£ ø ç å l §
 
Beltway ¹
  Island under siege
  10.1.00   Anita Huslin Wash.Post
 
 
 


Cecil County
Chesapeake City
Kent Island
@
Cape Charles

Holland Island MD   Storm clouds scud across the sky and the wind spits chilling rain in his face, but Stephen White is focused on the waves rolling toward him. He straightens his back, still strong after 70 years, to lift another 50 lb sandbag and waits for his nemesis to hit. The waves slam into the side of his wooden house, pulling away another whitewashed shingle and a few more inches of earth as they retreat. He heaves the bag against the brick foundation and jumps back as the water drives in again from the Chesapeake Bay. Since buying it 5 years ago, White has been fighting to save this little island, where he whiled away so many childhood days. He has formed a nonprofit and used donations to buy a dredge and other supplies. And every weekend, he steers his old tri-hull boat to the mound of land about 60 miles south of the Bay Bridge just off the southern tip of Dorchester County, carrying rocks for a jetty and filling more bags with sand.

Still, the waves have punched through the 1½ mile long island, cutting it into 3 pieces. The story of Holland Island, once the site of a bustling 19th-century village and now barren save White's house, is the tale of many islands in the Chesapeake Bay. Rising tides and erosion already have claimed a dozen in both Maryland and Virginia, and scientists say most of the rest will be consumed by the end of this century. State officials have been studying the problem, which affects more than a third of Maryland's 4,360-mile coastline and is costing the state about 260 acres along the shores each year. For Holland Island, any remedies that come from their efforts may be too late. "There's so much negativity," said White, a former waterman & minister and a semi-retired real estate developer. He lives in Salisbury and visits the island on weekends.

He knows that some people think he is tilting at windmills. But he hasn't got time for such talk. Holland Island has shrunken to 80 acres, less than half its size 50 years ago, and the pace of erosion is increasing. Blunting the battering waves "can be done," he insisted. "It's just a matter of will and ability. I have both of those, but I don't have the funds." White has asked the Maryland Port Administration to use his island as a disposal site for 10 million cubic yards of dredge material from bay channels--enough to restore the island to its footprint of 100 years ago. He also sought about $200,000 from the state and federal government to construct breakwaters and rebuild the island. Failing to win any grants, he has created a stopgap of sandbags, rocks and an old rusted barbecue grill piled next to his house.

But he has what he hopes is a more enduring strategy, the makings of which lie scattered around the island: A ramshackle Bantam excavator is beached near the house, its rusted chain sprawled by the front door awaiting repair. In the distance, a dredger sits listing in a watery gut, where White dragged it last year before the winter storms. He found a small front-end loader abandoned in the marsh and put new rings and bearings in it, but with a broken camshaft, it remains parked in the shadow of the excavator. His plan is to fill 100-foot-long textile tubes with sand from the island's lee side, then sink about 20 of them off the windward shoreline to thwart the waves. He has received permits to dredge 100,000 cubic yards of sand, which is what he figures it will take to build a breakwater the length of the island to prevent further erosion and siltation that has smothered acres of oyster beds and underwater grass. He has managed to scrape up enough to buy 10 tubes, which are tucked among the weeds and in a small shed he built by the house. But they must wait until he gets more money and help to run the machinery to scoop up the sand to fill the tubes.
He hopes to address the Maryland General Assembly to plead his case for getting dredge spoils from the northern regions of the bay. But that decision-making process could take years to unfold, and it could well prove too expensive for the state to transport the dredge material to his island. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is now guiding a $427 million project to move more than 30 million cubic yards of sandy soil from the bay's shipping lanes to create a 1,100-acre wildlife refuge at long-diminished Poplar Island. John Gill, leader of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's Chesapeake Bay island unit, admires White's tenacity and has offered him technical advice and assistance, but Gill said his agency had to turn down his request for funds. "There's benefits to the natural resources, but it's private land," said Gill, who heads the service's Chesapeake Bay islands unit. "I support his objective, which is to stop the island from eroding, but I'm not sure that the geotubes will prove to be anything but a stopgap measure."

About 10,500 acres of island have been lost just in the middle portion of the Chesapeake Bay since colonial times, according to the University of Maryland Center for Global Change. Formed centuries ago when Eastern Shore peninsulas were breached by rising bay tides, the three dozen islands in the midsection of the bay help curtail erosion on the Eastern Shore and provide underwater grasses that are habitat for fish and crabs. But as the wind-driven tides batter the islands from the west, their edges wash into the bay. And unlike coastal islands of sand that migrate and reposition, the bay islands' mud clay disintegrates into the water column and is washed into the deeper parts of the bay. With few exceptions, the "hardening" of the bay's western shoreline with bulkheads and jetties prevents the formation of new islands.
White grew up on the Eastern Shore and visited Holland Island as a child. The changes astonished him when he saw the island years later "I looked around, and I didn't recognize the place," he said. A sleepy village that once existed on the island was gone, most of the buildings washed into the bay and the oyster shell roads overgrown with cord grasses and water bushes. As he walked around the island trying to orient himself, he stumbled across a small graveyard under a hackberry tree, its branches filled with the nests of herons and egrets. Brushing the weeds from a headstone , he read the epitaph for a girl named Effie Lee Wilson, born Jan. 6, 1880, died Oct. 12, 1893:
  Forget me not is all I ask; I could not ask for more.
  Than to be cherished by my friends so loving & so dear.

"It hit me like a ton of bricks," White said. "Here's this girl who's been dead for 100 years seemingly crying out to me. Some people say that's kind of melodramatic, but I just couldn't let this island disappear." Of the 60 structures that were homes, churches, grocery stores and baseball field on Holland Island, only a handful remained, and many of the graves had been lost beneath the waves. White tracked down the island's owners, VA businessmen who used it as a hunting preserve, and explained to them what was happening to it. In 1995, he persuaded them to sell him the property for $73,000 and allow him to make payments over time. Then he began moving his tools & equipt onto the island and started to work.
He knows what some people say, that this may be the last winter for his house, that the storms will finally sweep it under the waves. He brushes aside such talk and continues his work, oblivious to the storm moving up the bay, the tides rising ever closer. "There comes a time when you have to do battle against the forces of nature," he said, as the wind whipped his silvering hair across his eyes. "If I dwell on the acuteness of the problem, it would be so discouraging I couldn't do it. So I focus 90% of the time on the solution and remind myself that if I don't do it no one else will."

  --- orig. msg --
  from: "JA Pilch"   sent: Sat 6.14.03 from soggy D.C.
  subject: CHANCE OF SHOWERS & THUNDERSTORMS
> everyday - 39 of 45 days previous
> … SEVERE THUNDERSTORM WATCH UNTIL 7 PM …
> TONIGHT … MOSTLY CLOUDY. CHANCE OF RAIN 80%

Your habit of delayed flight plans cost you this day.
That night we started at the monthly festival in the newest art quarter, moved on to merengue at las latinas' House of Wayward Women (their self-label, not mine) w/ soaring view of the flight path through sea mist and the bridge's arch of lights strung to the horizon, but we wound up at the Laurel Canyon vintage split level mansion on the next hill higher still.

Beyond the gate, the statuesque hostess wore butterfly wings and drank from a dragon's claw chalice, a gargoyle guarding the front lap pool; sheep & tumblers lept in the darkened room's holograms and the bed had a fur spread while an up & coming band blazed before the sunken circular iridescent chrome fireplace.
Saboroso.

Not a cloud in the sky as I recall.

Townsfolk reside in states of confusion
The simple country life is actually quite complicated in New Pine Creek, split in two along California's border with Oregon.
6.26.05   John M. Glionna L.A. Times

New Pine Creek OR   This is a town strangely divided, a tiny slice of eccentricity along a lonely highway at the long-ignored edge of two neighboring states. Thanks to a surveyor's blunder more than a century ago, the California-Oregon border runs right through the middle of this unincorporated backcountry burg, home to 250 residents equally distributed on both sides of the state line.
As a result, peculiar things happen in New Pine Creek. California-side residents carry driver's licenses with Oregon addresses because the town's post office boxes are on the Oregon side. Come tax time, Californians say, try explaining that little logistical oddity to the humorless bureaucrats down in Sacramento. Calls to nearby Oregon are considered local, but there's a toll to phone Alturas, the nearest town in California, 42 miles distant.

Californians can forget about overnight home delivery: When they say they live in New Pine Creek, CA, stubborn computers reject their request. Because to the outside world, there is no New Pine Creek in California. For their part, Oregonians until recently had to sneak their kids across the state line to the town's only school, which sits a few steps from the border on the California side. If you shop at the town's only general store, on the Oregon side, you don't pay sales tax, and vehicle registrations in the Beaver State are much cheaper. But over in the Golden State, you pay much less in property taxes.

With toes in two states, New Pine Creek finds itself scrutinized by two abutting and often contradictory government bureaucracies. The town isn't the only California community of two minds. To the southeast, South Lake Tahoe also shares a border with out-of-state cousin Stateline, Nev. Still, in New Pine Creek, things are just different.
The oddest part: Nobody in town can quite agree where the state border lies. That demarcation is currently drawn along State Line Road, but some insist the official boundary is actually a half-mile north. If that's true, most of the town actually lies in California. But don't tell that to proud Oregonians.
"It's a tale of two cities, only we're just one little town," said Tom Carpenter, whose Broken Era Ranch covers 248 acres on the California side. "This is definitely a strange place to live."

A preacher recently arrived at a home on the south side of State Line Road to perform a wedding but then realized his license was valid only in Oregon. So the minister moved the function to the middle of the road and brought the wedding off as planned.
The town is now home to farmers, ranchers and retirees, but during California's last gold rush, in 1912, New Pine Creek boasted 5,000 residents, with 7 bars to serve thirsty prospectors. All were on the California side, since Oregon was still a dry state back then.
The border issue dates back to a survey performed by Daniel Major, who in 1868 traversed the Goose Valley. Major tried to establish the state line along the 42nd parallel. But that's not the way it worked out.
Some say Major was a heavy drinker, champagne bottles were later unearthed at many of his campsites, according to historical accounts. Others cite his rudimentary surveying equipment.

Traversing more than 300 miles of untamed country to trace a line from the 120th meridian to the Pacific Ocean, Major took astronomical readings with a sextant on only 3 occasions, historians say. The result: His border estimate veered back and forth across the true line by up to half a mile, looking more like the bite marks made by a set of crooked teeth.
For years, Major's goof remained a secret. Then in 1976, a California state boundary official noticed Major's surveying errors. Sacramento sent a delegation to Salem, the Oregon capital, suggesting that officials there had somehow made off with a valuable hunk of their state. The story made national news when the California attorney general's office recommended taking the issue to the U.S. Supreme Court.

"You know what that fight was all about, don't you?" asked resident Herb Watts as he stopped by the general store one morning to buy nails. "It was all about oil. Greed and oil." At stake were potential revenues if oil or gas were discovered in coastal waters whose purview was now in question. Officials finally decided to leave the line right where it was.
A generation later, questions over the border are again being raised, this time by an Oregon state trooper. Sgt. Steve Yates worries investigations could be compromised if Oregon officers pursue suspects into territory that's technically California. "We're not from California so we have no enforcement powers in that state," he said. "I'd like to know where the line is really drawn."
The Oregon Dept of Transportation plans to consult California officials for their input on the matter.

In New Pine Creek, Yates' pursuit has stirred up unwanted geographic ghosts. Most residents want to leave the border alone. They're happy with their identities. Californian or Oregonian, they say, they're all "New Pine Creekans."
"Every so often somebody decides to stir things up," said Sally Burneikis, who owns an antiques store on the border. She pointed to the window. "As far as I'm concerned, that state line is right out there. That's where it's been, and that's where it'll stay."
But Yates notes confusion along the border. A few years ago, a car on the California side of State Line Road collided with another vehicle at the intersection of U.S. 395. The car was knocked a few feet into Oregon, and authorities there charged its driver with drunk driving. An Oregon judge dismissed the case, ruling that the driver was in California at the time of the accident.

Said Oregon lawyer Dave Vandenberg: "We've always suspected that some people live there to keep one foot in either state, to decide which way to run if the law comes calling." Differing state laws on each side of the border have traditionally kept inspectors busy. Until the 2 school districts signed an agreement last year, regulations forbade parents from schooling their children across the border.
Oregonians who wanted their kids to attend the closest elementary school often sneaked them across the line, ducking California authorities who waited outside the school looking for cars with Oregon plates. The scrutiny went both ways. Californians who wanted their teens to attend high school 14 miles into Oregon rather than bus them 42 miles south often created fictional addresses north of the border.

California authorities still routinely check homes south of State Line Road for cars with Oregon plates, looking for Californians who register their vehicles in Oregon, where fees are lower. Fish and game laws are also head-scratchers. In Oregon, anglers can fish for a redband trout considered endangered a short cast away in California. In Oregon, deer with any size antlers are fair game, while California has stricter rules.
When townsfolk decided to raise funds for a new community center, they created a nonprofit corporation in Oregon and now must apply for a business license in California. Still, folks put up with the oddities of life along a state border where the nearest stoplight is 108 miles away (in California) and the nearest Wal-Mart two hours distant (in Oregon).

Burneikis embodies the loyalties people feel to their side of New Pine Creek. Last year, after her divorce, her ex-husband got the house, which is on the Oregon side, forcing the 64-year-old to rent a home two houses south of the border. Now she's a refugee.
"I've lived in Oregon all my life," she said. "I miss it over there. I'm moving back as soon as I can."
Jim Spence tells a tale that pretty much sums up life in New Pine Creek. Spence was recently stopped in Sacramento for a bum light on his truck trailer. The officer asked about the Oregon address on his California license.
"Here we go again," he thought. Then he explained the New Pine Creek puzzle. The officer went back to his cruiser but soon returned. He asked again about the address and Spence restarted his story. Suddenly the cop handed him back the license, sighing: "Just get that light fixed."

    California
Sacramento Raelian: 'It just makes so much sense'
1.23.03   Will Evans
Sacramento Bee

Raelians eat salad. Raelians go fishing. They have children & pets. They have state jobs and worry about layoffs like anyone else. At least one does, and he lives in Sacramento. Angelo Napolitano, State Board of Equalization information systems technician, is Sacramento's Raelian, the more involved of only 2 members in the region. He belongs to the spiritual organization that burst into the news recently for its claim of cloning a baby girl. Napolitano, 46, is a gung-ho believer.
"It's going to be the dominant philosophy on the planet," he says. "It completes all the religions." In a white, collared shirt & gray coat, eating salad with his wife, Sherry, at downtown's Il Fornaio, nothing makes Napolitano seem out of place except a big, gold-plated Raelian medallion around his neck and beliefs in his head.

Raelians believe:

  •   On 12.13.73, a French sports journalist named Claude Vorilhon came across an alien who took him into his spaceship, named him Rael and explained the origin of life on Earth. Rael last communicated with the aliens, telepathically, in 1998.
  •   Life on Earth was created by the aliens, called Elohim (translated as "God" in the Bible), who reside on the "planet of eternal life" (heaven) in our galaxy. The Elohim created humans in their image using genetic engineering.
  •   Buddha, Moses, Jesus and Muhammad were prophets sent by the aliens to educate humans, and they are all alive & well on the Elohim's planet.
  •   The Bible describes the Raelian story with imprecise language.
  •   Humanity will achieve eternal life through cloning. The next step is to transfer the mind & memory of a human to its clone.
  •   The aliens want Raelians to establish an embassy on Earth for them (near Jerusalem, if possible) so they can officially meet us.

    What drew in Napolitano was Rael's book, "The True Face of God," now titled "The Message Given by Extraterrestrials," which he bought off the Internet 2 years ago. "I knew I had to get the book because I had been really interested in the way God & aliens relate to each other," he says.
    A member of the high-IQ society Mensa International & a black belt in Korean martial arts, Napolitano grew up in Nevada City. CalState Chico grad who served in the U.S. Army, he has 2 children by a previous marriage & 5 grandchildren.

    Napolitano has always been hooked on outer space. As a child, he peered into telescopes and hoped to become an astronaut. His father, an engineer, worked on the first U.S. satellite and scrawled Angelo's name on the inside of a panel. Rael's book fascinated Napolitano. He wasn't completely convinced but decided to try out a Raelian seminar in Las Vegas.
    "I had to go," he says. "I said, 'Hey, if these guys are in contact with extraterrestrials, I have to find out.' " Of course, he was a little worried, joking that a clone might come back in his place.
    "I was telling him, 'Don't shave your head and don't sign anything,' " says Sherry, his wife of 15 years. Actually, Napolitano signed up. "I did a cellular transmission," he says, smiling. "It tells the Elohim, … that I recognize them as our creators, that they created us scientifically in their laboratory, which kind of boggles the mind until you think about it. It just makes so much sense."

    A transmission is a Raelian baptism performed by a priest, or "guide." In Napolitano's case, it was Brigitte Boisselier, who, as head of Clonaid, co. affiliated with the Raelians, made the cloning claims. The priest serves as an antenna, putting a wet hand on the forehead and on the back of an initiate's head.
    The transmission is required to become an official member but can be performed only on someone old enough to consciously choose involvement in the movement, says Felix Clairvoyant, the Northern California guide.
    "The genetic code of the individual is directly transmitted to the Elohim spaceship, which is hovering above the Earth," Clairvoyant says. "It sounds difficult to comprehend, but now that we understand quantum physics and how bodies are bioelectrical in nature, it's easy to understand."

    If a catastrophe occurs on Earth, the Elohim can re-create those people, using the genetic data. And when Raelians die, they have a piece of their forehead sent to a Raelian safe, where it will be used to re-create them when the technology is available. Clairvoyant concedes it "might sound a little far-fetched," but says the books explain everything.
    Though sometimes portrayed as a loony cult, the Raelian movement does not show the earmarks of a violent or dangerous one, says Montreal's Dawson College religious studies prof. Susan Palmer, who studied the Raelians extensively and interviewed Rael. Instead, she says, the organization encourages members to be integrated in society, to attain an education and excel at their jobs.
    "There's a lot of anti-cult feeling in our society, so anyone who joins a new religion or a baby religion is considered to be duped," she says. "It's a new religion, but in another hundred years it might become as respected as the Mormon church."

    Though there have been charges that Raelians are anti-Semitic, based, in part, on a swastika incorporated into their original symbol, Palmer says they're not. Rael, whose Jewish father hid from the Nazis, believes Jews are more intelligent than other people, she says. Raelians advocate feminism, gay rights and racial diversity. The one thing Raelians are not tolerant of is the Catholic Church, she says, because of some of its actions & messages.
    Napolitano was raised Catholic, became a born-again Christian, then explored Mormonism & Buddhism. ¹ Later, he returned to Catholicism but left it again. His wife also left the church. "I'm not really a religious person," Sherry says. "I guess I'm a Raelian sympathizer. It's as believable as any other religion, as far as I'm concerned." "Actually, it's more believable," Angelo breaks in, "because they give you answers for everything at the level of scientific understanding."

    The organization claims 60,000 members worldwide, a 10% increase since its recent blast of publicity. There are 15 to 20 Raelians scattered throughout Northern California. Napolitano spreads the word to everyone he meets, every chance he gets. At work, he keeps a Raelian poster in his cubicle, wears his medallion & hopes people will ask him about it.
    He hasn't experienced harassment but said his family members "just kind of shake their heads." He doesn't harbor a grudge against the naysayers. The essence of the religion, he says, is "love each other, have a good time, love your creator."
    Other than that, it's up to you. Because the movement is based on personal freedom, specific practices aren't required. Napolitano gave up coffee & cigarettes because they "damage your genetic code," but doesn't spend as much time on "sensual meditation," a contemplation of infinity, as he should, he says.

    Raelian marriage is loose, too. Even multiple partners are fine. "We were created for pleasure," Napolitano says. "We like sex; everyone likes sex. There is no human response that avoids pleasure, esp. sexual pleasure."
    His idea of govt, though, isn't so free & easy. He favors a "geniocratic" system like that of the aliens, in which "you have to be smart enough to vote, and you have to be even smarter to run (for office)." Intelligence, science, understanding and facts. That's the basis of their movement, Raelians say, not blind beliefs.
    But when it comes down to it, Napolitano is taking a leap of faith. "You just understand that we were created by aliens," he says. He motions to his copy of Rael's book: "You just accept this."


  • Nov. 2000 160 nations voted in UN, U.S. abstaining, to reaffirm the Outer Space Treaty, basic intl law on space enacted in 1967 to keep war out of space.
    Holes in the coverage Nov. 2000   M.Ciarrocca Extra
    Meteor shower reports abound along East Coast
    7.23.01   Reuters

    Philadelphia   Reports of a possible meteor shower flooded police & govt telephone lines along the U.S. East Coast on Monday, authorities said. The sightings of what some described as a fast- moving meteor prompted evening rush-hour motorists to pull off suburban highways west of Philadelphia. Pilots in flight issued reports of similar sightings to federal aviation officials in Pennsylvania, Delaware and Maryland. Authorities said eyewitness accounts came from upstate New York to Virginia.

