul in July 2003.
State-run Al-Iraqiya television later confirmed the body had been handed to the Salahuddin province governor and the leader of Saddam's Albu-Nassir clan.

Um Abdullah, a Sunni and teacher in Tikrit, 80 miles north of Baghdad, said she would wear black to mourn the city's favorite son.
"Saddam will be a hero in our eyes," she said. "I have five kids and I will teach them to take revenge on Americans."
Police blocked the entrances to Tikrit and said nobody was allowed to leave or enter the city for four days. Despite the security precaution, gunmen took into the streets, carrying pictures of Saddam, shooting into the air and calling for vengeance.

Security forces also set up roadblocks at the entrance to another Sunni stronghold, Samarra, and a curfew was imposed after about 500 went into the streets to protest the execution.
Among minority Sunnis there was deep anger, born not only of Saddam's execution but of the loss of their decades-long political and economic dominance that began with Saddam's ouster in the U.S. invasion nearly four years ago.
"The president, the leader, Saddam Hussein is a martyr and God will put him along with other martyrs," said Yahya al-Attawi, who led prayer at a towering Sunni mosque constructed by Saddam in Tikrit.

There were cheers at the cafeteria of a U.S. outpost in Baghdad as soldiers having breakfast learned Saddam had been hanged. But members of the Army's 2nd Battalion, 17th Field Artillery Regiment, on patrol in an overwhelmingly Shiite neighborhood in eastern Baghdad, said the execution wouldn't get them home any faster, and therefore didn't make much difference.
"Nothing really changes," said Capt. Dave Eastburn, 30, of Columbus, Ohio. "The militias run everything now, not Saddam."
Staff Sgt. David Earp, who also fought in 1991's Operation Desert Storm, said the execution worried him.
"In my opinion, something big is going to happen," said Earp, of Colorado Springs, Colo. "There will be a response. Probably not today because they know we are looking for one, but soon."

Saddam is itching to test another Bush
Iraq resists the U.S. push for 'smart sanctions'
7.2.01   K.Whitelaw, M.Mazzetti US News & World Rpt

Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein did not wait long to challenge the new Bush administration. Responding to an American plan to create "smart sanctions," Iraq promptly turned off the spigot on the bulk of its oil exports. Saddam's envoys are touring capitals in a campaign to intimidate countries into opposing the U.S. plan. Iraq's military is on alert, while Baghdad is touting a reward for military personnel who shoot down U.S. or British jets patrolling the no-fly zones. "We are approaching a new confrontation," Saddam warned his people earlier this month. This time, Saddam clearly means business. He has spent the past several years chipping away at the decade-old sanctions regime and is eager to destroy it. He has billions of dollars in the bank. And he has rarely been so popular in the Arab world, with his support of the Palestinian intifada. Emboldened, Saddam is pledging to withhold his oil until Washington backs down. The showdown begins this week when the UN holds a public debate on the U.S. plan. "It's a game of chicken," says one U.S. govt analyst. "He is ready to stick it out for the long term." Officials believe he can hold out through 2001.

Failing sanctions
The current administration came into office eager to polish off the enemy that many of them faced in the Gulf War, when the elder George Bush was president. The first order of business: salvaging a failing sanctions regime. "Everybody knows that he can smuggle through the Jordanian and Syrian borders a whole herd of elephants and the Americans will know about it only when satellites spot the elephants grazing in the Baghdad amusement park," says Amatzia Baram, a leading Iraq expert at the University of Haifa.

Secretary of State Colin Powell's answer was "smart sanctions." The idea has strong intellectual appeal: Free up more goods to reach Iraqi civilians, while tightening controls on weapons-related materials and restricting Iraq's revenues from oil smuggling. But the reality is that new restrictions are likely unworkable. Tightening the embargo depends on Iraq's neighbors, many of whom are heavily reliant on Iraqi trade and oil. Take Jordan, which is known to be a busy corridor for smuggling into Iraq. The tiny nation receives its entire oil supply from Iraq at heavily discounted rates. An additional $450 million in exports to Iraq is a crucial stimulus for its weak economy. If Jordan clamps down on its border monitoring, Saddam has explicitly threatened to cut off the cheap oil and buy goods elsewhere. Going along with the U.S. plan "would be suicidal," says a Jordanian official.
The U.N. resolution only pares down the list of goods that Iraq cannot purchase under the oil-for-food program. New monitoring procedures are left to a later date. With Russia opposed, the plan's fate is uncertain. But even if it passes, the odds are that Washington will end up relaxing the sanctions without getting any corresponding tightening. So far, Saddam's oil cutoff has had little effect on world markets, mostly because Saudi Arabia pledged to fill the gap. "There seems to be little likelihood that Iraq can exercise political leverage by toying with the oil market," says James Placke of Cambridge Energy Research Associates.

Where he could score politically would be in shooting down a U.S. fighter jet patrolling the no-fly zone. U.S. military officials have seen a marked increase in the accuracy of Iraqi air defenses in recent months. U.S. News has learned that the White House is concerned that the no-fly operation is not having much effect on Saddam's behavior. As part of a broader review, officials are looking for new targets they could hit to inflict more pain on the regime. The most controversial part of U.S. policy remains its commitment to effecting a change of regime. U.S. officials are sending an additional $6 million to the Iraqi National Congress, mostly to create a radio station to broadcast to Iraq. But in a conclusion many Western govts share, Israeli security sources dismiss Iraqi opposition groups as corrupt and ineffective, finding Saddam's grip as firm as ever.

A tyrant 40 years in the making
3.14.03   Roger Morris NY Times

On the brink of war, both supporters & critics of U.S. policy on Iraq agree on the origins, at least, of the haunted relations that have brought us to this pass. America's dealings with Saddam Hussein, justifiable or not, began 2 decades ago with its shadowy, expedient support of his regime in the Iraq-Iran war of the 1980's.
Both sides are mistaken. Washington's policy traces an even longer, more shrouded and fateful history. 40 years ago, the Central Intelligence Agency, under President John F. Kennedy, conducted its own regime change in Baghdad, carried out in collaboration with Saddam Hussein.

The Iraqi leader seen as a grave threat in 1963 was Abdel Karim Kassem, a general who 5 years earlier had deposed the Western-allied Iraqi monarchy. Washington's role in the coup went unreported at the time and has been little noted since.
America's anti-Kassem intrigue has been widely substantiated, however, in disclosures by the Senate Committee on Intelligence and in the work of journalists and historians like David Wise, an authority on the C.I.A.

From 1958 to 1960, despite Kassem's harsh repression, the Eisenhower administration abided him as a counter to Washington's Arab nemesis of the era, Gamal Abdel Nasser of Egypt, much as Ronald Reagan & George H. W. Bush would aid Saddam Hussein in the 1980's against the common foe of Iran.
By 1961, the Kassem regime had grown more assertive. Seeking new arms rivaling Israel's arsenal, threatening Western oil interests, resuming his country's old quarrel with Kuwait, talking openly of challenging the dominance of America in the Middle East, all steps Saddam Hussein was to repeat in some form, Kassem was regarded by Washington as a dangerous leader who must be removed.

In 1963 Britain & Israel backed American intervention in Iraq, while other U.S. allies, chiefly France & Germany, resisted. But without significant opposition within the govt, Kennedy, like President Bush today, pressed on.
In Cairo, Damascus, Tehran and Baghdad, American agents marshaled opponents of the Iraqi regime. Washington set up a base of operations in Kuwait, intercepting Iraqi communications and radioing orders to rebels. The United States armed Kurdish insurgents. The C.I.A.'s "Health Alteration Committee" as it was tactfully called, sent Kassem a monogrammed, poisoned handkerchief, though the potentially lethal gift either failed to work or never reached its victim.

Then, on 2.8.63, the conspirators staged a coup in Baghdad. For a time the govt held out, but eventually Kassem gave up, and after a swift trial was shot; his body was later shown on Baghdad television.
Washington immediately befriended the successor regime. "Almost certainly a gain for our side," National Security Council aide Robert Komer wrote to Kennedy the day of the takeover.
As its instrument the C.I.A. had chosen the authoritarian and anti-Communist Baath Party, in 1963 still a relatively small political faction influential in the Iraqi Army. According to the former Baathist leader Hani Fkaiki, among party members colluding with the C.I.A. in 1962 & 1963 was Saddam Hussein, then a 25-year-old who had fled to Cairo after taking part in a failed assassination of Kassem in 1958.

According to Western scholars, as well as Iraqi refugees and a British human rights organization, the 1963 coup was accompanied by a bloodbath. Using lists of suspected Communists and other leftists provided by the C.I.A., the Baathists systematically murdered untold numbers of Iraq's educated elite, killings in which Saddam Hussein himself is said to have participated.
No one knows the exact toll, but accounts agree that the victims included hundreds of doctors, teachers, technicians, lawyers and other professionals as well as military and political figures.

The United States also sent arms to the new regime, weapons later used against the same Kurdish insurgents the U.S. had backed against Kassem and then abandoned.
Soon, Western corporations like Mobil, Bechtel and British Petroleum were doing business with Baghdad for American firms, their first major involvement in Iraq.
But it wasn't long before there was infighting among Iraq's new rulers. In 1968, after yet another coup, the Baathist general Ahmed Hassan al-Bakr seized control, bringing to the threshold of power his kinsman, Saddam Hussein.

Again, this coup, amid more factional violence, came with C.I.A. backing. Serving on the staff of the National Security Council under Lyndon Johnson and Richard Nixon in the late 1960's, I often heard C.I.A. officers including Archibald Roosevelt, grandson of Theodore Roosevelt and a ranking C.I.A. official for the Near East and Africa at the time, speak openly about their close relations with the Iraqi Baathists.
This history is known to many in the Middle East and Europe, though few Americans are acquainted with it, much less understand it. Yet these interventions help explain why United States policy is viewed with some cynicism abroad. George W. Bush is not the first American president to seek regime change in Iraq. Mr. Bush and his advisers are following a familiar pattern.

The Kassem episode raises questions about the war at hand. In the last half century, regime change in Iraq has been accompanied by bloody reprisals. How fierce, then, may be the resistance of hundreds of officers, scientists and others identified with Saddam Hussein's long rule? Why should they believe America and its latest Iraqi clients will act more wisely, or less vengefully, now than in the past?

Condoleezza war cry
8.17.02   James Hardy Mirror UK

GWBush's National Security Adviser yesterday admitted the President is pushing ahead with plans to topple Saddam Hussein. Condoleezza Rice said there was a strong moral case for a change of regime in Iraq and the West did not have "the luxury of doing nothing". Leaders in Egypt, Jordan, Kuwait, Morocco, Saudi Arabia are reported to have received blunt letters from the US president warning them: "There will be no turning back from the military option.'' The nearly identical notes give notice of America's intent to oust Saddam and tell them to prepare public opinion. They are also said to disclose that the US is sending soldiers and military equipt to the region. Dr Rice's comments contradict claims by ministers here that war against Saddam is not inevitable.

She said: "He is is an evil man who, left to his own devices, will wreak havoc again on his own population, his neighbours and, if he gets weapons of mass destruction and the means to deliver them, all of us, is a very powerful moral case for regime change." She added: "History is littered with cases of inaction that led to have grave consequences for the world. We just have to look back and ask how many dictators who ended up being a tremendous global threat and killing thousands and, indeed, millions of people, should we have stopped in their tracks. That is really the question." She claimed President Bush had not yet decided how to remove Saddam. But she added, in a BBC radio interview: "We believe the case for regime change is very powerful.
"This is a regime that we know has twice tried, and come closer than we thought at the time, to acquiring nuclear weapons. He has used chemical weapons against his own people, he has invaded his neighbours, he has killed thousands of his own people. He shoots at our planes in the no-fly zones And despite the fact that he lost this war, a war which he started, he negotiates with the UN as if he won the war. I think it is a fairly strong indictment."

Her hardline will cause problems for Tony Blair, already battling MPs opposed to a military attack. Labour MP Gerald Kaufman said: "Bush, himself the most intellectually backward American president of my political lifetime, is surrounded by advisers whose bellicosity is exceeded only by their political, military and diplomatic illiteracy." Lib Dem foreign affairs spokesman Menzies Campbell said: "There will be no world order if the most powerful states are entitled to remove other govts at will."

Saddam to be hanged by Sunday   Ex-dictator’s execution expected to be carried out by start of Eid holiday   12.28.06   Richard Engel NBC News

Former Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein, sentenced to death for his role in 148 killings in 1982, will have his sentence carried out by Sunday, NBC News reported Thursday. According to a U.S. military officer who spoke on condition of anonymity, Saddam will be hanged before the start of the Eid religious holiday, which begins this Sunday. The hanging could take place as early as Friday, NBC’s Richard Engel reported.
The U.S. military received a formal request from the Iraqi govt to transfer Saddam to Iraqi authorities, NBC reported on Thursday, which is one of the final steps required before his execution. His sentence, handed down last month, ordered that he be hanged within 30 days.

Earlier Thursday, Saddam’s chief lawyer implored world leaders to prevent the United States from handing over the ousted leader to Iraqi authorities for execution, saying the former dictator should enjoy protection from his enemies as a “prisoner of war.”
“According to the international conventions, it is forbidden to hand a prisoner of war to his adversary,” Saddam’s lawyer Khalil al-Dulaimi said in Amman, Jordan. “I urge all the international and legal organizations, the United Nations secretary-general, the Arab League and all the leaders of the world to rapidly prevent the American administration from handing the president to the Iraqi authorities,” he told The Associated Press.

Saddam met with two of his half-brothers on Thursday and passed on personal messages to his family, a lawyer said. Badie Aref, one of Saddam's lawyers, said the rare meeting with maternal half-brothers Sabawi and Watban Ibrahim Hassanal-Tikriti, who are in U.S. custody, was at the request of the ousted Iraqi leader and took place inside his heavily guarded prison cell in Baghdad.
Aref said Saddam was in very high spirits and had sensed “something was happening relating to the sentence” when prison guards took away a small radio he had been given several months ago.
“He met Sabawi and Watban and gave them letters to his family in anticipation.... He is clearly unaware of the details of what is happening around him and prepared to give his life as a martyr to his country,” Aref told Reuters by telephone.

Aref said prison sources who told him of the family meeting said Saddam was aware of an appeals court decision to uphold his death sentence for crimes against humanity during his 24-year rule.
“He was in very high spirits and clearly readying himself,” Aref said during a visit to Dubai. “He told them that he was happy he would meet his death at the hands of his enemies and be a martyr and not just languish in prison in oblivion.”
Aref said he was unsure if Saddam's third half-brother, Barzan al-Tikriti, who was sentenced to death along with the ousted leader, saw Saddam.

An official close to Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki has said that Saddam would remain in a U.S. military prison until he is handed over to Iraqi authorities on the day of his execution. The official spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to address the media.
A top govt official disputed the court’s ruling that Saddam must be hanged within 30 days, saying the execution should be held after that time period. The comment comes amid debate over other legal procedures such as whether the presidency is required to approve the execution.

Cardinal Renato Martino, Pope Benedict XVI’s top prelate for justice issues and a former Vatican envoy to the U.N., condemned the death sentence in a newspaper interview published Thursday, saying capital punishment goes against the teachings of the Roman Catholic Church.
After his sentence was given, Louise Arbour, the U.N. high commissioner for human rights, urged Iraq to ensure a fair appeals process and to refrain from executing Saddam even if the sentence is upheld. Some international legal observers and human rights groups have also called Saddam’s trial unfair because of alleged interference by the Shiite-dominated govt.

Iraqi arms dossier seen as rehashing old data
Concerns grow that dossier is mostly previously discredited reports   12.12.02   Bob Drogin
L.A. Times

Wash.D.C.   The CIA delivered an initial assessment of Iraq's declaration of banned weapons programs to the White House on Wednesday amid growing concerns that the bulk of the 12,000 page dossier consists of previously discredited Iraqi reports.
In particular, officials said, Iraq's account of its nuclear weapons program, totaling 2,081 pages, incl 113-page executive summary, appears to largely duplicate Iraqi declarations delivered to U.N. inspectors in 1996 & 1997.

Thousands more pages that Iraq submitted over the weekend on its biological & chemical weapons programs also appear to be copies of reports that U.N. weapons inspectors repeatedly rejected as inadequate & incomplete between 1995 & 1998, officials said.
"The initial conclusion is there's nothing really new," said one official who is assisting in the review. "What I'm hearing is it's all recycled and [Iraqi claims that] it didn't do anything wrong."

U.S. analysts are esp. looking to see whether Iraq has adequately answered scores of questions left unresolved during the U.N. inspections that ended in 1998, and whether it can explain a body of intelligence since 1998 suggesting that Baghdad has rebuilt at least some of its proscribed weapons programs.
Several Arabic-language portions of the report, incl 300-page section that details Iraqi industrial & other facilities involved in nuclear research or development, have now been translated and are undergoing what the official called a "line-by-line review to see if [Iraq] inserted something that wasn't in previous reports. … Nothing has emerged yet."

White House softened its rhetoric on Iraq this week as the review got underway. But a determination that President Saddam Hussein's regime failed to provide an accurate & complete account of its proscribed weapons programs, as mandated by 11.8.02 resolution by U.N. Security Council, almost certainly would rekindle Bush administration efforts to disarm Baghdad by force
"All indications so far, Iraq has taken a hard line," said former nuclear weapons inspector in Iraq & Washington think tank Institute for Science & Intl Security David Albright. "Perhaps Saddam has decided war is inevitable, so why give up anything? Either that, or they want to give things up gradually and see what happens."

Pressure is growing on CIA to complete assessment. Chief UN weapons inspector Hans Blix said Tuesday he planned to complete analysis by Friday and give censored version of raw document to full Security Council as early as Monday. Details are expected to quickly leak at that point.
The council's 5 permanent members, U.S., Britain, Russia, China and France, all of which already have nuclear weapons, are receiving unedited copies of the report. Blix said he would delete esp. sensitive material, incl any blueprints or other designs for nuclear weapons, as well as plans for converting short-range missiles to long-range rockets, before handing over the document. He said he is focusing on 3,000-page section that includes fresh details about Iraq's activities since U.N. inspectors withdrew 4 years ago.

CIA is still studying the trove of documents and CD-ROMs with teams of weapons specialists & other experts from the Pentagon's Defense Intelligence Agency, State Dept's Intelligence & Research division, Energy Dept's Office of Intelligence, and a group of nuclear scientists & technicians from the Los Alamos National Laboratory NM, among others.
"It's an ongoing process," an intelligence official said of the CIA-led review. He said the agency is providing regular updates to the White House "as our work proceeds."

Gaps in Iraq's previous declarations of its biological & chemical weapons program are of special concern, officials said. And Iraq has a history of using fresh packaging for old reports. Summary of the previous U.N. inspection effort in Iraq issued Jan. 1999 notes Baghdad denied even having a biological weapons program until 1995, for example, and that it used "fraudulent statements, forged documents, misrepresentation of the roles of people and facilities and other specific acts" to perpetuate the deception.
After a senior Iraqi defector first revealed the clandestine effort July 1995, Baghdad issued 3 "full, final and complete" declarations of its germ warfare research and production efforts. The first was declared null & void by Iraq. The second, June 1996, was rejected by U.N. inspectors as incomplete. The third, issued Sept. 1997, "contained no new significant information from the previous one" and was "deficient in all areas," according to the U.N. report.

Iraq then appealed for a review and met a team of U.N. experts in Vienna in March 1998. "Iraq did not present any new information at that meeting and the experts therefore reviewed the same material for the third time," the report notes. The inspectors particularly cited conflicting or insufficient credible details on the production & location not only of such bulk biological warfare agents as anthrax, botulinum toxin, aflatoxin and wheat smut, but also of warheads designed to deliver them.
In many cases, Iraq claimed that it had destroyed the weapons but could produce no proof that it had done so. "They basically gave 'the dog ate my homework' excuse, that when they destroyed their biological & chemical weapons, they destroyed their documents as well," said former U.N. inspector Jonathan Tucker. "We know that's false."

Officials are also looking to see whether Iraq can explain its apparent attempts to procure & import uranium and specialized parts for nuclear weapons development since 1998. One official said Iraqi officials have privately acknowledged making 5 covert attempts since 1998 to obtain highly specialized aluminum tubes from overseas sources. The Iraqis said the tubes were intended for conventional artillery rockets.
White House officials this fall accused Iraq of trying to import the tubes to build a gas centrifuge to enrich uranium for nuclear bombs. Several U.S. scientists questioned the claim, however, asserting that the tubes were the wrong dimensions for centrifuges.

Iraq's nuclear weapons program was essentially destroyed or dismantled by the time weapons inspectors left in 1998, according to Intl Atomic Energy Agency. But U.S. & British intelligence reported in Oct. 2002 that Hussein's regime secretly continued and even accelerated its effort to build a nuclear bomb since then.
Sr Iraqi official in Baghdad last weekend admitted for the first time what U.S. & U.N. officials concluded years ago: that Iraq was only 6 months or so from assembling a workable nuclear device when Hussein invaded Kuwait in 1990. The attack led to the Persian Gulf War in 1991 and subsequent U.N. effort to disarm Iraq of any weapons of mass destruction.

Listings of production & other weapons sites in the Iraqi dossier are proving useful to U.N. inspectors. Newly reinforced teams of inspectors visited 6 suspect sites Wednesday, the most in a day since inspections began 2 weeks ago. One group visited the Karama factory in Baghdad for missile & tank parts. The factory was built in 1999 and is part of Iraq's Military Industrialization Commission, but Iraqi officials insisted that nothing illegal was being done there.
"We make precision parts for Al-Samoud missiles," dir. Brig. Kamel Saeed told reporters who toured the site after the U.N. team left. The 60 ft rocket has a maximum range of 95 miles, which is permitted under the Gulf War cease-fire terms.

Inspectors' spokesman Hiro Ueki said in a statement that Iraq incl the site in a declaration it submitted 10.1.02 in Vienna. That declaration focused on factories & facilities that used so-called dual-use materials or parts that might have military applications.
Another weapons facility at the site was bombed by U.S. warplanes in late 1998, Saeed said. The U.N. experts checked machines previously tagged by arms teams at the destroyed facility. "They checked & found everything is OK. There were no provocations but questions, and we answered them," Saeed added. U.N. officials declined to characterize the visit.

    Iraq: 4 dead after no-fly zone attack
    2.4.02   CNN
Wash. D.C.   For the first time since Sept. 4, U.S. warplanes Monday bombed Iraq's integrated air defense system in a northern part of the country. Iraq said Monday that four people were killed when U.S. and British warplanes attacked a civilian area near Mosul in the northern no-fly zone. The U.S. European Command said its jets struck elements of the Iraqi integrated air defense system after its planes were fired on by anti-aircraft batteries. U.S. aircraft regularly patrol Iraq's northern no-fly zone and have been shot at by Iraqi anti-aircraft artillery and missiles. Often the precise source of such fire is not known. This time, however, pilots were able to pinpoint the location of the Iraqi launch site and responded by dropping precision munitions, European Command officials said. The Iraqi account, carried by the Iraqi News Agency, said its missile and anti-aircraft installations "confronted" the planes after they violated Iraqi air space flying from Turkey. The European Command said all its planes returned safely. U.S. warplanes have conducted a small number of strikes recently in Iraq's southern no-fly zone. Officials say Monday's ground fire does not represent any particular move by Iraq to increase its challenge the U.S. flights.
Iran rockets hit Baghdad, wreck houses, wound 1
9.17.00   Reuters

Iraq: 311 killed in US, UK raids since 1998
8.28.00   Reuters

Between the attack Dec.r 1998 & the present, total of 18,607 sorties by raiding US & British warplanes in south Iraq killed 311 citizens & wounded 927.

Turkey admits Iraqi air raid, probes casualty claims
Ankara said military operations started only after measures were taken to prevent any harm to civilians in the Kurdish-held enclave
8.18.18   AFP

ANKARA   Turkey admitted Friday that it launched an operation against Turkish Kurdish rebels in northern Iraq and said it was investigating claims by Iraqi factions in the area that civilians were killed in the strike. "Turkey carries out operations in northern Iraq from time to time as part of the combat against the terrorist Kurdistan Workers Party (PKK)," Turkish foreign ministry spokesman Huseyin Dirioz said. Dirioz said such military operations started only after measures were taken to prevent any harm to civilians in the Kurdish-held enclave. "In a similar operation Aug.15, necessary measures were taken once again to ensure civilian population would not be harmed," Dirioz said.

    Iraq, Russia win sanctions battle
    7.4.01   AP
UN   Russia & Iraq won latest battle on overhauling sanctions against the oil-rich Mideast nation as the U.N. Security Council extended the oil-for-food program. But U.S. & Britain are adamant that the sanctions war isn't over yet. At the end of a 6 week campaign, Americans & British got 14 of 15 council members to support key elements of their plan to lift most restrictions on civilian goods entering Iraq, tighten enforcement of 11-year-old arms embargo and block lucrative Iraqi smuggling routes. But Russia, Iraq's closest ally on the council, remained staunchly opposed and threatened to veto the plan. So Americans & British decided to indefinitely postpone a vote and simply extend the 4½ year-old program, which allows Iraq to sell unlimited quantities of oil on condition that the proceeds are spent on food, medicine & other essential goods.

After a day of wrangling over a reference to the U.S.-British plan in the resolution, which Russia opposed, the council voted unanimously Tuesday night on 5 month extension of the oil-for-food program. The vote came less than 6 hours before the current phase of the program was set to expire. To protest the proposed sanctions overhaul, Iraq halted its oil exports June 4. Even before the council vote Tuesday, the Iraqi military's Al-Qadissya newspaper called the extension "a victory for Iraq's rights.'' But Iraqi U.N. Amb. Mohammed al-Douri declined to say Tuesday night whether Baghdad will reopen its oil taps. He said the new resolution's mention of an earlier resolution that referred to the U.S.-British plan, "is not acceptable in principle.''
Nonetheless, Iraq appeared likely to resume oil exports soon. While Iraq sounded triumphant, Russia's U.N. Amb. Sergey Lavrov said, "I don't believe it was a victory for anybody except for the humanitarian program continuation.'' British & Americans would not concede defeat. "The real losers here are the Iraqi people,'' said acting U.S. Amb. James Cunningham. "Revisions we proposed facilitate trade & accelerate commerce and they would improve the lot of Iraq's people.''

He said London & Washington will use coming months to press ahead with their plan and try to sway Russia. "We have made considerable progress and come too close to agreement to concede the field to Baghdad,'' Cunningham said. "We've won a lot of the battles in this process. We haven't yet won the war. But we're going to continue to go forward.'' Russia isn't giving up, either. Lavrov said Moscow's rival resolution to hasten end to Iraqi sanctions remains on the council table. The Russian resolution would suspend sanctions on civilian goods once U.N. weapons inspectors certify that a long-term program to monitor Iraq's weapons programs is fully deployed.
"We expect council members to come back to it as soon as they are ready,'' he said, stressing Russia believes any new Iraq policy must include "very specific criteria on suspending and lifting sanctions'' in conjunction with resumption of U.N. weapons monitoring.

Under council resolutions, sanctions imposed after Saddam Hussein's 1990 invasion of Kuwait cannot be lifted until U.N. inspectors certify Iraq dismantled weapons of mass destruction & long-range missiles. Weapons inspectors left Iraq ahead of U.S.-British airstrikes in Dec. 1998 and Baghdad has barred their return. Iraqi govt maintains it eliminated its weapons programs and has demanded immediate lifting of sanctions. Britain's U.N. Amb. Jeremy Greenstock said "there might be more credibility'' to Russia's approach if Moscow could persuade the Iraqi govt to accept U.N. inspectors. In the meantime, he said, it was "illogical'' to block humanitarian improvements for the Iraqi people.

    Iraq to resume oil sales but delays signing
    7.5.01   Reuters
… The oil-for-food program, an exception to the sanctions, allows Baghdad to export oil under U.N. supervision in order to buy humanitarian supplies to alleviate the suffering of ordinary Iraqis. But according to oil traders, in the past year Iraq has managed to sell considerable amounts of oil outside of the program as well as obtain kickbacks from some middlemen and oil firms. Iraq exports its crude under the oil-for-food program through two outlets -- the port of Ceyhan on the Turkish Mediterranean coast and the port of Mina-al-Bakr on Iraq's Gulf coast. Ships were ready to start loading crude at both outlets but had not done so by Thursday. A pipeline that brings Iraq's Kirkuk crude to Turkey and the Mediterranean market was shut down a month ago has not restarted, the officials said.
    Iraq pushes to break out of isolation
    9.23.00   Howard Schneider Dawn LATimes - Wash.Post NewsService
AMMAN, Jordan   Iraq has launched an aggressive new effort to weaken the crippling sanctions imposed on it after the Persian Gulf War, encouraged by record oil prices, improving trade with its neighbours and growing opposition to the embargo in the Arab world and beyond. Iraq has been directly pressuring Jordan to break the embargo and has stoked tensions with Kuwait & Saudi Arabia in what analysts see as a reminder that it still has the capacity to disrupt regional stability and push rising world oil prices even higher. These moves have been particularly noticeable against a backdrop of protests across Europe over high fuel costs, election-year concern in the U.S. over oil prices that have topped $37 a barrel and forecasts of high heating oil prices this winter.
    France, Russia want UN aid changes
    9.21.00   Nicole Winfield AP
UN   Iraq's Security Council allies stepped up their campaign against U.N. sanctions Thursday with proposals to cut the compensation fund for victims of Iraq's invasion of Kuwait and delay a $16 billion payout to Kuwait's oil co. Maneuvering over the U.N. compensation fund for Gulf War reparations comes amid plans for more passenger flights by Russia & France into Baghdad. Flights are seen as new attempts by Iraq's friends to whittle away the decade-old embargo & tweak U.S. Challenge to sanctions expected to come to a head next week in Geneva. Beginning Sept. 26, committee of Security Council members decides whether to award $16 billion payout to Kuwait Petroleum Corp. from an account funded by proceeds from U.N. oil-for-food program that allows Iraq to sell unlimited amounts of oil provided that it uses the profits to buy humanitarian goods for its people suffering under sanctions. 30% diverted to compensate victims of Iraq's 1990 Kuwait invasion.

Several countries, incl Russia, France, China & Malaysia, believed to want to delay the payout Kuwait's oil company, which would represent largest award to a corporation since fund's inception. So far, the fund has paid out more than $8 billion. Iraq highly critical of compensation commission, accusing it of unfair practices and asserting that most claims, currently 2.6 million claims for a total of $320 billion, have no legal grounds. Some diplomats & analysts suggested Iraq's accusation last week that Kuwait was stealing its oil designed to put pressure on the commission to defer a decision on the Kuwait Petroleum Corp. claim.
French Amb.Jean-David Levitte Thursday told Security Council enormous payout to Kuwaiti company, at a time when oil companies are benefitting from record high oil prices, was unconscionable at a time when Iraqis are suffering from sanctions. He proposed the council consider reducing money diverted into the compensation account from 30¢ to 20¢ & proceeds used to buy more humanitarian goods, a proposal backed by Russia & Tunisia, Western diplomats said.

MOSCOW   In yet another apparent challenge to U.N. sanctions, a Russian airliner left for Iraq on Saturday with a soccer team, a musical group, businessmen and medical supplies. The flight, carrying 143 passengers and five tons of cargo, was the latest challenge to sanctions on Iraq, imposed after Saddam Hussein's army invaded Kuwait in 1990. A dispute over the controls has fractured the U.N. Security Council, some of whose members sharply disagree on the effectiveness of the sanctions. Russia did not ask permission for the flight from the U.N. sanctions committee, saying authorization was not required because the flight is humanitarian. A plane from France flew to Baghdad Friday without U.N. authority, and officials from Russia and France say more flights will follow. U.S. & Great Britain, meanwhile, insist that all humanitarian flights must get permission to fly to Iraq. They say passenger flights are an economic resource and a breach of the sanctions.
But Russia & France say the controls do not specifically ban passenger flights, and Russia's state-controlled airline Aeroflot is negotiating with Iraq on resuming flights to Baghdad. Russia & France are increasingly impatient with the sanctions regime. Russia is eager to resume lucrative oil contracts with Baghdad and wants Iraq to pay back some $8 billion in Soviet-era debt. U.N. resolutions require the sanctions to remain in place until Baghdad complies with demands to dismantle its weapons of mass destruction. For the past decade, travelers to Iraq have generally had to fly to Amman, Jordan, and then drive to Baghdad.
  more bear stories
UN to delay plan to revamp sanctions against Iraq
7.2.01   Reuters

UN   U.N. Security Council members reached broad agreement Monday to drop for 5 or 6 months revamp of sanctions against Iraq and extend current oil-for-food program without changes, diplomats said.. China's U.N. Amb. Wang Yingfan told reporters "extension was agreeable for every council member but whether it is 5 or 6 months, we will have to consult with other council members." China holds this month's Security Council's presidency. Russia objected to U.S.-British resolution that would ease sanctions on civilian goods but spell out "dual use" supplies that could be utilized for military & civilian purposes. It would also seek to stop smuggling of goods by Iraq, est. at $1 billion a year. Overhaul of sanctions procedures were to be put in the context of the U.N.-humanitarian oil-for-food program, which expires on Tuesday.

U.S. said it had to consult Washington before any final decision, which diplomats said concerned length of the delay. "The British have proposed it; I have to consult Washington about it. We have not made a decision," U.S. rep. James Cunningham told reporters.

      allegation
    "Eisenberg set up Soros to launder for bin Laden."   Also critical figure in PERMINDEX, JFK cover-up management firm   ¹ º
    "Iraqi diesel is practically stolen from the people of Iraq; Hussein gets almost nothing. U.S. buys it in the oil for food deal at $5-6 per barrel. Diesel & guns are exchanged for opium that comes through from China. Iran is also a part of this exchange. The original network was set up by Meyer Lansky & Aristotle Onasis.
Diplomats said Washington would have no choice but to drop putting the new plan to a vote immediately. The council has to vote on the U.N. oil-for-food program before it expires on Tuesday. Iraq cut off oil sales June 4 in protest of U.S.-British plan. British Amb. Jeremy Greenstock, who drafted the resolution on the new sanctions plan said discussions would continue but the current oil-for-food plan would be extended without any changes. Without mentioning Russia by name, he called the objections "unjustifiable, negative and national, but they are there. "
French Amb. Jean-David Levitte said: "The idea is to adopt a rollover, neutral and to go on quietly with discussions on the substance." He said Britain proposed rollover and Russian Amb. Sergei Lavrov agreed, without objections from other members.
click pic for Iraqi oil primer per 
MSNBC This week team of intl oil experts working on behalf of UN secretary general completed a survey of Iraq's oil industry suffering the effects of nine years of UN sanctions imposed after Iraq's invasion of Kuwait. Deficiencies in the process that allows Iraq to import limited quantities of oilfield equipt & services, to sustain a creaking industry whose exports are needed to finance the multi-billion-dollar UN humanitarian aid programme, were high on their list of priorities. Oil ministry officials in Baghdad say the UN team was generally sympathetic to the plight of Iraq's oil industry, but there is deep scepticism about whether even a glowing report from the experts will ease the situation.

Baghdad claims U.S. & U.K. deliberately undermined provisions in the process. Non-oil contracts, covering such areas as power generation and water purification equipt, have also fallen victim to concerns, again mainly from the US and UK, over their potential "dual use". Rarely in the history of sanctions has the international community been faced with devising a system that sustains and improves strategic civilian industries while ensuring that a still extensive military machine does not become an unintended beneficiary.
Iraqi officials are especially critical of US and British representatives on the Security Council's so-called "661 Committee", which controls the flow to Iraq of foreign-made spare parts and equipt under the UN oil-for-food programme. "Out of 377 contracts put on hold by the 661 Committee, 343 are on hold because of objections from the US representative," according to a senior ministry official. A further 28 are on hold because of objections by both the US and UK, and four because of British objections only. Representatives from the other Security Council members have asked that only a total of two contracts be put on hold.
Houston   A unit of Houston-based oilfield services giant Halliburton Co. will organize the oil well firefighting & rehabilitation effort in Iraq just as it did after the 1991 Gulf War, officials said. The value of the contract was not disclosed. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers on Monday gave Kellogg Brown & Root the go-ahead to implement the Defense Dept's plan to extinguish oil well fires in Iraq and repair the damage.
Halliburton was led by now-VP Cheney before he resigned in 2000 to join GOP presidential ticket.

Halliburton subcontractors Boots & Coots Intl Well Control Inc. & Wild Well Control Inc., both also from Houston, will handle the firefighting chores. However, unease around the oil fields in the far southeastern corner of Iraq have delayed the beginning of work the last 2 days, officials said.
Halliburton oversaw the firefighting efforts on 320 wells in Kuwait after retreating Iraqi troops set fires in 1991. Firefighting companies extinguished 90% of the fires within a year, far ahead of the 18-month schedule. The contract was initially disclosed at the end of a Defense Dept statement on preparation for the possibility that Saddam Hussein's regime might destroy Iraq's oil fields in case of war with the U.S.-led coalition.

Analysts believe the wells may need significant work even if they aren't sabotaged. Daily production has slid from 3.5 million barrels per day in 1979 to about 2 million barrels per day, partly due to United Nations sanctions that banned import of equipt. Iraq's proven oil reserves are second only to those of Saudi Arabia.
In NYSE trading Tuesday, Halliburton shares rose 54¢, 2.7%, to $20.66.


Asylum Trail first step ¹
Back door entry lures Iraqis on a 2,500-mile voyage
2.1.03   Daniel McGrory Times

Sarajevo   At the entrance to a scruffy hotel across from Sarajevo's main bus station, a huddle of young men are careful to cover their faces with scarves as they congregate around a payphone, waiting their turn to make a call home.

This group, thought to be Iraqi asylum-seekers, checked in together at the Sinovi Drine hotel 3 days ago, saying they had come for the skiing. None had any sports equipt and the farthest they have moved is to a coffee shop in the old quarter of the city which is known to shelter immigrants in an upstairs dormitory.
The one receptionist on duty at the Sinovi Drine thumbs through the dog-eared notebook used to register guests. He points to the list of 5 names, all of them carrying Turkish passports. The receptionist shrugs and says he has no idea why supposed Turkish holidaymakers are conversing in Arabic and seldom stray far from their cramped, sparsely furnished rooms.
"They paid cash for 5 days and I haven't seen much of them, but we don't question our guests," he says, anxious to return to watching a televised English football match.

A search of the records of half a dozen rooming houses in the city shows how easy it is for this people- trafficking racket to operate. Young men aged 20 to early 30s turn up in groups of no more than 4 or 5, often carrying Turkish identity documents because Turks do not need a visa to enter Bosnia.
Some of these hotels do not even bother to keep a register and, even if they do, they are not required to pass on any information to the police. The men are clean-shaven, in Western casual dress and book their rooms for no more than 5 days, always paying cash in advance but often leaving sooner with no warning.

The frustration of Bosnia's fledgeling investigation force with the activities of the people-smugglers is obvious. Sarajevo's immigration police head Edin Vranj admits: "We urgently need new immigration laws as the traffickers are making fools of us with our stupid rules." At present, Bosnia does not recognise the idea of "illegal entry".

Mr Vranj points out a travel agency operating at one of the busiest crossroads in the old city. It has advertisements plastered across its front window offering accommodation in private homes where you pay cash only and no registration is required. Shopkeepers say that when smuggling gangs are at their busiest you can hardly find a flat or a house in this street that is not sheltering paying guests.

Detectives suspect that staff working for the local airline, travel agents and taxi firms are all involved in providing package tours for asylum-seekers. On a recent flight from Istanbul, aircrew were seen counting out fistfuls of cash. British police have helped in the crackdown at Sarajevo airport, which used to be described as "Europe's back door". Even a year ago, of the 24,000 holidaymakers who turned up, barely 1,000 ever went home.
As security makes it harder for the traffickers, so they charge more for their services. The cost can be as much as £12,000 for anyone wanting to reach Britain. Newly formed State Border Service Inspector Ismail Saric estimates more than 85% of illegal immigrants, 400,000 people, are smuggled through Kosovo by Mafia-style gangs under the indifferent gaze of intl peacekeepers there.