    "People say they saw what was perhaps a meteor shower, but there's nothing we can confirm," said FAA spokeswoman Arlene Salac. A Reuters reporter saw a tapered object shaped like a trumpet bell falling diagonally through the western sky near West Chester, PA 20 miles from Philadelphia, at about 6:20 pm. The object emitted a lustrous rainbow of colors, ranging from bright yellow on its downward-pointing flared end to light green and finally rust-colored red at the upward-pointing tapered end.
    Others reported seeing a triangular object or a fireball shooting through the sky.

    People living near Montoursville, Pennsylvania, a rural community 130 miles northwest of Philadelphia, reported hearing a loud explosion after seeing the unidentified object. A state police dispatcher said one woman reported that the blast broke windows in her home. There were also unconfirmed reports of people finding debris on the ground.
    "It was a ball of fire," Mark Barbour of Syracuse, New York, told CNN. "It looked like something you would see from the movies." The National Weather Service reported no natural phenomena that could account for such a sight.

    PA police were investigating the possibility of a part falling from a plane from Philadelphia Intl Airport, which sometimes guides flights across the city's western suburbs. But sightings were later reported southward through Delaware, Maryland, Washington and into Virginia. There were no reports of aviation emergencies, apart from the nonfatal crash of a single-engine plane in Calvert, Maryland, near the state's border with PA & DE. "We have no idea what it was, whether it was a meteor or what," said National Weather Service spokesman Curtis Carey.

    Russian spaceship maker fights bankruptcy
    7.31.07   CNN

    Moscow   Russia's main producer of spacecraft is to be put into emergency administration to fight off bankruptcy, Russia's Interfax news agency quoted the company's chief as saying on Tuesday. The Energia Rocket and Space Corporation is the main Russian contractor for the international space station and also makes satellites and rockets. It was unclear if Russia's space program would be affected.

    "We intend to introduce emergency administration for the corporation, because the financial idealism that existed here has led not to flights to the moon, but to bankruptcy," Interfax quoted company chairman Vitaly Lopota as saying.
    In April, Nikolai Sevastianov, who headed Energia at the time, told the Vedomosti daily the company was working on a new space transport system that could eventually lead to the industrial development of the moon.

    Russia mulls mothballing space station
    9.27.02  
    Reuters

    Moscow   Manned missions to the international space station may have to be suspended because Russia cannot afford to build new craft to carry crews there, a Russian space official said Thursday. "The situation is desperate," Russian section of ISS dir. Valery Ryumin said by telephone. Ryumin, also a top designer for rocket- builder Energiya which supplies the Soyuz craft said the co. had no money beyond next year to build the vehicles. "It takes 2 years to build the spaceship. Unless we place an order today, we will have nothing to fly on in 2004," he said.
    A key member of the 16-nation space station program, Russia has undertaken to provide Soyuz capsules. Designed to carry 3 people, they remain docked to the orbiting outpost for months at a time and can be used for emergency rescues. It is intended for use on a single mission. Ryumin said that without Soyuz, U.S. crews would not be able to use the space station as their shuttle craft were designed to remain at the station for a maximum of 3 weeks. The U.S. program also had no alternative provision for rescue missions. "That is why the issue has been raised of suspending permanent manned missions at the station," he said.
    Ryumin said he had sent a letter to his U.S. counterpart explaining Russia's concerns. He suggested that the publicity given to Russia's financial difficulties might prompt the government to stump up more funds. "Perhaps the govt will choose to avoid an international scandal," he said. "But I will tell you frankly that I have almost given up hope."

    Russian rocket throws lifeline to space station
    8.29.03   Reuters

    Baikonur, Kazakhstan   Russia threw a supply lifeline to a 2 man U.S.-Russian space crew in orbit on Friday, but dropped a heavy hint to U.S. that it would like some financial help to keep its program going. The Progress rocket, Earth's only supply link now to the Intl Space Station, was taking food, water, films and a satellite phone to American Edward Lu & Russia's Yuri Malenchenko who have manned the outpost since late April.

    But Russian space officials said they would welcome some financial input from U.S. to help them handle the costly burden of supplying the $95 billion ISS single-handedly. Russia has borne the brunt of manned flights & supplies to the 16-nation ISS since the U.S. space Shuttle Columbia disintegrated in February killing 7 & grounding the 3 remaining Shuttles.
    "This is becoming a very costly business for Russia," RKK Energia head Yuri Semyonov, Russia's lead participant in the ISS, told Reuters in Baikonur after a spectacular lift-off. "We will try to reach an agreement with the Americans, but there are annoying legal hiccups," he said without elaborating. "Today, we are trying to convey this problem to Pres. Putin & Bush. We do hope to find their understanding."

    Russia's Rossiya TV channel said the Progress would deliver some comedy films, CDs and fresh fruit as well as a satellite telephone which it said would enable the crew to get in touch with rescuers on their Oct. 2003 landing. The previous 3 member U.S.-Russian ISS crew landed hundreds of miles off target in the endless Kazakh steppe last May due to a technical glitch.
    A Mission Control spokesman outside Moscow said the Progress M-48 launch took place without a hitch at 5:48 a.m. Moscow time (9:48 p.m. EDT 8.28.03). It was expected to dock with the ISS at 7:45 a.m. Moscow time on Sunday (11:45 p.m. EDT 08.30.03).

    NASA officials have estimated that next March or April is the soonest the Shuttle can fly again. Earlier this week, an investigation into the disaster published a damning report on safety standards at U.S. space agency NASA whose Shuttles had long ferried astronauts to and from the space station.
    The Progress was also ferrying scientific equipt for experiments by Spain's Pedro Duque, who will go up with U.S. astronaut Mike Foale and Russia's Alexander Kaleri in Oct. 2003. Duque will return to Earth a week later with Lu & Malenchenko at the end of their 6 month stint in space.
    Russian cosmonaut Malenchenko achieved a first earlier this month when he married his earth-bound fiancee by video link.

    End of U.S. manned spaceflight looms ever closer
    U.S. manned space pgm has at best only a few more years of missions left in it, until its cost, complexity and design flaws results in another failure that grounds all US manned launches until a new transport system is designed & built.   7.10.03   Jeffrey F. Bell Space Daily

    Honolulu   Once again, NASA has proposed to develop a replacement for the troubled Space Shuttle. This year's project goes by the ungrammatical moniker "Orbital Space Plane". An interim version of OSP called the CRV (Crew Rescue Vehicle) to be developed by 2010 will take over the International Space Station lifeboat task now done by Soyuz.
    An improved OSP called the CTV (Crew Transfer Vehicle) will assume the ISS crew exchange task now done by Shuttle in 2012. To minimize development costs, the OSP will be launched on one of the new EELV family of expendable boosters, Delta 4 or Atlas V.

    OSP is the latest of many "Shuttle replacement" programs that have all failed dismally. A close look at OSP shows that this program is also doomed to failure due to fundamental technical defects. It's no surprise that such usually reliable NASA boosters as "Space Coast" Congressman Dave Weldon and aerospace lobbyist Lori Garver have publicly attacked OSP.
    Most critics have focused on the suspiciously low development costs, or the embarrassing gap between 2006 & 2010 in which no ISS lifeboat is planned. In fact, the basic concept of the program is so stupid that every knowledgeable person involved in it must be perfectly aware that it will never fly.

    The basic problem is that the OSP, as currently defined, must carry such heavy mass penalties in the form of wings, wheels, and various escape systems that its performance will not be much better than the Dyna-Soar design of 40 years ago. Because it cannot carry any of the supplies needed to sustain its passengers once they arrive at the ISS, it will not reduce the number or expense of Shuttle missions needed to support the International Space Station, and will not provide "assured access to space" as NASA claims.

    Instead OSP will force NASA to simultaneously fly 2 very expensive man-rated vehicles at a time when it is financially unable to support even one, and will double the risk of long stand-downs in ISS operations due to lack of either replacement crewmen or the supplies needed to keep them alive.

    NASA's finances in disarray; auditor leaves
    5.14.04   Reuters

    NYC / Wash.D.C.   As NASA sets course for the moon & Mars, the space agency's finances are in disarray, with significant errors in its last financial statements and inadequate documentation for $565 billion posted to its accounts, its former auditor reported. NASA's chief for internal financial management said the problem stemmed from a rough transition from 10 different internal accounting programs to a new integrated one, but audit firm PriceWaterhouseCoopers noted basic accounting errors and a breakdown in NASA's financial controls.

    PriceWaterhouseCoopers & NASA parted ways earlier this year, according to NASA inspector general Robert Cobb. PriceWaterhouseCoopers declined to comment, but a source familiar with the situation said the audit firm opted out of the contract because it was unhappy with the relationship.
    In a scathing report on NASA's 9.30.03 financial statement, which got scant attention at its release but was detailed in a cover story in the May issue of CFO Magazine, the audit firm accused the space agency of one of the cardinal sins of the accounting world: failing to record its own costs properly.
    The same report said the transition to the new accounting program triggered a series of blunders that made completing the NASA audit impossible. There were hundreds of millions of dollars of "unreconciled" funds and a $2 billion difference between what NASA said it had and what was actually in its accounts, which are held by the Treasury Dept, PriceWaterhouseCoopers said in its report.

    "The documentation NASA provided in support of its 9.30.03 financial statements was not adequate to support $565 billion in adjustments to various financial statement accounts," the auditor wrote in 1.20.04 report to NASA inspector general Cobb. It also noted "significant errors" in financial statements provided by NASA.
    That big number, $565 billion, with a "B", was the result of posting problems, new software and a "massive cleanup" of 12 years of NASA's financial records, said NASA chief for integrated financial management Patrick Ciganer. Under the new system, Ciganer said in a phone interview, errors that were discovered in the transition could show up multiple times in the accounting process: once as an erroneous credit in one column, then as a debit to delete the error, then as a credit in the correct column. By this reckoning, a $40 billion contract that stretched over 9 years and several separate NASA centers generated $120 billion worth of entries, and these were turned over to the auditors.

    "They have weak controls and problems with their internal system that make them vulnerable to (financial) fraud, although we don't have that evidence yet," said GAO dir. Gregory Kutz, looking into NASA's accounting issues. A Senate hearing on the issue was set for Wednesday. With a current annual budget of $16.2 billion, NASA's priorities include an ambitious multi-year mission to the moon and possibly Mars, finishing construction on the Intl Space Station and returning the grounded shuttle fleet to flight after the 2003 Columbia disaster.
    The independent investigation of the Columbia accident, in which 7 astronauts died, found NASA's culture at fault. The same spirit that fueled the early boom in space exploration in the 1950s evolved into separate parts of a sprawling agency working independently rather than cooperatively. The same independent path extends to NASA's financial accounting, Cobb said. "You've got an environment at the agency where there are these 10 centers which pride themselves on their independence   and it becomes very difficult in connection with any of NASA's functional management responsibilities to have people kowtow to the folks at (NASA) headquarters who have the responsibility to pull it all together," Cobb said.

    Cinager said he was hopeful that NASA's culture would change, noting a new "willingness of all of the constituencies in the agency to introspectively look at how can they improve the way they are doing their specific duties." Yale School of Management accounting prof. Shyam Sundar described the event as "a big mess," after seeing the auditor's report. "If NASA would have been a public co., the management would have been fired by now," he said.

    Space junk: the stuff left behind
    10.19.00   Robt Roy Britt Space.com

    Saturn V stage 3 Thousands of nuts, bolts, gloves and other debris from space missions form an orbiting garbage dump around Earth, presenting a hazard to spacecraft. Some of the bits & pieces scream along at 17,500 mph. When these objects fall back into Earth's atmosphere, which they inevitably do, they behave just like any other meteor, lighting up the sky.
    A 1999 study estimated there are some 4 million pounds of space junk in low-Earth orbit, just one part of a celestial sea of roughly 110,000 objects larger than 1 centimeter, each big enough to damage a satellite or space-based telescope.
    Some of the objects, baseball-sized & bigger, could threaten the lives of astronauts in a space shuttle or the International Space Station. As an example of the hazard, a tiny speck of paint from a satellite once dug a pit in a space shuttle window nearly a quarter-inch wide.

    Aware of the threat, the U.S. Space Command monitors space debris & other objects, reporting directly to NASA & other agencies whenever there's threat of an orbital impact. As of 6.21.00, the agency counted 8,927 man-made objects in the great above & beyond; some are there more or less permanently. Of the total, 2,671 are satellites (working or not), 90 are space probes that have been launched out of Earth orbit, and 6096 are mere chunks of debris zooming around the third planet from the Sun. U.S. leads the former Soviet Union in the total quantity of orbital junk, but some companies & other organizations contribute significantly to the count.

    But there are more objects up there. The Space Command's electronic eyes can spot a baseball-sized object up to about 600 miles high, officials say. But at 22,300 miles up, where geostationary satellites roam providing weather images used by forecasters, an object has to be as big as a volleyball to be seen. These object, moving in fixed perches with the rotating Earth, may remain in place for centuries, experts say.

    And even with more than a dozen of these electronic eyes arrayed around the planet, the agency admits to not being able to see the entire sky all around the world. The threat to satellites & Earth-orbiting deep-space telescopes from orbiting debris is clear. In the first 6 months of 1999, 57 of the tracked objects re-entered Earth's atmosphere, according to U.S. Space Command Maj. Michael Birmingham. Birmingham said that 91 objects fell into the atmosphere in all of 1998, and 69 in 1997.

    The most spectacular re-entry in the short history of the phenomenon was Skylab. Launched in 1973 (2 years after Russia put its first space station into orbit), the first & only U.S. space station stumbled home 6 years later, part of it splashing into the Indian Ocean and another portion ending up in Australia.
    "Most objects that re-enter the Earth's atmosphere burn-up or re-enter over water," Birmingham said, noting that nearly three-quarters of the planet is wet and a great majority of what's dry is uninhabited. "Since the space surveillance mission began, almost 17,000 objects that we track re-entered the Earth's atmosphere. Catastrophic re-entries such as Skylab are rare & the exception."

    Pentagon to shoot down broken spy satellite
    2.14.08   AP

    Wash.D.C.   President Bush has ordered the Pentagon to use a Navy missile to attempt to destroy a broken U.S. spy satellite, thereby minimizing the risk to humans from its toxic fuel, by intercepting it just before it re-enters the atmosphere, officials said Thursday.
    The effort, first of its kind, will be undertaken because of the potential that people in the area where the satellite would otherwise crash could be harmed, the officials said. Deputy National Security Adviser James Jeffrey, briefing reporters at the Pentagon, did not say when the attempted intercept would be conducted, but the satellite is expected to hit Earth during the first week of March.
    "This is all about trying to reduce the danger to human beings," Jeffrey said.

    Joint Chiefs of Staff vice chairman Gen. James Cartwright said at the same briefing that the "window of opportunity" for such a shootdown, presumably to be launched from a Navy ship, will open in the next three or four days and last for seven or eight days. He did not say whether the Pentagon has decided on an exact launch date. Cartwright said this will be an unprecedented effort; he would not say exactly what are the odds of success.
    "This is the first time we've used a tactical missile to engage a spacecraft," Cartwright said.

    After extensive study and analysis, U.S. officials came to the conclusion that, "we're better off taking the attempt than not," Cartwright said. He said a Navy missile known as Standard Missile 3 would be fired in an attempt to intercept the satellite just prior to it re-entering Earth's atmosphere. It would be "next to impossible" to hit the satellite after that because of atmospheric disturbances, Cartwright said.
    A second goal, he said, is to directly hit the fuel tank in order to minimize the amount of fuel that returns to Earth.

    Software associated with the Standard Missile 3 has been modified to enhance the chances of the missile's sensors recognizing that the satellite is its target; he noted that the missile's designed mission is to shoot down ballistic missiles, not satellites. Other officials said the missile's maximum range, while a classified figure, is not great enough to hit a satellite operating in normal orbits.
    "It's a one-time deal," Cartwright said when asked whether the modified Standard Missile 3 should be considered a new U.S. anti-satellite weapon technology. Cartwright also said that if an initial shootdown attempt fails, a decision will be made whether to take a second shot.
    Jeffrey said members of Congress were briefed on the plan earlier Thursday and that diplomatic notifications to other countries would be made before the end of the day.

    Shooting down a satellite is particularly sensitive because of the controversy surrounding China's anti-satellite test last year, when Beijing shot down one of its defunct weather satellites, drawing immediate criticism from the U.S. and other countries. A key concern at that time was the debris created by Chinese satellite's destruction, and that will also be a focus now as the U.S. determines exactly when and under what circumstances to shoot down its errant satellite.
    The military will have to choose a time and a location that will avoid to the greatest degree any damage to other satellites in the sky. Also, there is the possibility that large pieces could remain, and either stay in orbit where they can collide with other satellites or possibly fall to Earth.

    It is not known where the satellite will hit. But officials familiar with the situation say about half of the 5,000-pound spacecraft is expected to survive its blazing descent through the atmosphere and will scatter debris, some of it potentially hazardous. over several hundred miles. The officials spoke on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the matter.
    The satellite is outfitted with thrusters, small engines used to position it in space. They contain the toxic rocket fuel hydrazine, which can cause harm to anyone who contacts it. Officials have said there is about 1,000 pounds of propellent on the satellite. The satellite known by its military designation US 193 was launched in December 2006. It lost power and its central computer failed almost immediately afterward, leaving it uncontrollable. It carried a sophisticated and secret imaging sensor.

    Russia says U.S. may use satellite blast as test
    2.16.08   Tanya Mosolova Reuters

    Moscow   Russia's Defence Ministry said on Saturday a U.S. plan to shoot down an ailing spy satellite could be used as a cover to test a new space weapon. The ministry said there was insufficient proof that Washington's decision to fire a missile at the disabled satellite was to prevent a potentially deadly leak of toxic gas as it re-entered Earth's atmosphere.
    "In our opinion, the decision to destroy the U.S. satellite is not as harmless as it is being presented. Especially as the United States has been avoiding talks on restricting a space arms race for quite a long time," the ministry's information department said in a statement. "Under cover of discussions about the danger posed by the satellite, preparation is going ahead for tests of an anti-satellite weapon. Such tests mean in essence the creation of a new strategic weapon."

    U.S. officials said on Thursday that President George W. Bush had decided to have the Navy shoot the 5,000-pound (2,270 kg) satellite with a modified tactical missile after security advisers suggested its re-entry could lead to a loss of life. Some space and security experts have said they did not believe Washington's justification for the plans and argued the Pentagon was more likely testing its ability to target other states' satellites.
    This suggestion is rejected by U.S. officials. It will be the first time the United States has conducted an anti-satellite operation since the 1980s. Russia also has not conducted anti-satellite activities in 20 years.
    Genesis spacecraft crash

    Columbia R.I.P. 2.1.03   Columbia

    Independent board to probe space shuttle
    1.2.03   Matt Kelley
    AP

    Wash.D.C.   U.S. govt appointed an independent board Saturday to investigate the space shuttle Columbia disaster. Experts from USAF & USN, which had 5 of the 7 crew members, will join officials from the Transportation Department and other federal agencies on the review panel, NASA Administrator Sean O'Keefe said.
      [ This mission's 80 experiments were conducted by 6 military personnel. Why does a scientific space lab require a military crew? Because they're much less expensive than equally skilled private sector labor; their heirs can't sue for reparations.
    Which was the civilian crew member? An even less expensive H1-B Punjabi female.
    ]

    NASA also will conduct its own investigation into the disaster, O'Keefe said at a news conference from Cape Canaveral FL. Both investigations will review all the information NASA collected as the Columbia began its descent for landing, then started breaking up more than 200,000 ft over Texas. That information includes transmissions from the crew, as well as records from the shuttle's sensors, analysis of the debris and data from military, govt and commercial satellites.

    Israeli astronaut has prayer cup   1.19.03 AP

    … 48-year-old astronaut, Israeli air force colonel and former fighter pilot Ramon said he was well aware of all the security surrounding his launch. He called the protection, unprecedented for a NASA space shot, "unbelievable & helpful. I didn't have any doubt that everything would go pretty good and so it did,'' …

    Military satellites with infrared detectors saw several flashes as Columbia broke apart, according to a defense official who spoke only on condition of anonymity. It was unclear whether those ``spikes'' of heat indicated an explosion, the burning of pieces of debris re-entering the atmosphere or something else. O'Keefe and other senior administration officials said there was no indication that any kind of attack from the ground caused the disaster.
    FBI spokeswoman Angela Bell also said there was no indication of terrorism and that the FBI would have a minor role in the investigation, mainly helping collect evidence.

    Federal Emergency Management Agency took the lead in responding to the disaster. The military's Northern Command, which handles operations inside U.S., was coordinating Defense Dept response. 2 F- 16 fighters from an Ft Worth TX Air Force Reserve unit joined effort to search for pieces of the shuttle, said unit spokesman Maj. Clay Church.