A legacy of allegiances formed during the ruinous civil wars in the former Yugoslavia are hindering efforts to curb illegal immigration. As a reward for Iraq's steadfast support for Slobodan Milosevic, its citizens do not need visas to enter Serbia. From there, traffickers use any number of meandering routes into Bosnia by river or road along the porous eastern border between Bijeljina & Visegrad.
After a recent operation near Visegrad, involving British police, to seal off a smuggling route, investigators found that within 24 hours traffickers had bulldozed another track through forest to reach the Drina River. To give an idea of the scale of this policing operation, Mr Saric runs his finger along a map of Bosnia's borders and says: "We have 392 border crossing points and 1,600km (1,000 miles) of border, so we can't seal it all."

He is aware that Iraqi asylum-seekers have been using Turkish identity documents because Turks do not need a visa to enter Bosnia. In recent months his force has uncovered 15,000 fake Turkish identity documents, incl passports, and says: "I don't doubt some of those will have been used again by immigrants to get into Europe some other way."
Nowadays, he says, traffickers are using "genuine" documents, stolen in Turkey, and faking the appearance of some of the asylum-seekers to pass a cursory border inspection. British undercover officers in the Balkans are still being told to concentrate their efforts on tracking Islamic extremists and have not got the manpower to investigate the possible Iraqi menace.

Mr Saric says that if there is a mass exodus of Iraqis after the outbreak of a war, then his officers will not be able to cope. He gives warning that the UN & overseas countries must be ready to step in to deal with the approaching problem. During the 1991 Gulf War, more than 2.7 million people fled Iraq's borders. Greek authorities are watching a group of 100,000 already massing near Turkish ports.
3.28.01 UNIKOM SecGen rpt
DMZ developments. Also reports on organizational matters & financial aspects of UN Iraq-Kuwait Observation Mission (UNIKOM). Incl observations &. 3.01 UNIKOM deployment map
    U.N. arms inspectors will not return to Iraq"
    9.24.00   Colum Lynch Wash.Post pA22
U.S. & British diplomats conceded today that they had failed in a week-long, high-level effort to gain support in the U.N. Security Council for a proposal to send international weapons inspectors back into Iraq. The impasse spells the indefinite continuation of economic sanctions on Baghdad, along with a low-intensity U.S. bombing campaign and an Iraqi ban on international inspectors. … In an attempt to restart the inspections, Britain and the Netherlands circulated a resolution to create a new arms control agency to replace the United Nations Special Commission, or UNSCOM. U.S. officials said Russia & China refused to support that proposal without assurances that economic sanctions would be lifted.

designer destabilization by the West
9.14.00 U.N. favored status of Oil for Food proceeds to autonomous Kurds Chicago Tribune

Child malnutrition in iraq 'unacceptably high' as drought, lack of Investment aggravate food and nutrition situation
9.13.00
UN Food & Agriculture Organization (FAO) and World Food Pgm
The report points out that malnutrition is often due to factors other than insufficient food, poor water (both in quality & quantity) and poor sanitation are key causes of repeated infections resulting in infant & child malnutrition. Infections in infants are associated with the decline in breast-feeding, early introduction of infant formula and an increase in bottle-feeding. The report calls for the maintenance & rehabilitation of the water & sanitation system as a priority for meeting basic needs as well as nutrition and health education to promote best practices in health, food and nutrition incl support for breast- feeding.

While highlighting the UN's latest efforts to improve the effectiveness of the Oil-for-Food pgm, the report recommends speeding up the process for approving Oil-for-Food contracts and ensuring the timely delivery of humanitarian imports, incl food & medicine. The report also recommends more inputs for the rehabilitation of agriculture, particularly seeds and materials for water conservation & irrigation management.

9.8.00   U.N. Office of the Iraq Pgm Oil for Food
"The Special Rapporteur criticized the Govt for " letting innocent people suffer while [it] maneuvered to get sanctions lifted." Had the Govt not waited 5 years to adopt the oil-for-food program in 1996, he stated in October, " millions of innocent people would have avoided serious & prolonged suffering."
US State Dept. 1999 Human Rights Report re Iraq
  [ U.S./U.N. sanctions used food to extort resource expropriation giving reparations preference over aid beyond half billion dollar limit + 30% off the top then blames resulting million dead children on their extortion victim. What a racket. ]

2.8.00   BBC Online   "How long the civilian population, which is totally innocent on all this, should be exposed to such punishment for something that they have never done?" Hans von Sponeck
before resigning as second UN AsstSecGeneral & Humanitarian Coordinator in Iraq 10.15.98   The Independent   "We are in the process of destroying an entire society. It is as simple and terrifying as that. It is illegal & immoral." Denis Halliday
after resigning as first UN AsstSecGeneral & Humanitarian Coordinator in Iraq

U.N. Security Council Resolution 986 authorizes sale of $5.2 billion (U.S.) worth of Iraq oil for each 6 month period. Every oil contract must be approved by the sanctions committee.

"Cuban & Iraqi instances make it abundantly clear that economic sanctions are, at their core, a war against public health. Our professional ethic demands the defense of public health. Thus, as physicians, we have a moral imperative to call for the end of sanctions. Having found the cause, we must act to remove it. Continuing to allow our reason to sleep will produce more monsters."
4.24.97   New England Journal of Medicine editorial

White House: "Saddam has missed 'last chance'"
Officials say
declaration falls short, but war not imminent   12.18.02   CNN

… The president's national security team recommended U.S. declare Iraq violated U.N. Security Council resolution 1441 by failing to fully account for its chemical, biological and nuclear weapons programs. "They [the Iraqis] have failed the test, and we will make it plain that they have done so," said a senior official familiar with the process.
Sr officials say there is no recommendation to the president that he use the term "material breach", the language in the U.N. resolution that is the trigger for possible "serious consequences," incl military action, at this time. "That doesn't mean there are not strong views that they are in 'material breach,' but that is not the pressing issue at the moment," one official said.

U.S. will deliver its verdict on the declaration after U.N. weapons inspectors present their analysis to the U.N. Security Council Thursday, Secretary of State Colin Powell said. "We will make statements after they have presented to the Security Council, and then work with our partners on the Security Council to determine the way to move forward," Powell said. U.S. will continue to work "within the U.N. process," he said.
Powell met Wednesday with European Union leaders in London. A senior EU diplomat told CNN that during the talks Powell explained the U.S. dissatisfaction with the Iraqi declaration.

Powell said a case could be made that Iraq is in "material breach" of the resolution. "Our analysis of the Iraqi declaration to this point, almost 2 weeks into the process this weekend, shows problems with the declaration, gaps, omissions. And all of this is troublesome," Powell said after the talks. "In my conversations with other permanent members of the Security Council, I sense they also see deficiencies in the declaration."
… Bush was scheduled to meet Thursday with Spanish PM Jose Maria Aznar, key U.S. ally, and officials said Bush was already planning to outline some of his view on Iraq during a Friday White House meeting with the
Quartet, a diplomatic group trying to find a path toward a renewed Middle East peace process. U.S., Russia, EU and UN are the members of the Quartet.

U.S. officials said they believe Iraq has failed to account for mustard gas shells and other chemical & biological weapons known to be in its stockpile, and has provided little or no information about developments the U.S. says have occurred in its nuclear weapons program over the past decade.
U.N. resolution 1441, calling for Iraq to give a "currently accurate, full, and complete declaration" of its weapons programs, was unanimously passed by the Security Council on 11.8.02. Officials said the measured response from the Bush administration is part of an effort to make a strong presentation to UN on what the administration views as deficiencies in Iraq's declaration.

Officials said administration's strategy was also designed to give weapons inspectors more time, and U.S. will argue that deficiencies in Iraq's declaration should result in more aggressive inspections incl use of a provision allowing inspectors to take Iraqi scientists out of the country for interviews.
U.S. response also is a reflection of the political realities in the Security Council. Other key members have said there is no justification for military action at this early stage in the inspections process and have argued it is the inspectors, not U.S. or any other Security Council member, who carry the burden of deciding whether Iraq is in "material breach" of its obligations.
1.27.03 Blix to present report on inspections to Security Council, 60 days after inspections began.

US will lose war, says former UN inspector
3.26.03   Sapa-AFP

Lisbon   U.S. does not have the military means to take over Baghdad and will lose the war against Iraq, former UN weapons inspector Scott Ritter said. "U.S. is going to leave Iraq with its tail between its legs, defeated. It is a war we can not win," he told private radio TSF in an interview broadcast here Tuesday evening. "We do not have the military means to take over Baghdad and for this reason I believe the defeat of U.S. in this war is inevitable," he said. "Every time we confront Iraqi troops we may win some tactical battles, as we did for 10 years in Vietnam but we will not be able to win this war, which in my opinion is already lost," Ritter added. Stiffening Iraqi resistance as US-led forces close in on Baghdad have prompted questions about the strategy to use precision air power and a smaller, fast moving ground force to topple Iraqi President Saddam Hussein.

Some military analysts have said there are not enough allied troops in Iraq to take control of Baghdad, where Saddam Hussein's elite troops are said to be concentrated, and that the planning of the war was overly optimistic.

10.13.02 Time mag. Click graphic for regional diagram British PM Blair told parliament Wednesday U.S. & Britain believe they have "sufficient forces" in Iraq & London was not planning to send reinforcements to the country at this stage. A combination of bad weather & heavy fighting in central Iraq has slowed the advance of coalition troops marching on Baghdad.

Ritter resigned Aug. 1998 after accusing both Wash.D.C. & the UN of not doing enough to support the weapons inspectors. Since leaving the UN weapons inspectors team he has become an outspoken critic of US policies towards Iraq.

Bush to sign congressional resolution on Iraq
10.15.02  
Reuters

Wash.D.C.   President Bush on Wednesday will hold an event to formally sign the congressional resolution authorizing U.S. use of force against Iraq if needed. Both the House of Representatives and the Senate last week voted overwhelmingly to give Bush the authorization he sought to wage war if necessary to disarm Iraqi President Saddam Hussein of his suspected weapons of mass destruction.
Bush is due to formally sign the joint resolution on Wednesday in a White House East Room ceremony. "Tomorrow the president will sign a resolution showing that America speaks with one voice. He hopes that it will send a signal to the world and to Saddam Hussein that it's time for Saddam Hussein to disarm," said Wh.House spokesman Fleischer.
4.24.00   Rep Tony Hall Iraq trip

March 2000   Cong. Staffers Delegation trip Report

2.1.00   Conyers/Cambell letter, letter signed by 70 US Representatives asking Pres.Clinton to lift Iraq economic sanctions on Iraq. AIPAC-sponsored "keep the sanctions" letter in response & its signatories "AIPAC letter contains number of factual errors therefore not a reliable source."

10.20.97   Economic Sanctions to Achieve U.S. Foreign Policy Goals discussion & guide to current law Congressional Research Service

Madeleine Albright: 8/4/00 on Iraq
When asked in a 5/96 CBS interview in May 1996 about the estimated million deaths of Iraqi children, stated: "I think this is a very hard choice but the price - we think the price is worth it."
3/26/97 first major foreign policy address as Secretary of State: "We do not agree with the nations who argue that if Iraq complies with its obligations concerning weapons of mass destruction, sanctions should be lifted. Our view, which is unshakable, is that Iraq must prove its peaceful intentions … And the evidence is overwhelming that Saddam Hussein's intentions will never be peaceful."

3.24.00   US Ambassador Jas.Cunningham defence of U.S. policy in Security Council. Cunningham is U.N. DeputyRep. Rep. R.Holbrooke has avoided statements on Iraq.

Sanctions per State Dept Bureau of Economic and Business Affairs
pdf Iraqi Sanctions per Treasury Dept Office of Foreign Assets Control
1999 Human Rights ¹ & Terrorism reports re Iraq   profile

¹   "For the sixth year, the Govt held 3-week training courses in weapons use, hand-to-hand fighting, rappelling from helicopters, and infantry tactics for children from 10 to 15 years of age. Camps for these " Saddam Cubs" operated throughout the country. Senior military officers who supervised the course noted that the children held up under the " physical and psychological strain" of tough training for as long as 14 hours each day. Sources in the Iraqi opposition report that the army found it difficult to recruit enough children to fill all of the slots in the program. Families reportedly were threatened with the loss of their food ration cards if they refused to enroll their children in the grueling course. The Supreme Council for the Islamic Revolution in Iraq reported in October that authorities were denying food ration cards to families that failed to send their young sons to Saddam Cubs compulsory weapons-training camps. Similarly, authorities reportedly withheld school examination results to students unless they registered in the Feddayin Saddam organization."


Wash.D.C.   President GWBush's attempt to maintain public support for military action against Iraq has taken a fresh blow from an unexpected quarter, with the publication of a letter from the CIA stating that while Saddam Hussein poses little threat to America now, a US invasion could push him into retaliating with chemical or biological weapons. The unusually detailed public statement, in the form of a letter from CIA dir. Geo. Tenet, to Congress, comes at a highly sensitive moment, potentially damaging Mr Bush's attempt to rally an overwhelming congressional mandate for the use of force against Iraq.
In a chilling excerpt, Mr Tenet warned that if Saddam was personally threatened he might seize "his last chance to exact vengeance by taking a large number of victims with him". The risk of such an attack, possibly involving weapons of mass destruction, would rise from "low" to "pretty high" were Saddam to feel cornered by US military might.

Such a stark judgment seems likely to increase public anxiety about the prospect of a new war. There is still majority backing for military action, but that support appears to be fading despite a concerted public relations campaign by the administration to put its case. Approval for military action has fallen from 57% last month to 53% this week, according to a US Gallup poll. The CIA letter was seized on by Democrat opponents of military action, at the height of the congressional debate on a resolution authorising an invasion if & when the president deems it necessary.

House Democrat Donald Payne said that Mr Tenet's letter showed that the Bush administration's aggressive strategy "could trigger the very things that our president has said that he is trying to prevent: the use of chemical or biological weapons. In view of this report, the policy of a pre-emptive strike is troublesome."
Mr Tenet's letter came in response to a congressional request to declassify segments of CIA briefings on Iraq over the past few days. He said: "Baghdad for now appears to be drawing a line short of conducting terrorist attacks with conventional or CBW [chemical and biological weapons] against the U.S."

This assessment is reinforced by testimony given to Congress last week by an unnamed senior intelligence officer, which Mr Tenet allowed to be declassified. The officer said: "My judgment would be that the probability of [Saddam] initiating an attack . . . in the foreseeable future, given the conditions we understand now, the likelihood I think would be low." Asked about the likelihood of an Iraqi chemical or biological attack on the US in response to an invasion, the intelligence officer said: "Pretty high, in my view."

Mr Tenet emphasised the same point in his own words. "Should Saddam conclude that a US-led attack could no longer be deterred, he probably would become much less constrained in adopting terrorist actions," he wrote. He added that Saddam might work with Islamist terrorists to carry out an attack.
It is unusual for the CIA to put such details of its intelligence assessments into a public document. The letter was produced after intense pressure from senators. The letter also comes at a time when the CIA is competing with the more hawkish Pentagon, which is also supplying the White House with intelligence on the Iraqi threat.

"You have to ask yourself the question, since Tenet is part of the team, why now?" said Fred Hitz, a former CIA inspector general. "You have to go back to the Vietnam era to find a time when the judgment of the intelligence community was in the public eye on such a current affairs basis."
The White House last night denied that the CIA analysis undermined Mr Bush's message on the urgency of confronting Baghdad. Mr Tenet "did not say we're OK," said White House spokesman Ari Fleischer. "If Saddam Hussein holds a gun to someone's head, while he denies he even owns a gun, do you really want to take a chance that he'll never use it."

In a bid to dampen the controversy, Mr Tenet later put out a statement insisting: "There is no inconsistency between our view of Saddam's growing threat and the view as expressed in [Bush's] speech. Although we think the chances of Saddam initiating a WMD [weapons of mass destruction] attack at this moment are low, in part because it would constitute an admission that he possesses WMD, there is no question that the likelihood of Saddam using WMD against the US or our allies in the region for blackmail, deterrence or otherwise grows as his arsenal continues to build."

Bush clings to dubious accusations ¹
U.S. claims about Saddam's arsenal hotly disputed
3.18.03   Walter Pincus & Dana Milbank Wash.Post

As the Bush administration prepares to attack Iraq this week, it is doing so on the basis of a number of allegations against Iraqi President Saddam Hussein that have been challenged and in some cases disproved by the UN, European govts and even U.S. intelligence reports. For months, Pres.GWBush and top lieutenants produced a long list of Iraqi offenses, culminating Sunday with VP Cheney's assertion that Iraq has "reconstituted nuclear weapons." Previously, administration officials have tied Hussein to al Qaeda, to 9.11.01, and to an aggressive production of biological & chemical weapons. Bush reiterated many of these charges in his address to the nation last night.

These assertions are disputed. Some administration evidence such as Bush's assertion that Iraq sought to purchase uranium has been refuted by subsequent discoveries. Other claims have been questioned, though their validity can be known only after U.S. forces occupy Iraq. In outlining his case for war on Sunday, Cheney focused on how much more damage al Qaeda could have done on 9.11.01 "if they'd had a nuclear weapon and detonated it in the middle of one of our cities, or if they had unleashed … biological weapons of some kind, smallpox or anthrax." He then tied that to evidence found in Afghanistan of how al Qaeda leaders "have done everything they could to acquire those capabilities over the years." Oct. 2002 CIA dir. George J. Tenet told Congress Hussein would not give such weapons to terrorists unless he decided helping "terrorists in conducting a WMD [weapons of mass destruction] attack against U.S. would be his last chance to exact vengeance by taking a large number of victims with him."

In his appearance Sunday, on NBC's "Meet the Press," the vice president argued "we believe [Hussein] has, in fact, reconstituted nuclear weapons." But Cheney contradicted that assertion moments later, saying it was "only a matter of time before he acquires nuclear weapons."
Both assertions were contradicted earlier by Intl Atomic Energy Agency dir. general Mohamed el Baradei, who reported that "there is no indication of resumed nuclear activities." el Baradei also contradicted Bush & other officials who argued Iraq had tried to purchase high-strength aluminum tubes to use in centrifuges for uranium enrichment. The IAEA determined that Iraq did not plan to use imported aluminum tubes for enriching uranium and generating nuclear weapons. ElBaradei argued that the tubes were for conventional weapons and "it was highly unlikely" that the tubes could have been used to produce nuclear material.

Cheney on Sunday said el Baradei was "wrong" about Iraq's nuclear program and questioned the IAEA's credibility. Earlier this month, el Baradei said information about Iraqi efforts to buy uranium were based on fabricated documents. Further investigation has found that top CIA officials had significant doubts about the veracity of the evidence, linking Iraq to efforts to purchase uranium for nuclear weapons from Niger, but the information ended up as fact in Bush's State of the Union address.
In another embarrassing episode for the administration, Sec.State Powell cited evidence about Iraq's weapons efforts that originally appeared in a British intelligence document. It later emerged the British report's evidence was based in part on academic papers & trade publications.

Sometimes information offered by Bush & his top officials is questioned by administration aides. In his 3.6.03 news conference, Bush dismissed Iraq's destruction of its al Samoud-2 missiles, saying they were being dismantled "even as [Hussein] has ordered the continued production of the very same type of missiles." But the only intelligence was electronic intercepts that had individuals talking about being able to build missiles in the future, according to a senior intelligence analyst.
Last month, Bush spoke about a liberated Iraq showing "the power of freedom to transform that vital region" and said "a new regime in Iraq would serve as a dramatic & inspiring example of freedom for other nations in the region." But a classified State Dept report put together by the Dept's intelligence & research staff and delivered to Powell the same day as Bush's speech questioned that theory, arguing that history runs counter to it.

In his first major speech solely on the Iraqi threat last October, Bush said, "Iraq possesses ballistic missiles with a likely range of hundreds of miles, far enough to strike Saudi Arabia, Israel, Turkey and other nations, in a region where more than 135,000 American civilians & service members live & work."
Inspectors have found that the al Samoud-2 missiles can travel less than 200 miles, not far enough to hit the targets Bush named. Iraq has not accounted for 14 medium-range Scud missiles from the 1991 Persian Gulf War, but the administration has not presented any evidence that they still exist.