    Army's 1st Cavalry Division also sent search &rescue task force from Ft Hood TX to help search for debris.The task force included helicopters & military police to search for and to guard pieces of wreckage for collection by NASA, Ft Hood spokesman Cecil Green said. The teams were relying on UH-60 Black Hawk helicopters during the day and OH-58D Kiowa Warrior helicopters at night, Green said.
    Homeland Security Sec. Ridge called AZ & NM officials to warn them about possible debris, although those states were out of the likely debris field. OK, TX & LA were more likely to see shuttle debris.

    All debris is U.S. Govt property and is critical to the investigation of the shuttle accident. Any & all debris from the accident is to be left alone and reported to Govt authorities. Unauthorized persons found in possession of accident debris will be prosecuted to the full extent of the law. If you find any debris, please call the Johnson Space Ctr Emergency Operations Ctr 281.483.3388 or send e-mail to columbiaimages@nasa.gov Cape Canaveral   Investigators trying to figure out what destroyed space shuttle Columbia immediately focused on the left wing and the possibility that its thermal tiles were damaged far more seriously than NASA realized by a piece of debris during liftoff. Just a little over a minute into Columbia's 1.16.03 launch, a chunk of insulating foam peeled away from the external fuel tank and smacked into the ship's left wing. On Saturday, that same wing started exhibiting sensor failures & other problems 23 minutes before Columbia was scheduled to touch down. With just 16 minutes remaining before landing, the shuttle disintegrated over Texas.

    Just a day earlier, on Friday, NASA's lead flight director, Leroy Cain, had declared the launch-day incident to be absolutely no reason for concern. An extensive engineering analysis had concluded that any damage to Columbia's thermal tiles would be minor. "As we look at that now in hindsight … we can't discount that there might be a connection,'' shuttle manager Ron Dittemore said Saturday, hours after the tragedy. "But we have to caution you and ourselves that we can't rush to judgment on it because there are a lot of things in this business that look like the smoking gun but turn out not even to be close.''

    The shuttle has more than 20,000 thermal tiles to protect it from the extreme heat of re-entry into the atmosphere. The black, white or gray tiles are made of a carbon composite or silica-glass fibers and are attached to the shuttle with silicone adhesive. If a spaceship has loose, damaged or missing tiles, that can change the aerodynamics of the ship and warp or melt the underlying aluminum airframe, causing nearby tiles to peel off in a chain reaction. If the tiles start stripping off in large numbers or in crucial spots, a spacecraft can overheat, break up and plunge to Earth in a shower of hot metal, much like Russia's Mir space station did in 2001.

    Dittemore said that the disaster could have been caused instead by a structural failure of some sort. He did not elaborate. As for other possibilities, however, NASA said that until the problems with the wing were noticed, everything else appeared to be performing fine. NASA officials said, for example, that the shuttle was in the proper position when it re-entered the atmosphere on autopilot. Re-entry at too steep an angle can cause a spaceship to burn up.
    Law enforcement authorities said was no indication of terrorism; at an altitude of 39 miles, the shuttle was out of range of any surface-to-air missile, one sr government official said.

    If the liftoff damage was to blame, shuttle & crew may well have been doomed from the very start of the mission. Dittemore said there was nothing that the astronauts could have done in orbit to fix damaged thermal tiles and nothing that flight controllers could have done to safely bring home a severely scarred shuttle, given the extreme temperatures of re-entry.
    The shuttle broke apart while being exposed to the peak temperature of 3,000 degrees on the leading edge of the wings, while traveling at 12,500 mph, or 18 times the speed of sound. If thermal tiles were being ripped off the wing, that would have created drag and the shuttle would have started tilting from the ideal angle of attack. That could have caused the ship to overheat and disintegrate.

    Calif. Inst. of Technology astronomer Anthony Beasley reported seeing a trail of fiery debris behind the shuttle over California, with one piece clearly backing away and giving off its own light before slowly fading & falling.
    Dittemore was unaware of the sighting and did not want to speculate on it. Dittemore said even if astronauts had gone out on an emergency spacewalk, there was no way a spacewalker could have safely checked under the wings, which bear the brunt of heat re-entry and have reinforced protection. Even if they did find damage, there was nothing the crew could have done to fix it, he said.
    "There's nothing that we can do about tile damage once we get to orbit,'' Dittemore said. "We can't minimize the heating to the point that it would somehow not require a tile. So once you get to orbit, you're there and you have your tile insulation and that's all you have for protection on the way home from the extreme thermal heating during re-entry.''

    The shuttle was not equipped with its 50-foot robot arm because it was not needed during this laboratory research mission, and so the astronauts did not have the option of using the arm's cameras to get a look at the damage. NASA did not request help in trying to observe the damaged area with ground telescopes or satellites, in part because it did not believe the pictures would be useful, said Dittemore.
    Long-distance pictures did not help flight controllers when they wanted to see the tail of space shuttle Discovery during John Glenn's flight in 1998; the door for the drag-chute compartment had fallen off seconds after liftoff. It was the second time in just 4 months that a piece of fuel-tank foam came off during a shuttle liftoff. In Oct. 2002, Atlantis lost a piece of foam that ended up striking the aft skirt of one of its solid-fuel booster rockets. At the time, the damage was thought to be superficial.

      Communication lost with shuttle
      2.1.03   CNN
    … 38 miles above Texas on its way to Kennedy Space Ctr FL … O'Keefe said that NASA officials had been waiting eagerly for the shuttle to land because "we couldn't wait to congratulate them" for their extraordinary performance.
    … The debris field is believed to be very large. Residents as far east as Shreveport, Louisiana, reported seeing & feeling an apparent explosion. "As we seen [Columbia] coming over, we seen a lot of light and it looked like debris & stuff was coming off the shuttle," Benjamin Laster of Kemp TX told CNN. "We seen large masses of pieces coming off from the shuttle as it was coming by," Laster said. "The house kind-of shook and we noticed a sonic boom … and then we seen a big continuous puff of vapor or smoke stream come out and then we noticed a big chunk go over."
    Search & rescue teams from Dallas Ft Worth area were alerted and residents were urged to stay away from any possible debris from the shuttle, which may be hazardous, said NASA public affairs officer James Hartfield.

    NASA officials at Johnson Space Ctr Houston said they last had contact with the shuttle about 9 a.m. EST, and it had been expected to touch down at about 9:16 a.m. EST. … Officials said no tracking data were available. …

    NASA unlikely to build new space shuttle
    2.1.03   Matt Crenson AP

    NASA is extremely unlikely to build a new space shuttle to replace Columbia, according to experts, leaving the space agency with 3 remaining orbiters as its entire fleet for the foreseeable future. The next generation of reusable space vehicles is at least 10 to 15 years off, said 189-93 shuttle chief engineer Donald H. Emero.
    "I think the country will not invest in any more shuttles,'' Emero said Saturday.
    Until a few years ago, NASA was exploring several designs for vehicles to replace the space shuttle. But new NASA administrator, Sean O'Keefe shelved those designs and committed to operating the space shuttle for the next 10 to 15 years. The fleet's primary mission during that period will be constructing & servicing the intl space station.

    Discovery, oldest of NASA's 3 remaining shuttles, has been in service for 18 years. Endeavour, built at a cost of about $2 billion to replace the Challenger after that spacecraft exploded shortly after takeoff in 1986, has been flying for a decade. Atlantis, the third remaining shuttle, has been in use for 17 years.
    NASA's shuttle fleet was grounded for nearly 3 years following the Challenger disaster, as investigators struggled first to determine what had caused it to explode then to fix the problem. In the hours after that accident, few could have guessed that the cause would be a rubber "O-ring'' stiffened & cracked by low temperatures.
      [ No one needed to guess. Investigation revealed prior warning from technicians in the firm & govt who were hounded from the program for naysaying ]

    At that time, NASA had sufficient spare parts to assemble Endeavour as a replacement for Challenger. But today the space agency does not have that capability. Emero said the investigation of Saturday's accident could take as long as that inquiry, but doubted it would because Challenger was destroyed by such a minor defect that was difficult to find. There is no doubt that the remaining space shuttles will be grounded for some time pending NASA's investigation of the Columbia accident.
    "Certainly there is a hold on future flights until we get ourselves established and understand how this happened,'' said space shuttle program manager Ron Dittemore. The next shuttle mission on NASA's flight schedule is a 3.1.03 to the space station by the Atlantis orbiter.

    During the 1990s, NASA spent billions of dollars investigating a radical design to replace the space shuttle. The X- 33 vehicle would have had a dramatic "lifting body'' design propelled by a type of rocket that had never been used in spaceflight. But persistent engineering problems led NASA to abandon the vehicle in 2001.

    Boeing says space shuttles to last into next decade
    9.17.03   Reuters

    Kennedy Space Ctr   The fleet of 3 U.S. space shuttles will probably operate for another 10 to 15 years, despite new space vehicles expected to launch during that time, a top space official at Boeing Co. said on Tuesday. A NASA plan to develop an orbital space plane by 2010 was plausible but would not fully replace the shuttle's heavy lift ability, said Boeing's NASA Systems unit vp & GM Mike Mott.
    "There is not right now on the drawing board one vehicle that can replace what the shuttle can do," Mott told reporters during a briefing at the company's offices at Florida's Kennedy Space Ctr. Since the Intl Space Station was designed to work with the space shuttle and to stay in service until at least 2018, the shuttle should probably stay in service until that date, Mott said.

    "So if you go to 2018 that becomes very logical because that (the shuttle & the space station) works together as an integrated system," Mott said. Chicago-based Boeing is one of NASA's biggest contractors, jointly operating the space shuttle program with Lockheed Martin Corp. In light of the mid-flight explosion of the shuttle Columbia on Feb. 1, leaving a fleet of just 3 orbiters, NASA has accelerated plans for a shuttle replacement and is expected to ask for proposals by early 2004, Mott said.
    Sometime in the summer of 2004, NASA is expected to award the contract for an orbital space plane. That contract is estimated by industry experts to be worth as much as $4 billion. Over the next 3 to 4 years, Mott expects NASA to award between $10 billion and $12 billion in new space contracts.

    2 years ago, I was a highly decorated NASA engineer. I was awarded their highest medal, for Exceptional Achievement, something that is usually reserved for senior managers, because of my expertise. I was a safety engineer.
    I was removed from my GS-13 position as an internationally recognized authority on hypergolic propellants &d explosives, and forced off the Kennedy Space Ctr. At gunpoint.
    Their excuse was that I had "abused govt equipt." Because I sent a friend an e-mail joke.
    The reality was that I wouldn't play their "political ball." I F-ING WARNED THEM.

    I told them technicians & engineers were overworked. I told them that there were too many managers and too many meetings and "dog & pony" shows. I told them that their senior "face time" play games, while they spent all their time plotting how to give each other pay raises, and left the guys on the floor to struggle day to day with obsolete and overpriced and unqualified equipt, was going to result in another Challenger.

    I was there for Challenger. I saw the same exact conditions happening again. Overpaid, lazy, irresponsible managers concerned solely with their climbing up their ladders. I told them they were skimping on inspections. I told them that the ground crews were asleep on their feet from exhaustion.
    I made as much noise as I knew how to make about the top-heavy bureaucracy sitting around in their fancy panelled offices, giving whorish press interviews in their smugness, while they did not have a clue what was going on in the real world where I was working.

    They fired me. They fired a GS-13 civil servant, with an Exceptional Service medal & 10 dozen commendations. For sending an e-mail joke. In reality, for objecting to political fat-cats sitting on their fat rear ends and failing to do their jobs.
    Like Challenger, those who are most guilty are the ones who will attempt to make the most political capital out of it. But the blame for Columbia lies entirely & totally with the NASA administrators. They should all be investigated for their criminal negligence. They should all serve time in jail.
    I warned them. They did their best to destroy me, because I warned them. It's too bad that innocent astronauts paid with their lives for NASA managers greed and political ass-kissing. But I am not surprised. 2 years ago, I warned them.

    Lost in space
    3.5.02   Radley Balko
    TCS

    America's federally run space program faces a funding crunch. According to Space.com , NASA has run $5 billion over budget in attempting to complete its portion of the Intl Space Station. The agency has also been forced to cut back on space shuttle missions or, at the request of the Bush administration, privatize the shuttle program altogether. Here's hoping the Bushies stick to their guns, and NASA is forced to allow free markets to carve niches from space.
    Carl Sagan's … politics were a hair to the right of Angela Davis, but his analysis of the history of human technology in Cosmos makes a compelling case for NASA's eradication, and for a space program driven entirely by private enterprise. In Cosmos, Sagan rightly points to human societies that welcomed new & potentially uncomfortable ideas, shunned mysticism, and ventured seaward as the antecedents to modern space exploration.
      [ Mysticisms rightly shunned are superstitious worship of an invisible free hand properly guiding resource allocation via unregulated markets and deification of munitons makers' corporate welfare. ]

    From ancient times he cites the Ionians, whose geographical placement exposed them to vastly different ideas from neighboring civilizations, as the prototype of a society conducive to the advancement of human thought. The Ionian region produced most of ancient civilization's great thinkers, incl Democritus, Aristotle and Plato, to name three. Sagan also cites the seventeenth century Dutch & Chinese Sung dynasty, as other civilizations worthy of our praise & admiration.   [ Both cultures engaged in slave trade ]

    What Sagan fails to mention, at least explicitly, is that in addition to his favored criteria of open exchange of ideas and an aversion to religious oppression, all of these societies also embraced trade, and were comparatively friendly to free markets.   [ "Comparitively" to warlord guided anarchy antithetical to any preservation of infrastructure ]

    Last July, Stephen Davies of Manchester University gave a lecture in San Diego entitled "History of Liberty, History of Power." In it, Prof. Davies looked at the strong correlation between free societies and their scientific & cultural achievement. Davies explained how China's Sung dynasty, spanning the 10th to 13th centuries, embraced free thought and open trade by banning censorship, encouraging movement & commerce, minting billions of coins, and even establishing banking & insurance systems.
    More pertinent to the point, the Sung built grand, expansive ships for exploration & trade, ships on a size and scale never seen before.

    17th century Holland too was a remarkably free society for its day. Holland became a destination for intellectuals & artists from all over Europe looking to escape the wave of censorship & church-led oppression sweeping the continent. Dutch East Indies Company, which was more privately than publicly funded, sent ships on exploratory missions all over the globe, and came back with, as Sagan writes "the zest for discovery of new lands, new plants and animals, new people, (and) the pursuit of knowledge for its own sake."

    Which brings me back to NASA. Since its inception, NASA has held a heavy regulatory lid over space entrepreneurship. Yes, NASA thrilled us with such breakthroughs as a moonwalk and a Mars rover, but the agency's first inclination has long been to protect its turf, and in the process smother any new, private markets emerging with respect to space.
      [ Absolutely false assertion based on the claim any restriction is equivalent to utter prohibition. ]

    Last spring for example, billionaire Dennis Tito offered to pay $20 million to visit the space station MIR. NASA balked, deeming him a "mere tourist" who oughtn't benefit from taxpayer-supported research. After several other attempts, all rebuffed by NASA, Tito finally turned to Energia, a largely private Russian company, which gladly obliged his extra-planetary ambitions, and sent him to the Intl Space Station.
    An American "consumer" was forced to take his business to a private Russian company, because an American "state-run agency" wouldn't accommodate him.
      [ I want to binge on heroin while raping underage women. Does that mean Albania is more enlightened than U.S. because I can go there & do so? ]

    Ed Hudgins, formerly of the Cato Institute, testified before Congress last June on the issue of space & private enterprise. Hudgins pointed out that about a million people took flights in airplanes in the 40 years after the Wright brothers first put humanity airborne. But so far, 40 years after the first cosmonaut left the earth's atmosphere, fewer than 500 people have traveled to space. It isn't as if the desire isn't there.
      [ Inaccurate analogy failing to mirror the genuine relationship. Space is drastically more inimical to routine travel and not remotely as productive for commerical travel.
    Unspoken contention that all markets are practically uniform to application of commerce is a myth of capitalism.
    ]

    According to a report by the Space Transportation Association & NASA itself, more than half the American public would travel to space, technology & cost permitting. There are dozens of entrepreneurs eagerly awaiting the opportunity to merge space & private enterprise.
      [ Capitalism's Tom Swift myth: all problems of technology & cost can be practically solved by application of eager entrepeneurs. Space perils make clear how puny that solution's use is. ]

    Recently space hero Buzz Aldrin announced plans for a floating hotel that would shuttle between the earth & moon. In his testimony, Hudgins pointed to several other private companies willing & anxious to squeeze profit from space, incl such projects as space "cruises," exploration of alternative energy sources, and less expensive, out & back thrill trips to the tip of the atmosphere.
    The Space Transportation Association estimates that a "ticket" to space could cost as little as $10,000 in the decades to come, a cost reasonable enough to bring in a half-million "tourists."
      [ Enron forever put a stake through the heart of reliance on wishful industry projections. ]

    Americans fail to see the consumer potential for space because space has for too long been under NASA's jurisdiction tucked far away from any commercial endeavors. NASA is a federal agency, subject to the same bureaucratic waste, turf protection, and inefficiency that plagues other govt agencies.
      [ Capitalist myth of market efficiency. "Bulworth" spoke empirical truth: however flawed, govt delivers for 3¢ administrative cost what industry delivers at 21¢ cost. ]
    Space shuttle contractors
    2.3.03   M.Norris & H.Berkes NPR

    … growing NASA reliance on contractors for work once performed by govt employees, … who spend 92% of NASA's $3 billion space shuttle budget and employ more than 80% of the people who work at the Johnson & Kennedy Space Ctrs. …

    What we learned after Challenger:   schedule pressure caused both NASA & contract managers to ignore or overlook evidence that Challenger shouldn't be launched.


    It isn't religious zealotry or mysticism or an aversion to learning that's holding back our society's potential for discovery, it's overgrown bureaucracy.
      [ That bureaucracy having resulted most from direct nurture of hypocritical religious zealotry & mysticism of capitalism as proselytized by NatSec corporate welfare for most of the past century ]
    Yes, NASA took us to the moon. But the "moon race" was spurred in part by Cold War competition from the Soviets. There's also no evidence to suggest that private firms couldn't have gotten us there sooner.
      [ Capitalist myth of more sooner = increased efficiency hence superior. Stewardship abides w/ patience; speculation damns the hindmost and squanders tomorrow for immediate but illusory gain. ]

    Now that the Cold War is over, NASA has little competitive incentive for innovation.
      [ False unsupported claim ]
    Faced with competing budget priorities, a war on terrorism & an economic recession, to name two, it could be a long while before NASA finds the public funding (or interest) it thinks it needs to accomplish its missions.
    But that's no reason to hold back our pursuit of knowledge & discovery. Better to free up space to the profiteers & businessmen than to wait for rejuvenated public interest, or for another president who might will us to our generation's moon mission. Americans will regain interest in space when enterprising capitalists find ways to bring space to Americans.
    But for that to happen, NASA needs to evolve radically or simply step aside.

      [ Money does not make the world go around. Interplay between inertia, gravity and cosmic currents of particles & electromagnetic waves appear to do that, although no one is certain how or why.
    Motive energy of currency is a euphemism, which is the maximum validity of laissez faire claptrap from the Victorian era now a century old. Greed is NOT good. Capitalism is a religion, not a science or even sound logic validated by empirical test. Self interest must be enlightened to the point of its extinction before safe strategic stewardship can surplant expedient tactical speculation.

    NASA engineers & corporate technicians told Morton Thiokol & U.S. Govt the Challenger's o-rings were not reliable. For speaking truth, they were removed from decision making processes.
    Not until post Challenger shuttle management was relegated to corporate welfare for munitions makers in an illegal albeit sanctioned "trust" or cartel named United Space Alliance did profit motive once more kill expensive, highly trained personnel & destroy irreplacable transport vehicles.

    The frontier of space is far too critical for mankind's future to squander it on behalf of industry revenue enhancement. Industry has repeatedly demonstrated it is not capable of self regulation, or even safely executing average missions.
    Do you want to fly in spacecraft managed by Enron?
    ]

    NASA's debris experts been working on foam issue for years   2.3.03   John Kelly Florida Today ¹

    Houston   From tiny fragments to large chunks, NASA has known for years that pieces of the foam insulating its external tank would break off and sometimes strike the bottom of the orbiter during its climb to orbit. A 1997 report by NASA engineer Greg Katnik, who monitors problems with ice & debris during shuttle launches at Kennedy Space Center, described a launch in which more than 300 tiles were damaged by the falling spray-on foam material.
    Katnik's report was part of an ongoing process of studying the issue. NASA has in recent years made slight adjustments in how it prepares the tank for launch to try to minimize the so-called "shedding" of foam. On the particular 1997 launch Katnik was studying, more than 100 of the dents were larger than an inch. Some were more like scrapes, measuring as long as 15 inches.

    "Foam cause damage to a ceramic tile!" Katnik said w/ questioning tone in a tile investigation status report which appeared in a NASA newsletter-like Web site. "That seems unlikely. However, when that foam is combined with a flight velocity between speeds of MACH two to MACH four, it becomes a projectile with incredible damage potential.
    The big question?: At what phase of the flight did it happen and what changes need to be made to correct this for future missions?"

    The foam has now become one focus of the investigation into the loss of Columbia, which burned up during reentry through the Earth's atmosphere on Saturday morning. When it launched 1.16.03, a large chunk of debris fell from the tank and struck the under side of the orbiter. A video obtained by Florida Today shows a flash of light upon impact.
    "Everyone has leaped to the conclusion that was the cause," Associate NASA administrator Bill Readdy said at a news conference today. "I' m not ready to say that … that is certainly the leading candidate right now. But we have to rule things out."
    Shuttle program manager Ron Dittemore has said that the impact, which NASA believed at the time to be "inconsequential," could have damaged the tiles that protect the orbiter from the heat of reentry. Dittemore said the shuttle transmitted data in its final moments showing spiking temperatures near the left wing where the tile damage occurred on launch day.

    The mission that Katnik was studying was STS-87, a science mission aboard the shuttle Columbia. All of the shuttles have sustained tile damage during launch and while enduring the rigors of flying in space & back through the atmosphere to get home. Tiles on the under side of the orbiter are very fragile & susceptible to damage, esp. from objects moving at very high speeds.
    Columbia's had particular trouble with its tiles, incl losing hundreds of them during its delivery from the manufacturer to Kennedy Space Ctr aboard a modified 747 in preparation for its inaugural 1981 flight.
    About 3 hours before every launch, a crew clad in orange jump suits walks up & down the entire length of the shuttle launch tower. They're looking mostly for ice, which tends to form on the outside of the big orange external tank because of the supercold liquid hydrogen & oxygen stored inside. They're also looking for anything else that could be considered dangerous foreign object debris, or FOD in NASA's acronym-heavy lingo.

    The damage on that particular Columbia mission was not normal, Katnik said in his report. One suspected reason for the change in damage, according to reports by Katnik & outside organizations that helped Kennedy Space Ctr study the issue, is NASA changed the way it "foamed" the external tank sometime shortly before that mission in an effort to be more environmentally friendly by reducing the use of ozone-depleting materials.
    "Freon was used in the production of the previous foam," he reported. "This method was eliminated in favor of foam that did not require freon for its production. MSFC is investigating the consideration that some characteristics of the new foam may not be known for the ascent environment."

    Dittemore said the agency has been studying the shedding issue for years and has made improvements in processes. One of them includes basically sanding the material on the outside of the orbiter to reduce the rough part of the surface that is more likely to flake off during launch. Usually, the pieces in question are tiny. But with the shuttle orbiter, NASA has long said even the tiniest piece of debris can become a potential disaster on launch.

    NASA enlisted the help of Dryden Flight Research Ctr, U.S. Air Force and the SW Research Institute in recent years to study the foam debris issue. Those investigators used pictures, telemetry data transmitted from the orbiter, radar coverage during launch, aerodynamic modeling, lab analysis and other tools, according to the govt reports. "At this point, virtually every inch of the orbiter was inspected and all hits were documented & mapped to aid in visualizing the damage," Katnik reported. "Maps were constructed of the lower surface, the left & right surfaces and the top surface of the orbiter. At this point, a "fault tree" was created."

    Katnik did not return telephone calls seeking comment on his report. The theories he espoused in his summary report, according to the NASA documents, included:

  •   Shrinkage of the gigantic tank during the loading of the liquid hydrogen, at 400-plus degrees below zero, and oxygen, at almost 300 degrees below zero. Katnik wrote, "These extreme temperatures cause the external tank to shrink up to six (6) linear inches while it is on the pad prior to launch. Even though this may not seem much when compared to the circumference of the external tank, six inches of shrinkage is significant."

  •   Environmentally-friendly material.
    The report said Marshall Space Flight Center was assigned to research whether the new freon-free process had previously unknown weaknesses that made it a bad choice for shuttle launch conditions. It's not immediately known whether the material was changed back to the previous version after that or not.
    The new material, according to the report, was also used on the previous mission, STS-86, which also had a higher than normal level of tile damage. However, that was deemed an anomaly at the time and, because it was a night launch, NASA did not have photographs good enough to study what was going on in the space between the tank & orbiter during that ascent, the report said.

  •   Aerodynamics of a new roll maneuver called "heads up," which had not been completed before.

  •   Primer that bonds the foam to the metal tank did not hold, but that theory was dismissed early on because the areas of damage, which were described as "divots" in the report, were not deep enough to expose that primer.

    A Dryden Flight Research Ctr report tested the new foam using a special aircraft. "Initial results of the flight tests at Dryden, which were designed to replicate the pressure environment the shuttle encounters in the first 65 seconds after launch, indicate the new foam survived the tests in perfect shape, with no evidence of flaking or erosion found," according to a Dryden press release issued at the time to tout its assistance to the shuttle program.
    According to the release, "Dryden research pilot Dana Purifoy flew the F-15B through a series of side-to-side yaw maneuvers beginning at 7,300 feet altitude. He then increased speed & altitude in a stair-step approach, finally zooming up to 61,000 feet at speeds of up to Mach 1.5 (1.5 times the speed of sound) before descending for landing."

    "It was important that the F-15B could match part of our (shuttle launch) profile, and it does a fantastic job of doing that," said Lockheed-Martin Michoud Space Systems aerodynamicist Roy Steinbock, staff engineer on the experiment, according to comments reprinted in the center's press summary at the time. "Our main goal was to try to match the dynamic pressure history (that the external tank encounters during a shuttle launch).
    The Dryden F-15B can match the high-altitude, low-pressure environment that the shuttle encounters, and can test a multitude of Mach numbers in (one) flight. That's something we cannot do anywhere else; we can't replicate that in a wind tunnel."

    U.S. Air Force issued a separate 3.19.99 press release detailing its role in ongoing evaluations of the foam problem.
    The report said foam is a "concern because it causes tile replacement costs to significantly increase, however, it is not a flight safety issue." Dittemore made a similar point on Sunday, saying that the ongoing problems with tile damage, incl one flight where the "popcorning" external tank foam damaged more tiles than normal, was a cost & processing issue.

    He said that while the damage to the tiles never appeared to pose a threat to the orbiter, it did take a lot of time & money to replace the tiles. There are more than 20,000 of the insulating pieces under the orbiter.
    In the Air Force release, its Materiel Command reported assisting NASA with supersonic tunnel tests on panels of the shuttle external tanks, which helped match some of the conditions of launch. As of the time of that release, the Air Force said NASA's efforts so far to discover the cause of the foam shedding were unsuccessful. The report said that the Air Force also was unable to replicate the damage being seen during flight in its tests in the supersonic tunnel. The report said the Air Force generated plentiful data for NASA to look over about the stresses on the material from heat, vibration, pressure and other forces being applied during launch.


  • pod sports bailout   "… As sports become ever more extreme & expensive, surely the next millennium will find the spaceways filled not with govt employees but rather daredevils … "
    5.3.65 article   description of Vostok is recounted with the comment that the spherical capsule was the great surprise: "Gagarin traveled like Baron Munchhausen - on a cannon ball!"

    Can you survive in space without a spacesuit?
    The sci-fi movie "Sunshine" gets it almost right. 8.1.07 Morgan Smith Slate

    In the new sci-fi film Sunshine, an astronaut named Mace must leave his spacecraft without a protective suit. He makes it through his exposure with only a case of frostbite. Could you really survive outer space without a suit? Yes, for a very short time.
    The principle functions of a spacesuit are to create a pressurized, oxygenated atmosphere for astronauts, and to protect them from ultraviolet rays and extreme temperatures. Without it, a spacewalker would asphyxiate from the lack of breathable air and suffer from ebullism, in which a reduction in pressure causes the boiling point of bodily fluids to decrease below the body's normal temperature. Since it takes a bit of time for these things to kill you, it's possible to make it through a very quick stint in outer space.

    At most, an astronaut without a suit would last about 15 seconds before losing conciousness from lack of oxygen. (That's how long it would take the body to use up the oxygen left in the blood.) Of course, on Earth, you could hold your breath for several minutes without passing out. But that's not going to help in a vacuum.
    In fact, attempting to hold your breath is a sure way to a quick death. To make it for even a few seconds, Sunshine's Mace must have expelled the air from his lungs before he ventured into the starry void. If he hadn't, the vacuum would have caused that oxygen to expand and rupture his lung tissue, forcing fatal air bubbles into his blood vessels, and ultimately his heart and brain.
    Scuba divers are also at risk for air embolism; they're instructed not to hold their breath as they ascend from the deep sea.

    An astronaut who fell unconscious from lack of oxygen would last for a few minutes more before dying from asphyxiation or the effects of the pressure reduction. Ebullism would result in the formation of bubbles in the moisture found in the eyes, mouth, and skin tissue.
    One NASA test subject who survived a 1965 accident in which he was exposed to near-vacuum conditions felt the saliva on his tongue begin to boil before he lost consciousness after 14 seconds.
    In the movie, Mace takes the precaution of wrapping himself in insulation torn from the walls of the spacecraft he's leaving. This might provide some protection against temperatures in space that can run from minus-200 to 200 degrees Fahrenheit.
    It might also ward off ultraviolet-related skin damage during a short jump through space.

    What about the frostbite? That's actually the least plausible result of Sunshine's suitless spacewalk. The cold wouldn't cause Mace too much harm in just 15 seconds, even if he encountered the very lowest temperatures in space. That's because heat leaves the body very slowly in a vacuum.
    The more likely damage would be a "space hickey", caused from the swelling and bursting of the skin's small blood vessels—which would look more like the effects of freeze-drying a wart than a case of frostbite.
    Columbia R.I.P. 2.1.03
    Space camp falls from orbit & into foreclosure
    Kids say they're more interested in Earthbound pursuits. 9.11.01 also affected attendance at Florida facility.   9.25.02   John-Thor Dahlburg L.A.Times

    Titusville, FL   Here on a school field trip, Grace Wilkowski trooped past cases of memorabilia from the Mercury, Gemini and Apollo missions, and etched acrylic likenesses of the astronauts who were heroes to a generation of Americans. Space, remarked the Georgia teen, seems so passe. "With the problems we have on Earth, space exploration isn't now our top priority," said the Savannah 14-year-old who wants to become a physician. "It's OK to do some preliminary exploration & stuff, but we need to be able to figure out how to better survive on Earth together."

    That attitude, in a nutshell, may explain the woes of U.S. Space Camp Florida, a privately run training ground for young would-be astronauts outside the gates of Kennedy Space Ctr. Dropping attendance & related financial problems have forced the facility and the adjacent U.S. Astronaut Hall of Fame into foreclosure, and barring eleventh-hour intervention of an angel investor, the attractions will be auctioned off at a Florida courthouse today. A related space camp in Mountain View, Calif., went belly up in January. ¹
    One week this month, the Florida camp graduated only 14 children, though it has room for 276. September is normally a slack time, said camp & hall of fame dir. Mary Merritt, but she acknowledged that enrollment has been falling for more than a year. Once such a national passion that astronaut John Glenn, who in Feb. 1962 became the first American to orbit the Earth, needed 6 people to help answer his fan mail, interest in space has been dwindling among adults & children alike for years, said Bowling Green State Univ. OH popular culture prof. Jeff Brown. "As a society," he said, "we've shifted our focus from outer space to computer space."

    Then came 9.11.01. "Cops & firemen have always been something we valued, but now the real heroism of their work is evident," Brown added. "I've heard some little girls say they now want to grow up not to be a high- fashion model, but a policewoman." America's first woman in space, Sally K. Ride, said she finds that while many young people don't know much about the history of the space program, they are still fascinated by outer space.
    "They are absolutely enthralled by astronauts, by space exploration, by being weightless in space, by looking back at Earth," said UCSD physics prof. Ride. "It's amazing to me how many of them yearn to be in the space program." Space, Ride said, remains a remarkably effective hook to grab & keep children's attention. The accompanying message to America's girls from an educational co. that Ride has founded, Imaginary Lines Inc., is that "it's fascinating, cool, OK" to be interested in math, science and engineering, she said.

    If Space Camp felt shock of 9.11.01, Merritt said, it's chiefly because families became much more reluctant to allow sons & daughters to fly unaccompanied on airliners to attend. An economic downturn already underway also thinned the ranks of parents willing or able to spend up to $799 in peak season on a 5 day virtual cosmic experience for their child. "Our enrollment has declined, esp. after 9.11.01, but our organization has not done a good job in marketing itself," Merritt said. "I think children are still interested in space and dream of being astronauts."
    Space Camp traces its genesis to German-born rocket scientist Werner Von Braun, who believed youngsters could be lured into studying the sciences by being exposed to excitement & romance of space travel. The first camp opened in Huntsville, AL in 1982 and was so successful that the Florida installation opened in 1988. Other camps sprang up from Japan to California. Campers clad in sky-blue flight suits are spun here in centrifuges, don harnesses that let them walk in simulated lunar gravity, and work on a "zero-G wall" where pulleys and harnesses duplicate the weightlessness of space. There are simulated space shuttle missions, with teams working inside realistic mock-ups of the spacecraft & mission control center.
    The Florida camp alone claims to have introduced more than 50,000 children to the rudiments of imitation spaceflight, incl 1993 seventh-grader Lance Bass, who, as member of the pop group 'N Sync, tried to join a three- man Russian crew blasting off next month to the Intl Space Station. Bass, now 23, was bumped from 10.28.02 Soyuz launch and replaced by a cargo container when he didn't pay the $20-million fee demanded by the Russians, but he was reported this week to be at Russia's cosmonaut ctr outside Moscow beginning another training program.

    In the 1990s, the Florida facility, joint venture of the Astronaut Scholarship Foundation and the Space Camp Foundation, saddled itself with $10 million in debt to fund construction of a dormitory and an expanded hall of fame. SouthTrustBank of Birmingham, AL, which holds the mortgage on the properties here, postponed the sell-off once as it negotiated with a potential buyer, but the auction is now supposed to go ahead. .
    "I'm getting a little bit worried," Brenda McMillan, marketing representative for the camp and hall of fame, said Tuesday. "I'd like to have a white knight come in and save us. I have my fingers crossed." For 12 years, Keith Sterner, 35, has worked at the attractions here. One recent morning, as he showed a visitor around exhibits in the hall of fame also being toured by the students from Savannah, the guide couldn't hide his gee-whiz reactions. There was Virgil I. "Gus" Grissom's silver pressure suit, he marveled, and Wally Schirra's cramped Sigma 7 Mercury capsule, and the singed Apollo 14 Command Module, "Kitty Hawk," that flew to the moon and back in 1971.

    Sterner hopes something with sufficient "glamour & glitz," like a manned mission to Mars, comes along soon to awaken in others the same youthful passion for space travel he felt as a child. Space Camp, he firmly believes, fulfills a need. "One kid who came here told us this is the first place he'd ever been where it was cool to be smart," Sterner said.

    Intl space crew retrievable
    2.1.03   AP

    Even with its shuttles grounded, NASA can easily retrieve the astronauts aboard the international space station using Russian vehicles. A Soyuz vehicle attached to the space station could bring the 3 astronauts onboard back to Earth at a moment's notice.
    But if the space agency's remaining shuttles are out of service for an extended period in the wake of Saturday's catastrophe, as seems likely, it could prove difficult to maintain the station's operations. "This is clearly a big setback for station because during the rest of this year shuttles were supposed to carry up lots of big pieces of hardware for assembly,'' said George Washington Univ. Space Policy Institute dir. John Logsdon.

    NASA plans call for expanding the space station during 5 shuttle flights this year. Next scheduled flight's 3.1.03 launch by shuttle Atlantis has orders to deliver supplies & scientific equipt. Subsequent missions this year call for installing a framework of external trusses & solar arrays.
    With Russia's ability to launch supply vehicles to the intl station already compromised by budget problems, the loss of U.S. space shuttle Columbia could seriously jeopardize the continued operation of the outpost.

    With no permanent crew aboard, the space station can operate in a "dormant'' mode as long as occasional maintenance is performed by visiting astronauts. NASA had already been considering a "demanning'' contingency for 2003 before Saturday's events.
    But the longer the station went unoccupied, the greater the chances that it would deteriorate to an uninhabitable state. A dormant period would also cause a significant interruption in the station's continuing assembly & scientific research program.

    Expedition 6, as the current crew is called, arrived at the station in November and is scheduled to return to in March. The crew consists of NASA astronauts Ken Bowersox & Don Pettit and Russian Soyuz commander Nikolai Budarin.
    Shuttle Columbia did not visit the space station. The crews of the 2 spacecraft did speak by telephone 1.28.03, Challenger disaster anniversary. An unmanned supply vessel was to be launched Sunday from Russia's Baikonur Cosmodrome. It was scheduled to arrive at the orbiting station Tuesday.

    Apollo moon experiment still working
    7.20.99   David Whitehouse
    BBC

    An experiment left on the lunar surface 30 years ago by the Apollo 11 moonwalkers still continues to return valuable data about our satellite. Pulses of laser light fired from the Earth are reflected by the lunar laser ranging reflector. The idea was to determine the round-trip travel time of a laser pulse from the Earth to the Moon and back again, thereby calculating the distance between the 2 with incredible accuracy.
    The data gathered has shown us that the Moon is receding from the Earth at about 3.8cm (1.5" every year. It has also measured minute changes in the shape of the Earth as landmasses gradually change after being compressed by the great weight of the glaciers in the last Ice Age.

    Unlike the other scientific experiments left on the Moon, the reflector requires no power and is still functioning perfectly. The reflector consists of a mosaic of 100 glass half cubes, all together about the size of an average tv screen. They are called corner cubes and reflect a beam of light directly back towards its point of origin. 3 decades on, the McDonald Observatory Laser Ranging Station near Ft Davis, TX regularly sends a laser beam through an optical telescope to try to hit one of the reflectors.
    They are far too small to be seen from Earth. Even when the beam is correctly aligned in the telescope, actually hitting a lunar reflector is quite challenging. At the Moon's surface the laser beam is a little over 1.5km wide. The reflected light is too weak to be seen with the human eye. Thanks to the equipt, scientists know the average distance between the centres of the Earth & the Moon is 385,000km (239,000 miles). This level of accuracy represents one of the most precise distance measurements ever made and is equivalent to determining the distance between London & Moscow to within a quarter millimetre (0.01").

    Earth has a magnetic field that forms a bubble around the planet called a magnetosphere which deflects solar wind gusts. Mars does not have a protective magnetosphere and consequently lost much atmosphere as a result of solar wind erosion.
    Interplanetary Magnetic Field NASA
    New co. sets goal of settling Mars
    9.16.05   Brian Bergstein
    AP

    All companies set goals, but newly formed 4Frontiers Corp. is eyeing some expansive horizons. The company's mission: to open a small human settlement on Mars within 20 years or so. The company's initial plans are a lot more terrestrial than ethereal, like developing a 25,000 sq ft replica of a Mars settlement here on Earth, then charging tourists admission.
    But the people behind the venture are quite serious, as serious as the $25 million they want to raise from investors. CEO Mark Homnick, a former manager for Intel Corp. who has registered 4Frontiers in Florida, says he has already raised "a couple million" from people he won't name. He hopes for an initial public offering within 5 years.

    That still leaves a lot of questions: Why should people live on Mars? And if it's going to be done, should a private enterprise engage in what would be one of humanity's defining moments? Besides, what's in it for investors?
    Homnick and his co-founders, longtime Mars aficionado named Bruce Mackenzie and a 25-year-old MIT master's student, Joseph Palaia, are ready with several answers. irst, they contend, humankind needs a new frontier to explore, with all the intellectual and engineering challenges that homesteading Mars would present.

    Also, who knows the fate of our humble Earth? Will we meet an early end at the hands of an asteroid, warfare, disease or some other catastrophe? In that case, we'd sure be glad civilization had been preserved by some colonists on Mars, and perhaps elsewhere in the galaxy, if all goes well on the Red Planet. That broader vision of space settlement gives 4Frontiers its name: the frontiers being the Earth, the moon, Mars and the asteroids.
    "It's the nature of life, life tries to expand and tries to adapt," Mackenzie says. "If there's a forest fire in one valley, then all of the organisms in the next valley will slowly creep over the ridge and repopulate that valley. Any species that don't do it eventually die out." Going to space, he believes, is as if "all of earth's life, acting together, is trying to get into the next valley. And the only way we can do it is by building rockets."

    Mackenzie, a software developer, has devoted much of his energy to a nonprofit group called the Mars Foundation, which aims to advance knowledge about how to colonize the planet. But he decided a private venture like 4Frontiers also would be necessary, to drive things forward. Although President Bush has called for a manned mission to Mars, Mackenzie believes big bureaucracies might never get the job done right.
    "It's better to have lots of groups out there, all trying things," Mackenzie says.
    Space tourism is on the verge of becoming big business. Space Adventures Ltd. of Arlington, Va., has brokered $20 million trips for the wealthy on Russian rockets and is taking deposits for $100 million fly-bys of the far side of the moon. For a lot less money, you can sign up for a quick blast into zero gravity. But in comparison, 4Frontiers' ultimate goal of an extended stay on Mars would be off-the-charts extreme.