    U.S. attacked American human shields
    4.1.03   CNN
Baghdad   Iraq's information minister accused U.S. forces Tuesday of "indiscriminately" killing their own citizens in a bus attack and killing 9 Iraqi children in a central neighborhood of Babylon. "Yesterday, an American warplane attacked 2 buses on the highway between Baghdad & Ahman," Mohammed Saeed al Sahaf told reporters. "Those people on those 2 buses are human shields coming to participate in defending civilian installations like water sanitation stations, electricity generation stations, and so on." Sahaf said: "The 'brave' Americans start shooting the Americans [in the buses]. They are indiscriminately killing people."

He said Iraqis are awaiting more details on the incident., and the U.S. Central Command said it is investigating the claim. Describing what Sahaf said was the attack in southern Babylon, 60 miles south of Baghdad, he said, "This morning, the villains bombarded a civilian quarter." He said the children who died lived in adjacent houses. He described "fierce battles" in Basra & Nasiriya, and said coalition troops had targeted telephone exchanges & farms throughout the country, and hit TV & radio transmitters in more than 3 cities.
Coalition bombing of Baghdad on Tuesday morning killed 5 Iraqi civilians and wounded 25 others, he said. He said the 5 are among 24 civilians killed since late Monday. Iraqi troops, however, are prevailing, the minister said. "Iraqi troops & Iraqi fighters are in control of all the places, as we have witnessed," Sahaf said. "No big change in that. We are fighting against them."

Iraqi fighters destroyed 7 tanks and Fedayeen forces loyal to pres. Hussein, destroyed 7 coalition personnel carriers near Najaf, he said. Iraqis also shot down an Apache helicopter, he added. "They are achieving nothing, they are suffering from casualties. Those casualties are increasing, not decreasing," said Sahaf, who referred to Pres. GWBush and other Americans as "bastards."
Referring to Monday's fatal shootings by U.S. soldiers of at least 7 women & children at a checkpoint in southern Iraq, Sahaf said "all those who do such acts are definitely racist." The soldiers fired on the van carrying the Iraqis when it failed to stop after repeated warnings, the coalition's Central Command said Monday.

Wash.D.C.   The Pentagon has approved a list of 400 to 500 members of Iraqi opposition groups who will be invited to undergo U.S. military training early next year, officials said. DefSec Rumsfeld is expected to approve final details of the training effort shortly. The plan calls for the exiles to be trained mainly in noncombat skills so they can serve as translators, guides and in other support functions to U.S. troops.
Basic firearms training also will be part of the effort, which is expected to take place at a military base at Taszar, Hungary. Iraqi opposition groups originally provided a list of about 5,000 names, but only a fraction have been approved so far. Defense Intelligence Agency is vetting them for security concerns, and additional names may be approved in the coming weeks.

Senior Pentagon & military officials have been meeting with opposition groups privately in recent days in London to work out details. The proposed trainees are expected to gather somewhere in the Persian Gulf region, perhaps Jordan, and then move to Hungary. One Pentagon source noted that U.S. isn't sure how many of those invited will show up.
About 1,000 U.S. Army trainers are on standby at Ft Jackson SC to conduct the training once the plan is approved. The program will be funded under the Iraqi Liberation Act, enacted in 1998 to promote democracy and a change of power in Iraq. Some $96 million remains available under that legislation.

Cape Canaveral   As urgency mounts for better intelligence on Iraq to guide U.S. diplomatic & military policy, 6 secret National Reconnaissance Office high-resolution imaging satellites, each costing $1 billion, are maintaining an almost hourly watch on specific Iraqi facilities. 3 Advanced KH-11s with optical & infrared sensors are teamed with 3 Lacrosse imaging radar spacecraft with night/all-weather capabilities to search for evidence of nuclear, chemical and biological weapons development, along with missile production.
But some of these spacecraft are growing old, and a critical new KH-11 replacement satellite that was to have been launched from Vandenberg AFB, Calif., in Dec. 2001 has now been delayed nearly 1.5 years by problems. It is now not planned to launch any earlier than May 2003. An unrelated large NRO eavesdropping spacecraft has also been delayed (AW&ST Sept. 2, p. 34).

Rarely 2-3 hours go by without at least one of the current 15-ton spacecraft obtaining imagery somewhere over Iraq, although 12 specific overflights per day have viewing angles that provide the highest resolution pictures. The slant-range capability of the advanced KH-11 is also impressive, allowing it to take quality imagery 100 mi. to the left or right of its ground track on several other, less ideal Iraqi passes per day. Each of the school bus-size spacecraft currently aloft have been spaced in polar orbit to provide the National Imagery & Mapping Agency (NIMA) with coordinated, repetitive image resolutions as good as 4-6 in. during the day and 2-3 ft. or so at night using infrared & radar sensors.

High-resolution satellites cannot see through buildings, but their imagery is critical to characterizing Iraqi activity and in providing 3D imagery to plan attack strategy. They are also critical in supporting covert U.S. Special Forces ground reconnaissance activity. The spacecraft are helping to characterize the function of Iraqi sites possibly developing nuclear, chemical and biological weapons, as well as helping NIMA, the CIA and Defense Intelligence Agency assess the pace & concealment of such work.

The imagery is also an important element in "all source" analysis, especially in tying signal intercept data with imaging reconnaissance. The same 6 spacecraft are also being heavily tasked with "force protection" imaging duties to monitor the flanks of U.S. troops deployed around the world and to watch for potential threats from the shores adjoining sea lanes that could be choked, if Al Qaeda terrorists attack oil tankers or other ships at critical locations.
Each of the 6 spacecraft fly ground tracks timed for the best viewing angles and to work in connection with the other 5, all launched from Vandenberg between March 1991 & Oct. 2001. The satellites are:

  •   Advanced KH-11 launched Oct. 2001. This spacecraft uses infrared & low-light optical capabilities on passes flying north over Baghdad area at roughly 2 am local time daily.

    At about 3 pm Baghdad time, the satellite again passes over the Iraqi capital area on a southward pass using full daylight optical capabilities to image targets. Like most Advanced KH-11s, it is flying a 256 X 530-mi. orbit inclined 98 deg.

  •   Advanced KH-11 launched in Dec. 1996. It maneuvered last week in an orbital plane west of the 2001 satellite, said Toronto-based analyst Ted Molczan. It makes its first pass overhead Baghdad during the late morning on a southern trajectory. Then, using its infrared capabilities, it overflies central Iraq before midnight on a northern trajectory. It is in an orbit nearly identical to the 2001 spacecraft.
  •   Advanced KH-11, launched Dec. 1995. This oldest of the KH-11s was replaced by the 2001 satellite but is still flying on a ground track that follows the newer satellite closely, Molczan said.
  •   Lacrosse radar, launched March 1991. NRO's oldest recce satellite currently passes over central Iraq at about 11 a.m. each day on a northern trajectory, then again at about 8:30 p.m. on a southern flight path.
  •   Lacrosse radar, launched in Oct. 1997. This spacecraft currently overflies central Iraq at about 10 p.m. on a southern trajectory, then comes back on a northern trajectory at about 3 p.m. local time.
  •   Lacrosse radar, launched Aug. 2000. This spacecraft comes over the Baghdad area, first flying south at about 3 a.m. daily, then on a northern trajectory at about 5:30 p.m.

    Times here for both types refer to only the best overhead passes per day. The spacecraft also overfly Iraq almost daily on passes that are less advantageous to imagery. The Advanced KH-11s are in Sun-synchronous orbits where their overflight times will not change much day-to-day, although some days they have more passes than others. The Lacrosse radar overflight times are for current operations and will vary more with time.
    Although all current reconnaissance satellite operations are highly secret, NIMA will this week declassify & release some of the low-resolution mapping imagery taken by Lockheed Martin Keyhole KH-9 film return spacecraft during 1973-80 and imagery from the KH-7 spacecraft that operated during 1963-67.

    The release marks only the second time in the history of space reconnaissance that imagery has been declassified, the first being the declassification of original Corona KH-1 imagery in 1995 (AW&ST 6.12.95 p167). The KH-9 situation is the most intriguing. Some analysts are disappointed that only 9-24-in. "low-resolution mapping camera" imagery from the KH-9s is being released. None of the satellites' high-resolution imagery taken during 1971-85 is being freed, said Charles P. Vick, who analyzed reconnaissance operations for the Federation of American Scientists.

    The first of about 20 KH-9 "Project Octagon" satellites was launched in 1971, and the last was destroyed in a Titan 34D accident at Vandenberg in 1986. The KH-9s, often referred to as "Big Birds," normally carried 4 film-pod return canisters. The primary KH-9 high-resolution imaging system used 2 60-in.-dia. lens cameras that could return stereo pictures with up to 6-in. resolution. But 5 of the missions were modified to also carry a mapping camera with a 12-in. lens to provide about 9-24-in. resolution. This imagery was critical in providing maps used by the Tomahawk cruise missile navigation system.

    Older KH-7 imagery also being released has about 18-20-in. resolution. Official release of the KH-9 low-resolution mapping imagery and KH-7 pictures will take place Sept. 20 at a NIMA ceremony at the Univ. of Maryland. NIMA will not release imagery from the different KH-8 Gambit spacecraft that flew 50 missions from 1966-84. The KH-8s were remarkable satellites that would dip as low as 80 mi. over the Soviet Union to obtain imagery with about 3 to 4 in. resolution later returned by a single film pod. DoD photo by Petty Officer 1st Class Wm G. Lewis USN The KH-10 was to have been the Manned Orbiting Lab program, but was canceled before it ever became operational. The KH-11 digital imaging spacecraft, now more advanced with 4-6-in. resolution, were first launched in late 1976. They heralded the transition away from film favored by the Air Force, to digital imaging preferred by the CIA.



      FBI probes fake papers on Iraq
      Investigation eyes possible role of foreign intelligence service
      3.13.03   Dana Priest & Susan Schmidt NBC
    Wash.D.C.   The FBI is looking into the forgery of a key piece of evidence linking Iraq to a nuclear weapons program, incl possibility that a foreign govt is using a deception campaign to foster support for military action against Iraq. "It's something we're just beginning to look at," a sr law enforcement official said yesterday. Officials are trying to determine whether the documents were forged to try to influence U.S. policy, or whether they may have been created as part of a disinformation campaign directed by a foreign intelligence service.
    "We're looking at it from a preliminary stage as to what it's all about," he said. The FBI has not yet opened a formal investigation because it is unclear whether the bureau has jurisdiction over the matter.

    The phony documents, a series of letters between Iraqi & Niger officials showing Iraq's interest in equipt that could be used to make nuclear weapons, came to British & U.S. intelligence officials from a third country. The identity of the third country could not be learned yesterday.
    The forgery came to light last week during a highly publicized & contentious UN meeting. Intl Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) dir. general Mohamed el Baradei told the Security Council 3.7.03 that U.N. & independent experts had decided that the documents were "not authentic." el Baradei's disclosure and his rejection of 3 other key claims that U.S. intelligence officials have cited to support allegations about Iraq's nuclear ambitions struck a powerful blow to the Bush administration's argument on the matter. To the contrary, ElBaradei told the council, "we have to date found no evidence or plausible indications of the revival of a nuclear program in Iraq."

    The CIA, which had also obtained the documents, had questions about "whether they were accurate," said one intelligence official, and it decided not to include them in its file on Iraq's program to procure weapons of mass destruction. FBI has jurisdiction over counterintelligence operations by foreign govts against U.S. Because the documents were delivered to U.S., the bureau would most likely try to determine whether the foreign govt knew the documents were forged or whether it, too, was deceived.
    Iraq pursued an aggressive nuclear weapons program during the 1970s & 1980s. It launched a crash program to build a nuclear bomb in 1990 after it invaded Kuwait. Allied bombing during the Persian Gulf War in 1991 damaged Iraq's nuclear infrastructure. The country's known stocks of nuclear fuel & equipt were removed or destroyed during the U.N. inspections after the war.
    Iraq never surrendered the blueprints for its nuclear program, and it kept teams of scientists employed after U.N. inspectors were forced to leave in 1998.

    British troops prefer Iraqi boots to Her Majesty's standard issue 3.27.03   AFP

    near Basra, Iraq   British soldiers have been scavenging the debris of war for Iraqi army boots because the British army variety are disintegrating in the hot desert sun. Guardsman Lee Williams, 18, of the Desert Rats' Royal Scots Dragoon Guards battle group, found a new pair of boots in an abandoned barracks which he said were "lighter and more comfortable" than the British footwear. He added that he had been forced to swap his footwear because no replacements were available for his own disintegrating boots.
    Equipt shortages have affected British forces since their arrival in the Gulf. Other soldiers are wearing patched-up combat trousers, repaired in one instance by removing a pocket, and in another case by cutting up a colleague's spare shirt.

    Army officers concede there have been problems with supplies, partly because of the relatively short time available between the announcement of British deployment and the soldiers' arrival in the Gulf. Guardsman Williams, from Birmingham, accepted that his footwear problems would not prevent him fighting effectively, but said that he was disappointed that he was having to wear Iraqi boots.
    "I was in a prisoner of war camp 2 days ago in which there was an abandoned barracks and I saw a room full of boots & clothing," he said. "The English boots I had on were coming apart, they were the black ones, not desert boots, and the sole on them was coming off because of the heat. So I picked up a pair of the Iraqi boots for myself. There were lots of them, and they are more comfortable and lighter than the ones I was wearing. I'm not too keen about it for obvious reasons and I would not have believed it if you'd have said that I would be wearing Iraqi boots before I came out here."

    Another Irish Guard, Guardsman David Richardson, 22, from Manchester, has cut up his own trousers in an attempt to repair holes in the crotch and backside. "I've only got one pair of desert combats and they were issued second-hand with tears in them which have got worse since I got here," he said. "I've had to cut my pocket out to make patches to cover up the holes. It's embarrassing. The Iraqi army seems to be better clothed than we are. We are supposed to look like professional soldiers, but we don't. I look like a tramp."

    Marines ponder reports of Iraqis' premature surrender   3.8.03   Michael Wilson NY Times

    Marine Task Force Tarawa, west of Amara, Iraq   If enemy troops decided to give up, but there was no opposing force to surrender to, did it really happen? A group of Marine battalions from Task Force Tarawa swung east today toward Amara, near the Iranian border, to confront the 10th Armored Division of the Iraqi Army and determine whether it intended to surrender. But on the initial approach to the city, there was no Iraqi div. to be found.
    "Apparently the 10th Armored capitulated yesterday, but they didn't have anybody to capitulate to," Lt. Col. Glenn Starnes of a Marine artillery battalion said. "The locals around there are saying they stacked their weapons, parked their vehicles and walked away. Right now, there is no enemy that we know of."

    A small allied unit will approach the div. HQ Wednesday to make sure the Iraqis have surrendered. Reports of rioting in Amara, perhaps between civilians & members of the dominant Baath Party, and the Marines do not plan to intervene, Colonel Starnes said. "There's no forces in that city we need to take on," he said.
    There were signs of surrender early today, when 13 men approached Marine vehicles on the way to Amara and surrendered. They were quickly searched and questioned on the blacktop. "Bagging them & tagging them," as one marine put it, placing their wallets & prayer beads in plastic bags and giving each a number that matched the one written in marker on each man's hand. The soldiers were taken to a Marine camp, their wrists bound with rope.

    One Iraqi soldier told an interpreter that 3 days ago they freed a group of their fellow soldiers who had been imprisoned for deserting. Later today, another encouraging sign for coalition forces: on the north side of a bridge through the village of Kumayt, across the Tigris River, a "battalion's worth" of tanks were found abandoned, not a soldier in sight, a marine said.
    Marines from an infantry battalion approached the bridge, but local residents told them it was wired with explosives. The civilians said they had cut the wires, but the marines waited until their own engineers had checked out the explosives. The tanks appear to be what is left of a forward guard of the Iraqi armored div.. "It's not the breadbasket," said Capt. Walker Field. "Far from it."

    At full strength, the Iraqi div. was thought to have 219 tanks, 260 armored personnel carriers, more than 60 artillery pieces and more than 5,000 soldiers, but those numbers are thought to have dropped dramatically, perhaps as much as 75%, after airstrikes in recent days.
    The little town of Kumayt gave the Marines a warm welcome, crowding around individual men, tugging on sleeves, tapping shoulders, shouting in Arabic. "They think I'm Santa Claus," said Maj. Daniel Geisenhof, surrounded by a couple of dozen men and boys offering him sunflower seeds.
    "U.S. soldiers help the Iraqi people," one man said in English. "Iraq people support Mr. Bush because Mr. Bush loves the Iraqi people." Word of the bombing in Baghdad on Monday that had Saddam Hussein and his two sons as targets had already spread to the town. "Saddam dead and 2 sons," the man said, though it seemed impossible that he could be sure. "Let's become people happy for the news."


  • Supreme Council of the Islamic Revolution of Iraq leader al-Hakim 
 exiled to Iran since 1980, protected by its Shiite religious leaders
      Witnesses: Clerics killed at Shiite shrine
      Hacked to death with swords
      4.10.03   AP
    Najaf, Iraq   A crowd rushed and hacked to death 2 Shiite Muslim clerics, one a Saddam Hussein loyalist, the other a returning exile who had urged support for U.S. troops, during a Thursday meeting meant to forge reconciliation at one of Shiite Islam's holiest shrines, witnesses said.
    An unknown number of people were injured in the melee at the Ali Mosque, one of the holiest shrines for Shiite Muslims. "People attacked & killed both of them inside the mosque," said Ali Assayid Haider, a mullah who had traveled from the southern city of Basra for the meeting of religious leaders.
    Reporters were taken by the U.S. military to witness the meeting, which was meant to show a spirit of reconciliation and openness among religious leaders in U.S.-held Najaf. However, the group arrived late in Najaf, and the killings had already taken place.

    The shrine had been under the control of the widely disliked Haider al-Kadar, Saddam loyalist connected to his Ministry of Religion. In a gesture of reconciliation, al-Kadar was accompanied to the meeting by Abdul Majid al- Khoei, high-ranking Shiite cleric and son of one of the religion's most prominent ayatollahs, or spiritual leaders. He had just returned a week ago from exile in London to help restore order in the city.
    When the 2 men appeared at the shrine, members of another faction loyal to a different mullah, Mohammed Baqer al-Sadr, verbally assailed al-Kadar, furious that he was there. "Al-Kadar was an animal," said Adil Adnan al- Moussawi, 25, who witnessed the confrontation. "Everybody was afraid of him. The people were shouting that they hated him, that he should not be there."

    Apparently feeling threatened, and wanting to defend his fellow cleric, al-Khoei pulled a gun and fired one or two shots. There were conflicting accounts over whether he fired the bullets into the air, or at the crowd. Both men were then rushed by the crowd and hacked to death with swords & knives, the witnesses said.
    First word of the incident came when U.S. military vehicles carrying the visiting journalists tried to approach the area of the mosque and were stopped by crowds who warned them that fighting had occurred and to stay away for their own safety.

    Journalists later approached the mosque from another angle on foot. The structure, decorated with a gold dome, minarets and ornate tiling, stands above dust & squalor of Najaf, where goats & donkeys share streets with beat-up cars, barefoot children and women in black.

    The journalists did not enter the mosque but saw bloodstains on the a sidewalk outside. A firetruck eventually pulled up, apparently to clean up the mess, and one man told the crowd to disperse.
    U.S. special forces mounted an investigation late in the day to determine what happened, said Capt. Townley Hedrick. "I think it remains to be seen what actually happened," said USMC spokesman Maj. Dave Andersen. "But this will be a challenge for Iraq itself and the sects inside it to coexist and basically come to some kind of agreement or unity."

    Al-Khoei was among the prominent returned exiles. His father, Ayatollah Abul-Qassim al-Khoei, was the revered Shiite spiritual leader at the time of the 1991 Shiite uprising crushed by Saddam. He died in 1993, 2 years after he was forced to meet Saddam to prove his loyalty.
    Al-Khoei fled Iraq after the uprising, and started a philanthropic group in London. Arriving in Najaf 4.3.03, he said local clerics were attempting to negotiate a deal in which Iraqi loyalists who were barricaded in the mosque would leave in return for safe passage out of the city.