    It would take months to get there. Once there, you couldn't kick off your shoes and dig your toes into the sand. Life would transpire in an enclosed space with pumped-in air (unless Martian settlers could pull off the even more speculative feat of "terraforming" the planet by changing its toxic atmosphere.) Venturing outside would require sealed suits.
    To begin, 4Frontiers plans to gather patents and engineering ideas that would enable a small crew to land on Mars with home-building materials and the manufacturing capability to keep adding on. The hot topics would include ways to miniaturize key industrial processes, like making plastic or steel, and methods for exploiting Martian resources, such as the carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, iron in the dirt or the water bound up in Martian ice.

    As the company gains expertise, it expects to sell consulting services to aerospace companies or NASA. It envisions getting work designing Mars sets for movies and Mars rides for amusement parks. Meanwhile, it plans to construct a mock-up of its Mars home and begin selling tickets to it by 2007. Potential sites in Colorado, Florida and New Mexico are being considered.
    The company's business plan estimates these varied projects would bring in $34 million in revenue in 2010, including $7 million in gate receipts at the tourist site. Profits before taxes, depreciation and amortization are forecast at $1.4 million as early as next year, and $29.7 million in 2010.

    Even if that flies, then what? A $34 million company probably isn't in a great position to begin launching rockets. Homnick says 4Frontiers would probably "stay incremental" through the early 2010s, perhaps getting involved in robotic surveys of Mars or asteroid mining. However, projects like that, and perhaps even settling Mars, might require some clarity in space law.
    The 1967 Outer Space Treaty declared that the "exploration and use" of outer space and celestial bodies "shall be carried out for the benefit and in the interest of all countries." While that's not exactly the traditional language of private enterprise, some space scholars say it leaves room for commercial projects. A 1979 Moon Treaty was more explicit, holding that bodies in the solar system should not become the property of any nation, organization or person. But most countries, including the United States, China and Russia, never ratified it.

    Considering all the possible complications, Mackenzie says 4Frontiers' real success might come simply from getting the public pumped about living on Mars. In turn, that could make Washington eager to fund a settlement. Even if that doesn't happen, he is sure that people eventually will live on Mars, and perhaps scores of other places in space.
    "It's a question of when," he says. "I really hope we get started before we have an economic decline that delays it. I'd really hate to have something like the Great Depression, or the Dark Ages that lasted several hundred years, delay getting into space."

    correct national policy, wrong technology solution
    NASA prepares for nuclear-powered leap to Mars
    1.18.03   Chris Ayres
    Times (London)   ¹ ² ³

    Los Angeles   President GWBush is to authorise NASA to develop a hugely expensive nuclear- powered spacecraft that would take just 2 months to reach Mars. The spacecraft used a small nuclear generator for power; scientists have speculated that it would be capable of travelling at up to 54,000mph, 3x the speed of conventional craft, although NASA officials said yesterday that this was still theoretical.
    The generator would not power the craft's initial take-off, this would still require conventional rockets, but would be switched on after it left the Earth's atmosphere. As well as providing electricity for propulsion, the generator would power on-board scientific experiments and communications with Houston.

    Development of space-based nuclear power is unlikely to please other nations who fear U.S. will use the project, unofficially named Prometheus, mythological Greek figure who stole fire from the gods, for military purposes. China is the most likely to retaliate with its own space-based nuclear pgm, prompting comparisons with the the US & Soviet Union Cold War space race .
    Scientists are excited about the prospect of nuclear- powered space travel. It could lead not only to human missions to Mars but also to the construction of a permanent lunar base and exploration of Jupiter's icy satellite, Europa. It would also allow an unmanned craft to be sent beyond the Earth's solar system, in a mission that could last for more than a decade.

    NASA also hopes that the ambitious project will inspire American schoolchildren to take a greater interest in science & technology. U.S. is already beginning to suffer from a shortage of young engineers. Project Prometheus will involve dusting off a pgm that many regarded as a relic of the Cold War. It was last backed by President Bush Sr more than a decade ago, before the first Gulf War. It was dropped after opposition from Congress and a lack of public interest.
    It is not clear how the American public will react this time, esp. given U.S. recession and est. $200 billion cost of going to war with Iraq. However state of the economy has not always been a factor in big NASA space projects. Analysts have pointed out that President Nixon started the Space Shuttle pgm during a recession.

    With this in mind, NASA is thought to be pushing for a significant increase in funding for Project Prometheus, which has already been allocated $1 billion funding for next 5 years. Speculation that the President will make an announcement on NASA funding during his State of the Union address to the American people 1.28.03 was being played down yesterday.
    "We're talking about doing something on a very aggressive schedule to not only develop the capability for nuclear propulsion & power generation but to have a mission using the new technology within this decade," said NASA administrator Sean O'Keefe.

    The move is a significant shift in strategy for NASA, which, since the end of the space race, has been forced to request funding on a mission-by-mission basis. Now it wants the freedom to develop so-called "enabling technologies" that could be put to any number of future uses.
    "The laws of physics are the only things controlling how fast we go anywhere, what we do and whether we can survive the experience," Mr O'Keefe said. "So until we beat the technical limitations, you basically end up arguing about fantasy missions. We've been restricted to the same speed for 40 years. With the new technology, where we go next will only be limited by our imaginations."

    Nuclear-powered spacecraft have long been seen as the only serious way to give manned spacecraft enough power to explore beyond the Moon. Existing spacecraft use the momentum of the launch to simply "coast" through space. Even before that, however, U.S had spent billions trying to build a space-based nuclear reactor; several prototypes had been tested in Nevada desert. One reactor was launched in 1965, operated for only 43 days and remains in orbit to this day. The nuclear project was eventually discontinued.

    There are still concerns over the safety of using a nuclear-powered craft in space. The protection of astronauts would have to be improved, for example. Astronauts return from space with a 30% decrease in muscle mass and a 10% loss of bone mass. Radiation in a spacecraft is equivalent to 8 chest X-rays every day.



    NASA watchdog calls Columbia decisions 'shocking'   8.7.03   Reuters

    Cape Canaveral FL   NASA made "shocking" & "disappointing" mistakes before & during the doomed Columbia flight, the watchdog picked by the space agency to monitor its return to flight said on Thursday. Former astronaut Richard Covey, pilot of first shuttle flight to follow Challenger accident of 17 years ago, is task group co-chair tapped by NASA to oversee reforms expected after another panel completes its investigation of 2.1.03 Columbia crash and turns over its findings to Congress later this month.
    Covey told reporters at Kennedy Space Ctr he was not necessarily surprised that NASA suffered a second shuttle disaster, since "space flight is risky business and it will remain risky business." But he said he was disappointed there were so many management mistakes similar to those that preceded Challenger.

    "Shocking? Yeah. Disappointing? Particularly when … it has similarities to the Challenger accident," Covey said. Following Challenger crash, investigation board tagged NASA with term "go fever", a malady that led managers to ignore or minimize risk in order to meet an ambitious launch schedule.
    In Columbia's wake, investigators have said NASA ignored the potential danger of foam shedding from the shuttle's external fuel tank during liftoff, then managers failed to get imagery from spy satellites that could have assessed the injury to the shuttle's left wing from a foam impact 81 seconds after liftoff.

    Columbia crew of 7 were lost over Texas when the wing failed at about 21 times the speed of sound. Covey said his 27-member task group, co-chaired w/ retired astronaut Tom Stafford, may never adequately address the so-called cultural or managerial issues. Their charter requires them to wrap their work a month before NASA resumes shuttle flights.
    By their nature, such cultural issues, as opposed to purely technical issues, are hard to assess until the space program is fully operational again. Covey said his board may be restricted to studying plans & concepts. "But it would not be a complete assessment because the real implementation may take longer," he said.

    That next launch is tentatively scheduled for March or April 2004 but could be pushed back months, or even a year or more, depending on how many problems are uncovered by separate investigation group headed by retired Adm. Harold Gehman. Gehman has said that cultural problems at NASA will be given attention equal to the technical problems.
    1986 Challenger explosion memorial

    1986 Challenger explosion last shuttle disaster
    2.1.03   CNN

    7 crew members took off 1.28.86 aboard space shuttle Challenger from Kennedy Space Ctr FL. 73 seconds later, the shuttle disintegrated in the sky. All crew members incl NH teacher Christa McAuliffe were killed while millions watched on live TV. A gas leak in the right booster rocket was blamed for the Challenger blast. In the explosion, the crew module separated intact from the fireball, went into a 2½ minute free fall from 50,000 ft and plunged into the sea.
    The crew members had no parachutes and no way to jettison the hatch. The public had embraced the crew members, including McAuliffe; commander Francis R. (Dick) Scobee, pilot Michael J. Smith; specialists Judith A. Resnik, Ronald E. McNair and Ellison S. Onizuka; payload specialist Gregory B. Jarvis, a Hughes Aircraft Corp. employee.

    McAuliffe was selected from among more than 11,000 teachers who applied for the Challenger mission. She was chosen by NASA in 1984 and took a leave of absence that fall to train for the mission.
    NASA put the shuttle program on hold after the Challenger accident until 1988. The agency has put the odds of a catastrophic accident during launch, most dangerous part of any shuttle mission, at 1 in 438.

      Astronauts honor Challenger victims
      1.28.03   AP
    Cape Canaveral   Space shuttle Columbia's astronauts joined Mission Control in a moment of silence Tuesday at the exact time 17 years ago that Challenger exploded in the sky. NASA's work force, in orbit & on Earth, remembered not only the 7 astronauts who died 1.28.86, but also the 3 killed by fire 1.27.67 in Apollo spacecraft. At the launch site Tuesday, flags flew at half staff for the second day in a row.
    The 2 tragedies, separated by 19 years & a single day, represent the space agency's darkest hours. "It is today that we remember & honor the crews of Apollo 11 & Challenger. They made the ultimate sacrifice, giving their lives in service to their country and for all mankind. "Their dedication and devotion to the exploration of space was an inspiration to each of us and still motivates people around the world to achieve great things and service to others.'' Columbia commander Rick Husband radioed a few minutes before the airwaves went silent.

    Columbia round-the-clock laboratory research mission, featuring more than 80 experiments … Last week, NASA announced it will hire 3 to 6 teachers for its next astronaut class. McAuliffe's backup, Barbara Morgan, will be on Columbia's next flight, to the intl space station Nov. 2003. She quit her Idaho teaching job in 1998 to become a full-fledged astronaut.

    Astronauts experiment with balls of flame
    1.23.03  
    AP

    Cape Canaveral   Space shuttle Columbia's astronauts created tiny, weak balls of flame Thursday in an experiment that could lead to better car engines. They ignited hydrogen & methane fuel inside a sealed chamber, and set records for weakest flame & leanest mixture ever burned in space or on Earth, said UCLA lead scientist Paul Ronney.
    The 3/8" dia. flames were too weak to be seen by the naked eye and had to be magnified through a video camera. To get the astronauts in the mood, Mission Control piped up a recording of ``Burning Down the House'' by the Talking Heads.

    On Wednesday, the astronauts burned a flame that produced just one-half of one watt of thermal power, Ronney said. A birthday candle, by comparison, is about 50 watts. Then on Thursday, one week into Columbia's 16-day research mission, one of the flames consisted of an 8 mixture of fuel & air, Ronney said. The leanest mixture that can be burned in a car engine is about 70%. One flame ball burned for about 20 minutes aboard Columbia, also believed to be record, Ronney said. A similar fire experiment flew on Columbia in 1997.
    By going to space and getting rid of gravity, scientists can get weak flames to burn longer and thus yield data of use to the auto industry. The goal is to design car engines that can burn fuel more efficiently and produce less pollution.

      Shuttle had more than 80 experiments
      2.1.03   Sharon L. Crenson AP
    Columbia's 16-day mission featured more than 80 experiments ranging from the effects of space travel on astronauts to the possibility of creating a new perfume. "Folks on the ground were just ecstatic with the amount of science that they were reaping,'' said space shuttle pgm manager Ron Dittemore. "Some of it will be their legacy.''
    Some research results were lost forever when the shuttle disintegrated over Texas, others were downloaded to Earth earlier.
    Spiders, flowers, cancer cells, ants, carpenter bees, fish embryos, silkworms and rats were all on board. "I hope they can salvage something,'' said Univ. of Nebraska biochemist Hideaki Moriyama who supplied vials of proteins to the flight in hopes of finding clues to diseases like HIV-AIDS, Huntington's and Alzheimer's. "It took more than 4 years to prepare those experiments,'' Moriyama said.

    USC aerospace engineer Mohamed Abid had a combustion experiment on board. He saw video of his tiny fireballs ping-ponging around the shuttle's laboratory, a safely isolated area. But Abid said the data, designed to help researchers model combustion in car, airplane and rocket engines, was lost.
    In another experiment, shuttle crew members collected samples of their own blood, urine and saliva to detect possible bone loss, kidney stones, muscle loss or weakening of immune systems. … Columbia was the first shuttle in 3 years not headed to the intl space station or the Hubble Space Telescope.

    Israel Space Agency & Tel Aviv Univ. sponsored a $2 million experiment on board. It involved aiming a pair of cameras at the Mediterranean and Atlantic in search of huge dust plumes from the Sahara Desert that might affect Earth's climate. Soon after the cameras were positioned, NASA reported receiving remarkable details of the clouds.
    Perhaps the most commercially viable experiment on board was sponsored by Intl Flavors & Fragrances Inc., which sent a miniature red rose plant with 6 buds and an Asian rice flower with a jasmine scent. Astronauts extracted & preserved essential oils from the flowers so fragrance experts back home could recreate the smell. A 1998 space shuttle experiment yielded a new scent incorporated in the perfume Zen, and a body spray called Impulse.

    Northeastern Univ. contributed another kind of experiment to Columbia's last flight. They sent zeolites, a kind of crystal, into the weightless environment. The center is working on ways to improve zeolite materials for more efficient storage of hydrogen fuels. A project by 2 Arizona State researchers was to help turn crew member urine & wastewater into clean water for drinking, cooking and bathing.
    Johnson Space Ctr scientific investigator David Warmflash had been expecting to study bacteria cultures brought back to space Saturday afternoon. One of the experiments Warmflash worked on, examining how well bacteria grew on rocks in space, was put together by an Israeli graduate student & a Palestinian undergraduate studying in U.S.

    Columbia was NASA's oldest shuttle
    2.1.03  
    AP

    Space shuttle Columbia was the oldest in NASA's fleet and the first to enter the Earth's orbit in 1981. Saturday's voyage was its 28th trip into orbit. Named after a ship that made the first American circumnavigation of the globe in 1792, Columbia flew into orbit in 1981. 4 ships joined the fleet over the next decade; Challenger in 1982; Discovery in 1983; Atlantis in 1985, and Endeavour, built in 1991 to replace the Challenger after it exploded in 1986.

    The shuttle went by the name OV-102, standing for Orbiter Vehicle. It weighed 178,000 pounds with its main engines installed. The shuttle had undergone about 50 modifications, incl addition of carbon brakes, improved nose wheel steering and an enhancement of its thermal protection system.
    It was last refurbished in 1999. Scientists found 3 cracks last July in Columbia's stainless steel liners used to direct the flow of super-cold hydrogen fuel to the main engines. Similar cracks had been discovered in other ships in the fleet.
    Age was not considered a factor in the cracks because they were found in NASA's oldest & newest shuttles.

    Oldest NASA shuttle Columbia made 28 voyages
    2.1.03   Reuters

    Wash.D.C.   Columbia, named after Boston MA based sloop that in 1792 maneuvered past the dangerous sandbar at the mouth of a river extending more than 1,000 miles/1600 km through what is today southeast British Columbia, Canada and the Washington-Oregon border, … launched era of reusable space freighters, replacing expendable rockets used during first 2 decades of manned space flight. Its 1.16.03 16-day voyage marked NASA's 113th shuttle mission. Columbia was delivered to Kennedy Space Ctr March 1979 and lifted off for the first time 4.12.81.

    The 22-year-old spacecraft underwent more than 100 modifications in Sept. 1999 at Rockwell Intl's Palmdale, California, assembly plant.The orbiter returned to Kennedy Space Ctr Feb. 1992 after the $70 million tuneup, which included upgrades to make a longer stay in space possible.
    "Columbia is a safer shuttle today than the day it first launched," astronaut John Young, who commanded Columbia's first space mission, said at the time. "Columbia has gotten better as it has gotten older. It's gone from test flights to doing things we once never dreamed we could do." Modifications included a new, lighter cockpit that used less electricity, inspection of more than 200 miles of wire and enhanced heat protection on the craft's wings.
    On Friday, NASA's flight entry director, Leroy Cain, was asked about possible damage or missing tile to the left wing of the orbiter on lift off. He said the analyzes by NASA engineers had shown any damage to be minor.

    Experts warned of safety worries   Age, oversight sparked concerns among range of observers
    2.2.03   R.J.Smith, J.Warrick, R.Stein & E.Pianin Wash.Post

    Wash.D.C.   … warnings by govt auditors & experts who voiced concerns about lapses in oversight and deferred safety improvements for NASA's aging fleet of space shuttles. Although "safety first" was the watchword of shuttle launches, aerospace engineers have repeatedly complained that belt-tightening & shifting priorities were denying Columbia & the 3 other shuttles the necessary upgrades & improvements.
    As recently as last April, the Aerospace Safety Advisory Panel chairman Richard Blomberg warned Congress that NASA's management of the shuttle program had drawn "the strongest safety concern the panel has voiced" in 15 years. "I have never been as worried for space shuttle safety as I am right now."

    The last lethal shuttle disaster, 17 years ago, provoked calls for revolutionary changes in the program's management. The agency promised safety would henceforth be put far ahead of all other considerations, incl budget constraints, users' demands and political pressures. "We will never launch when it is unsafe," then NASA space flight dir. Fred Gregory promised the House science & space subcommittee 9 months ago.
    While none of those who issued warnings pointed specifically to a defect immediately known to be implicated in yesterday's disaster, they warned repeatedly that safety was losing the battle for scarce NASA funds. The program's 40% budget decline over the past decade had undermined its ability to guarantee flawless performances, they said.

    NASA's response was mostly to say it disagreed: The problems were not that bad; safety was still the top priority; and the number of shuttle "anomalies" or defects was dropping fast. "NASA will continue to ensure that an adequate staff & shuttle workforce" is available to maintain a perfect record, Gregory promised.
    But safety experts have long said NASA's claim that safety was improving stemmed from an illusion. The shuttle, they said, was an aging, balky and delicate space truck that exceeded NASA's own risk limits for manned flight. Time was not its friend. The ungainly glider was created in the 1970s through a marriage of adventurous design & well-known technology, and it was considered underfunded from the outset.

    By all accounts, the program has never really embraced the past decade's stunning advances in aerospace engineering & safety testing. After the shuttle Challenger exploded on launch in 1986, for example, numerous safety advisers urged that a crew ejection capsule be added to save lives even in the midst of calamity. "There is a clear need … to develop a plan to address the absence of an escape system by either upgrading the space shuttle or initiating a program with a realistic timetable to replace it," the Aerospace Safety Advisory Panel concluded last year.
    NASA has studied the problem for years, but the costs of retrofitting such a device kept it from acting. As a result, Columbia's crew had no choice but to follow the craft's fate as it broke up around the point of reentry into Earth's atmosphere.

    No new shuttle has been in development, and, in fact, many of the most recent safety alarms stemmed from the agency's recent plan to try to extend the life of the current shuttles by an additional 25 years. Blomberg warned, in particular, that budget-tightening compelled the shuttle program to spend most of its resources on current operations while planned improvements, incl some that would "directly reduce flight risk," were deferred or eliminated.
    "The concern is not for the present flight or the next or perhaps the one after that," Blomberg said last April. "One of the roots of my concern is that nobody will know for sure when the safety margin has been eroded too far. Repeated govt & contractor hiring freezes" during the shuttle's operating life "led to a lack of depth of critical skills" that become more troubling as the system ages, Blomberg said.

    In implied criticism of Congress & White House, the panel said in its most recent published report that NASA's budgets were "not sufficient to improve or even maintain the safety risk level of operating the space shuttle. Needed restorations & improvements cannot be accomplished under current budgets and spending priorities."
    In mid-2001, 5 of 9 members of the aerospace advisory panel and 2 consultants were asked to step down after NASA changed its charter and required rotating memberships. They were replaced, but the year "was one of significant upheaval on the panel," the panel said in a report last March.

    The most detailed independent assessment of shuttle safety in recent years, completed March 2000, pointed to specific problems that analysts yesterday said may have played a role in Columbia's breakup around the time of its reentry into Earth's atmosphere. It called for scrutiny of wiring problems in "difficult-to-inspect regions" of the Columbia shuttle, in particular, a problem that NASA said it had fixed.
    It also said that NASA was not using the latest scientific techniques to find and fix structural cracks & other consequences of routine aging. The panel said further that NASA was not working hard enough to find & fix corrosion beneath the tiles that protect the shuttle from intense heat during reentry, and that the agency was not working hard enough to find a way to probe or study portions of each shuttle's structure, one-tenth, on average, that are entirely inaccessible.
    "The large reduction in NASA quality assurance inspectors for each shuttle is very disturbing," said the panel chaired by NASA's own Ames Research Ctr dir. Henry McDonald. Some of the safety alarms stemmed from what experts have described as inadequate NASA oversight of those parts of the program that have been privatized. 3 days ago, the General Accounting Office (GAO) described NASA's management of its major contractors as "weak" and "debilitating," and accused the space agency of placing "little emphasis on end results [or] product performance."
    The GAO report was the latest in a series by the congressional auditing agency faulting NASA's management of major programs, incl the shuttle. Weak contract management had been ranked as a "high-risk" problem at NASA since at least 1990, the report said.