    A tearful Ghanem Jawad at the Khoei foundation in London confirmed that al-Khoei had been attacked, but didn't know if he'd been killed. He accused a group of "followers of the regime" of attacking the 2 men. British PM Tony Blair said he was "saddened & appalled" by news of al-Khoei's death. "He was a religious leader who embodied hope & reconciliation and who was committed to building a better future for the people of Iraq," he said in London.

    Najaf is the third-holiest city for the world's nearly 120 million Shiites behind Mecca & Medina in Saudi Arabia. Ali Mosque holds the tomb of the Shiites' most beloved saint, Imam Ali Ibn Abu Talib, Prophet Muhammad's cousin & son-in-law.
    Najaf, whose name in Arabic means "a high land," is located about 160 km (100 miles) south of Baghdad on a high desert plateau overlooking the world's largest cemetery, where Shiites aspire to bury their dead. Najaf also is a center for scientific, literary and theological studies for the Islamic world.
      Rebuild Iraq?   excerpted   ¹
      Get the old gang back
      4.24.03   Arianna Huffington L.A. Times
    … cozy … blackout curtains the Bush administration used to cloak awarding of contracts to rebuild Iraq … muscular, cash-drunk, handpicked corporate Lotharios vying for the affection of their governmental kissing cousins. Relationships between those doling out these fantastically valuable deals and those receiving them is so intimate that taxpayers should demand the participants be checked for STDs before the first megabuck check is (given) … 2 ultimate Washington insiders, Halliburton & Bechtel Group.
    … Halliburton & former CEO Cheney. But Bechtel connections are really byzantine, starting with Geo. Shultz, former Bechtel president, former Reagan Sec.State and now both Bechtel board member and Committee for the Liberation of Iraq chair. Bechtel sr vp Jack Sheehan, member of Pentagon's influential Defense Policy Board. Chair & CEO Riley Bechtel, who in Feb. 2003 was appointed by Bush to President's Export Council.

    Access, influence and positions of ostensible public service (for) … most precious commodity of all: experience. In the 1980s, the co. wanted to build a pipeline to carry oil from Iraq to the Jordanian port of Aqaba, project ardently supported by the Reagan administration, which included Shultz & fellow Bechtel alumnus, Sec.Defense Weinberger.
    Backers of the Bechtel pipeline lined up a Reagan-Bush power players to push for the scheme, incl former Sec.Defense & CIA chief James Schlesinger, former national security adv. Wm Clark, former national security adv. Robert McFarlane and former Atty. Gen. Ed Meese.

    Though not on Bechtel payroll, one working hardest to convince Iraqis was Don Rumsfeld as Reagan's special MidEast envoy in 1983. Rumsfeld met with Hussein to try to convince him to sign on to Bechtel's pipe dream. U.S. Agency for Intl Development admin. Andrew Natsios, agency responsible for handing lucrative Iraqi rebuilding contract to Bechtel, used to be in charge of overseeing Boston's "Big Dig," massive highway project managed by Bechtel that went from a projected cost of $4.5 billion to an actual cost of $14 billion.
    In a scathing letter sent to Natsios, Massachusetts inspector general called Bechtel's handling of the Big Dig "an invitation to fraud, waste and abuse." … 3 years later, the very short list of companies invited to bid on $1.5 billion in Iraq contracts, Natsios didn't hesitate to include Bechtel. …
    Sen. Charles Grassley R-IA: "The purpose behind the abuse was so that cronies of the president could win the spoils of political gain for themselves." … He was actually talking about Bill & Hillary Clinton's Travelgate.


    Who sold what to Iraq?
    U.S. aims to hunt down companies that supplied Saddam
    3.30.03   Nelson D. Schwartz Fortune

    When the first wave of American soldiers swept out of the desert north toward Baghdad, Iraqis weren't the only ones who experienced shock & awe. In the thick of battle, U.S. commanders discovered that the Iraqi army was able to jam the global-positioning systems the military uses to pinpoint everything from cruise missile attacks to the location of troops on the ground. "It was a technological preemptive strike," says a sr military source.
    It was also a prime example of how private companies violated the U.S. / UN embargo imposed on Iraq more than a decade ago. Russian firms supplied the jammers to Iraq in the past few years, prompting a personal protest from President Bush to Russian leader Vladimir Putin. They didn't exist during the first Gulf war. The news about the GPS-blocking devices is just the beginning of what's likely to be a series of revelations detailing how companies, incl American ones, helped supply Saddam Hussein's war machine during the past decade.

    That's because in addition to searching for weapons of mass destruction, U.S. forces are scouring Iraq for evidence of who sold what to Saddam. Military sources have told FORTUNE that special teams are already on the ground, sifting through files to determine where Iraq got everything from rocket parts to fiber-optic technology. Despite both U.S. laws & UN sanctions that prohibited all but a handful of commercial dealings with Baghdad, there have been persistent reports that companies from Russia, France, and China, among others, were breaking the embargo.
    When evidence in Iraq is analyzed, says a top Washington official who deals with trade policy, it's likely that at least a few U.S. co. will face fines or perhaps even criminal prosecution. "The fact that American companies have broken the embargo with Iran suggests that there will be some leads in Iraq," adds the govt official, who spoke with FORTUNE on condition of anonymity. "Those of us in law enforcement certainly contemplate that things will be found in Iraq."

    Probing the byzantine web of deals that kept technology flowing to Iraq is a complex job. It's likely to involve teams from the Treasury, State, and Commerce depts, as well as the Pentagon & CIA. For now the main task is locating the forbidden goods and their paper trail. Sources say units made up of both military personnel and representatives of the CIA & other agencies have been trained to operate in volatile areas inside Iraq, taking inventory of contraband items and poring over records.
    Similar task forces operated after the U.S. invasion of Panama in 1989 and NATO's intervention in the Balkans in the mid-1990s, but this time the job is much bigger. Because of Iraq's oil riches, Saddam had a far easier time of evading the embargo than Manuel Noriega & Slobodan Milosevic.

    Fixing blame can be tough, however. Business transactions with embargoed nations are usually conducted through intermediaries, with China & United Arab Emirates as common transshipment points. To further complicate matters, U.S. companies might innocently sell something to a Chinese buyer, only to learn later that it ended up in Iraq. For example, Wisconsin Project on Nuclear Arms Control Kelly Motz says China's giant Huawei Technologies is believed to have supplied Saddam's army with sophisticated communications hardware even as it was doing business with the likes of IBM, Motorola, Hewlett Packard, and Qualcomm.
    "These companies might have thought they were just selling telecom equipt into an emerging Asian market," says Motz. "However, it's been known since early 2001 that Huawei has had dealings with Iraq. So any deals that might have been done since then are questionable."

    If it turns out that companies intentionally evaded the ban, govt officials say they are loaded for bear. "We won't tolerate the breaking of the embargo," says Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control dir. Richard Newcomb. "If there's a knowing violation, we would prosecute to the full extent of the law." In 2001, the Commerce Dept hit McDonnell Douglas, unit of Boeing, with a $2.12 million fine for improperly selling machine tools to China. Fines for dealing with Iraq are likely to be larger.
    If evidence turns up that a particular firm knowingly sold items like night-vision goggles or gas masks to Iraq, federal agencies might impose what they call the "death penalty", total ban on all exports by the guilty firm. Criminal charges for executives are also a distinct possibility.

    It's going to take time to determine just who did business with Iraq. But the military, for one, seems eager to shine a light in some otherwise dark corners. "We will have everything at our disposal," says Army's V Corps officer Maj. Max Blumenfeld in Kuwait. Documenting Iraq's deals, he says, "will justify this operation and show the world what we've been saying all along about Saddam Hussein and his efforts to acquire weapons of mass destruction."
      Russia
    U.S. pressures Russia over arms sales to Iraq
    3.24.03  
    CNN

    Wash.D.C.   U.S. on Monday continued to pressure Moscow to rein in 2 Russian companies it accuses of supplying military equipt to Hussein. … Wash.Post identified 2 of the companies as Aviaconversiya, which allegedly supplied jamming equipt, and KBP Tula, an optics co. Aviaconversiya, according to the co. Web site, produces jamming equipt which can suppress radio signals from global positioning systems.
    A high-ranking Russian official Monday said allegations by U.S. that Russia is involved in illegal shipments of military equipt to Iraq are "completely baseless."
    "There were absolutely no violations of the arms embargo," the official said, adding that "on numerous occasions Moscow gave a detailed account of all of this to the American govt starting Oct. 2002."

    The heads of 2 accused Russian companies have denied any involvement and at a Pentagon briefing Monday Maj Gen. Stanley McChrystal said that the equipt hadn't had an impact on coalition forces in Iraq. Sec.State Powell … Powell said he had called Russian foreign minister Igor Ivanov earlier in the day and was told the Russian could find no evidence that such sales were occurring.
    "Ivanov assured me that, with enough information, the right information, they would do something about it. But, frankly, we believe we have given them more than enough information, so that they should have been able to find out the truth of it." Powell added, "I must say that, so far, I'm disappointed at the response."


    Bush accuses Russian firms of aiding Iraq
    3.24.03   Ron Fournier AP

    Wash.D.C.   Russia is putting American troops at risk by selling antitank guided missiles, jamming devices and night-vision goggles to Iraq, the administration said Monday as President Bush called Vladimir Putin to express U.S. complaints. Bush raised his objections in a tense telephone call with Putin, who in turn charged that U.S. was creating "a humanitarian catastrophe'' in Iraq.
    Issues between Washington & Moscow range from missile-defense plans to NATO expansion. Russia sided with France & Germany to block a Bush-backed U.N. resolution sanctioning military conflict to disarm Iraqi president Hussein.

    After months of monitoring sales to Iraq, U.S. received information in the past 48 hours about "the kind of equipt that will put our men & women in harm's way,'' Sec.State Powell said Monday on Fox News. Later, he told Britain's Sky News that he hoped to convey fresh information to Moscow. Asked if he is certain the equipt was in Iraq, Powell replied, "Yes.''
    White House spokesman Ari Fleischer said there was "ongoing cooperation & support to Iraqi military forces being provided by a Russian co. that produces GPS jamming equipt.'' The technology blocks satellite signals that guide bombs, missiles and even troop movements.Asked if the items were being used against U.S. troops, Fleischer said, "They were not provided for the purpose of sitting on shelves.''

    U.S. officials declined to disclose how the Russian technology was transported to Iraq, but they said Iraq has its ways of importing items.In particular, U.S. officials alleged Russian technicians were in Iraq during the last few weeks to provide technical support for the GPS jammers. The technicians were from a Russian private co., not the govt.

    Maj. Gen. Stanley McChrystal told reporters at the Pentagon that the jamming devices had not hurt U.S. troops on the battlefield thus far. Fleischer said U.S. also is concerned that Russian firms have sold night-vision goggles and anti-tank guided missiles to Iraq. U.S. holds Moscow responsible for sales by Russian companies, arguing that the govt should do more to monitor the companies and stop exports.

    Earlier, Russian Foreign Minister Igor Ivanov hotly denied selling military equipt in violation of intl sanctions against Iraq. "No fact supporting the American's anxiety has been found,'' he said. But Powell told Fox News that the Bush administration has given Ivanov and his govt "more than enough information'' to support its assertion. Administration officials said the accusations were based on confidential U.S. intelligence.
    "President Putin assured President Bush that he would look into it,'' Fleischer said. "President Bush said he looked forward to hearing the results.''

    This is not the first time Moscow has been accused of leaking sensitive technology to U.S. enemies in spite of pledges to tighten its export controls.Fleischer said concerns have been raised at the "highest levels'' of govt over the past year, but Monday's call was the first time to his knowledge that Bush broached the subject directly with Putin.
    The personal relationship between Putin & Bush is strong enough to overcome this disagreement, Fleischer said, though he made clear the telephone call was unusually blunt. "The two of them are comfortable saying directly to each other what they think,'' the spokesman said.

    In Moscow, Putin called on Iraq to treat war prisoners humanely and warned Bush of the danger of a humanitarian disaster in the region. "The number of victims on both sides is growing, and this gives rise to regret,'' Putin told top Cabinet members. Later, in his telephone call with Bush, the Russian leader called attention to "the humanitarian consequences of military operations,'' the presidential press service said.
    Bush, who had no public appearances Monday, told reporters a day earlier that "massive amounts of humanitarian aid should begin moving within the next 36 hours.'' National security adviser Condoleezza Rice is visiting U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan on Tuesday to discuss humanitarian issues, a sr administration official said.

    DoD photo by StaffSgt. D.W. Richards USAF

    Russia demands seized tanker's immediate release
    2.3.00   CNN

    Moscow   Russia on Thursday demanded immediate release of a tanker seized in the Persian Gulf by the U.S. Navy on suspicion of violating the U.N.-imposed oil embargo on Iraq. "The Russian side resolutely insists the tanker is immediately released," Interfax news agency quoted Russian deputy Foreign Minister Vasily Seredin as saying. Russia "expressed puzzlement" to U.S. & United Arab Emirates over the incident, Seredin said.
    Sailors from the cruiser USS Monterey boarded the Russian ship Volgonef Wednesday without resistance from its captain or crew, a sr U.S. official told CNN. The deputy minister, echoing earlier remarks by Transport Minister Sergei Frank, said the tanker was carrying Iranian fuel oil. "The vessel never entered Iraqi territorial waters or Iraqi ports," he said.
      Russia wants Iraq sanctions ended
      5.19.99   Nicole Winfield AP
    Russia, China and France suggested Wednesday that the Security Council suspend sanctions on Iraq once a new arms monitoring system is in place, part of a new round of negotiations on drafting a new U.N. policy for Baghdad. The U.S. immediately rejected the proposal and said it would instead consider an alternative draft resolution submitted Tuesday by Britain & the Netherlands which calls for foreign investment in Iraq's oil sector after U.N. arms inspections resume.

    Russia expects & opposes military strike against Iraq   1.26.98   Arabic News

    In a statement issued Sunday to London-based al-Hayat daily, a high-ranking Russian official expects Iraq to receive a US-British military strike targeting military positions after Eid al-Fitr, adding that the strike will be carried out without legitimate intl approval.

    New Delhi   As the Bush administration builds its case for a war with Iraq, it is getting help from an unexpected place, a 2 year investigation by Indian intelligence officials into a little known Indian engineering co. NEC Engineers Private Ltd. being probed for violating Indian export controls by helping Iraq to acquire equipt & materials "capable of being used for the production of chemicals for mass destruction," according to Indian court records obtained by CNN.
    Procuring such materials would place Iraq in violation of UN ecurity Council resolutions.

    According to the court documents, NEC Engineers Private Ltd. also sent technical personnel to Iraq within the past several years to the Fallujah II chemical plant. UN weapons inspectors say the plant is now inoperative, but it has been used in the past to produce large quantities of chlorine, a chemical commonly used in water purification, but is also a building block for chemical weapons.
    In statements to Indian intelligence authorities in the records obtained by CNN, NEC Engineers Private Ltd.'s employees acknowledge they were sent to Fallujah II to install equipt. These records also contain a letter from NEC Engineers' Private Limited to Fallujah's managers demanding $1 million for services rendered at the plant.

    Between 1998 & 2001, investigators allege, NEC Eng. Private Ltd; shipped 10 consignments of highly sensitive equipt worth $800,000, incl titanium vessels & centrifugal pumps. Titanium is an extremely strong, yet light material that is frequently used in manufacturing the casing & warheads for missiles.
    The shipments also contained 3 tons of what is called "spherical aluminium powder," a substance that can be used to make specialty paints & coatings, but is also an ingredient in solid rocket fuel for missiles. According to a British intelligence report, most of NEC Engineers' exports of spherical aluminium powder found their way to the Al Mamoun rocket propulsion facility just south of Baghdad.

    Indian authorities have launched an investigation to find out what was shipped to Iraq and when. "This company has been investigated for violation of domestic laws concerning export controls, and currently it is not allowed to export or import because of action taken by the concerned authorities," said Indian govt spokesperson Navtej Sarna.
    Over the past few months, court records show, 3 NEC Eng. Private Ltd officials have been detained for interrogation. None of these officials have yet been charged, although prosecutors say they expect to file criminal charges soon. Indian investigators say NEC Eng. Private Ltd. falsified Indians customs documents and mislabeled goods to get its shipments out of India and routed highly sensitive goods to Iraq through other MidEastern countries to evade UN restrictions on Iraqi imports.

    The company admits it did export some titanium products, but not to Iraq. It says it had proper licenses to ship the goods from the Indian port of Mumbai to Amman, Jordan, and Dubai in the United Arab Emirates. NEC Eng. Private Ltd lawyer R.K. Anand says he does not know how the goods reached Iraq. "The goods might have reached Iraq from somewhere else," he said.
    Anand says the company never shipped items banned for export by India, such as spherical aluminum powder. "This spherical powder is not available in India ... It's made only in Germany and one other country, to the best of my knowledge. I don't think that you can supply it from India," Anand said.

    Iraqi ambassador to New Delhi, Salah Al Mukhtar also says his country has no connections with NEC Eng. Private Ltd. "NEC Eng. Private Ltd. has exported some material to both UAE & Jordan legally, but not to Iraq," he said. "There is no proof this material reached Iraq." The Iraqis are also dismissing court records containing admissions by NEC Eng. Private Ltd. officials who say they visited Fallujah several times.
    "The lawyer of the accused said officially and published here in New Delhi that the accused was tortured to admit this information," Ambassador Mukhtar told CNN. Indian intelligence denies torturing any co. officials.

    As this case takes on a more public dimension, Mukhtar says its all part of a ploy by the U.S. govt to prepare intl public opinion for a possible war with Iraq. "It is part of the American campaign to accuse Iraq and demonize Iraq intlly," he said.
    Last July, U.S. officially sanctioned NEC Eng. Private Ltd. founder Hans Raj Shiv under the Iran-Iraq Non- proliferation Act. Shiv is currently not permitted to conduct any business with U.S. According to Indian investigators, Shiv has failed to appear at any court hearings and is believed to have left the country.

    Indian investigators say this case unravels a complex & well thought out scheme for supplying Iraq with the building blocks for development of chemical weapons & missiles in violation of U.N. resolutions. Senior Indian officials concede this case has tarnished the country's image. NEC electronics co. of Japan is in no way connected to NEC Eng. Private Ltd.


    A beautiful friendship?   What France sees in Iraq
    10.28.02   Michel Gurfinkiel
    Weekly Standard ¹

    Modern France's love affair with Iraq was fleetingly foreshadowed in the year 803, when Harun ar-Rashid, legendary Abbassid caliph of Baghdad, sent an embassy to the equally famous emperor Charlemagne, ruler of the Franks.
    It seemed a promising beginning: The caliph's gifts to the emperor incl unbreakable Damascene swords, a clepsydra, and an elephant. Nevertheless, many centuries would pass before the 2 countries came into regular contact.
    In the meantime, the Mongol invaders of the 13th century would burn Iraq's ancient cities, ruin the irrigation system along the Tigris & Euphrates, and put 90% of its people to the sword.

    Even in the late 19th & early 20th centuries, when the French were active in many Arab lands, the Maghreb, Egypt, Syria, and Lebanon, they stayed out of Iraq, an Ottoman province and preserve of the Germans until 1917, when it fell into the hands of the British as a nominally independent Hashemite monarchy.
    Only after the Iraqi republican revolution of 1958, most brutal & bloody coup ever carried out in an Arab country, did the relationship change. The Soviet Union replaced Britain as the most influential foreign power in Baghdad, and France came close behind it.

    Two men saw to this. The first was President Charles de Gaulle. Leader of the Resistance during WWII, General de Gaulle had made a political comeback in 1958 and set up the Fifth Republic, dedicated to the rebirth of France as a great power. That entailed modernizing the economy at home and challenging the postwar div. of the world between the superpowers, U.S. & Soviet Union, in particular, challenging U.S. as paramount Western power.
    One way to advance both goals was to support Third World nationalism. In less than 4 years, de Gaulle transformed the old colonial empire in Africa into a loose constellation of client-states, making possible new links with other countries, notably in the Arab world. To a Conservative member of the National Assembly who lamented the transfer of the oil-rich Sahara to independent Algeria in 1962, de Gaulle retorted: "Don't you see we have traded Grandpa's empire for the much broader empire of the future, and the limited oil of the Sahara for the much more plentiful oil of Arabia?"