    Increased fiscal pressure on NASA is partly the result of steep budget cuts over the past decade. Funding for NASA & other civilian agencies involved in the space program was slashed by $1 billion in fiscal 2002, while Defense Dept spending on space programs rose by $600 million, according to a recent study by industry trade group Aerospace Industries Association "The civil space program that NASA runs has been neglected for a generation, and as a consequence we find ourselves flying increasingly aged technology," said think tank Lexington Institute defense industry analyst Loren Thompson.

    In 1996, NASA turned over space shuttle flight operations to the United Space Alliance, private firm owned by Boeing Co. & Lockheed Martin Corp. Under pressure from the Clinton administration & Congress to cut costs, NASA had gradually shifted many responsibilities to the private sector. United Space is now considered the prime contractor for the space shuttle program and manages about a third of the program's budget.
    In addition to its role as part of United Space, Bethesda-based Lockheed also provides many crucial functions, incl construction of the external tank that feeds liquid propellant to the shuttle's 3 main engines. It also develops the electronic systems that perform navigation, guidance & flight control for the space program and manages data collection, said spokesman Tom Jurkowsky.

    While NASA managers have described their contractor oversight as adequate, NASA's Office of Inspector General disagreed. "The lack of systematic & well-documented contract surveillance is a particular area of concern", the inspector general said in a report last June. In response to such reports, NASA has sometimes sought increased funding, added backup systems and new safety routines, and has taken other steps designed to bolster its already complex procedures for preventing accidents.
    But NASA has always acknowledged that the program would never be 100% reliable. After post-Challenger safety upgrades, NASA estimated there was a 1-in-250 chance of catastrophic failure and fatalities. "The shuttle is a wonderful machine, but it is at that left-hand bar of risk to humans," NASA's aerospace technology office head Sam Venneri said in congressional testimony last year.

    GlobalSecurity.org dir. John Pike, longtime critic of the agency's shuttle management, said even this estimate is speculative. "NASA has been wildly unrealistic about shuttle reliability. If you look back at their reliability estimates, I think that they basically just made them up," Pike said.
    "There's a statistical chance every time you launch that there could be an accident. This is just a very hard thing to do", George Washington Univ. Space Policy Institute dir. John Logsdon said yesterday. "It's only in retrospect that you can say that it wasn't enough. Second-guessing is easy. Hindsight is wonderful."

    "What people have done to keep an old system flying is just amazing. But it's an old system. At some point, they had to expect something to go wrong," said former NASA Mars exploration manager Donna Shirley, now an University of Oklahoma in Norman aerospace engineering instructor. "It's remarkable that they've kept it going this long."
    National Space Society exec.dir. Brian Chase noted NASA had also struggled with aging support facilities crucial for maintaining the fleet. "There's definitely been concern about the facilities on the ground," Chase said. "Everything from rusting pipes to crumbling concrete."

    Experts fired after questioning safety
    Panel warned NASA pgm was headed for trouble
    2.3.03   Wm J. Broad & Carl Hulse NY Times

    After an expert NASA panel warned last year that safety troubles loomed for the fleet of shuttles if the space agency's budget was not increased, NASA removed 5 of its 9 members and 2 consultants. Some of them now say the agency was trying to suppress their criticisms. A sixth member, retired 3 star admiral Bernard Kauderer, was so upset at the firings that he quit the group, NASA's Aerospace Safety Advisory Panel, a group of industry & academic experts charged with monitoring safety at the space agency.

    NASA says it changed the charter of the group so that new members, younger & more skilled, could be added. "It had nothing to do with shooting the messenger," said Wash.D.C. NASA HQ spokeswoman Sonja Alexander.
    One of those who found himself pushed off the panel said that was exactly what was going on. "We were telling it like it was and were disagreeing with some of the agency's actions," said shuttle expert Dr. Seymour Himmel who served on the panel for 2 decades. The eight departed panel members & consultants had long experience with the shuttles' systems and their troubles. In interviews on Sunday, some said NASA had developed an institutional myopia about the panel's warnings, advice and observations, however pointed.

    Members of Congress who heard testimony from the panel last spring said Sunday that they would re-examine whether budget constraints had undermined safety, but several said they doubted it. The Bush administration said it would propose a $470 million increase in NASA spending today, when it presents a federal budget to Congress, and that the increase was planned before the Columbia's destruction.
    The panel's most recent report, which came out last March and included analyses by the 6 departed members, warned that work on long-term shuttle safety "had deteriorated." Tight budgets, it said, were forcing an emphasis on short-term planning and adding to a backlog of planned improvements. It called for sweeping change.

    'planting the seeds' for disaster
    "I have never been as worried for space shuttle safety as I am right now," the report's chairman Dr. Richard Blomberg told Congress in April. "All of my instincts suggest that the current approach is planting the seeds for future danger."
    Even the director of the private consortium that presently manages half of the space shuttle budget had predicted before the accident that the program was headed for serious trouble. "I am more pessimistic today than I have been in the 17 years I have been doing this," said United Space Alliance dir Michael McCulley at a Senate hearing in Sept. 2001.

    Referring to looming challenges of replacing a wide range of aging shuttle components & support equipt, McCulley said, "The ice is getting thinner under our feet as we move toward the middle of this lake."
    Since he spoke, NASA's space shuttle budget has been increased by more than $100 million. But at the same time, several repairs deemed critical to improving crew safety, such as a redesign of its internal warning sensors and the replacement of a hazardous internal power unit, were deferred by the Bush administration because they cost too much.

    Leading members of congressional committees with oversight of the space program promised Sunday that they would investigate whether the budget policies of the administration and Congress were a factor in the loss of the shuttle. "A large part of our inquiry will be examining what policies contributed to the loss of the Columbia and what policies should follow the tragedy," said Rep. Sherwood Boehlert R-NY, who heads the House Science Committee.
    But he said he believed the agency had been adequately funded. "Have we done the right things? he said. "I think the answer is yes."

    shortchanged by space station
    As recently as last week, the General Accounting Office said the space agency was continuing to be challenged by shortages of trained staff. Over the years other panels have issued similar reports. For example, a NASA committee reported in 2000 that more money & staff were needed to support operations critical to shuttle safety.
    Some lawmakers also contend that the shuttle program has been shortchanged in recent years while the intl space station now under construction experienced cost overruns. They said budget problems prevented NASA from initiating safety upgrades in the shuttle.

    Staff members at the House Science Committee, which delivered the main congressional report on the 1986 Challenger explosion, were researching records of the Challenger inquiry Sunday. They were also trying to assemble comprehensive data on the NASA budget to show precisely the history of funding on the shuttle program and shuttle safety. "We are going to let everything see the light of day," said Boehlert, who said an initial review could find no evidence that Congress ever denied a NASA request for resources pinned to safety.
    Lawmakers and other space experts on Capitol Hill, however, said it is no secret that NASA has had major difficulties with programs & personnel issues. "NASA has got a lot of problems, there is no question about it," said one senior official. "They have been under a lot of scrutiny because of some high- profile screwups and the enormous cost overruns in the space station."

    Langley director eyes safety center
    8.19.01   Sonja Barisic AP

    Hampton VA   NASA safety center being created in response to the Columbia space shuttle accident is on track to open around 10.1.03, the man overseeing its startup said Tuesday. Roy D. Bridges is in his second week as director of NASA's Langley Research Ctr, where the new NASA Engineering & Safety Ctr will be based. He said developing the safety center will be his top priority.
    The independent center will perform engineering assessment & testing to support critical NASA projects and serve as a central clearinghouse for staff concerns during future missions. Creation of a safety center addresses a concern by the Columbia accident investigation board that NASA doesn't have enough technical expertise in its existing safety organizations, Bridges said.

    A Langley engineer was among those involved in e-mail discussions in the days before the 2.1.03 Columbia disaster. He raised the possibility of damage to the spaceship's thermal protection system from a flying piece of foam during launch. The concerns were forwarded to Langley's acting director, whose staff was assured by Johnson Space Ctr in Houston that the shuttle was fine.

    Secret shuttle part sought in search   ¹
    2.8.03   Reuters

    Cape Canaveral FL   Hundreds of searchers combed an area in east Texas Thursday for a top- secret object from the doomed shuttle Columbia while VP Cheney paid tribute to the 7 dead astronauts.
    As it began to consider whether meteorites or even space junk played a role in the disintegration of the shuttle over Texas, NASA took steps to ensure that the investigation into the disaster would follow the evidence wherever it led.
    In & around tiny Texas town of Bronson, near the Louisiana border, hundreds of National Guardsmen, federal agents, state troopers and volunteers searched for a mystery object from the shuttle. They searched block by block and used machetes to hack their way through thick woods that surround the town. The searchers were given a picture of a faceplate from the device, which said "Secret Government Property" in white letters on a black background.

    Houston Chronicle Thursday reported that the object was a communications device that handled encrypted messages between the shuttle & the ground. It said the device was in a govt "telecommunications security" category that normally allowed handling only under the tightest of restrictions.
    There was no indication why the Bronson district had been made the focus of the search. Texas state troopers stood guard over the operation and told photographers to keep their distance. They said they would be asked to leave the area if searchers found something they did not want photographed.

    In Texas, Nacogdoches County Sheriff Thomas Kerss said the rain had made it difficult for heavy equipt and vehicles to cross wooded areas & pasture land to collect debris. Tens of thousands of pieces of the shuttle rained down on east Texas and Louisiana when the shuttle disintegrated.

    "Each & every part of the shuttle is an important piece in trying to help NASA solve this mystery as to what occurred," Kerss told a news conference.
    Shuttle program manager Ron Dittemore said that despite reports of witnesses who saw what appeared to be pieces of Columbia breaking away as far west as California, no debris collected west of Ft. Worth, TX had been positively identified as belonging to the shuttle.

    NASA expanded the power of the Space Shuttle Mishap Interagency Investigation Board, chaired by retired Navy Admiral Harold Gehman. O'Keefe said the investigation board would be able to add new members at its discretion. Editorials, op-ed pages and TV commentators have all questioned the independence of the investigation.
    Federal Emergency Management Agency said President Bush had amended the emergency declaration issued for Texas after the disaster to incl all states in which debris is found. The agency said Bush's amendment authorized it to pay all the federal costs of retrieving debris in any state where it was reported to have been found.


      Columbia shuttle debris in last resting place
      1.30.04   Reuters
    Cape Canaveral FL   NASA allowed reporters to see debris from the space shuttle Columbia in its final resting place Friday, a space that is part shrine and part laboratory, described by a NASA official as "the Arlington Cemetery for Columbia." The viewing of the depository, at Cape Canaveral where the U.S. space agency launches its shuttles, took place just ahead of Sunday's first anniversary of the most recent U.S. space disaster.

    84,147 lbs of recovered shuttle pieces are neatly labeled and bar-coded & displayed or crated with a sense of order & composure that contrasts sharply with the violent demise of U.S.' oldest shuttle craft. Columbia, returning to Earth with a wing damaged during lift-off 16 days earlier, broke apart in the skies over Texas 2.1.03, killing all 7 astronauts aboard.

    Converted office space inside the mammoth Vehicle Assembly Building, where the shuttles begin their long, slow roll-out to the launch pad, was chosen as the depository for the debris. Some of the pieces are instantly recognizable. The shuttle's forward window frames survived the disaster, though only fragments of the windows themselves survived. A hatch door and a complete landing gear, with 4 fairly intact tires beside it, are also on view.

    "Columbia was a great ship," said shuttle pgm launch dir. Michael Leinbach . "We like to call this the Arlington Cemetery for Columbia." Arlington National Cemetery, just outside Wash.D.C., is where U.S. has buried its honored war veterans since the Civil War. A memorial service for Columbia astronauts is being held there for families next Monday.

    Remains of NASA's earlier flight disaster, the Challenger, lost just after its launch 18 years ago, were buried in an abandoned missile silo, but NASA decided the Columbia debris still had a useful purpose. So far, NASA said, some 20 research institutions, mostly universities, have expressed interest in studying the debris. Although satellites routinely are destroyed in the atmosphere, the cost of collecting the debris has always prevented materials scientists from studying how various components react to the intense heat and kinetic energy of reentry.
    Some Columbia parts, esp. wing panels that failed in the accident, are already being studied at different NASA centers as part of the space agency's effort to return the three remaining shuttles to flight status.

    Remains of the crew compartment are kept in a room apart from the rest of the debris. Because the 7 astronauts died on those 2 decks, the Astronaut Office must approve the release of those materials, NASA said. "It'll happen eventually. Somebody will have a good safety idea and they'll need access to the crew compartment. And, of course, the astronauts have a personal interest in that," said Columbia vehicle manager Scott Thurston.
    Also stored in the room are the thousands of sympathy cards & mementos sent by school children and a banner signed before launch by all the NASA and contract employees who prepared the orbiter for launch. "It helps us when we come into this room. It was stuff we just couldn't destroy," said Leinbach.

    NASA weighs new shuttle foam problem
    7.4.06   M. Schneider, S. Borenstein AP

    Cape Canaveral FL   NASA wrestled Monday with whether to try a Fourth of July space shuttle liftoff after the startling discovery of a small chunk of foam insulation that broke off Discovery's fuel tank as it sat on the launch pad. The troubling find came after inspectors discovered a 5" long crack in the foam, a problem that continues to vex NASA ever since a big piece of foam brought down Columbia and killed seven astronauts in 2003. NASA managers were meeting Monday evening to decide how to tackle the problem and whether a Tuesday launch was possible.
    At least one member of the panel of experts that investigated the Columbia accident said he was nervous about the decision.
    "If those guys aren't more nervous than I am, they've become jaded and should resign their positions," said Nobel Prize-winning physicist Douglas Osheroff. But 2 of Osheroff's accident board colleagues said they were comfortable, with board chair Harold Gehman Jr. saying, "It looks to me like they are following the right decision processes."

    NASA managers are leaning toward flying Discovery with no changes to the foam section in question, said external tank project manager John Chapman. The other options were to spend a day inspecting the foam area of concern, which would push the launch back to Wednesday, or to try to fix the foam, which would take several days and require NASA to use a new technique since such a repair has never been done in that area before, Chapman said.
    "We believe we're getting much more comfortable with the ability to potentially fly as we are right now, but the team is still looking at that," Chapman said. "We want to make sure that we understand all the considerations that caused this foam to be lost."

    The 3" long, triangle-shaped piece fell off an area of foam that covers an expandable bracket holding a liquid oxygen fuel line against the huge external tank. NASA engineers believe ice built up in that area from condensation caused by rain Sunday.
    The tank expanded when the super-cold fuel was drained after Sunday's launch was canceled because of the weather. The ice that formed "pinched" some of that foam, causing the quarter-inch-wide crack and the piece of foam to drop off, said space shuttle program deputy manager John Shannon.


    The size of the fallen foam was less than half the size of one that could cause damage, NASA officials said.
    "Although it is in an area that we don't like to see foam come off   it would not have caused damage to the orbiter itself," Shannon said.
    Outside experts had mixed opinions on what NASA should do. Osheroff said he was disturbed to hear about the small chunk of foam that fell off while the spacecraft was at rest. His own experiments at Stanford University show that the foam would weigh double what NASA anticipates if water gets into it, leading to potentially catastrophic results if it hits the shuttle.
    On the other hand, another member of the Columbia accident board, Space Policy Institute dir. John Logsdon at George Washington University said NASA doesn't have "all the information, but they have no information that says not to go."

    Inspectors spotted the crack in the foam insulation during an overnight check of the shuttle. NASA had scrubbed launch plans Saturday and Sunday because of weather problems. The forecast for a Tuesday liftoff was better than previous days, with just a 40 percent chance that storm clouds would prevent liftoff.
    NASA Administrator Michael Griffin decided last week that the shuttle should go into orbit as planned, despite the concerns of 2 top agency managers, including the top safety officer who wanted additional repairs to the foam insulation.
    The mission for Discovery's crew this time is to test shuttle-inspection techniques, deliver supplies to the international space station and drop off European Space Agency astronaut Thomas Reiter for a 6 month stay.



    Earth's newest "moon"?
    9.12.02   David Tytell & Roger W. Sinnott Sky & Telescope

    9.3.02 in Benson, AZ, Bill Yeung discovered a 16th-magnitude object on CCD images taken with a 0.45m telescope. It was moving rapidly northeastward across Pisces. He e-mailed the positions to the Minor Planet Ctr in Cambridge, MA, which quickly posted the object on its Near-Earth Object Confirmation Page under the temporary designation J002E3.
    But within a few days of the report, the MPC removed the object from its Confirmation Page; preliminary orbit calculations suggested it was traveling in a large, 50-day orbit around the Earth, not the Sun. It had all the earmarks of being a spent rocket casing or other piece of "space junk" instead of a true minor planet. Apollo 12 pad A, launch complex 39, Kennedy Space Ctr. NASA photo ID S69-56596
    But what exactly is it? Efforts by Tony Beresford in Australia and other satellite experts have failed to match this object with any known artificial satellite.

    Photometric measurements by Peter Kusnirak in the Czech Republic failed to show much variation in brightness, as would be expected of a small metallic object, especially if cylindrical. But the big question is, if it is really in Earth orbit, why has it not been detected before? In Yeung's words, 16th magnitude should have made it "a piece of cake" for survey telescopes or for CCD-equipped amateur instruments to locate long ago.

    Still, Brian G. Marsden (Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, Minor Planet Center) remains skeptical that the mystery object is a rocky asteroid. "There is a very remote chance it's natural," he believes. "Just because it hasn't been identified doesn't mean it's not artificial." "I will be awfully surprised if this is a natural thing captured by Earth," says Marsden.

    According to Marsden, the object's geocentric orbit was his first indication that the body was most likely space junk. But to be certain, he suggests that astrometric stations continue monitoring its motion and that radio telescopes observe the mysterious body. A detailed ephemeris is available from the Jet Propulsion Laboratory's HORIZONS System. "Radar ought to be able to tell us pretty quickly if we are seeing a polished metallic surface or a natural surface," says Marsden. "Radar would settle it once and for all."
    Meanwhile, using the observations available so far, JPL's Paul Chodas concludes that J002E3 is possibly a leftover Saturn-IVB stage from one of the Apollo missions of the late 1960s. His report includes an animation of the object's recapture by Earth in April 2002 after being in a heliocentric orbit for several decades. This recapture, incidentally, explains why it eluded detection until now.

    First confirmed capture into earth orbit is likely Apollo rocket   9.20.02   press release 2002-178 NASA JPL

    … Analysis this week by researchers from the Univ. of Arizona, Tucson & MIT, Cambridge, suggests that J002E3's surface is white paint rather than more asteroid-like material. If it is not from the Apollo 12 rocket, some less likely possibilities are one of the 4 7m long (22' long) panels that enclosed lunar modules from 6 Apollo missions or rocket stages from Soviet or U.S. unmanned lunar missions. Those are less likely because they seem too small to match the object's observed brightness, and they are not known to have been left in orbits that could have escaped Earth. Additional observations in coming weeks may pin down the identification.

    After J002E3 escaped Earth's gravity in 1971, it raced Earth in circles around the Sun, but it had an inner lane, so it completed 33 solar orbits in the time it took Earth to complete 31. In 1986, the object lapped Earth on the inside, too far away to be snagged by Earth's gravity. This year, it was about to lap Earth again but passed too close to the L1 portal and Earth captured it.
    The transition between Earth-centered dynamics and Sun-centered dynamics has been understood theoretically for years and has been used for designing orbits of some spacecraft, but this is the first time a capture into Earth orbit has been confirmed, Chodas said. Comet Shoemaker-Levy 9, which struck Jupiter in 1994, made this kind of transition into Jupiter's orbit several decades earlier. NASA's Genesis spacecraft, currently collecting samples of solar-wind material near the L1 point, will use a similar maneuver for a low-energy return to Earth with the samples in 2004.

    Earth won't have seen the last of J002E3 when this peripatetic bit of space junk escapes after its sixth orbit in mid-2003. It will shift from solar orbit to Earth orbit again in decades ahead. "This type of orbit can't last very long," Chodas said. "That's one reason it would be very unlikely to find an asteroid with an orbit like this." Within several thousand years, the object will likely end its travels by hitting the Moon or Earth. That is not cause for concern, though. 5 rocket stages like the Apollo 12 third stage were crashed into the Moon intentionally as part of seismic research, and several others harmlessly disintegrated when they re-entered Earth's atmosphere.