    There was some logic to this, except that the richest Arab or Islamic oil countries, from Libya to Saudi Arabia to Iran, monarchies all. remained very much under Anglo-Saxon influence. Iraq, however, seemed to present an opportunity.
    The revolutionary regime had started to expropriate the assets of the former colonial oil co., the largely Anglo- American Iraq Petroleum Co. Could Iraq be brought into the French orbit? De Gaulle was confident that even the Americans would not object, eager as they were to prevent a Soviet takeover.

    But then, who was in charge in Baghdad? The new regime was ridden with coups & intrigues. Kassem, first republican leader, was overthrown and put to death in 1963. There was a succession of further nationalist rulers, either followers of Nasser or supporters of the more dogmatic Baath party, hardly strong & stable leadership that France would need to deal with.
    The man who came to de Gaulle's aid at this juncture was the historian & military expert Jacques Benoist-Méchin. A most unlikely go-between, Benoist-Méchin was ostensibly de Gaulle's very opposite. During WWII, he had not merely sided with Marshall Philippe Pétain's Vichy régime over de Gaulle's Free French, but had explicitly supported Hitler's New Order in Europe. He would even report in his "Memoirs" that he had warned Hitler, in the course of an interview in Berlin in 1942, about some of his strategic decisions; and commented that the Fuhrer had "unfortunately" not heeded his advice.

    De Gaulle, however, was not one to classify people by conventional criteria. Above all, he admired Benoist- Méchin's great "History of the German Army Since the Armistice," first published in 1938, which explained how the Reichswehr, the Weimar Republic's rump-army, had been turned into an elite corps paving the way for Hitler's Wehrmacht.
    In fact, de Gaulle's first order, upon taking over the Ministry of War as head of the National Liberation Govt of France in 1944, had been to have the book reissued & distributed to the officers of the resurrected French army. As for its author, de Gaulle could not spare him some measure of punishment, but made sure he would survive. Benoist-Méchin was sentenced to death for treason by France's High Court of Justice in June 1947, only to be reprieved almost at once and sent back to his studies.

    Benoist-Méchin became as strong a supporter of de Gaulle's anti-Anglo-Saxon policies as he had been of Pétain's. He knew the MidEast almost as well as he knew Germany. He had written the first, and to this day, the best biographies of Mustafa Kemal & Ibn Saud ever published in French, and was a confidant of most Arab leaders, from King Hassan II of Morocco to Nasser.
    But his ties with Iraq were even stronger. Sept. 1941 while serving as sr asst to Vichy govt vice president, he engineered bilateral agreement allowing Germany to transfer weapons through the then French-controlled territory of Syria to pro-Axis Iraqi leader Rashid Ali who had just toppled pro-British regent Abdullilah & his PM Nuri Said. The German weapons transfer did not materialize, as a month later, the Free French wrested Syria from the Vichy French, and the British restored the regent in Iraq.

    But Rashid Ali's people never forgot how helpful Benoist-Méchin had been prepared to be. Many of them were sacked, but those who managed to stay in the Iraqi armed forces were active in the 1958 revolution. They soon got in touch with their old friend, who in turn introduced them to the appropriate people at the Quai d'Orsay, the French Foreign Office.
    It was then that de Gaulle summoned Benoist-Méchin himself to the Elysée Palace. "Iraq really is the key to your Arab policy," the former Vichy official would recall telling the president. "Its oil reserves are second only to Saudi Arabia's. And the most reliable people in Iraq are the Baathists."

    De Gaulle resigned in 1969, not long after Saddam Hussein, cleverest & most ruthless of all the Baathists, came to power. Saddam was to bring his country stability, albeit by totalitarian means.

    He had a soft spot for France. His uncle & surrogate father, Khairallah Tulfah, had been involved in the Rashid Ali coup.

      [ This uncle was the first to assign Saddam the task of assassination, the target being the loudest accuser of the uncle's Nazi collusion. Saddam's incredibly disfunctional childhood is clearly the cause of his sociopathy
    cf. King of Terror, Con Coughlin auth. ]
    Contacts initiated by Benoist-Méchin eventually led to full-fledged accords negotiated under de Gaulle's successor, Georges Pompidou. It fell to Jacques Chirac, one of Pompidou's most trusted assistants & ministers until 1974; then, under Pompidou's successor, Valéry Giscard d'Estaing, French PM 1974 -976, to formalize these agreements in treaties & contracts.

    Of course, it would be absurd to claim that Gaullist France had deliberately armed Iraq, much less provided it with weapons of mass destruction. France was simply advancing its national interests. Once the Iraqis promised not to build nuclear weapons, it wasn't up to Paris to determine whether or not they were secretly taking steps to turn the Osirak civilian nuclear reactor into a military facility.
    Earlier French govts had not been fussy about how the Israelis were using their French-built reactor at Dimona, in the Negev desert. The same Gaullist or post-Gaullist govts that negotiated with Saddam Hussein's Iraq were engaged in parallel talks & accords, even over nuclear facilities, with the shah's Iran, Iraq's rival for hegemony in the Persian Gulf.

    As for Chirac himself, he was not responsible for the most consequential step taken by France regarding Iraq in nuclear matters: the decision to provide Iraq enriched plutonium. That decision was made by his successor as prime minister, Raymond Barre.

    Baghdad   Immediate popular reaction in Baghdad on Saturday to the loss of the U.S. space shuttle Columbia & its 7 member crew incl the first Israeli in space was that its was God's retribution on Americans."We are happy that it broke up," govt employee Abdul Jabbar al- Quraishi said. "God wants to show that his might is greater than the Americans. They have encroached on our country. God is avenging us."
    Car mechanic Mohammed Jaber al-Tamini noted Israeli air force Col. Ilan Ramon was among the dead when the shuttle broke up shortly before its return to earth. "Israel launched an aggression on us when it raided our nuclear reactor without any reason (in 1981), now time has come and God has retaliated to their aggression," Tamini said.
    In the end, only one of the 6 planned shipments was carried out. In 1981, the Israelis felt sufficiently threatened by Iraq to destroy the Osirak reactor in one of the most daring airborne raids in history. By then, the shah had been replaced by the Ayatollah Khomeini's Islamic Republic of Iran, and Saddam Hussein had invaded this new neighbor.

    The French, who had just elected a Socialist president, François Mitterrand, for the first time in 27 years, wondered whether they should continue the relationship with Iraq. One reason not to was that Saddam was an unreliable customer. Most French companies involved with Iraq were actually getting paid by Coface, French govt agency that backs export contracts.
    Still, there was the prospect that Iraq might win the war with Iran and, with its enormous oil resources, become the dominant Mideast power. Moreover, solidarity with Baghdad, cemented by the high-profile cooperation & commercial contracts of the 1970s, had become quite popular with the French public. Gaullists saw it as part of France's sacrosanct "Arab policy," a legacy from the general, as well as a personal achievement of Chirac.

    The Communists, still a significant political force in the 1980s, were supportive of the generally pro-Soviet Iraqi regime. The anti-American left, a rising force within the Socialist party, saw Saddam as an "anti-imperialist leader" and even as a "secularist bulwark" against Shiite fundamentalism. The Catholic church had contacts of its own with Tariq Aziz, Saddam Hussein's Christian foreign minister. Anti-Semites & anti-Zionists of all stripes, incl latter-day Vichy loyalists, were enthusiastic, too.
    Mitterrand eventually agreed to resume and even upgrade French cooperation with Iraq, both supplying weapons and entering into industrial partnerships. By 1989, when Saddam Hussein finally defeated Khomeini, about $10 billion worth of French arms had been delivered to Iraq, of which less than $5 billion had been paid for. And Iraq-related orders accounted for about half of all French arms production.

    Saddam's invasion of Kuwait a year later only rekindled the debate. Was Iraq to be fought or supported? A significant part of French opinion, from the hard left to the far right, stood by Iraq. Its champion, the Socialist defense minister, Jean-Pierre Chevènement, resigned from the cabinet rather than condone military intervention.
    An even larger share of the public was inclined to neutrality. Mitterrand, however, joined the American-led intl coalition for the liberation of Kuwait (not without engaging in last-minute negotiations with Baghdad), as well as the smaller coalition that later forced Iraqi air forces out of Kurdistan & southern Iraq. He did this out of sheer realpolitik. It was obvious to him that Iraq was no match for U.S. and that the old Gaullist strategy made no sense now that the Cold War was over and the Soviet Union was disintegrating. It no longer served the national interest of France to challenge America, but to be among the winners and so have a say in the final settlement, whatever it might be.

    Nearly a dozen years later, little has changed in this regard. For all its anti-American rhetoric, France actively supported U.S. military endeavors all around the globe throughout the 1990s, be it in Bosnia, in Kosovo, or in Afghanistan. The rationale is still to be seen as a peer of the one & only superpower, and incidentally to keep in touch with the superpower's ever-improving military technology & training.
    Regarding Iraq, France now confronts an ironic situation: Iraq was crushed in 1991, as Mitterrand foresaw it would be, but GHWBush then Bill Clinton allowed Saddam to survive. The only sensible response for the French was to keep their distance.

    Now new American president GWBush, seems serious about getting rid of the Baathist dictatorship, things may change again. France, too, has a new president, the very Jacques Chirac who helped Pompidou & Giscard cement the Iraqi-French relationship in the 1970s.
    French public opinion is arguably more pro-Iraq or neutralist than ever, if only because of France's growing Islamic population. But Chirac's own position is more subtle. In recent months, he has repeatedly expressed concern about a "preventive war" against Iraq not "authorized" by UN or the world community. Still, unlike the neutralist German chancellor, Gerhard Schröder, he has not ruled out war as such. That would be to step onto the sidelines, and France must be a great power at any cost.

    Iraq: a decade of devastation Middle East Rpt 215
    "And they called it peace" US Policy on Iraq
    6.00   Phyllis Bennis Inst. for Policy Studies cf ¶22

    As of the spring of 2000, the US-led sanctions remain in place. But changes are undeniably afoot. The passage of Security Council resolution 1284 provides a useful indication: it did not qualitatively change the devastating impact of the existing economic sanctions (that failure led von Sponeck to resign shortly after its passage). It tinkers with the sanctions regime, creates a new arms monitoring agency and considers, more than a year down the line, the possibility that some economic restrictions might be temporarily suspended. But economic sanctions remain the default position, unless the Council, including the US, affirmatively votes to keep them suspended after each four-month period. Under such restrictions, no oil company worth its stockholders is likely to risk large-scale investment in Iraq, however much they may covet Iraq's oil wealth. Without such investment, repair and reconstruction of the oil industry itself will remain impossible, and Iraq's poverty will only deepen.
    Even with those limitations, it is certain that 1284 could not have passed US muster as recently as two years ago. Ironically, it has long been clear that the sanctions policy holds no strategic value. Until the last few months, there was no political constituency (except the Kuwaiti royal family) demanding that economic sanctions remain in place. The refusal even to consider lifting sanctions reflected craven political concerns: the US couldn't appear "soft on Saddam Hussein."

    In early spring 2000, the American-Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) suddenly seized the pro-sanctions mantle. Until that time AIPAC had largely avoided the fray, deeming Iran a far more serious potential threat to Israel than Baghdad's degraded military. In February 2000, after a congressional letter had called on President Clinton to lift the economic sanctions, AIPAC, by some reports at the urging of the White House, began a campaign supporting a "keep the sanctions" letter initiated by Rep. Tom Lantos, chair of the House Human Rights Caucus.

    By Dec. 1999, US policy faced isolation, both domestically and intlly. In the UN, only the British remained qualitatively supportive. The Netherlands, with a new foreign minister from the conservative Liberal Party, moved to defend the US-UK alliance, with half-hearted support from dismayed Dutch diplomats. But support for sanctions was fraying. Resolution 1284 squeaked by with permanent members France, China and Russia, as well as Malaysia, abstaining. France, Russia and China were unwilling to spend the requisite political capital to veto 1284. But, as the Wall St Journal described it on May 1, now it was "unclear which side is more isolated: the dictator who has successfully defied sanctions, or the Anglo-US alliance that insists they remain in place." In that context, the growing domestic opposition took on new visibility. In 1999 Cong. John Conyers had sent a letter to Clinton signed by 40 of his colleagues, calling for a "delinking" of economic & military sanctions against Iraq. Earlier that year, during a speaking tour sponsored by major peace, faith-based and Arab-American organizations, this writer and former UN Humanitarian Coordinator Denis Halliday spoke to over 10,000 people directly, and reached hundreds of thousands more through op-eds, radio and TV interviews in 22 cities. But results would take a while longer.

    In the summer of 1999, the first group of congressional staff traveled to Iraq to examine the impact of sanctions. All but one represented members of the Progressive Caucus of the House; three were also members of the Congressional Black Caucus. By spring 2000 the latest congressional letter had 71 signatures, and demanded economic sanctions be lifted. Democratic Whip and close Clinton ally David Bonior called the economic sanctions "infanticide masquerading as policy." Rep. Tony Hall, known as "Mister Hunger" for his 20 year commitment to that issue, traveled to Iraq in April 2000 to examine the humanitarian conditions. He did not call for lifting the economic sanctions, but brought back a devastating critique of the sanctions and admitted that the US was the main problem within the UN's Sanctions Committee. By May 2000, Rep. Conyers & Cynthia McKinney called for an official congressional delegation to Iraq.
    U.S. tilt toward Iraq 1980-1984 National Security archive 2.25.03 CIA gave Ba'ath party wherewithal for 1963 coup contra regime of nationalist army officer Abd al-Karim Qassim
    When US turned a blind eye to poison gas
    America knew Baghdad was using chemical weapons against the Kurds in 1988. Why has it taken 14 years to muster its outrage?   ¹ ²
    9.1.02   Dilip Hiro The Observer

    When it comes to demonising Saddam Hussein, nothing captures the popular imagination in America better than the statement that 'he gassed his own people'. This is an allusion to the deployment of chemical weapons by Iraq's military in the Iraqi Kurdistan town of Halabja in March 1988 during the Iran-Iraq war, and then in the territory administered by the Tehran-backed Kurdish rebels after the ceasefire 5 months later.
    Iraq's use of poison gases in war & in peace was public knowledge. What did the U.S. admin do about it then? Absolutely nothing. The pro-Baghdad lobby was so powerful during the Reagan admin that it got the White House to foil the Senate's attempt to penalise Iraq for its violation of the Geneva Protocol on Chemical Weapons to which it was a signatory. This made Saddam believe that the US was his firm ally, a deduction that paved the way for his brutal invasion & occupation of Kuwait and the 1991 Gulf war, outcomes of which have not yet fully played themselves out.

    Between Oct. 1983 & autumn 1988, Baghdad deployed 100,000 munitions, containing mainly mustard gas, which produces blisters on the skin & inside the lungs, and nerve gas, which damages the nervous system, but also cyanide gas, which kills instantly.
    From initially using these lethal agents in extremis to repulse Iran's offensives, the Iraqis proceeded to use them as a key factor in their assaults in the spring & summer of 1988 to regain their lost territories, incl strategic Fao peninsula.

    That the Pentagon had first-hand knowledge of Iraq's use of chemical agents during these offensives was confirmed by NY Times 2 weeks ago. 'After the Iraqi army, with American planning assistance, retook the Fao peninsula, Defense Intelligence Agency officer Lt Col Rick Francona, now retired, was sent to tour the battlefield with Iraqi officers,' wrote Patrick Tyler of the Times. 'Francona saw zones marked off for chemical contamination, and containers for the drug atropine scattered around, indicating that Iraqi soldiers had taken injections to protect themselves from the effects of gas that might blow back over their positions.'

    In 1986, it was with the aim of recapturing the Fao peninsula, taken by the Iranians in February, that Saddam's military used chemical agents so extensively that the UN Security Council stopped accepting its routine denials. Following an examination of 700 Iranian casualties, UN experts concluded that Baghdad had deployed mustard & nerve gases many times.
    Instead of condemning Baghdad for this, the Security Council, dominated by Washington & Moscow, both pro- Iraq, coupled its condemnation of Baghdad with its disapproval of 'the prolongation of the war' by Tehran for refusing a truce until the council had named Iraq the aggressor.

    Despite its repeated reiteration of neutrality, the US had all along been pro-Baghdad. It lost no time in supplying Iraq with intelligence collected by the Saudi-owned but Pentagon-operated Airborne Warning & Control Systems (AWACS) in the region. Once Iraq and U.S. had resumed diplomatic links after the re-election of Reagan as President in Nov.1984, the military cooperation blossomed.

    Starting in July 1986, aided by the Pentagon which clandestinely seconded Air Force officers to work with their Iraqi counterparts, Saddam's air force greatly improved its targeting accuracy, striking relentlessly the enemy's power plants, factories and bridges, and extending the range of its strikes to Iran's oil terminals in the lower Gulf. Under the rubric of escorting Kuwaiti oil tankers, the US built up an armada in the Gulf, which clashed with the small, under-equipped Iranian navy and sank 2 Iranian offshore oil platforms in the lower Gulf in retaliation for Iran's missile attack on an American-flagged supertanker docked in Kuwaiti waters.

    Against this background, Iraq started hitting Tehran with its upgraded Scud ground-to-ground missiles in late Feb. 1988. To retake Halabja from Iran & its Kurdish allies, who had captured it in March, Iraq's air force attacked it with poison gas bombs. The objective was to take out the occupying Iranian troops (who had by then left the town); instead, the assault killed 3,200 to 5,000 civilians.
    The images of men, woman and children, frozen in instant death, relayed by the Iranian media, shocked the world. Yet no condemnation came from Washington. It was only when, following the ceasefire with Iran in August, Saddam made widespread use of chemical agents to recapture 4,000 sq miles controlled by the Kurdish insurgents that the Security Council decided to dispatch a team to find out if Baghdad had resorted to chemical arms. Saddam refused to cooperate.

    But instead of pressuring him to reverse his stand, or face a ban on the sale of American military equipt & advanced technology to Iraq by the revival of the Senate's bill, US Sec.State Shultz chose to say only that interviews with the Kurdish refugees in Turkey and 'other sources' (which remained obscure) pointed towards Iraqi use of chemical agents. These 2 elements did not constitute 'conclusive' evidence. This was the verdict of Shultz's British counterpart, Sir Geoffrey Howe: 'If conclusive evidence is obtained, then punitive measures against Iraq have not been ruled out.'
    As neither he nor Shultz is known to have made a further move to get at the truth, Iraq went unpunished. That was the end of the story until GW Bush admin hawks recently began bandying about the revolting phrase of 'gassing his own people' for their partisan ends.


      reading
    "Sanctions as siege wafare" 3.22.99
    The Nation

    Spider's Web   Alan Friedman Fin.Times London (1994, Bantam)   Secret history of White House illegally arming Iraq

    Shell Game Peter Mantius (1995, St. Martin's Press)
    Evidence is clear U.S. assisted Iraq in obtaining cluster bombs, nuclear enrichment technology, U.S. designed munitions, missile technology, $5billion in loan guarantees & much more in spite of Saddam's open hatred of U.S. and his wanton use of poison gas against his own civilian population.

    The lessons of empire   £   As Bush considers colonizing Iraq, he ought to look at the last attempt
    9.30.02   Michael Elliott Time

    The photograph below of a fierce-looking group of men cradling antique machine guns comes from an old album in my home. It dates from about 1930, and its caption reads, "Sheik Mahmoud of Kurdistan. Surrendered to Political Officer Victor Holt VC accompanied by F\O M.O."
    "Sheik Mahmoud" was Mahmoud Barzanji, chieftain of a famous Kurdish clan, who led a series of revolts against British rule in Iraq after World War I. "F\O M.O." was Royal Air Force Flight Officer Max Oxford, my late father-in- law. Max had splendid adventures in the service of the British Empire everywhere from central Africa to the South China Sea, but he always had warm memories of his years in Iraq, though this may be because he learned the noble sport of pigsticking there (we've got pictures of that too).

    I suspect, however, that his affection for Iraq was a rarity. Britain's attempt to rule there was a disaster. At a time when broad-chested conservative believers in American power and dewy-eyed Wilsonian intlists contemplate a new imperial adventure in Iraq, it's worth recalling what happened the last time.
    dirge: empire's lullaby
    In the carve-up of the Ottoman Empire at the end of WWI,
    London thought that the best way to secure routes to India, the jewel in its imperial crown, was to dominate Mesopotamia. To that end, the treaty at the close of the war cobbled together Iraq from 3 Ottoman provinces, one Kurdish, one Sunni Muslim and another Shi'ite Muslim. The British moved in under a League of Nations mandate.
    They didn't have a clue. In 1920 a full-scale revolt broke out. By one account, Britain lost 450 in the rebellion; other sources put the figure higher. Very quickly the British public, weary of endless war and shocked by reports that the R.A.F. routinely bombed women & children in Kurdish villages, turned against the intervention in Iraq. By the time the British slunk home in the 1930s, Iraq's brush with imperialism seemed over.

    GWBush's speech to the UN last month explicitly cast America's Iraq ambitions in terms much wider than the removal of Saddam Hussein's weapons of mass destruction. Bush contemplated nothing less than a remaking of the MidEast into an area of democracy & economic freedom. The President looked forward to a day when "the people of Iraq" can join a "democratic Afghanistan and a democratic Palestine, inspiring reforms throughout the Muslim world."

    Who could argue with that? Yet there is a problem with Bush's vision: it will have to be imposed from the outside. To be sure, in the past, American imperialist practice has usually been more benign than Britain's. (The R.A.F. bombed Iraqi villages that were late in paying their taxes, which even the Colonial Office in London thought was a bit much.) And America's ostensible motives today are pure (so long as we don't mention oil).
    "Liberty for the Iraqi people," said Bush, "is a great moral cause." It doubtless is. But just as beauty is in the eye of the beholder, so imperialism is in the mind of the imperialized. The motive of imperialists is irrelevant. (France justified its past colonial policies by a "mission to civilize.") What matters is that imperialism means rule by others. In the end, as the old colonial powers came to understand, that breeds resentment and costs both money & young lives.

    Today's neoimperialists claim that if the U.S. could rebuild W.Germany & Japan after WWII, it can rebuild Iraq. But the cases could hardly be more different. Both W.Germany & Japan had fixed national identities; Iraq does not. Both nations, Germany esp., had memories of democratic institutions; Iraq does not. Neither Japan nor Germany had bitter memories of prior attempts to impose colonial rule; Iraq does.
    Nor has Washington said precisely how Baghdad will be transformed into Omaha-on-the-Tigris. Bush has signaled that Washington has no intention of doing the job alone; he looks to "the prospect of the U.N. helping to build a govt that represents all Iraqis." But there is scant evidence that the Administration is yet thinking about what an intl effort to create a new Iraq would entail or how to canvass outside help.

    A free Iraq in a prosperous Arab world is in everyone's interest, and unseating Saddam would be a good start down that road. It's what follows that's tricky. The lesson of history is that reforms succeed best if they well up from within a nation, not when they are thrust upon it from outside. If the Administration seriously thinks otherwise, it would be nice to know what lessons it has learned from the failed imperialism of the past, not just about the finer points of pigsticking.

    Mesopotamia 1917   R.Kipling ¹   re class hatred
    They shall not return to us, the resolute, the young,    
    The eager and whole-hearted whom we gave:    
    But the men who left them thriftily to die in their own dung,    
    Shall they come with years and honour to the grave?    

    Shall we only threaten and be angry for an hour?    
    When the storm is ended shall we find    
    How softly but how swiftly they have sidled back to power    
    By their favor and contrivance of their kind?      


      Breaker Morant's denouement
        to his confederate NCO ;
      "Well, Peter, this is what comes of empire-building."

        to his executioners;
      "Shoot straight, you bastards! Don't make a mess of it!"

    "Uniformed service personnel always salute the Cenotaph as they pass.   It was, for example, very noticeably the only salute made by the Royal Horse Artillery driver of Princess Diana's funeral carriage during that procession; on that occasion he did not salute even the Queen."

    cf. Lord Wakehurst mention at +2:49;   ibid 5:03-5:23:
    cortege caisson drawn, not by horses, but Royal Marines,
    yoked in harness and, in 2 ranks behind, to axle ends,
    presumably as brakes.

    Roger Water's "Southampton Docks"
    Pink Floyd's Final Cut
    its entasis a cultural symbol of imprimature: "the Cenotaph
      is nothing less than the hilt of Excalibur itself -
    'Whoso Pulleth Out This Sword of this Stone and Anvil,
      is Rightwise King Born of all England' "
    The tragedy of Kut   Military headstones have started arriving in Iraq from Britain. Not in preparation for an invasion but to commemorate allied soldiers who died in a previous attempt at 'regime change'.
    11.20.02   Ross Davies The Guardian

    500 military headstones that have just arrived in Baghdad from England already bear names of soldiers killed in action in Iraq. These troops died in ill-fated, little-remembered attempt at "regime change" nearly a century ago in winter 1915 towards end of first full year of WWI when an Anglo-Indian force was sent to capture Baghdad. To historian & veteran CRMF Cruttwell, the attack was "a capital sin": advance on Baghdad was "perhaps the most remarkable example of an enormous military risk being taken, after full deliberation, for no definite or concrete military purpose."

    Officials from the Commonwealth war graves commission have just arrived in Iraq to assess the damage done by 20 years of upheaval and many more years of decay to 13 war cemeteries the commission tends there. New headstones are first phase of a major pgm: total 51,830 British & Commonwealth servicemen died during the war in what was then Mesopotamia; 22,400 graves (more than two-thirds of the troops who fought in Mesopotamia were Indians whose faith requires cremation rather than burial). Many of these deaths were result of decision to attack Baghdad, in particular in a loop of the Tigris river at Kut-al-Amara.
    CWGC now hopes to see other names from Kut remembered in its Iraqi war cemeteries. "We have always found Iraqis willing to take us for what we are," says director-general Richard Kellaway, "a non-governmental organisation, whose duty is to commemorate, by name, the people who died in the 2 world wars."

    11.22.15 Gen. Charles Vere Ferrers Townshend & 6th Indian div. force of about 9,000 men advanced on Baghdad by boat along the Tigris, the land being roadless, an "arid billiard table". At Ctesiphon 20 mi. short of the capital, Indian & British troops came against larger, better armed and better supplied Turkish force which had had months to dig in on both sides of the river.
    Townshend's force drove out the defenders, but at the cost of 40% casualties. Unable to withstand a counter- attack, let alone continue the advance, Townshend retreated back down the Tigris, with 1,600 Turkish prisoners and more than 4,500 wounded from both sides. The long, slow journey was nightmarish for the wounded, for Townshend was short supplied boats & medical supplies by stingy India govt. An over-optimistic superior, Sir John Nixon, ordained the men would find all they needed in Baghdad.

    Collecting other troops as he inched along, Townshend made his stand at Kut, strategic river junction he captured a month previously, one of a number of cheap brilliant victories by clever & resourceful soldier who knew value of morale, and until the end kept the respect of his men. He had argued all along against going on to Baghdad; he lacked sufficient men, food and artillery as well as river transport & medical back-up.
    But the general & his men were victims of their own success. Mesopotamia invasion was about oil, but that required only a landing on the Gulf coast to secure southern part around Basra. This would keep Turks away from nearby Persian port of Abadan, terminus of Anglo-Persian pipe-line which was source of Royal Navy's oil supply.

    Basra was taken & held with little cost at the end of 1914 by a small invasion force launched from India. By late 1915, however, the war cabinet needed a success story to round off a year of military disaster, most recently at Gallipoli, where the British were preparing to pull out, having failed to break out and take Constantinople. Gallipoli campaign ended 1.8.16 with re-embarkation of Dunkirk proportions.
    By then, Kut, a collection of flyblown hovels, with Townshend & men inside, had been surrounded for more than a month: incl in 13,500 penned inside were some 3,500 Indian non-combatants and 2,000 sick & wounded. There were also 6,000 Arabs to be fed.

    They held out in freezing cold then torrential rain against infantry assault, sniper fire, shelling, and bombing, until a relief force could get near enough for the defenders to risk breaking out. It never happened. 3 attempts were made to relieve Kut. Each failed, at a total cost of 23,000 casualties. Food began to run out, and many Indian troops could or would not eat what meat there was. Defenders' draught animals, oxen, were the first to go, followed by horses, camels, and finally, starlings, cats, dogs and even hedgehogs.
    Kut was first siege in which aircraft dropped supplies: money to millstones to keep the garrison's flour mill going (and thus the Indians' supply of chapatis). But Turks & their German officers were able to send up more & better aircraft. Too few friendly planes could get through to avert starvation. Repeated attempts to supply Kut by river were also repulsed.

    Desperate to keep his men alive, Townshend suggested and govt endorsed ransom of £2m (about £67m today) for defenders to go free. Turks, elated by Gallipoli and able to switch troops from there to Kut, refused. Finally 4.29.16, when vegetarian Indians were down to 7 ounces of grain a day, Kut capitulated. Townshend was given permission to surrender, and obtained promises of humane treatment for his men from the Turks.

    It was then, after 5 months of siege, that Kut defenders' troubles really began. Turks had a different notion of what constitutes "humane treatment" and, as they treated their own soldiers with extreme brutality, saw no reason to pamper their captives.
    About 1,750 men had died from wounds or disease during the siege. Some 2,600 British & 9,300 Indian other ranks were rounded up and marched away. Two-thirds of the British & about a seventh of the Indians never saw their homes again. Relative to the numbers of men involved, the British losses at Kut dwarfs those of the far bigger battles on the Western Front.

    Historian & war poet Geoffrey Elton was jr officer at Kut and saw the rank & file being marched away, officerless, "none of them fit to march 5 miles … full of dysentery, beri-beri, scurvy, malaria and enteritis; they had no doctors, no medical stores and no transport; hot weather, just beginning, would have meant much sickness and many deaths, even among troops who were fit, well-cared for and well supplied."
    Some were marched to captivity elsewhere in Mesopotamia, others all the way to Turkey. Elton spoke of the Arab guards stealing the mens' boots, helmets and water bottles, and of dead & dying stragglers left where they fell. Cruttwell said: "The men were herded like animals across the desert, flogged, kicked, raped, tortured, and murdered."

    Turks abandoned Kut Feb. 917; Baghdad fell in March. That June a royal commission reported on who was to blame for ordering Townshend to advance so far forward. The answer was everybody but Townshend. His commanding officer, Sir John Nixon, was censured. So too was the viceroy of India, Lord Hardinge, the commander-in-chief in India, Sir Beauchamp Duff, the secretary of state for India, Austen Chamberlain, and the war cabinet in London, which had disregarded the advice of its own secretary of state for war, Earl Kitchener.
    As death marches' & prison camps' horrors became known after the war, so sufferings of men were contrasted with more favourable treatment given to their officers. Townshend, in comfortable captivity near Constantinople, was knighted in 1917. From being the hero of his country's longest siege, "Townshend of Kut" became its villain.


    Soldiers of the Queen
      Britons always loyally declaim
      Of how Brittania rules the waves.
      Every Briton's song is just the same
      When singing of our soldiers brave.

      All the world has heard it,
      Wonders why we sing,
      And some have learned
      The reason why.

      We're not forgetting it,
      We're not letting it
      Fade away or gradually die;

      Fade away or gradually die.

      So when we say that England's master,
      Remember who has made her so.

      It's the soldiers of the Queen, my lads,
      Who've been, my lads,
      Who've seen, my lads,

      In the fight for England's glory, lads,
      Of its world wide glory let us sing.

      And when we say we've always won,
      And when they ask us how it's done,
      We'll proudly point to every one
      Of England's soldiers of the Queen.

      War clouds gather over every land,
      Our treaties threatened east & west.
      Nations that we've shaken by the hand,
      Our honoured pledges try to test.

      They may have thought us sleeping,
      Thought us unprepared,
      Because we have our party wars.

      But Britons all unite,
      When they're called to fight
      The battle for old England's cause;

      The battle for old England's cause.

      So when we say that England's master,
      Remember who has made her so.

      It's the soldiers of the Queen, my lads,
      Who've been, my lads,
      Who've seen, my lads,

      In the fight for England's glory, lads,
      Of its world wide glory let us sing.

      When we're roused
      We buckle on our swords,
      We've done with diplomatic lingo.

      We do deeds to follow our words,
      We show we're something more than jingo.

      The sons of merry England
      Answered duty's call,
      And military duties do.

      And though new at the game,
      They show them all the same,
      An Englishman can be a soldier too;

      An Englishman can be a soldier too.

      So when we say that England's master,
      Remember who has made her so.

      It's the soldiers of the Queen, my lads,
      Who've been, my lads,
      Who've seen, my lads.

      In the fight for England's glory, lads,
      Of its world wide glory let us sing.

    British troops pull out of last base in Basra
    Security worries as Iraqi forces take over central palace in southern city   9.3.07   AP

    Basra, Iraq   Iraqi soldiers hoisted the country’s flag over the Basra palace compound Monday after British troops withdrew from their last garrison in the city, a move that will hand control to an Iraqi force riddled with Shiite militiamen.
    A British statement said the operation began at 10 p.m. Sunday “with all British troops arriving at the airport by midday” Monday.
    “There were no clashes or attacks on British forces during the operation. The formal handing-over of the Palaces will happen in the near future,” British spokesman Maj. Matthew Bird said.

    The departure of most of the remaining 500-member British force from the palace left the nation’s second largest city without any multinational presence for the first time since the U.S.-led invasion of 2003.
    “We told those (militias) who were fighting the British troops that the Iraqi forces are now in the palaces,” Lt. Gen. Mohan al-Fireji, the Iraqi commander in the area. He said the last of the British force left about 4:30 a.m. British vehicles rumbled out of the gates of the sprawling compound after dark Sunday headed for the Basra international airport, about 12 miles away. It is Britain’s last remaining base in southern Iraq.

    U.S. officials have raised concerns about the prospect of British troops leaving the city, which has seen rival armed militia groups, some linked to Iran, battling for control. The city controls a key land supply line from Kuwait to Baghdad and farther north, and is also near important oil fields.
    In London, Prime Minister Gordon Brown disputed claims that the redeployment marks a British “defeat” and said the move to the airport had been planned and organized.
    “Let me make this very clear. This is a pre-planned, and this is an organized move from Basra Palace to Basra Air Station,” he told BBC Radio 4.

    The Basra palace had come under near daily rocket and mortar fire from Shiite militias until the British released about 30 gunmen a few months ago and spread the word that they would soon leave. Over the past years, Britain’s ability to control events in Basra waned as the militias rose in power. People on the streets of Basra cheered the departure of the British.
    “We reject any strangers and they are colonialists,” resident Rudha Muter told Associated Press Television News. “We are pleased that the Iraqi army are now taking over the situation. We as an Iraqi people reject occupation. We reject colonialism. We want our freedom.”

    Another resident, Khazaal al-Nisiri, said he was confident the Iraqi army would be able to provide enough security without the British presence.
    “We have recently seen intensive deployment for Iraqi security troops; this indicates that the Iraqi troops are in full control of the situation,” he told AP Television. “So the British troops pullout won’t cause a vacuum in the area; our security troops are carrying out their duty well.”

    Following the collapse of Saddam Hussein’s rule, Britain controlled security across southern Iraq, but has since handed over most of the territory to Iraqi forces. Britain’s Ministry of Defense said it hoped to hand security responsibility for Basra, the last remaining province, over to Iraqi forces sometime this autumn.

    Brown has consistently refused to set a timetable for the overall withdrawal of British troops from the country, but the long anticipated pullout from the downtown palace will give British govt the option to pull out more than 500 soldiers immediately.
    Ex-leader Tony Blair’s decision to cut troops numbers in Iraq from 7,000 to 5,500 in February included an option of pulling out the soldiers based in the Basra palace once it was handed back to the Iraqis. Britain’s Defense Ministry said in a statement that U.S. officials had been consulted over the plan, and offered assurances that there was still a large enough British presence in the area to provide security.

    “The decision is an Iraqi-led initiative and is part of a coalition-endorsed process,” the ministry said.
    British forces will operate from Basra Air Station, but “retain security responsibility for Basra until we hand over to provincial Iraqi control, which we anticipate in the autumn,” the statement said.

    Elsewhere in Iraq, a car bomb exploded in central Baghdad, killing 2 people and wounding 5 others, police said. Another car bomb exploded at a police checkpoint outside Ramadi early Monday, killing two policemen and seriously injuring four others, as well as two civilians, said Ramadi police Lt. Col. Jubair Rashid Naif. The bridge, on a road that links Baghdad with Jordan and Syria, was unaffected by the blast, Naif said.

    Iraq's cultural capital
    1.5.03   Deborah Solomon NY Times

    Ancient kingdom of Mesopotamia, which flourished in the region that became Iraq, is what textbooks like to call the birthplace of urban civilization. The Mesopotamians were the first to record their thoughts in writing, the first to divide the day into 24 hours, the first to eat off ceramic plates.
    Iraq is home to some of the most important landmarks of the Judeo-Christian tradition, incl the reputed Garden of Eden and Ur, birthplace of the patriarch Abraham. The area had a second flowering in the Middle Ages, when it became a capital of the Islamic world and mosques sprang up everywhere. With war in Iraq looming, many in the art historical world are worried about what might be damaged or destroyed.
    Ctesiphon / Samarra Some of the country's most significant sites:
  •   The Arch at Ctesiphon   This hundred-foot arch on the outskirts of Baghdad is one of the tallest brick vaults in the world. A fragment of a 1,400-year-old royal palace, it was damaged during the gulf war. Scholars warn that its collapse is increasingly likely.

  •   Samarra   Major Islamic site and religious center 70 miles north of Baghdad, very close to a main Iraqi chemical research complex and production plant. Home to a stunning ninth-century mosque and minaret that were hit by allied bombers in 1991.
    Ur / Basra al-Qurna (Garden of Eden)
  •   Ur   Supposedly the world's first city. Peaked around 3500 B.C. Ur is mentioned passingly in the Bible as the birthplace of the patriarch Abraham. Its fantastic temple, or ziggurat, was damaged by allied troops during the gulf war, which left four massive bomb craters in the ground and some 400 bullet holes in the walls of the city.

  •   Basra Al-Qurna   Here, a gnarled old tree, supposedly Adam's, stands on the supposed Garden of Eden.

  •   Nineveh   The third capital of Assyria. It is mentioned in the Bible as a city whose people live in sin. A whalebone hangs in the mosque on Nebi Yunis, said to be a relic from the adventures of Jonah and the whale.

  •   Babylon   The city reached the height of its splendor during the reign of Hammurabi, Babylon / Karbala around 1750 B.C., when he developed one of the great legal codes. Babylon is only 6 miles from Iraq's Hilla chemical arsenal.

  •   Karbala   About 60 miles south of Baghdad, the Karbala Shia shrine to Husein, grandson of the prophet Muhammad, is the most famous of Iraq's sacred attractions. It lies near a chemical-weapons plant and a missile range that were bombed in 1991.

  •   Erbil   Ancient town, continuously inhabited for more than 5,000 years. It has a high ''tell,'' an archaeological marvel consisting of layered towns that were built one on top of the other over thousands of years.

  •   Nippur   Major religious center of the south, well stocked with Sumerian and Babylonian temples. It is fairly isolated and thus less vulnerable to bombs than other towns.

  •   Baghdad   Site of the National Museum of Iraq, which has the world's pre-eminent collection of Mesopotamian antiquities, including a 4,000-year-old silver harp from Ur and thousands of clay tablets.

  •   Nimrud   Home of the Assyrian royal palace, whose walls cracked during the gulf war, and of the tombs of Assyrian queens and princesses, discovered in 1989 and widely considered the most significant tombs since King Tut's.

  •   UrUk   Another Sumerian city. Some scholars say it is older than Ur, dating to at least 4000 B.C. Local Sumerians invented writing here in 3500 B.C.
  • Hurt by sanctions, Iraqis sell antiquities despite export laws   6.23.96   Barbara Crossette NY Times

    Browsing antiques markets of London a few years ago, Univ. of Chicago archaeology & Mesopotamian art expert McGuire Gibson found some of his worst fears confirmed. In the stalls of Portobello Road & shops of Bond St, dealers offered him antiquities probably smuggled from Iraq, modern nation in distress that sits astride remains of several ancient civilizations.
    Cylinder seals, which were once used on tablets of wet clay in something like an ancient version of notarization, were for sale by the bagful. There were clay tablets with cuneiform writing from as early as the Babylonian period and other objects of uncertain origin.