    UA astronomers discover that Earth's second moon wears Apollo paint   9.17.02   Lori Stiles UANews

    Astronomers have the first direct evidence that a newly discovered object orbiting Earth is debris from one of the Apollo moon launches over 30 years ago. Carl Hergenrother and Robert Whiteley, astronomers at the Lunar & Planetary Laboratory at Univ. of Arizona, used the Steward Observatory 61" telescope near Mount Bigelow in the Santa Catalina Mountains north of Tucson for observations of J002E3.
    The mysterious object named J002E3 was discovered in orbit around Earth 9.3.02 by amateur astronomer Bill Yeung, viewing from a site in southern California. The discovery made news headlines as it could be the only satellite, other than the moon, naturally captured by Earth to enter Earth orbit.

    After studying the object's past motion, Paul Chodas of the NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) in Pasadena, Calif., concluded that the object had been orbiting the sun until April of this year, when it was captured by Earth. Researchers have believed that J002E3's small size and unusual orbit suggest the object is no asteroid or other natural object, but a piece of man-made "space junk," possibly a piece of one of the Saturn V rockets that launched American astronauts to the moon during the Apollo program.

    Hergenrother & Whiteley measured reflected light from the object Sept. 12 and 13. The photometric measurements showed that the object spins once every 63.5 seconds or once every 127 seconds, more observations are needed to pin down the exact time, Hergenrother said. "Such a rapid rate of rotation is not unheard of either for an asteroid or a piece of man-made space junk, but is very consistent with each," he added.
    The UA astronomers made their definitive observations with various filters to sample the colors, or spectra, that J002E3 reflects. "Rather than looking like a known asteroid, the colors were consistent with the spectral properties of an object covered with white Titanium oxide (TiO) paint," Hergenrother said. "The Apollo Saturn S-IVB upper stages were painted with TiO paint," he noted.

    Hergenrother & Whiteley checked their observations with some professional colleagues, " a kind of informal 'peer review' just in case we were way off on things," Hergenrother said. Those key colleagues incl Richard Binzel & Andy Rivken of Massachusetts Inst. of Technology. Binzel & Rivken took infrared spectra on the unique object, and those spectra "confirm that J002E3 is a dead ringer for white TiO paint," Hergenrother added. The object is most likely a S-IVB from either Apollo 8, 10, 11, or 12, with Apollo 12 being most likely, the UA researchers conclude. "As Bill Yeung said, this is the first recorded observation of any object being captured into a geocentric orbit," Hergenrother said. "There is also a fairly good chance that J002E3 might crash into the moon at some point. Scientifically, that isn't too important, but it is interesting, " he said.


      Earth's new moon   abridged
      9.13.02   Rebecca Roberts The World ¹
    J002E3 photo by Clay Sherrod early morning 9.11.02 from Arkansas There are a lot of asteroids, thousands of them. During recent tracking effort to catalog them, an amateur Canadian astronomer Bill Yeung, with an observatory in Arizona, found an interesting asteroid. Then he kept watching it. It looked like it was orbiting Earth rather than the sun, which makes it a moon.

    It was probably only recently captured by the Earth's gravitational field. Australian observations indicated it was not just another piece of space junk; it did not match any known space junk. A NASA astronomer has determined that, if it is new, it was probably drawn into Earth orbit in April or May.
    This will be Earth's third moon.
    The second is called
    Cruithne ¹ ², orbiting since at least 1986 when it was discovered. It's highly eccentric orbit has a 770 year cycle. The new satellite appears to orbit every 50 days or so. At its biggest dimension, it is 150 ft diameter.

    Asteroid hunter's once in a blue moon find
    9.11.02   Tim Radford The Guardian

    … … If J002E3 is declared a moon, then its next name is likely to be no more exciting: it will be designated S/2002E1. The S stands for satellite, the E1 for the first satellite of Earth discovered in 2002. It circles the Earth every 49.5 days along an elliptical path which sometimes has it 840,000 km (520,000 miles) from Earth, sometimes a trifling 300,000 km, (12.16.02 est. 144,000 km,   just over a third of Luna's distance from Earth) and tilted at 21 degrees from the plane of the Earth's own orbit around the sun. The distance of the more familiar moon is about 380,000 km on average and it circles the Earth every 27.32 days.

    J002E3's size is uncertain: if it is a lump of space rock, then judging by the light reflected from it is a mere 50m across. Its composition is also uncertain: there is a chance that J002E3 is an old rocket body, strayed improbably far from home. If so, and if it is painted white to make it a good reflector, then it might be a only 10m or 20m in length. … Any object bright enough to have been picked up by an amateur telescope would be too bright to have escaped discovery for long. NASA researchers have already guessed that at some point in its freewheeling adventures in orbit, it was "captured" by the Earth's gravitational field. This is how Jupiter must have acquired at least some of its treasury of moons.

    In 1991 2 objects in orbit around the sun were classified as asteroids but turned out to be manmade satellites. "We have seen returning spacecraft before, but this one is different. It has recently arrived in orbit around our planet. Astronomers have made mistakes with returned rocket bodies before," said. Univ. of Salford astronomer & asteroid expert Duncan Steel. …

      New clues in J002E3 detective story
      9.19.02   P.Chodas & S.Chesley NASA
    The precision of our orbit solution for the unusual Earth-orbiting object J002E3 has improved considerably since last week, as astronomers around the world have continued to track this interesting body and provide measurements of its position. Even though the object has been tracked for only 15 days and traveled only about one sixth of the way around its orbit since discovery, it is now possible to draw more precise conclusions about its origin & future destinations.

    While it was strongly suspected a week ago that J002E3 had been captured by the Earth in April of this year, it was not known how long the object had been orbiting the Sun prior to capture. Additional observations have now confirmed that the object was indeed captured from a solar orbit earlier this year, and they have also made clear that it escaped the Earth-Moon system in March 1971.
    The mechanics of the escape are much like those of the capture in reverse: in both cases, the object passes slowly through a portal separating the regions of space controlled by the Earth and Sun. The portal is located at the L1 Lagrange point, about 1.5 million kilometers from Earth on a line towards the Sun.

    The timing of the object's escape is consistent with our theory that this object is the Apollo 12 S-IVB third stage, which was left in a distant Earth orbit after it was launched on 11.14.69 and passed the Moon 4 days later. We theorize that the spent rocket orbited the Earth chaotically for 15 months before finding the exit pathway through the L1 portal. The excellent match between the intrinsic brightness of J002E3 and that expected for a rocket stage of the S-IVB's size also supports this theory.
    The other 4 S-IVB stages still flying (those from Apollos 8 through 11) have been dismissed as suspects because they entered solar orbit much earlier than March 1971. Other possibilities for the true identity of J002E3 have been suggested. The object could be one of the Spacecraft-Lunar Module Adapter panels which enclosed the Lunar Module during Apollo launches. Or, the object might be a rocket stage from an unmanned lunar probe from that era. None of these, however, were launched at the right time or are known to have entered the sort of distant orbit from which escape is possible.

    Furthermore, these alternative candidates seem too small to explain the current brightness of J002E3. We conclude that the Apollo 12 S-IVB stage is the most likely identity of the object. Our improved orbital knowledge for J002E3 is also allowing more precise predictions for its future motion. The likelihood that the object will impact the Moon next year has decreased to less than 1%. This new conclusion follows from the fact that the range of possible motion in 2003 is now more tightly constrained and barely intersects the Moon. The possibility of collision with the Earth has also decreased, down to well less than 1%. (Even if it should hit our planet, the object is too small to be considered hazardous.)
    It now appears likely that the object will escape back into solar orbit in June 2003 after its brief six-orbit visit to our planet. In 30 years time the Earth may once again capture J002E3 for another brief tour around its home planet.

    Something odd is circling our planet. It's small, perhaps only 60-ft long, and rotates once every minute or so. Amateur astronomer Bill Yeung first spotted the 16th magnitude speck of light on Sept. 3rd in the constellation Pisces. He named it J002E3. Automated asteroid surveys scan the skies every few weeks, yet there was no sign of Yeung's object earlier this year. "It must have entered Earth orbit recently," says Paul Chodas of NASA's Near- Earth Object Program at JPL. "But it doesn't match any recently-launched spacecraft."

    Could it be an alien spaceship? "If it is," says Chodas, "the aliens aren't good pilots. J002E3 is in a chaotic orbit. It loops around Earth once every 48 days or so, coming as close to our planet as the Moon and ranging as far away as 2 lunar distances."

    There's no evidence that the speck is moving under its own power. The orbit is constantly changing because of gravitational perturbations by the Sun & Moon.
    … "I've traced the motion of J002E3 backwards in time to find out where it's been," he explains. Apparently, J002E3 left Earth in 1971, went around the Sun 30 or so times, and came back again. Expert in planetary motion Chodas, who has seen plenty of complicated orbits, says "I've never seen anything like this."

    At first glance, J002E3 would seem to be from Apollo 14. That mission began in January of 1971, and according to Chodas' calculations J002E3 broke out of Earth orbit in March of the same year. There's a problem, though: NASA has accounted for all the big pieces of the Apollo 14 spacecraft. None are missing.

    SLA panels
    Chodas inventories the mission: 1.31.71 a Saturn V rocket blasted off from Florida with Al Shepard, Ed Mitchell and Stuart Roosa inside. Two stages of the rocket fell back to Earth when they exhausted their fuel. A third stage, the S-IVB fuel tank & rocket engine, which propelled the crew from Earth-orbit toward the Moon, was likewise discarded.

    The S-IVB, however, did not fall back to Earth; it hit the Moon. Ground controllers guided it there on purpose to provide an impact for lunar seismic monitoring stations. The lunar module Antares was also deliberately crashed, more data for the seismic network. The command module Kitty Hawk returned the crew to Earth. J002E3 couldn't be any of those things. "There is an outside chance that it might be one of the Spacecraft-Lunar Module Adapter (SLA) panels," adds Chodas, "although J002E3 appears to be too bright for one of those."

    Another possibility is that J002E3 is an S-IVB from Apollo 12. Unlike Apollo 14, Apollo 12's S-IVB did not crash into the Moon. The crew jettisoned it 11.15.69, when it was nearly out of fuel. Once the astronauts were safely away, ground controllers ignited the S-IVB's engine. They meant to send the 60' long tank into a Sun-centered orbit, but something went wrong; the burn lasted too long.
    earlier model Instead of circling the Sun, the S-IVB entered a barely-stable orbit around the Earth & Moon "much like the current orbit of J002E3," notes Chodas. Eventually, the Apollo 12 S-IVB vanished; no one knows when. Perhaps gravitational tugs from the Sun & Moon accumulated until they nudged the engine away from Earth in 1971. In this scenario, it would have circled the Sun for 31 years until it was re-captured by Earth's gravity in 2002. "It's plausible," says Chodas, "but still speculative."
    Chodas' calculations indicate that J002E3 will leave Earth again in June 2003 to resume its orbit around the Sun. "Thirty years from now," he notes, "it might come back again." … J002E3 from afar (is) an unresolved speck of light easily detected by 8" to 10" telescopes with CCD cameras. This week J002E3 is gliding through the constellation Taurus. … With its 2.4m dia. mirror, the smallest object the Hubble Space Telescope can resolve at the Moon's distance is about 80m across. J002E3 is no larger than about 30m if it is an asteroid or 20m if it is an S-IVB, too small for Hubble.
    Martian space clutter

    Observing the sky with the green filter of it panoramic camera, the Mars Exploration Rover Spirit came across a surprise: a streak across the sky. The streak, seen in the middle of this mosaic of images taken by the navigation & panoramic cameras, was probably the brightest object in the sky at the time.

    Scientists theorize the mystery line could be either a meteorite or one of 7 out-of-commission spacecraft still orbiting Mars. Because the object appeared to move 4 degrees of an arc in 15 seconds, it's probably not the Russian probes Mars 2, Mars 3, Mars 5, or Phobos 2; or the American probes Mariner 9 or Viking 1.
    That leaves Viking 2, which has a polar orbit that would fit with the north-south orientation of the streak. In addition, only Viking 1 & 2 were left in orbits that could produce motion as fast as that seen by Spirit.

    Said Texas A&M University rover team member Mark Lemmon, "Is this the first image of a meteor on Mars, or an image of a spacecraft sent from another world during the dawn of our robotic space exploration program? We may never know, but we are still looking for clues."
    The inset shows only the panoramic image of the streak.

    Mystery emissions found at solar system edge   High-energy ribbon on sky map don’t resemble current theories of region
    10.15.09   Clara Moskowitz MSNBC

    In the murky boundary between our solar system and the rest of the galaxy, scientists have spotted a bright band of surprising high-energy emissions.
    The results come from the first all-sky map created by NASA's new Interstellar Boundary Explorer (IBEX) spacecraft, launched Oct. 2008. While orbiting Earth, IBEX monitors incoming neutral atoms that originate billions of miles away at the solar system's edge to learn about the interaction between the sun and the cold expanse of space.

    "The IBEX results are truly remarkable, with emissions not resembling any of the current theories or models of this never-before-seen region," said IBEX principal investigator David McComas at the Southwest Research Institute in Texas. "We expected to see small, gradual spatial variations at the interstellar boundary, some 10 billion miles away. However, IBEX is showing us a very narrow ribbon that is two to three times brighter than anything else in the sky."
    This ribbon of energy lies at the very edge of the solar system, where the bubble of charged particles streaming from the sun finally peters out. This bubble is called the heliosphere, and it encompasses the region of space dominated by the sun's influence.

    At the boundary of the heliosphere, the sun's positively-charged particles interact with neutral atoms drifting in from interstellar space. When these particles meet, an electron may hop over from a neutral atom to a charged one, called an ion. The result: the charged particle becomes neutral. IBEX detects these fast-moving neutral particles and traces their paths back to the solar system's edge to create a picture of this chaotic frontier.
    "We're just now getting a handle on the interaction of the surrounding interstellar medium with the heliosphere, and that's providing us with the big picture," said mission co-investigator Eberhard Möbius of the University of New Hampshire.

    The mission scientists said they were surprised to discover the striking band in IBEX's sky maps, because no models had predicted such a pattern beforehand.
    McComas said when he first saw the IBEX results he thought, "'Something's wrong,' It was quite a long time before we convinced ourselves that we were right," he said.
    The bright ribbon appears to be shaped by the direction of the interstellar magnetic field outside the heliosphere. Scientists think this suggests that the galactic environment just outside the solar system has far more influence on the structure of the heliosphere than previously believed.

    "[The ribbon is] aligned by and dominated by the external magnetic field," McComas said in a briefing Thursday. "That's a huge clue as to what's going on. But still we're missing some really fundamental aspect of the interaction; some fundamental physics is missing from our understanding."

    The boundary of the solar system was first explored by the Voyager 1 spacecraft in 2004 when it encountered an invisible shock created as the charged particles streaming off the sun hit the neutral gas from interstellar space. Its sister craft Voyager 2 followed into the solar system's edge in 2007. While these spacecraft began the exploration of this wild frontier, IBEX is now revealing a whole new picture.
    "The most astounding feature in the IBEX sky maps, the bright narrow ribbon, snakes through the sky between the Voyager spacecraft, where it remained completely undetected until now," McComas said. The new IBEX results will be published in 10.16.09 issue of the journal Science.

      more celestials
    Cat & mouse asteroid pulls close to Earth
    1.3.03  
    Reuters

    Wash.D.C.   An asteroid playing a cat & mouse game with Earth will pull to its closest point in almost a century on Monday before swinging away for another 95 years, NASA said in a statement. Asteroid 2002 AA29 is like a mouse teasing a cat, approaching Earth first on one side and then on another, without ever making contact or actually passing our planet as the 2 bodies circle the sun, the astronomers said on Thursday. At just 200 ft, the tiny asteroid will get within 3.7 million miles on Monday.
    This particular asteroid is the first ever found to orbit the sun in nearly the same path as Earth, but never manages to pass it, NASA said. "In some ways, the Earth & this asteroid are like 2 race cars on a circular track," said NASA Jet Propulsion Lab's Paul Chodas . "Right now the asteroid is on a slightly slower track just outside Earth's, and our planet is catching up. The combined gravitational effects of the Earth and sun will nudge the asteroid onto a slightly faster track just inside Earth's, and it will begin to pull ahead."

    In 95 years, the asteroid will have advanced all the way around to where it is catching up to the Earth from behind. A similar interaction with gravity from both the Earth & sun will then push the asteroid back onto a slower outside track, and the pattern will repeat. To an observer moving with the Earth, the asteroid appears to trace out a horse-shoe pattern, NASA said.
    "There's no possibility that this asteroid could hit Earth, because Earth's gravity rebuffs its periodic advances and keeps it at bay," said Don Yeomans of JPL in Pasadena, California. "The asteroid & Earth take turns sneaking up on each other, but they never get too close." In about 600 years, though, the little asteroid could start looping around Earth like a distant mini-moon for about 40 years before returning to its cat-and-mouse ways, the astronomers said.

    Report says asteroid did not kill dinosaurs
    3.3.04  
    AP

    Wash.D.C.   A Mexican crater often cited as evidence that a single asteroid wiped out the dinosaurs may not have been involved in that extinction at all, according to a new report. A group of researchers led by Gerta Keller of Princeton University contends that the impact that caused the crater occurred 300,000 years before the extinction.
    In a paper appearing in this week's online edition of Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, the group cites a layer of sediment it found between the impact layer and the co-called K-T boundary that marked the mass extinction 65 million years ago.

    Because it would have taken hundreds of thousands of years for the limestone layer to form, they argue the impact must have occurred well before the extinction. However, Richard D. Norris of the Scripps Institution of Oceanography, responded that the group has incorrectly located the K-T boundary and noted it suggests the sediments were deposited mainly in deep, quiet water. "The laminations, particularly since they are not of uniform thickness or horizontal, could easily be the product of high-energy bottom currents,'' he said. "The evidence they present, can in most cases be argued either way and so does not really resolve anything,'' Norris commented.

    Small asteroid will fly by Earth tonight
    When it makes pass, space rock will be just inside moon’s orbit
    10.16.09   MSNBC

    A small asteroid will buzz the Earth late Friday EDT, flying just inside the orbit of the moon. It should pass safely by our home planet, according to a crack team of NASA space rock trackers. The space rock, named 2009 TM8, was just discovered Thursday by the Catalina Sky Survey in Arizona. It will get within 216,000 miles of Earth when it zooms by at a speed of about 18,163 mph.
    "That's slightly closer than the orbit of our moon," NASA's Asteroid Watch team said Friday via Twitter.
    The time of closest approach will be 11:44 p.m. EDT tonight.

    The asteroid hunters at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) in Pasadena, Calif., stands on constant watch for rogue space rocks that could pose an impact risk to Earth. It was the same team which, last week, scaled back the risk of another asteroid, a large space rock called Apophis, hitting the Earth in 2036.
    Compared to Apophis, which is as large as two football fields, 2009 TM8 is tiny. It is about 30 feet across and was discovered Thursday by skywatchers, JPL officials told SPACE.com.
    Such close passes are not unheard of. With smaller objects, which are hard to find, announcements like this often come at the last minute. Researchers say there is a risk, however, of Earth eventually being hit by an undetected small asteroid that could cause heavy localized or even regional damage.

    When an object like this does strike, "if it's typical density, it would create a 4 kiloton explosion in the Earth's atmosphere if it were to hit, which of course it won't," said JPL Near-Earth Object Program Office manager Don Yeomans. "You'd expect an object of this size to fly within the orbit of the moon every few days or so."
    Most simply aren't spotted.
    "There're about 7 million of these objects in the near-Earth space; needless to say we have discovered only a small fraction of them." Yeomans said. An asteroid this size can hit the Earth once every seven years or so, he said.

    Professional and amateur skywatchers are expected to keep a close eye on 2009 TM8 over the next few days to refine its path through space. Additional observations will help astronomers pin down the rock's entire track around the sun. "We'll have this orbit nailed within a couple days or so," Yeomans said.
    While NASA tends to focus on larger asteroid threats and has found most of the big asteroid that could eventually threaten our planet, monitoring the smaller space rocks is also vital, Yeomans said. "They're sort of Mother Nature's way of shooting a few across the bow to make sure we pay attention."


    Killer asteroid approaching the Earth? ¹
    1.17.03   Pravda

    British Society for Popular Astronomy vp Robin Scagell said: "Now we start realizing that we are living in the world that is a real shooting range in fact. Until now, the mankind was lucky." He added that only when the last generation of telescopes appeared, astronomers understood that the space was polluted with "tiny" meteorites & asteroids, each of them may wipe a large city off the face of the Earth.
    Not so much time ago, a meteorite called 2000YA was just 800 thousand km from the Earth, a short distance by astronomic standards. The meteorite moved at the speed of over 36 km/sec. Scagell says that the meteorite could turn the central part of London into a mess if it hit London.