    "For decades, the Iraqis kept a very tight lid on stuff, and there was very, very little getting out," said the university's Oriental Inst. prof. Gibson, leading archaeologist who conducted digs in Iraq from 964 until 1991 Persian Gulf war.
    "After the war, the selling started. Now stuff is just pouring out. They are selling everything. If this continues, there won't be an archaeological site left that won't be damaged."
    With stringent economic sanctions against Iraq in place since 1990 and little relief in sight, art experts & archaeologists say precious artifacts from some of the world's oldest civilizations, Sumerian, Assyrian and Babylonian among them, are pouring into the intl market mainly to raise cash in hard times.

    Experts say they cannot estimate the total value of Iraqi antiquities reaching the market illegally, but given that even small individual pieces can be priced at $50,000 in some cases, and that there are so many objects involved, the figure probably runs into the millions of dollars.
    Mesopotamian antiquities exported legally from the 19th century until the 1960s have fetched high prices, in one case $12 million paid for an ancient palace relief. Experts at Sotheby's & Christie's, auction houses that are careful to authenticate objects and know their origins, say they have not encountered pieces from the new wave of illegal exports.

    While some of the sellers of Mesopotamian antiquities are middle-class families parting with heirlooms and Iraqi traders unable to sustain themselves because of an embargo imposed after Iraq invaded Kuwait in Aug. 1990, looters & grave robbers working with intl smugglers are doing most of the damage, some experts say.
    There have been reports of hundreds of looters swarming over archaeological sites, perhaps with semiofficial complicity, and a truckload of cuneiform tablets intercepted on the way to Saudi Arabia. So successful is the largely illegal trade in Iraqi antiquities that a thriving business in Mesopotamian fakes is also growing.

    Diplomats, collectors, dealers and university experts, most of whom do not want to be identified, so their future work in the region will not be disrupted, disagree on some details about the boom. Some believe that individuals, incl govt employees, are taking the best pieces out overland through Jordan; others think that most of the smuggling is done by professional rings operating through the Kurdish areas of northern Iraq into Iran.
    As might be expected, Nizar Hamdoon, Iraq's UN envoy and an architect by training, blames the Kurds, who are in a permanent state of rebellion against central authority. But he also says Iraq is unable to guard all its archaeological sites, numbering in the hundreds of thousands, and some objects are so close to the surface that they are easily removed.

    Hamdoon said that many pieces had disappeared from provincial Iraqi museums after the war. American scholars & collectors have varying opinions about the value of missing museum pieces. But several said they believed that the Iraq Museum in Baghdad, which they described as one of the world's finest, had survived with most of its collection intact.
    Intl Fdtn for Art Research exec. dir. Constance Lowenthal in New York, which with the independent Art Loss Register monitors stolen art & antiquities, said Iraq had been vigilant in watching over its major museums and helpful in compiling lists of missing objects.

    But questions remain about how some objects, esp. large pieces, get out of the country undetected. In the current issue of Ms. Lowenthal's newsletter, IFAR Reports, Columbia Univ. art historian & archaeologist John M. Russell reports that parts of 3 large reliefs from the throne room of the Sennacherib Palace in Nineveh that he photographed in 1990 are now on the intl market.
    Iraq has laws against exporting antiquities, and selling illegal imports is a crime in U.S.. But this trade is new, and many items are small and easily concealed.

    U.S. Customs Service sr agent Bonnie Goldblatt who specializes in art fraud in NY said law enforcement officials had not yet seized any illegal Iraqi objects. She added that such items were often camouflaged as goods from another country. A NY collector described a lot of the early museum pieces pilfered during and just after the gulf war as "rubbish" but concurred that many very valuable objects began to appear later from other sources, incl private collections held by families who, Iraqi & American experts say, have also sold off their modern art, antique carpets, furniture and wooden doors to stay afloat financially.

    Sympathy for these Iraqis seems widespread among U.S. collectors & archaeologists, who are critical of continued sanctions against Hussein's govt. They say the sanctions are hurting cultured families & intellectuals more than Iraq's leaders & soldiers, some of whom may be involved in trafficking in antiquities for profit.
    U.S. govt officials, who acknowledge that sanctions have caused Iraqis to sell off a lot of their private wealth, incl art & antiquities, nevertheless say that Saddam need only meet his promises to destroy his weapons of mass destruction to end the hardship. Officials also say the Iraqi leadership has shown its contempt for history by tampering with ancient sites.
    "Saddam Hussein's regime has chosen consciously to build luxury palaces on significant archaeological sites near the ruins of Babylon," said U.S. UN Mission spokesman James P. Rubin. "By refusing to meet demands of the intl community," Rubin added, "he is forcing his own people to sell their artwork, compounding the economic & material hardships with psychological & cultural suffering."

    Experts agree that London, NY and Tokyo have become prime centers of the Mesopotamian antiquities trade, with Asians often paying the highest prices. Univ. of Chicago's Gibson said dealers were sometimes sent videos of objects from MidEastern sellers, with offers to bring pieces to a prospective buyer anywhere in the world for inspection.
    With the slump in stocks, property and artworks in the 1980s, the market in antiquities was already on the rise when objects from Mesopotamia began to appear in larger numbers a few years ago. The exploding market for cylinder seals, Mesopotamian equivalent of Chinese chops or European signet rings or raised stamps to press into sealing wax, has been the most extraordinary.
    These seals from the Fertile Crescent are tiny columns of semiprecious stones, precious metals or occasionally clay, carved around the outside in concave relief and then rolled, not stamped, on clay tablets (or later, wax) to make identifying marks. They may have identified the tablets' owners and been buried with them, sometimes in large numbers, in tombs that date to 2500 B.C. or earlier.

    "Cylinder seals are special because they are very small, and to carve them takes extraordinary skill," said Gibson, who has edited a catalogue of objects presumed stolen from Iraq. "They are spectacularly beautiful things." "Except for the Assyrian reliefs with battle scenes and ritual scenes carved into them, there is nothing as wonderfully narrative or varied as a cylinder seal," he said.
    "Because they are so small and are often made of semiprecious stones, really wonderful stones, they have taken on a value way above most other artifacts. Unfortunately they are easily transportable, easy to carry around and get out of the country. The biggest one would be something like 3" high by 1.5" dia. Most seals are 1" long and 0.5" dia."

    Ancient amulets are also small and easy to steal & smuggle, a NY collector said. Many were also carved from semiprecious stones and worn on a string. Scholars believe that engravings on them indicate that they could have been intended to ward off illness or evil. Gibson has seen one that says, in effect, "This is to scare away demons." They may also have been used to protect a household.
    Ancient graves in Iraq, incl royal tombs at Ur, contain many other objects illustrating the daily life of succeeding civilizations. At Nippur, where Gibson had been working, archaeologists found 17 layers of cities built atop one another, tracing human settlements from around 5000 B.C. to 800 A.D.

    "Mesopotamia is the first place in the world where what we call civilization does pop up," Gibson said. "This is the first place where you get monumental architecture on a really grand scale, the first place you get an organization of people along craft lines, the first place you get monumental art."
    "By 3500 B.C. you have already laid in certain motifs that will stay there right through Mesopotamian civilization and beyond it," he added, stressing the region's importance to the study of subsequent ancient history. "Here we see the relationship of rulers to gods, the relationship of people to the ruler and in certain ways the relationship of people to nature. That was a tremendously strong tradition, and some of it found its way through Alexander the Great into Greece, influencing both the Western & Eastern worlds."


      Splendor & ruin   tale of 2 Baghdads
      1.31.98   Barbara Crossette NY Times
    Baghdad Iraq   On a small hill overlooking Baghdad's zoo, where most of the animals have perished from hunger, a stupendous new palace is rising. It is a massive, brooding, domed extravaganza, latest & perhaps grandest of the monuments that are steadily remaking the city's skyline to the glory of Saddam Hussein. Bricks at archeological reconstruction sites bear inscriptions hailing him as a new Al Mansur, the Caliph who founded Baghdad in the 8th century. A recent arts festival in Babylon was subtitled "From Nebuchadnezzar to Sadam Hussein." Portraits of the two hang together in Babylon, where Nebuchadnezzar, one of the greatest of ancient Babylonians, ruled in the sixth century B.C.

    To burnish his reputation as a leader of Muslims everywhere, Saddam has just broken ground for the largest mosque in the world. No one knows how Saddam can pay for these projects, after 7 years of crippling economic sanctions imposed after Iraq invaded Kuwait in 1990.
    Even as he builds his imperial Baghdad, there is another Baghdad, where people plot how to pay the next grocery bill. Ahmad Adnan, a 10-year-old boy suffering from diabetes, was in Saddam Central Children's Hospital for treatment. He was too shy to tell a reporter what he would like from the vendor's stall outside the building, crowded with teddy bears, toys, cookies and candy that no one was buying. Dr. Kasim Taai leaned down and asked Ahmad to tell him what he really wanted.
    "One egg, please," Ahmad whispered in the doctor's ear.

    Despite the oil embargo, Saddam seems stronger than ever. In 2 weeks of interviews here with Iraqis, UN officials, diplomats and Asian & European business executives, many say they believe that he may even be picking up political support in this period of unaccustomed hardships, esp. among the young who have been well indoctrinated in the schools.
    Saddam has been in full control for nearly 20 years, and for a decade before that was a rising star in the Arab Baath Socialist Party, which came to power in 1968. Despite the oil embargo, or perhaps because of it, many Iraqis, publicly at least, direct their anger at U.S., rather than at their president.
    "Do you think we wanted to invade Kuwait?" one unusually outspoken Iraqi remarked. Then he added, "But was that enough that our children should be dying even now?"

    It is all but impossible to gauge public opinion, though, because Iraqis seem to be under scrutiny at all times by a vast network of security agencies with outposts in most neighborhoods. "Please don't take pictures here," a taxi driver begged a reporter who was dropped off at a well-known restaurant. "They will take down my number and come to my house tonight to ask what I am doing with a foreigner in my car."
    By many accounts, Saddam rules by a potent combination of terror & secrecy. He & his party apparatus permit no dissent. In 1995, he held a referendum on his presidency. Those who watched the process say that in the days preceding the vote, Baath Party workers combed every neighborhood, going door to door to ask if the household had ration cards, a subtle message that the family's subsidized food might be in jeopardy if adults failed to vote. Rumors were deliberately circulated about the sophisticated methods the govt had for detecting negative ballots, even if cast in secret.

    As television cameras moved in on the day of the vote, people were seen holding their ballots aloft and chanting, "Naam, naam, Saddam!" or, 'Yes, yes, for Saddam!" The president won 99.96% of the vote.
    Saddam is rarely seen in public. Most of his official appearances are on govt TV, and no opposing view comes from satellite TV, which is forbidden. It is said that probably no more than a dozen people know where he is at any given time.
    U.N. weapons inspectors have been told that he moves from palace to palace from night to night. Ambassadors based in Baghdad never meet the president with the exception of Russians. Envoys present their credentials to a vice president or other official. Neither chief U.N. arms inspector Richard Butler nor his predecessor Rolf Ekeus, Swedish diplomat who is now ambassador to Washington, were ever given the opportunity to talk directly with Saddam.

    signs of hardship everywhere in capital
    Economic collapse of Iraq has gutted the intelligentsia, once one of the most highly respected in the Arab world. If any sector of society outside the military might have formed a political opposition, the Iraqi middle class would have been the only hope, a diplomat said.
    "It has now been totally destroyed," this envoy said of the middle class. It is a sentiment heard everywhere in Iraq. An Iraqi professional now earns a base pay of 3,000 dinars a month, or about $2 at the unofficial exchange rate, for govt work, which includes hospitals & universities. Just over 2 pounds of chicken cost 1,100 dinars. Eggs are about 1,200 dinars a dozen and sugar 500 dinars for a kilogram or 2.2 pounds. Fresh fruit & vegetables, now arriving with greater frequency in the markets, are priced beyond the reach of most families.

    Iraq's supply of drugs ran out in 1994, and doctors at Saddam Children's Hospital tell of children who die of curable diseases because, they say, the U.N. Security Council sanctions committee has refused to allow them to import some of the crucial medicine they need. Already-malnourished children are vulnerable to infection, yet the hospital cannot maintain sterile isolation wards.
    The signs of hardship are clear everywhere in Baghdad. What is less clear is to what extent Saddam is compounding the suffering created by the embargo, either through his grandiose palace-building, weapons programs and other govt projects or for propaganda purposes, to try to convince the world to ease up on the sanctions.

    Years before the embargo was even imposed, though, Saddam's govt had made economic policy choices that have now come back to haunt all 22 million Iraqis. From 1968 until the late 1980s, his Baath Party gave govt a large role in the economy and relegated the private sector largely to minor industries, crafts and petty trade.
    Some experts believe that Saddam was ambivalent about letting a strong economic middle class develop in the private sector. What is now Iraq was part of the ancient Fertile Crescent, but despite the fact that the country still has some of the best land in the region, little effort was made over the last few decades to develop agriculture. Instead, Iraq relied on oil wealth.

    "We became oil junkies," an Iraqi intellectual said. Need something? Just pick up the phone and call Switzerland for watches, Paris for cosmetics and a score of countries for processed foods or even fresh produce that could have been grown locally. "Energy is still used with great abandon," said U.N. official in charge of distributing food & medicine under the "oil for food" pgm Denis J. Halliday. Like Americans, Iraqis leave on lights & air conditioners and, in the cold of winter, turn on several electric heaters in a room.

    Iraq's 8 year war with Iran also drained the treasury, leading to heavy borrowing. A quarrel over Iraqi debt to Kuwait was one of the reasons Saddam annexed it, prompting the Security Council to impose the sanctions. With oil sales banned, the per capita gross domestic product of Iraqis plunged from more than $2,900 to about $60 annually. Value of the Iraqi currency, the dinar, worth more than $3 in 1989, dropped sharply. Now $1 buys 1,500 dinars at the bazaar money-changers' rates of exchange, or 450 dinars at the official rate.
    Saddam has compounded currency problems by printing money without adequate backing, causing inflation to soar. This has hit those with fixed incomes hardest. Among victims are govt employees, the majority of salaried workers in Iraq.

    Once the hard currency stopped flowing in, foreigners who had worked in jobs ranging from nursing to sanitation and who had been paid with hard currency from oil vanished, leaving Iraqis seemingly incapable or unwilling to do these jobs themselves. Garbage is piling up in many neighborhoods, on vacant lots & streets, worsening health problems caused by the lack of medicine and by a breakdown in water & sanitation systems.

    selling, emigrating or just surviving
    At the Dept of Antiquities & Heritage, custodian of Iraq's extraordinary ancient Mesopotamian sites and the priceless artifacts they contain, Mouad Said, the director general, is dangerously short-staffed. "Many of my employees prefer to work in the bazaar," he said. "A lot of our brains are also emigrating out of Iraq, to teach or work in other Arab countries, in Europe, the U.S., Australia, New Zealand, everywhere."

    Buying & selling, mostly selling, is the only money-earning pastime now left to many Iraqis who remain. Antique stores have become pawn shops full of family treasures: watches, jewelry, cameras, silverware, china, even souvenirs from trips abroad. Along the roadsides, impromptu markets have sprung up where people trying to maintain their dignity come to sell their clothes, a chandelier, the household furniture.
    The Iraqi middle class, large & well educated by the standards of most of the developing world, has fallen in recent years, and fallen hard. "Ten years ago I did whatever I wanted," said Baydaa Ihsaan, who is in charge of intl relations, or what is left of them, for the General Federation of Iraqi Women.

    "I realized my dreams. I got my degree. Now you can't do what you want." she said. "There will always be a block in your way. You can almost not survive. The embargo has stopped almost everything in my life."

    "Just catching a cold or the flu now are things that terrify me," she continued. "If I catch bronchitis, I know I will have to live with it for a few weeks. Life is like a nightmare. One day you have everything in your life, and the next day you open your eyes and there is darkness."

    Ms. Ihsaan, 29, and other women her age said they are unable to think of marriage & a family, and are forced by circumstances to stay in their parents' homes to contribute to earnings and to share in what resources they can muster. "The whole world is to blame," she said, echoing other youthful voices, some too young to remember very clearly how Iraq got itself into this predicament.
    At Univ. of Baghdad's College of Arts, English lecturer Lena Ali said many people were "going back to religion" in a society that is socially conservative but was never militantly Islamic. Christian churches are strong here, and Iraqi Christians of various Eastern & Western rites are among the better off and sometimes most influential people. Deputy PM Tariq Aziz, Saddam's liaison with the outside world, is a Christian.

    Search for solace in Islam is being encouraged by the govt, Iraqis say. It is beginning to cause some concern in Christian families, a number of which have left the country. It is undermining Iraq's once-promising potential to be a center for modernizing, reformist Islamic studies, a scholar said. Scholarship in all fields has suffered from a lack of books and contacts with the world of learning.
    Security Council sanctions committee has not allowed universities to import teaching materials, said Abdul Latif Jumaily, head of the English literature Dept and Ms. Ali's boss at the College of Arts.

    Iraqi scholars & medical specialists, considered among the best in the Arab world, once attended seminars & professional meetings around the globe. Now they cannot afford to travel or are forbidden to do so. Too many intellectuals joined the brain drain by going to conferences and never returning, a writer said. Iraq has apparently computerized a list of scholars with higher degrees who are barred from travel as a result. In the hospitals, doctors are not permitted to resign.
    To leave Iraq costs hundreds of dollars in exit fees. But growing numbers of people are selling everything they own to move. Universities in Yemen, Malaysia and a number of North African countries incl Libya bid for their services and offer salaries in the thousands of dollars a month.

    Those who stay make do with second-hand clothes and two or three jobs just to support their families. Cars with cracked windows and threadbare tires are the norm for many; they are used judiciously so that they will not collapse completely. During the boom years, Iraq built highways all over the country as good as those in U.S. and many Iraqi families bought cars or pickup trucks.
    "We have to lead a dog's life," said Jumaily, who teaches day & night courses, incl basic English-language courses for which there is a skyrocketing demand. "We don't have time for research. With our noses to the grindstone, who can think?"

    His colleague, Saad Hasani, a popular literature professor, is more bitter. "I fail to see why literary works are being denied to us," he said. "Books are not the tools of war. This is not a matter of war; it's a matter of malice." Diplomats & other foreigners who have known Iraq over several decades say the society has experienced a total inversion of values with the impoverishment of the professional middle classes. The people who matter now are the buyers & sellers of prohibited goods, smugglers & business tycoons with connections to the president or, increasingly, one of his two sons, Uday & Qusay.

    Some people are getting very rich in Iraq. Their spacious new homes are being built in prime land along the banks of the Tigris, which runs through this sprawling city. They have expensive imported cars and no shortage of food or medicine. They travel back & forth to Jordan pretty much at will. Some also have lavish houses in Amman, Jordan, where a leading Iraqi trader was recently assassinated in his home along with the second-ranking diplomat at Iraq's Embassy and half a dozen other people.
    At every level in Iraq, petty mafias are consolidating their power over monopolies of one kind or another. At the last major hotel still functioning with any semblance of intl service standards, one clan has cornered the car-service market and shakes down or physically threatens any other driver who tries to do business with hotel guests. All such mafias are assumed to have connections in the president's family or the state security services.

    "We are returning to tribalism, violent tribalism," an Iraqi said. All around, added a foreigner, "there is a sense of decay." At the Saddam Central Children's Hospital, pediatrician Dr. Dhia Obaidi has not recovered from the shock of seeing his once-comfortable world collapse around him, though he is politically powerless to do anything about it. Proud Iraqis dread slipping backward into a third-world existence. Children begging on the streets are a sign that this is already happening, other Iraqis said.
    "We feel like they put you first into a big castle, then all of a sudden you are in a small cottage," Obaidi said. "Imagine a child of 4 years or 5 years or 7 years; he has never seen an airplane in the sky." "We have two big rivers," he said. "We have oil. It should not be like this. We ourselves cannot live like in India, between two trees or along the side of the road."



    PicoSearch
    §ite map
    courtesy of FreeFind
    presented by §
    OCIAL
    JUSTICE  
    Home Search Site Portal E-mail