    Ukraine's 12.27.02 Pravda Ukraini (Ukrainian Truth) newspaper reported a meteorite called Eight (it is called so by its shape) was approaching the Earth and would hit the planet 1.25.03. It was also reported that "leaders & scientists of the world largest countries started incredibly heated disputes on the problem, the first time that projects of astrophysicists were discussed at parliamentary sessions in Central Europe. Most optimistic forecasts say that if the meteorite falls, it may raze to the ground the territory of several thousands of square km."
    The newspaper cited Boston Ctr for Space Research & Observation pres. Herbert Coliander who said that "no doubt that the meteorite discovered 4 years ago will fall on the Earth." The problem was discussed at a G7 session in Warsaw, where it was suggested that a special group for averting a catastrophe must be created. The newspaper reported at that: "However, the Council of Europe Parliamentary Assembly declared such hasty actions were ungrounded."

    … 6.14.02 asteroid 2002MN 100m in length passed by Earth at a distance of 120 thousand km, less than one third of the distance between Earth & the Moon. The asteroid was detected only in 3 days after it successfully passed the planet.
    … methods of detection of killer asteroids and instruments of liquidation of these asteroids are the main objectives of Russia's Space Shield Foundation in the city of Snezhinsk, the Federal Nuclear Center of Russia; the intl organization Space Guard is working on the problem in Europe. …

    Don Quixote to ride again on cosmic rescue mission   7.16.04 Reuters

    London   Mythical Spanish knight Don Quixote, famed for charging at windmills he mistakes for enemies, is to ride again on a cosmic mission to save the world. The European Space Agency has given high priority to a Spanish project which aims to attack an approaching asteroid to see whether spacecraft can deflect a body that may in future be on a collision course with earth.

    Two craft will set out, one named after the valiant knight of Cervantes' classic tale, the other after his long-suffering servant Sancho Panza. Spacecraft Sancho will circle the chosen asteroid while the other -- aping its literary namesake -- smashes headlong into the target.
    The orbiting Sancho and earth-based telescopes will watch closely to see what, if any, effect the impact has on the speed and direction of the asteroid. At the same time Sancho, being in orbit around the asteroid, will be able to detect fragments thrown from it by the impact and get a glimpse of its internal structure.

    "It will tell us how the target responds to an impact," said Alan Harris, Chairman of the Near-Earth Object Mission Advisory Panel (NEOMAP). "If you think about the chain of events between detecting a hazardous object and doing something about it, there is one area in which we have no experience at all and that is in directly interacting with an asteroid, trying to alter its orbit."
    Astronomers are aware of the devastating effect an asteroid impact had on the world's dinosaurs 65 million years ago and have so far found just over 1,000 large space objects that might one day collide with the earth. Although there is no suggestion that a kamikaze-style spacecraft impact on an asteroid would destroy the threat, it may generate the relatively small amount of energy scientists think would be enough to nudge it off course.
    If all goes to plan, the Quixote mission could launch between 2010 and 2015, the space agency said.

    Incoming asteroids, power-beaming satellites
    10.1.07   Leonard David Imaginova

    A 10.11.07 Congressional hearing will deal with that controversial and contentious NASA report on dealing with the space agency’s NEO survey program. Lawmakers want to examine the status of NASA’s ability to track and catalog NEOs, and current thinking about how best to thwart an incoming space rock with Earth’s name on it.
    NASA recently sent to Congress, at its request, a report that scopes out asteroid detection and deflection. That study has come under fire, particularly by former Apollo astronaut, Rusty Schweickart, as reported here

    In a newly issued note on The Near-Earth Objects: Status of the Survey Program and Review of NASA’s Report to Congress hearing, the witnesses will be NASA Planetary Science Div. dir. James Green, NASAS Program Analysis and Evaluation Associate Administrator Scott Pace, JPL/NASA Near Earth Object Program Office manager Donald Yeomans, Cornell Univ. astronomy prof. Donald Campbell; and B612 Foundation chair Russell Schweickart …

    Life's raw material can come from space
    DNA, RNA found in meteorite did not come from earthly contamination
    6.13.08   Clara Moskowitz
    Space.com

    We may all be aliens, it seems. Some of the building blocks of life on Earth came from space, according to a new study of molecules in meteorite fragments. The study confirmed that some of the raw material for DNA and RNA found in a meteorite did not contaminate the rock after it landed on Earth, but actually originated in space.
    The materials in question are the molecules uracil and xanthine, which are precursors to the compounds that make up DNA and RNA, and are known as nucleobases.

    "We believe early life may have adopted nucleobases from meteoritic fragments for use in genetic coding which enabled them to pass on their successful features to subsequent generations," said the study lead author Zita Martins, Imperial College London Earth Science and Engineering Dept researcher.

    Martins and her colleagues detailed their findings in the 6.15.08 issue of the journal Earth and Planetary Science Letters. The team discovered the molecules in rock fragments of the Murchison meteorite, which crashed in Australia in 1969. The scientists analyzed the genetic building blocks and found that they contain a heavy form of carbon which could only have been formed in space. Materials formed on Earth are made of a lighter type of carbon.

    The two molecules in this study are only a few of the organic molecules that have been detected in the famous Murchison meteorite, said University of California Santa Cruz chemist David Deamer.
    "There are about 70 different amino acids in the Murchison meteorite," Deamer told SPACE.com. "About six or so are the same kinds of amino acids associated with life on Earth."
    Uracil is one of the four base molecules of RNA, so is vital for life.

    Just because the molecules found on this meteorite and others came from space, doesn't mean the same compounds weren't also independently synthesized on Earth, Deamer pointed out. Scientists are unsure how many of the building blocks of life on Earth originated on this planet, and how many came from beyond.
    "We don't know the answer yet," he said. "Most people would say that both contributed to the organic compounds available on Earth, but we don't know with certainty how much of one compared to the other."

    Many space rocks similar to the Murchison meteorite rained down on Earth between 3.8 and 4.5 billion years ago, when primitive life was forming. The heavy bombardment would have dropped large amounts of meteorite material to the surface on planets such as Earth and Mars.
    Martins and her colleagues say their discovery may help shed light on how life first evolved in our solar system.
    "Because meteorites represent leftover materials from the formation of the solar system, the key components for life, including nucleobases, could be widespread in the cosmos," said co-author Imperial College London Earth science and engineering prof. Mark Sephton. "As more and more of life's raw materials are discovered in objects from space, the possibility of life springing forth wherever the right chemistry is present becomes more likely."

      subterranean
    Ancient polar lake could erupt
    8.14.03  
    Knight Ridder News

    San Jose CA   If Russian researchers in Antarctica succeed in drilling through the final 120 meters of nearly 4 km of ice to reach an ancient, unexplored lake underneath, scientists at NASA warn that the hole could cause a dangerous eruption that spews water thousands of feet into the air.
    The American scientists speculate that the water in pristine Lake Vostok, filled with gases and pressurized under tons & tons of ice, would act like a carbonated drink in a can that's shaken and then popped open.

    Their concern is that the lake water, which has not been exposed to Earth's atmosphere in as many as 15 million years, might become contaminated with microbes & chemicals from the surface. And unsuspecting researchers could get injured by an icy blast from the lake. In an article published last month in the journal Geophysical Research Letters, Chris McKay at NASA-Ames Research Center and his colleagues issued a simple message to the Russians: Be careful.

    "Imagine opening a can of Coke," McKay said. "We know from experience that you can do it carefully, no problem. But if you didn't do it carefully, there would be problems." Lake Vostok is filled with water & dissolved gases in roughly the same ratio as a 2 liter bottle of Coke, McKay estimates. If a hole is bored through the ice into the lake, McKay worries that the puncture could send a geyser of freezing cold water flying up from miles beneath the glacial surface.

    It remains a compelling mystery what, if anything, lives in the dark depths of the nearly freezing, highly pressurized, oxygen-filled environment. McKay has his sights set on Mars & Europa, one of Jupiter's moons. Ice has been detected on both globes, and he & other scientists speculate that liquid water exists underneath their frozen caps. And where there is liquid water, there is almost always life, Priscu said.
    By learning how to study such extreme environments and by confirming if life exists in such austere conditions, researchers could extrapolate that knowledge for the purposes of finding extraterrestrial life. The Russian group, which controls the drill & operates the only research station above the lake, had planned to make the final push to complete the hole, about 10cm in diameter this year. Delays, however, have pushed back that timeline.

    About 5 years ago, the Russians had stopped drilling through the ice when they hit a patch of unusual ice crystals, a signal of the proximity of the lake. Under international pressure, the Russians suspended their drilling to evaluate the best options for entering the lake. But the Russian team is eager to resume drilling; presumably, they would be the first humans to ever draw water from the lake.

    Supervolcanoes could trigger global freeze
    2.3.00   Alex Kirby BBC

    There are only a few supervolcanoes in the world, lie dormant for hundreds of thousands of years, building up magma then exploding with earth-shattering force.
    The last was in Sumatra 75,000 years ago. It threw up enough volcanic dust to block out the sunlight, and it changed the course of life here: global temperatures fell by an average of 11 degrees. The dust made the rain acidic. Three-quarters of the plants in the northern hemisphere died, and humans were pushed close to extinction, just a couple of thousand survived.

    One example of a supervolcano is Yellowstone, the national park in the US. Scientists only realised it had a crater when they looked at satellite photographs. And when is it due to go off? Apparently, it should explode every 600,000 years ; it last exploded 640,000 years ago.
    Worry rating: 6/10. Big and, like other volcanoes, unstoppable.

    Yellowstone thermal activity increases
    8.9.03   AP

    Yellowstone National Park   Scientists plan to set up a temporary network of seismographs, Global Positioning System receivers and thermometers to monitor increasing hydrothermal activity in the Norris Geyser Basin and gauge the risk of a hydrothermal explosion. The goal of the Yellowstone Volcano Observatory is to pinpoint underground sources of hydrothermal steam and learn more about how seismic activity affects the basin.
    A caldera that last erupted 70,000 years ago is in the center of Yellowstone. Scientists do not expect a volcanic eruption. However, small hydrothermal explosions occur in the park almost every year. Usually they are not noticed until after the fact. A hydrothermal explosion occurs when the pressure on hot groundwater is released suddenly. The water comes to a boil and expands, fracturing rocks and throwing them into the air. The resulting craters can be anywhere from a few feet to thousands of feet across.

    The GPS equipment being set up can measure very small movements of the earth and the seismic array can measure earthquakes associated with flow of thermal water and those associated with geologic faults. 7 seismometers that can record a wide range of seismic frequencies will be placed around the basin.
    Norris Back Basin has been closed since 7.23.03 due to formation of new mud pots, changes in geyser activity and much higher ground temperatures, as hot as 200 degrees in some areas. Vegetation has been dying due to thermal activity and altered eruption intervals for several geysers. Increased steam discharge has been continuing, according to park officials.

    Hydrothermal activity has been increasing each year in the basin, but the increase in recent weeks has been especially rapid. The Yellowstone Volcano Observatory is a partnership of the U.S. Geological Survey, University of Utah and the park. U.S. Geological Survey scientists studying the bottom of Yellowstone Lake, meanwhile, have expressed concern about a 100-foot-high bulge in the bottom of the lake that may have been formed recently.
    The scientists speculate the bulge could have been formed by carbon dioxide or steam and that it could explode.


    I took a tour of Yellowstone about 5 years ago and the park ranger mentioned that the lake was holding down the molten rock with the water pressure. He also mentioned that if the lake were to lose 2 ft of water the whole caldera would blow including most of the northwest corner of Wyoming.
    Just lately they have observed a gyser in the northern part of Yellowstone which has been relatively inactive for some time in the past, now fully active & erupting on a regular basis. …
    anecdotal forum post

    … lawsuits (USGS) received from their public eruption alert issued for Mammoth Lake Caldera in the 1980s. …
    anecdotal forum post
    Park lake hints at buildup to huge blast
    8.10.03   Diedtra Henderson Denver Post

    Yellowstone National Park WY   The mystery of the deep at picturesque Yellowstone Lake is a bulge that rises 100 ft from the lake floor, stretches the length of 7 football fields, and has the potential to explode at any time. Of all the life-threatening events that could happen at Yellowstone, from volcanic eruptions to massive earthquakes, this type of hydrothermal explosion is likely the most immediate, serious hazard in the park. So, scientists are trying to better understand possible warning signs.

    The dome acts like the lid on a pressure cooker. A hydrothermal explosion releases pent-up pressure; in this case, letting loose 10-foot-tall waves, raining chunks of pulverized rock on land, and injecting a plume of steam and poisonous gases through the water. If the entire dome exploded, the explosion could carve an underwater crater stretching up to 2,300 feet across.
    Scientists first noted a problem last summer, as they surveyed the lake. Sharp stench of rotting eggs, hydrogen sulfide gas, was in the air, clouds of sediment choked the water and swarms of bubbles rose to the surface. A team led by Colorado-based scientist will try to puzzle out this month. In a scientific paper, Lisa Morgan said the "inflated plain" is "a potential and serious hazard and possible precursor to a large hydrothermal explosion event."

    Morgan chose her words carefully in an interview near Indian Pond, a seemingly placid lake created by a similar hydrothermal explosion 3,000 years ago. "We're not saying this structure is ready to blow," said U.S. Geological Survey research geologist Morgan, based in Lakewood who specializes in volcanic terrain. "It's a significant feature. We're just not sure what it's going to do."
    The dome may be just one more visible sign that hydrothermal fluids are on the move, seeping into vulnerable sediments and creating another potential hazard in a park that has already endured earthquakes & volcanic eruptions.

    Already this summer, increased geothermal activity prompted park officials to seal off trails at one of the hottest geysers in the park for the safety of the more than 3 million annual visitors as well as the staff. Morgan wonders whether the same geothermal activity that inflated the dome is to blame for reawakening a nearby geyser that has long been dormant and for causing a 20-degree rise in water temperature at a nearby hot pool.

    Yellowstone, world's best real-time geologic laboratory, is teeming with spewing geysers such as Old Faithful, along with rumbling earthquakes, superheated hydrothermal fluids seeping from vents, and sputtering mud pots, where acid has dissolved rock and the resulting heat and water make the mud bubble. Yellowstone Lake, North America's largest high-altitude lake, shares this powerful geology.
    Despite the lake's rich history, no one had created an accurate map of Yellowstone Lake until recently. Ferdinand Hayden gave it a try in 1871, attaching wool sails to an 11-foot boat and exploring 130 miles of coastline. Hayden underestimated the coastline by some 11 miles. For 4 years, Morgan's group has applied higher-tech solutions, ricocheting sound waves 220 million times off the lake bottom and taking other detailed measurements by airplane.

    They found the lake bottom was paved by lava flows and scoured by glaciers, and that a few sections were dusted by fine sand likely swept there by earthquake-generated tsunami waves. The lake's geology lay concealed by its waves until revealed by the high-tech detective work. The bathymetric maps also sketched the contours of a swollen lump of land deep beneath the surface.
    The inflated dome is pockmarked by hydrothermal vents where acidic fluids gnawed away at lava. Bobbing atop Yellowstone Lake, scientists saw worrisome signs that the vents were active: The water churned with bubbles. A wide swath of water was turned opaque by finely dissolved sediments. The overpowering stench of hydrogen sulfide filled the air. Water temperatures 65 ft below the surface shot as high as 187 degrees Fahrenheit.

    Dropping a submersible rover for a closer look confirmed that up to a gallon per second of shimmering water shot from hydrothermal vents as large as coffee cans. This summer, Morgan will float in a tricked- out boat atop the lake, ricocheting more sound waves off the lake floor to closely map any new curves. CT based Eastern Oceanics owner Dave Lovalvo will pilot the $500,000 rover he built, directing its probes into vents spewing superheated hydrothermal fluids.
    Lakewood-based USGS geochemist Pat Shanks will study water samples for arsenic, antimony, mercury, tungsten and molybdenum, signature chemicals carried within geothermal fluids. The heightened scrutiny is to determine whether the bulge is evolving.

    Until that's known, researchers such as Robert B. Smith, auth. "Windows Into the Earth: Geologic Story of Yellowstone & Grand Teton National Parks," doesn't know what to make of Morgan's bathymetric maps despite 40 years of research at the park. "I guess the question is, is it actually going on today or is it a discovery of a mound that had inflated sometime in the past? I really don't know," said Univ. of Utah geology prof. Smith.
    … The larger Yellowstone Caldera, a geologic furnace providing the heat & molten rock that fuels the park's geothermal activity, rose from 1923 to 1985. The huge pool of hot rock lying 125 miles beneath Yellowstone slightly dropped from 1985 to 1995. From 1995 to 2001, the caldera again rose, accompanied by swarms of earthquakes.
    "That's why we named this 'the living, breathing caldera,"' Smith said.
    Norris Geyser Basin, hottest thermal area in Yellowstone, sprouted new mud pots. Ground temperature on the trail soared to 200 degrees Fahrenheit, too hot to touch. Porkchop Geyser, dormant since 1989, erupted 7.16.03. Park officials responded by barring access to half of the 2 miles of Norris Geyser trails.
    This summer, Smith and a team of scientists are closely studying Norris Geyser, where nearly 4,000 visitors passed in a single week in July. It's all part of a larger effort to determine how often to expect geologic events ranging from small hydrothermal explosions to massive earthquakes. What scientists fear is a repeat of the 1959 Hebgen Lake earthquake near Yellowstone that killed 28 people, triggered a massive landslide and caused $13 million in damages.

    Preliminary study indicates that quakes that large are likely to occur every 100 or so years. It's been 70,000 years since the last major volcanic eruption at Yellowstone. Hydrothermal explosions, large and small, are much more common. For now, no restrictions are planned at Yellowstone Lake.
    "There is no cause for alarm, at this point, and there may never be," said USGS' Yellowstone Volcano Observatory scientist-in-charge Jake Lowenstern in Menlo Park CA. The observatory tracks volcanic & hydrothermal unrest at Yellowstone as well as earthquakes.

      Volcano eruption leads to evacuations in Costa Rica   9.5.03   Reuters
    San Jose, Costa Rica   Costa Rica's most active volcano, Arenal, hacked & coughed on Friday, sending cinders, rocks and ash down its slopes and leading to the evacuation of people living nearby. The volcano, located in northern Costa Rica, began to erupt at 10:55 a.m. local time, and continued for almost 2 hours, said volcano monitoring organization Obsicori.
    Close to 100 people living nearby were evacuated, while hundreds of tourists slightly further away were put on alert. No victims were reported from the eruption of the 5,298-foot high volcano.

    Arenal has frequently erupted since 1968, when it exploded and killed 87 Costa Ricans and destroyed 2 villages. Since then the zone surrounding the volcano has become a tourist attraction, as visitors hope to catch a glimpse of nocturnal pyrotechnics. 9 tourists & a pilot were killed in 1999 when their plane crashed into the side of the volcano.

    Drilling finds crater beneath VA bay
    6.1.04   AP   ¹ ²

    Cape Charles VA   Geologists drilling half a mile below Virginia's Eastern Shore say they have uncovered more signs of a space rock's impact 35 million years ago. For more than 2 weeks, scientists drilled around the clock alongside a parking lot across the harbor from Cape Charles. They stopped at 2,700 ft. From the depths came jumbled, mixed bits of crystalline & melted rock that can be dated, as well as marine deposits, brine and other evidence of an ancient comet or asteroid that slammed into once-shallow waters near the Delmarva Peninsula.
    Cape Charles is considered ground zero for the resulting 56 mile wide depression below what's now Chesapeake Bay. The drilling project marks the first time the geologists explored the inner portion of the inverted-sombrero- shaped crater. "We expected to see some pretty strange rocks because of the extreme pressure and temperatures that occurred" approximately 35 million years ago, said geologist Greg Gohn, who led the $180,000 project for the U.S. Geological Survey.

    Over the past decade, USGS & Virginia scientists have investigated indications that a 2 mile wide brilliant ball traveling tens of thousands of miles per hour crashed off the Virginia coast, burrowing thousands of feet and depressing & fracturing the bedrock.
    Billions of tons of ocean water vaporized. Millions of tons of debris spewed 30 miles high before collapsing back into the excavation. A train of giant waves inundated the land. The waves then dragged debris as they washed back into the crater, preserving it beneath a blanket of rock & sediment. It probably took just a few minutes to create the largest crater in U.S. and sixth-largest known on the planet, according to computer simulations. The catastrophe squeezed freshwater from many of the aquifers of southeastern Virginia and filled others with briny water. Its legacy is well-known to residents who try to drill for drinkable groundwater and encounter the saltwater "wedge," pockets of brine nestled in an arc from the lower Eastern Shore to the Hampton Roads-Newport News area.

    Geological research off the NJ & VA coasts, begun in 1983, led to the crater's discovery a decade later. Drilling and further study of seismic data narrowed the location in the Chesapeake Bay. "We're getting evidence about how hot this thing (was) and what was the energy," said USGS hydrologist David Powars, one of those credited with the crater's discovery.
    More clues to the space rock's identity will come from cores taken in the drill's final 280 ft. A $1.2 million proposal to dig 7,000 ft not far from Cape Charles is before the Intl Continental Scientific Drilling Program, which would then assist the USGS with funding.



    PicoSearch
    §ite map
    courtesy of FreeFind
    presented by §
    OCIAL
    JUSTICE  
    Home Search Site Portal E-mail